Monitoring the Session

SB 2883

Hughes Bill Opens Business Court To $4.5M Disputes

Died in committee

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Bryan HughesRSenate 1

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the business court.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Unfunded divisions live to 2028. One judge gets paid $1 above the normal maximum!

The bill keeps six business court divisions that have not yet been funded alive until September 1, 2028 instead of 2026, lowers the dollar thresholds for cases the business court can hear from $5 million to $4.5 million and from $10 million to $9.5 million, and cuts the judge residency requirement from five years to four. It touches business litigants, business court judges and the Office of Court Administration, whose annual caseload report moves from December 1 to December 15. On the ground, more business disputes can go to the business court, the unfunded divisions get two more years to be funded, and the business court's administrative presiding judge gets a state salary $1 above the normal maximum.

Labels

Labels: PENDING FOREVER. Heard by the Senate Jurisprudence committee on May 7, 2025 and left pending. Never voted out. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB2883 · 2025-03-14

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the business court.

WHAT IT DOES

Unfunded divisions live to 2028. One judge gets paid $1 above the normal maximum!

The bill keeps six business court divisions that have not yet been funded alive until September 1, 2028 instead of 2026, lowers the dollar thresholds for cases the business court can hear from $5 million to $4.5 million and from $10 million to $9.5 million, and cuts the judge residency requirement from five years to four. It touches business litigants, business court judges and the Office of Court Administration, whose annual caseload report moves from December 1 to December 15. On the ground, more business disputes can go to the business court, the unfunded divisions get two more years to be funded, and the business court's administrative presiding judge gets a state salary $1 above the normal maximum.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

Net to General Revenue · FY 2026($8,437,420)

LBB estimate, flow · fiscal note version I · ( ) = negative · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · May 7, 2025

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB2883, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($14,825,025) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

First year · FY 2026 · ($8,437,420)

Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Jurisprudence
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Testimony taken in committee
  8. Left pending in committee
FILED UNDER

GOVERNMENT GROWTH UNDER A CONSERVATIVE BANNER

THE TEXT

…“an annual base salary from the state in the amount equal to $1 more than the maximum salary”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill changes state judicial pay by giving the business court's administrative presiding judge a salary $1 above the otherwise applicable maximum.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

GOPAC Election Fund$250,000.00

GOPAC Election Fund

$250,000.00

Cash
$250,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$250,000.00

Also funds 2 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101028838, 101071548.

CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)$100,000.00

CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101067724.

Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC$100,000.00

Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 32 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Feb 20, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101071548.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

GOPAC Election Fund

$250,000.00

Cash
$250,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$250,000.00

Also funds 2 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101028838, 101071548.

×

CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101067724.

×

Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 32 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Feb 20, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101071548.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal
Net to General Revenue · FY 2026($8,437,420)

LBB estimate, flow · fiscal note version I · ( ) = negative · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · May 7, 2025

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB2883, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($14,825,025) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

First year · FY 2026 · ($8,437,420)

Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Mar 14, 2025

05/07/2025 S Left pending in committee

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Senate committee · Jurisprudence · Final status: Died in committee

Subjects

Business & Commerce--General

Corporations & Associations

Courts--General

Courts--Judges

Salaries & Expenses

Text

The text as introduced · 1,140 words

89R16720 AMF-D

By: Hughes
S.B. No. 2883

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the business court.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Sections 25A.003(d), (g), (h), (i), (k), (l),

and (n), Government Code, are amended to read as follows:

(d) The Second Business Court Division is composed of the

counties composing the Second Administrative Judicial Region under

Section 74.042(c), subject to funding through legislative

appropriations. The division is abolished September 1, 2028 [ 2026 ],

unless reauthorized by the legislature and funded through

additional legislative appropriations.

(g) The Fifth Business Court Division is composed of the

counties composing the Fifth Administrative Judicial Region under

Section 74.042(f), subject to funding through legislative

appropriations. The division is abolished on September 1, 2028

[ 2026 ], unless reauthorized by the legislature and funded through

additional legislative appropriations.

(h) The Sixth Business Court Division is composed of the

counties composing the Sixth Administrative Judicial Region under

Section 74.042(g), subject to funding through legislative

appropriations. The division is abolished on September 1, 2028

[ 2026 ], unless reauthorized by the legislature and funded through

additional legislative appropriations.

(i) The Seventh Business Court Division is composed of the

counties composing the Seventh Administrative Judicial Region

under Section 74.042(h), subject to funding through legislative

appropriations. The division is abolished on September 1, 2028

[ 2026 ], unless reauthorized by the legislature and funded through

additional legislative appropriations.

