Monitoring the Session

SB 3016

Creighton Preemption Bill Freezes Local Budgets During Attorney General Suits

Did not pass

Verdict: Smells

SmellsReviewed
Sen. Brandon CreightonRSenate 4
Why it's charged
Caption mismatch

THE TEXT

“the attorney general may investigate an alleged violation of a law described by Section 102A.002 by a municipality or county”

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The caption names preemption in land use, structures, businesses and annexation, but the new attorney general power and its heavy money penalties reach every law listed in Section 102A.002, including the Labor, Finance, Insurance, Agriculture and Natural Resources codes. The caption also never mentions that a pending suit freezes local tax rates, budgets, sales tax payments and state grants.

Caption mismatch

Reviewed · Nov 1, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to state preemption of municipal and county regulation on land use, structures, businesses, and related activities and municipal boundaries and annexation.

Caption from analyzed text · version H.

Summary

Sales tax payments and most state grants stop mid-suit. Lose, and it’s five years of tax-rate limits!

The bill bars cities and counties from passing or keeping local rules in any area already covered by the state's laws on land use, structures, businesses, municipal boundaries and annexation, and voids any such rule that is not expressly allowed by another statute. It lets affected people, trade groups and nonprofits sue cities and counties over these rules, and it gives the attorney general new power to investigate and sue them over these fields and over the business, labor, finance, insurance, property and other codes already preempted. While an attorney general suit is pending, a city or county loses its sales tax payments, its tax rate and budget are frozen, and most state grants stop; if the attorney general wins, the local government faces five years of tax-rate limits and no state grants, plus a penalty equal to its sales tax suspense account.

Labels

Labels: GOT HALFWAY. Passed the Senate on May 8, 2025. Died in the House: voted out of the Intergovernmental Affairs committee 6-5, no floor vote.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB3016 · 2025-03-14

SOLD BY

+ 1 coauthor

ITEM

relating to state preemption of municipal and county regulation on land use, structures, businesses, and related activities and municipal boundaries and annexation.

WHAT IT DOES

Sales tax payments and most state grants stop mid-suit. Lose, and it’s five years of tax-rate limits!

The bill bars cities and counties from passing or keeping local rules in any area already covered by the state's laws on land use, structures, businesses, municipal boundaries and annexation, and voids any such rule that is not expressly allowed by another statute. It lets affected people, trade groups and nonprofits sue cities and counties over these rules, and it gives the attorney general new power to investigate and sue them over these fields and over the business, labor, finance, insurance, property and other codes already preempted. While an attorney general suit is pending, a city or county loses its sales tax payments, its tax rate and budget are frozen, and most state grants stop; if the attorney general wins, the local government faces five years of tax-rate limits and no state grants, plus a penalty equal to its sales tax suspense account.

CHARGES

[x] CAPTION MISMATCHanalysis confidence 60%

THE TEXT

“the attorney general may investigate an alleged violation of a law described by Section 102A.002 by a municipality or county”

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The caption names preemption in land use, structures, businesses and annexation, but the new attorney general power and its heavy money penalties reach every law listed in Section 102A.002, including the Labor, Finance, Insurance, Agriculture and Natural Resources codes. The caption also never mentions that a pending suit freezes local tax rates, budgets, sales tax payments and state grants.

TOTAL

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version E · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · May 24, 2025

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. However, the revenue impact would be dependent on the number of violations resulting in attorney general action, the disposition of those actions, and the amount of interest earned from any withheld municipal and county sales tax distributions.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Business & Commerce
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Testimony taken in committee
  8. Left pending in committee
  9. Considered in public hearing
  10. Vote taken in committee
  11. Reported favorably as substituted
  12. Committee report printed and distributed
  13. Placed on intent calendar
  14. Co-author authorized
  15. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  16. Record vote
  17. Read 2nd time
  18. Amendment(s) offered FA1 Creighton
  19. Amended
  20. Vote recorded in Journal
  21. Amendment(s) offered FA2 Creighton
  22. Amended
  23. Vote recorded in Journal
  24. Passed to engrossment as amended
  25. Record vote
  26. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  27. Record vote
  28. Read 3rd time
  29. Passed
  30. Record vote
  31. Reported engrossed
  32. Received from the Senate
  33. Read first time
  34. Referred to Intergovernmental Affairs
  35. Considered in formal meeting
  36. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  37. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  38. Committee report distributed
  39. Committee report sent to Calendars
FILED UNDER

SPEECH AND LAWFARE

THE TEXT

…“or a nonprofit organization or trade association representing the person, has standing to bring an action against the municipality or county”

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The bill lets trade associations and nonprofits sue cities and counties on behalf of others, waives local immunity for these suits, and awards attorney's fees to winning claimants.

