SB 2883
Hughes Bill Opens Business Court To $4.5M Disputes
Died in committee
Verdict: No flags
Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade
Caption
relating to the business court.
Caption from analyzed text · version I.
Summary
Unfunded divisions live to 2028. One judge gets paid $1 above the normal maximum!
The bill keeps six business court divisions that have not yet been funded alive until September 1, 2028 instead of 2026, lowers the dollar thresholds for cases the business court can hear from $5 million to $4.5 million and from $10 million to $9.5 million, and cuts the judge residency requirement from five years to four. It touches business litigants, business court judges and the Office of Court Administration, whose annual caseload report moves from December 1 to December 15. On the ground, more business disputes can go to the business court, the unfunded divisions get two more years to be funded, and the business court's administrative presiding judge gets a state salary $1 above the normal maximum.
Labels
Labels: PENDING FOREVER. Heard by the Senate Jurisprudence committee on May 7, 2025 and left pending. Never voted out. The bill died.
Receipt
The receipt
89R-SB2883 · 2025-03-14
SOLD BY
ITEM
relating to the business court.
WHAT IT DOES
Unfunded divisions live to 2028. One judge gets paid $1 above the normal maximum!
The bill keeps six business court divisions that have not yet been funded alive until September 1, 2028 instead of 2026, lowers the dollar thresholds for cases the business court can hear from $5 million to $4.5 million and from $10 million to $9.5 million, and cuts the judge residency requirement from five years to four. It touches business litigants, business court judges and the Office of Court Administration, whose annual caseload report moves from December 1 to December 15. On the ground, more business disputes can go to the business court, the unfunded divisions get two more years to be funded, and the business court's administrative presiding judge gets a state salary $1 above the normal maximum.
CHARGES
[ ] NONE FOUND
TOTAL
LBB estimate, flow · fiscal note version I · ( ) = negative · source
Sources
Fiscal note · version I · May 7, 2025
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB2883, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($14,825,025) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
First year · FY 2026 · ($8,437,420)
Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds
LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.
Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.
HISTORY
- Received by the Secretary of the Senate
- Filed
- Read first time
- Referred to Jurisprudence
- Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
- Considered in public hearing
- Testimony taken in committee
- Left pending in committee
FILED UNDER
GOVERNMENT GROWTH UNDER A CONSERVATIVE BANNER
THE TEXT
…“an annual base salary from the state in the amount equal to $1 more than the maximum salary”…
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The bill changes state judicial pay by giving the business court's administrative presiding judge a salary $1 above the otherwise applicable maximum.
THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
Donors
Not tied to this bill.
Sources
The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.
Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
GOPAC Election Fund$250,000.00
GOPAC Election Fund
$250,000.00
- Cash
- $250,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $250,000.00
Also funds 2 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.
Sources
Derived itemized flow · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101028838, 101071548.
CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)$100,000.00
CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)
$100,000.00
- Cash
- $100,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $100,000.00
Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.
Sources
Derived itemized flow · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101067724.
Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC$100,000.00
Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC
$100,000.00
- Cash
- $100,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $100,000.00
Also funds 32 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Feb 20, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · on Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101071548.
Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.
GOPAC Election Fund
$250,000.00
- Cash
- $250,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $250,000.00
Also funds 2 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.
Sources
Derived itemized flow · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101028838, 101071548.
CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)
$100,000.00
- Cash
- $100,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $100,000.00
Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.
Sources
Derived itemized flow · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101067724.
Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC
$100,000.00
- Cash
- $100,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $100,000.00
Also funds 32 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Feb 20, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · on Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101071548.
Votes
No floor vote loaded for this bill.
Fiscal
LBB estimate, flow · fiscal note version I · ( ) = negative · source
Sources
Fiscal note · version I · May 7, 2025
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB2883, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($14,825,025) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
First year · FY 2026 · ($8,437,420)
Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds
LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.
Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.
How this was graded
Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.
Sources
Texas Senate · Filed Mar 14, 2025
05/07/2025 S Left pending in committee
Texas Legislature Online · Introduced
Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.