(k) The Ninth Business Court Division is composed of the

counties composing the Ninth Administrative Judicial Region under

Section 74.042(j), subject to funding through legislative

appropriations. The division is abolished on September 1, 2028

[ 2026 ], unless reauthorized by the legislature and funded through

additional legislative appropriations.

(l) The Tenth Business Court Division is composed of the

counties composing the Tenth Administrative Judicial Region under

Section 74.042(k), subject to funding through legislative

appropriations. The division is abolished on September 1, 2028

[ 2026 ], unless reauthorized by the legislature and funded through

additional legislative appropriations.

(n) This subsection and Subsections (d), (g), (h), (i), (k),

and (l) expire September 1, 2028 [ 2026 ].

SECTION 2. Sections 25A.004(b) and (d), Government Code,

are amended to read as follows:

(b) Subject to Subsection (c), the business court has civil

jurisdiction concurrent with district courts in the following

actions in which the amount in controversy exceeds $4.5 [ $5 ]

million, excluding interest, statutory damages, exemplary damages,

penalties, attorney's fees, and court costs:

(1) a derivative proceeding;

(2) an action regarding the governance, governing

documents, or internal affairs of an organization;

(3) an action in which a claim under a state or federal

securities or trade regulation law is asserted against:

(A) an organization;

(B) a controlling person or managerial official

of an organization for an act or omission by the organization or by

the person in the person's capacity as a controlling person or

managerial official;

(C) an underwriter of securities issued by the

organization; or

(D) the auditor of an organization;

(4) an action by an organization, or an owner of an

organization, if the action:

(A) is brought against an owner, controlling

person, or managerial official of the organization; and

(B) alleges an act or omission by the person in

the person's capacity as an owner, controlling person, or

managerial official of the organization;

(5) an action alleging that an owner, controlling

person, or managerial official breached a duty owed to an

organization or an owner of an organization by reason of the

person's status as an owner, controlling person, or managerial

official, including the breach of a duty of loyalty or good faith;

(6) an action seeking to hold an owner or governing

person of an organization liable for an obligation of the

organization, other than on account of a written contract signed by

the person to be held liable in a capacity other than as an owner or

governing person; and

(7) an action arising out of the Business

Organizations Code.

(d) The business court has civil jurisdiction concurrent

with district courts in the following actions in which the amount in

controversy exceeds $9.5 [ $10 ] million, excluding interest,

statutory damages, exemplary damages, penalties, attorney's fees,

and court costs:

(1) an action arising out of a qualified transaction;

(2) an action that arises out of a contract or

commercial transaction in which the parties to the contract or

transaction agreed in the contract or a subsequent agreement that

the business court has jurisdiction of the action, except an action

that arises out of an insurance contract; and

(3) subject to Subsection (g), an action that arises

out of a violation of the Finance Code or Business & Commerce Code

by an organization or an officer or governing person acting on

behalf of an organization other than a bank, credit union, or

savings and loan association.

SECTION 3. Section 25A.008(a), Government Code, is amended

to read as follows:

(a) A business court judge must:

(1) be at least 35 years of age;

(2) be a United States citizen;

(3) have been a resident of a county within the

division of the business court to which the judge is appointed for

at least four [ five ] years before appointment; and

(4) be a licensed attorney in this state who has 10 or

more years of experience in:

(A) practicing complex civil business

litigation;

(B) practicing business transaction law;

(C) serving as a judge of a court in this state

with civil jurisdiction; or

(D) any combination of experience described by

Paragraphs (A)-(C).

SECTION 4. Section 25A.0171(e), Government Code, is amended

to read as follows:

(e) Not later than December 15 [ 1 ] of each year, the Office

of Court Administration of the Texas Judicial System shall submit

to the legislature a report on the number and types of cases heard

by the business court in the preceding year.

SECTION 5. Section 659.012(d), Government Code, is amended

to read as follows:

(d) Notwithstanding any other provision in this section or

other law :

(1) [ , ] in a county with more than five district courts,

a district judge who serves as a local administrative district

judge under Section 74.091 is entitled to an annual base salary from

the state in the amount equal to $5,000 more than the maximum salary

from the state to which the judge is otherwise entitled under

Subsection (a) or (b) ; and

(2) a business court judge who serves as

administrative presiding judge under Section 25A.009 is entitled to

an annual base salary from the state in the amount equal to $1 more

than the maximum salary from the state to which the judge is

otherwise entitled under Subsection (a) or (b) .

SECTION 6. Section 25A.007(b), Government Code, is

repealed.

SECTION 7. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.