SIGNED FOR BY

Senate · 20 yea · 11 nay

Sources

Senate: Final passage · May 8, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Donors report through Friends of Brandon Creighton.

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

$0 raised since Jul 1, 2024. Derived sum of published report totals. blank in the state's data, consistent with zero. Flow, Jul 1, 2024 through Jun 30, 2026. State filing data as of Nov 4, 2026. 4 of 4 filed reports carry a published figure.

Report 101060909: Published total from the filed report. Retrieved Oct 29, 2026. Filed report 101060909

$0 spent Jan 1, 2026 to Jun 30, 2026. Published total from the filed report. Flow, Jan 1, 2026 through Jun 30, 2026. State filing data as of Nov 4, 2026. 1 of 1 filed reports carry a published figure.

Report 101060909: Published total from the filed report. Retrieved Oct 29, 2026. Filed report 101060909

$0 cash on hand. Published report total. Stock, as of Jun 30, 2026. State filing data as of Nov 4, 2026.

$0 loans outstanding. Published report total. Stock, as of Jun 30, 2026. State filing data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived sum of itemized contributions in regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Unitemized contributions are not included. Flow, Jul 1, 2024 through Jun 30, 2026. State filing data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

Votes4

Senate May 8, 2025

Yea
20
Nay
11
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 20, Nays 11. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 20 (published)
  • Nay: 11 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 8, 2025

Yea
20
Nay
11
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Bettencourt, on behalf of Senator Creighton, moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration CSSB 3016 at this time on its third reading and final passage: CSSB 3016, Relating to state preemption of municipal and county regulation on land use, structures, businesses, and related activities and municipal boundaries and annexation. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 20, Nays 11.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 20 (published)
  • Nay: 11 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 7, 2025

Yea
20
Nay
11
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

CSSB 3016 as amended was passed to engrossment by the following vote: Yeas 20, Nays 11.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 20 (published)
  • Nay: 11 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 7, 2025

Yea
20
Nay
11
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Creighton moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration CSSB 3016 at this time on its second reading: CSSB 3016, Relating to state preemption of municipal and county regulation on land use, structures, businesses, and related activities and municipal boundaries and annexation. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 20, Nays 11.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 20 (published)
  • Nay: 11 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses47
For
20
Against
27
On
0
Names

For

  • AGC of Texas1 registration
  • Allen Boone Humphries Robinson LLP1 registration
  • CenterPoint Energy Inc1 registration
  • Dallas Police Assoc1 registration
  • National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB)1 registration
  • Schwartz, Page & Harding, LLP1 registration
  • Self2 registrations
  • Self; Houston Police Officers’ Union1 registration
  • Self; Tropicana Homes1 registration
  • TCCI Land Development1 registration
  • Texas Apartment Association1 registration
  • Texas Association of Builders2 registrations
  • Texas Association of Staffing1 registration
  • Texas Farm Bureau1 registration
  • Texas Municipal Police Association (TMPA)1 registration
  • Texas Public Policy Foundation1 registration
  • TPPF1 registration
  • Windy Hill Development LLC1 registration

Against

  • Bexar County Commissioners Court1 registration
  • City of Austin1 registration
  • City of Corpus Christi1 registration
  • City of Dallas1 registration
  • City of Dripping Springs1 registration
  • City of Fort Worth1 registration
  • City of Galveston1 registration
  • City of Garland, Texas1 registration
  • City of Georgetown1 registration
  • City of Houston1 registration
  • City of Irving1 registration
  • City of McAllen1 registration
  • City of San Antonio1 registration
  • City of Sugar Land, Texas1 registration
  • Conference of Urban Counties1 registration
  • County Judges and Commissioners Associaton of Texas1 registration
  • Dallas County1 registration
  • Dallas County Criminal District Attorney - John Creuzot1 registration
  • El Paso County1 registration
  • Every Texan1 registration
  • Harris County Commissioners Court1 registration
  • San Antonio Water System (SAWS)1 registration
  • Self; County Judges and Commissioners Association of Texas, McMullen County1 registration
  • Sierra Club Lone Star Chapter1 registration
  • Texas AFLCIO1 registration
  • Texas Municipal League1 registration
  • Travis County Commissioners Court1 registration
Sources