Senate committee · Jurisprudence · Final status: Died in committee
Subjects
Business & Commerce--General
Corporations & Associations
Courts--General
Courts--Judges
Salaries & Expenses
Text
The text as introduced · 1,140 words
89R16720 AMF-D By: Hughes S.B. No. 2883 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to the business court. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. Sections 25A.003(d), (g), (h), (i), (k), (l), and (n), Government Code, are amended to read as follows: (d) The Second Business Court Division is composed of the counties composing the Second Administrative Judicial Region under Section 74.042(c), subject to funding through legislative appropriations. The division is abolished September 1, 2028 [ 2026 ], unless reauthorized by the legislature and funded through additional legislative appropriations. (g) The Fifth Business Court Division is composed of the counties composing the Fifth Administrative Judicial Region under Section 74.042(f), subject to funding through legislative appropriations. The division is abolished on September 1, 2028 [ 2026 ], unless reauthorized by the legislature and funded through additional legislative appropriations. (h) The Sixth Business Court Division is composed of the counties composing the Sixth Administrative Judicial Region under Section 74.042(g), subject to funding through legislative appropriations. The division is abolished on September 1, 2028 [ 2026 ], unless reauthorized by the legislature and funded through additional legislative appropriations. (i) The Seventh Business Court Division is composed of the counties composing the Seventh Administrative Judicial Region under Section 74.042(h), subject to funding through legislative appropriations. The division is abolished on September 1, 2028 [ 2026 ], unless reauthorized by the legislature and funded through additional legislative appropriations. (k) The Ninth Business Court Division is composed of the counties composing the Ninth Administrative Judicial Region under Section 74.042(j), subject to funding through legislative appropriations. The division is abolished on September 1, 2028 [ 2026 ], unless reauthorized by the legislature and funded through additional legislative appropriations. (l) The Tenth Business Court Division is composed of the counties composing the Tenth Administrative Judicial Region under Section 74.042(k), subject to funding through legislative appropriations. The division is abolished on September 1, 2028 [ 2026 ], unless reauthorized by the legislature and funded through additional legislative appropriations. (n) This subsection and Subsections (d), (g), (h), (i), (k), and (l) expire September 1, 2028 [ 2026 ]. SECTION 2. Sections 25A.004(b) and (d), Government Code, are amended to read as follows: (b) Subject to Subsection (c), the business court has civil jurisdiction concurrent with district courts in the following actions in which the amount in controversy exceeds $4.5 [ $5 ] million, excluding interest, statutory damages, exemplary damages, penalties, attorney's fees, and court costs: (1) a derivative proceeding; (2) an action regarding the governance, governing documents, or internal affairs of an organization; (3) an action in which a claim under a state or federal securities or trade regulation law is asserted against: (A) an organization; (B) a controlling person or managerial official of an organization for an act or omission by the organization or by the person in the person's capacity as a controlling person or managerial official; (C) an underwriter of securities issued by the organization; or (D) the auditor of an organization; (4) an action by an organization, or an owner of an organization, if the action: (A) is brought against an owner, controlling person, or managerial official of the organization; and (B) alleges an act or omission by the person in the person's capacity as an owner, controlling person, or managerial official of the organization; (5) an action alleging that an owner, controlling person, or managerial official breached a duty owed to an organization or an owner of an organization by reason of the person's status as an owner, controlling person, or managerial official, including the breach of a duty of loyalty or good faith; (6) an action seeking to hold an owner or governing person of an organization liable for an obligation of the organization, other than on account of a written contract signed by the person to be held liable in a capacity other than as an owner or governing person; and (7) an action arising out of the Business Organizations Code. (d) The business court has civil jurisdiction concurrent with district courts in the following actions in which the amount in controversy exceeds $9.5 [ $10 ] million, excluding interest, statutory damages, exemplary damages, penalties, attorney's fees, and court costs: (1) an action arising out of a qualified transaction; (2) an action that arises out of a contract or commercial transaction in which the parties to the contract or transaction agreed in the contract or a subsequent agreement that the business court has jurisdiction of the action, except an action that arises out of an insurance contract; and (3) subject to Subsection (g), an action that arises out of a violation of the Finance Code or Business & Commerce Code by an organization or an officer or governing person acting on behalf of an organization other than a bank, credit union, or savings and loan association. SECTION 3. Section 25A.008(a), Government Code, is amended to read as follows: (a) A business court judge must: (1) be at least 35 years of age; (2) be a United States citizen; (3) have been a resident of a county within the division of the business court to which the judge is appointed for at least four [ five ] years before appointment; and (4) be a licensed attorney in this state who has 10 or more years of experience in: (A) practicing complex civil business litigation; (B) practicing business transaction law; (C) serving as a judge of a court in this state with civil jurisdiction; or (D) any combination of experience described by Paragraphs (A)-(C). SECTION 4. Section 25A.0171(e), Government Code, is amended to read as follows: (e) Not later than December 15 [ 1 ] of each year, the Office of Court Administration of the Texas Judicial System shall submit to the legislature a report on the number and types of cases heard by the business court in the preceding year. SECTION 5. Section 659.012(d), Government Code, is amended to read as follows: (d) Notwithstanding any other provision in this section or other law : (1) [ , ] in a county with more than five district courts, a district judge who serves as a local administrative district judge under Section 74.091 is entitled to an annual base salary from the state in the amount equal to $5,000 more than the maximum salary from the state to which the judge is otherwise entitled under Subsection (a) or (b) ; and (2) a business court judge who serves as administrative presiding judge under Section 25A.009 is entitled to an annual base salary from the state in the amount equal to $1 more than the maximum salary from the state to which the judge is otherwise entitled under Subsection (a) or (b) . SECTION 6. Section 25A.007(b), Government Code, is repealed. SECTION 7. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.