Monitoring the Session

SB 302

bill bills the estate for an assigned probate judge

Died in committee

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Charles PerryRSenate 28

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the payment of certain costs associated with certain assignments of a statutory probate court judge.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Ask for the judge, and the estate and parties pay the county back.

When a party in a probate case asks for a statutory probate court judge to be assigned to hear a contested matter and the request is granted, the assigned judge must, to the extent possible, order the estate and the parties to pay back the county for that judge's pay and expenses. This touches counties, estates in contested probate fights, and the parties who ask for an assigned judge. Counties stop eating the full cost of these assignments, and the judge splits the bill fairly between the estate and the parties, starting with motions filed on or after September 1, 2025.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 251 by Rep. Murr (Died in committee) and this bill (Died in committee). Checked against 88R only.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 251 by Rep. Murr (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.PENDING FOREVER. Heard by the Senate Jurisprudence committee on Apr 16, 2025 and left pending. Never voted out. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB302 · 2024-11-12

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the payment of certain costs associated with certain assignments of a statutory probate court judge.

WHAT IT DOES

Ask for the judge, and the estate and parties pay the county back.

When a party in a probate case asks for a statutory probate court judge to be assigned to hear a contested matter and the request is granted, the assigned judge must, to the extent possible, order the estate and the parties to pay back the county for that judge's pay and expenses. This touches counties, estates in contested probate fights, and the parties who ask for an assigned judge. Counties stop eating the full cost of these assignments, and the judge splits the bill fairly between the estate and the parties, starting with motions filed on or after September 1, 2025.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · April 8, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Jurisprudence
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Left pending in committee
  8. Considered in public hearing
  9. Left pending in committee
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$60,000.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$60,000.00

Cash
$60,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$60,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 13, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100983698, 101007598, 101030579, 101072377.

Ryan Texas PAC$35,000.00

Ryan Texas PAC

$35,000.00

Cash
$35,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$35,000.00

Also funds 25 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 23, 2024 to Oct 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 13, 2024 to Mar 12, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100983698, 101057700.

Fort Stockton Holdings LP$25,000.00

Fort Stockton Holdings LP

$25,000.00

Cash
$25,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$25,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Nov 23, 2024. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Nov 23, 2024. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100983698.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$60,000.00

Cash
$60,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$60,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 13, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100983698, 101007598, 101030579, 101072377.

×

Ryan Texas PAC

$35,000.00

Cash
$35,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$35,000.00

Also funds 25 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 23, 2024 to Oct 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 13, 2024 to Mar 12, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100983698, 101057700.

×

Fort Stockton Holdings LP

$25,000.00

Cash
$25,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$25,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Nov 23, 2024. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Nov 23, 2024. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100983698.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · April 8, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R HB 251

by Rep. Murr, different lead author · Died in committee · same text

Introduced text

Last action, May 15, 2023: Referred to Jurisprudence

Relating to the payment of certain costs associated with certain assignments of a statutory probate court judge.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Nov 12, 2024

04/16/2025 S Left pending in committee

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Senate committee · Jurisprudence · Final status: Died in committee

Companion

HB 1928 by Gerdes (identical)

Subjects

Courts--County & Statutory

Courts--Judges

Probate--Wills & Admin of Estates

Text

The text as introduced · 416 words

89R788 KFF-D

By: Perry
S.B. No. 302

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the payment of certain costs associated with certain

assignments of a statutory probate court judge.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Subchapter B, Chapter 352, Estates Code, is

amended by adding Section 352.054 to read as follows:

Sec. 352.054. REIMBURSEMENT FOR CERTAIN COSTS FOR ASSIGNED

JUDGE. A statutory probate court judge assigned to hear a contested

matter on the motion under Section 32.003 of a party to the

proceeding shall, to the extent possible, order the estate to

reimburse a county for any amounts the county paid as compensation

and expenses in accordance with Section 25.0022(o-1), Government

Code.

SECTION 2. Section 25.0022, Government Code, is amended by

adding Subsection (o-1) and amending Subsection (p) to read as

follows:

(o-1) If a party to a probate proceeding files a motion for

the assignment of a statutory probate court judge to hear a

contested matter in the proceeding under Section 32.003, Estates

Code, and the motion is granted, the assigned statutory probate

court judge shall:

(1) to the extent possible, order that the county be

reimbursed for any amounts the county paid as compensation and

expenses under Subsections (o) and (p) from the estate under

Section 352.054, Estates Code, and from the parties to the

proceeding; and

(2) prescribe the amount and manner by which the

compensation and expenses described by Subdivision (1) are to be

equitably apportioned among the estate and parties, as applicable.

(p) In addition to all compensation and expenses authorized

by this section and other law, a judge who is assigned to a court

outside the county of the judge's residence is entitled to receive

$25 for each day or fraction of a day served. Subject to Subsection

(o-1), the [ The ] county in which the judge served shall pay the

additional compensation from the county's general fund on

certification by the presiding judge.

SECTION 3. Section 25.0022, Government Code, as amended by

this Act, applies only to a motion for the assignment of a statutory

probate court judge under Section 32.003, Estates Code, that is

filed on or after the effective date of this Act. A motion filed

before the effective date of this Act is governed by the law in

effect on the date the motion was filed, and the former law is

continued in effect for that purpose.

SECTION 4. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.