47 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version E · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · May 24, 2025

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. However, the revenue impact would be dependent on the number of violations resulting in attorney general action, the disposition of those actions, and the amount of interest earned from any withheld municipal and county sales tax distributions.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version H by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Mar 14, 2025

05/24/2025 H Committee report sent to Calendars

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report

Data snapshot Nov 1, 2026 at 3:20 PM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors

House committee · Intergovernmental Affairs · Committee vote 6 aye, 5 nay · Out of committee

Senate committee · Business & Commerce · Committee vote 6 aye, 5 nay · Out of committee

Companion

HB 5612 by Bell, Cecil (identical)

Subjects

City Government--General

Civil Remedies & Liabilities

County Government--General

Courts--Appellate

Courts--General

Disaster Preparedness & Relief

Intergovernmental Relations

State Finances--Management & Control

ATTORNEY GENERAL

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS

SUPREME COURT

Text

The text as introduced · 1,466 words

By: Creighton
S.B. No. 3016

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to state preemption of certain municipal and county

regulation.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. The legislature finds that:

(1) the state has historically been the exclusive regulator

of many aspects of commerce, trade, elections, and criminal justice

in this state;

(2) in recent years, several local jurisdictions have

sought to establish their own regulations that are different than

the state's regulations; and

(3) such local regulations have led to a patchwork of

regulations that apply inconsistently across this state.

SECTION 2. The purpose of this Act is to provide additional

statewide consistency by returning sovereign regulatory powers to

the state where those powers belong in accordance with Section 5,

Article XI, Texas Constitution.

SECTION 3. This Act:

(1) may not be construed to prohibit a municipality or

county from building or maintaining a road, imposing a tax, or

carrying out any authority expressly authorized by statute;

(2) may not be construed to prohibit a home-rule

municipality from providing the same services and imposing the same

regulations that a general-law municipality is authorized to

provide or impose in its corporate limits;

(3) does not affect the authority of a municipality or

county to conduct a public awareness campaign; and

(4) does not affect the authority of a municipality or

county to repeal or amend an existing ordinance, order, or rule that

violates the provisions of this Act for the limited purpose of

bringing that ordinance, order, or rule in compliance with this

Act.

SECTION 4. Title 5, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, is

amended by adding a new Section 120A.0025 to read as follows:

Sec. 102A.0025. LIABILITY FOR CERTAIN REGULATION. Any

person who has sustained an injury in fact, actual or threatened,

from a municipal or county ordinance, order, or rule adopted or

enforced by a municipality or county in violation of Sections

40.001 or 250A.001, Local Government Code, a nonprofit

organization, or a trade association representing the person has

standing to bring and may bring an action against the municipality

or county.

SECTION 5. Chapter 102A, Civil Practice and Remedies Code,

is amended by adding sections 102A.008 through 102A.014 to read as

follows:

Sec. 102A.008. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:

(1) "Local government" means a municipality or county.

(2) "No-new-revenue tax rate" means the no-new-revenue tax

rate calculated under Chapter 26, Tax Code.

Sec. 102A.009. ATTORNEY GENERAL INVESTIGATION AND ACTION.

(a) The attorney general may investigate an alleged violation of

this chapter by a local government.

(b) If, after conducting an investigation under Subsection

(a), the attorney general determines a local government adopted,

enforced, or maintained an ordinance, order, or rule in violation

of the provisions listed in section 102A.002, the attorney general

may bring an action in the name of the state against a local

government for the violation.

Sec. 102A.010. ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS DURING PENDENCY OF

ACTION. During the pendency of an action brought under Section

102A.009, with respect to a local government defending the action:

(1) the comptroller shall withhold payment of any money due

to the local government under Section 321.502 or 323.502, Tax Code,

as applicable;

(2) the local government may not adopt an ad valorem tax

rate that exceeds the local government's no-new-revenue tax rate;

and

(3) the local government may not receive state grant funds

and any pending application for such funds shall be denied.

Sec. 102A.011. BURDEN OF PROOF; INITIAL HEARING. (a) A

local government defending an action brought under Section 102A.009

has the burden of proof to establish by a preponderance of the

evidence that the local government complied with the law the

alleged violation of which is the subject of the action.

(b) The court of original jurisdiction shall set an action

brought under Section 102A.009 for an initial hearing not later

than the 30th day after the date the local government defending the

action was served with process for the action.

Sec. 102A.012. RESOLUTION OF ACTION IN FAVOR OF ATTORNEY

GENERAL. (a) If the attorney general prevails in an action brought

under Section 102A.009:

(1) the local government defending the action may not,

during the five state fiscal years following the year in which the

judgment becomes final:

(A) adopt an ad valorem tax rate that exceeds the local

government's no-new-revenue tax rate; or

(B) receive state grant funds; and

(2) the court issuing the final judgment resolving the

action shall provide in the judgment that the state is entitled to

recover from the local government defending the action a penalty

equal to the balance of the suspense account maintained for the

local government under Section 321.501 or 323.501, Tax Code, as

applicable, that exists on the date the judgment is signed.

(b) The comptroller shall, on receipt of a copy of the final

judgment in an action brought under Section 102A.009 that includes

a provision described by Subsection (a)(2), deposit the balance of

the suspense account maintained for the local government defending

the action under Section 321.501 or 323.501, Tax Code, as

applicable, as of the date the judgment is signed to the credit of

the general revenue fund.

Sec. 102A.013. RESOLUTION OF ACTION IN FAVOR OF LOCAL

GOVERNMENT. If a local government prevails in an action brought

under section 102A.009, the comptroller shall, notwithstanding any

other law, immediately send to the local government the balance of

the suspense account maintained for the local government under

Section 321.501 or 323.501, Tax Code, as applicable, as of the date

the judgment resolving the action is signed.

SECTION 6. Title 2, Subtitle C, Local Government Code, is

amended by adding Chapter 40 to read as follows:

CHAPTER 40. PREEMPTION.

Sec. 40.001. PREEMPTION. Unless expressly authorized by

another statute, a municipality may not adopt, enforce, or maintain

an ordinance, order, or rule regulating conduct in a field of

regulation that is occupied by a provision of this subtitle. An

ordinance, order, or rule that violates this section is void,

unenforceable, and inconsistent with this subtitle.

SECTION 7. Title 7, Subtitle C, Local Government Code, is

amended by adding Chapter 250A to read as follows:

CHAPTER 250A. PREEMPTION.

Sec. 250A.001. PREEMPTION. Unless expressly authorized by

another statute, a municipality or county may not adopt, enforce,

or maintain an ordinance, order, or rule regulating conduct in a

field of regulation that is occupied by a provision of this title.

An ordinance, order, or rule that violates this section is void,

unenforceable, and inconsistent with this title.

SECTION 8. Section 102A.0025, Civil Practices and Remedies

Code, as amended by this Act, applies only to a cause of action that

accrues on or after the effective date of this Act. Section

102A.009, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, as added by this Act,

applies only to a cause of action that accrues on or after the

effective date of this Act. Section 102A.014, Civil Practice and

Remedies Code, as added by this Act, and Section 22.220, Government

Code, as amended by this Act, apply only to an appeal initiated on

or after the effective date of this Act.

SECTION 9. Every provision, section, subsection, sentence,

clause, phrase, or word in this Act, and every application of the

provisions in this Act to every person, group of persons, or

circumstances, are severable from each other. If any application

of any provision in this Act to any person, group of persons, or

circumstances is found by a court to be invalid, preempted, or

unconstitutional, for any reason whatsoever, then the remaining

applications of the Act to all other persons and circumstances

shall be severed and preserved and shall remain in effect. All

constitutionally valid applications of the provisions in this Act

shall be severed from any applications that a court finds to be

invalid, preempted, or unconstitutional, because it is the

legislature's intent and priority that every single valid

application of every statutory provision be allowed to stand alone.

The legislature further declares that it would have enacted this

Act, and each provision, section, subsection, sentence, clause,

phrase, or word, and all constitutional applications of the

provisions of this Act, irrespective of the fact that any

provision, section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word,

or applications of this chapter were to be declared invalid,

preempted, or unconstitutional.

SECTION 10. The Texas Supreme Court has exclusive and

original jurisdiction over a challenge to the constitutionality of

this Act or any part of this Act and may issue injunctive or

declaratory relief in connection with the challenge.

SECTION 11. This Act takes effect immediately if it

receives a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each

house, as provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution.

If this Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate

effect, this Act takes effect September 1, 2025.