Monitoring the Session

SB 3073

bill requiring written findings when arrests lack probable cause

Did not pass

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Joan HuffmanRSenate 17

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the duty of a magistrate to make written findings in certain criminal proceedings.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Magistrates explain it in the record within 24 hours.

The bill requires a magistrate who finds no probable cause to support a person's arrest to put written findings explaining that decision into the record within 24 hours. It touches magistrates handling arrestees and the people arrested, along with prosecutors and police whose arrests are rejected. On the ground, a no-probable-cause call now leaves a written explanation in the file, for offenses committed on or after September 1, 2025.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB3073 · 2025-05-13

SOLD BY

+ 4 coauthors

ITEM

relating to the duty of a magistrate to make written findings in certain criminal proceedings.

WHAT IT DOES

Magistrates explain it in the record within 24 hours.

The bill requires a magistrate who finds no probable cause to support a person's arrest to put written findings explaining that decision into the record within 24 hours. It touches magistrates handling arrestees and the people arrested, along with prosecutors and police whose arrests are rejected. On the ground, a no-probable-cause call now leaves a written explanation in the file, for offenses committed on or after September 1, 2025.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · May 13, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Permission to introduce
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Criminal Justice
  5. Posting rule suspended
  6. Co-author authorized
  7. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  8. Considered in public hearing
  9. Vote taken in committee
  10. Reported favorably w/o amendments
  11. Committee report printed and distributed
  12. Printing rule suspended
  13. Rules suspended-Intent Calendar
  14. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  15. Vote recorded in Journal
  16. Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
  17. Vote recorded in Journal
  18. Three day rule suspended
  19. Record vote
  20. Read 3rd time
  21. Passed
  22. Record vote
  23. Reported engrossed
  24. Received from the Senate
  25. Read first time
  26. Referred to Criminal Jurisprudence
  27. Considered in formal meeting
  28. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  29. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  30. Committee report distributed
  31. Committee report sent to Calendars
  32. Considered in Calendars
  33. Placed on General State Calendar
  34. Read 2nd time
  35. Postponed 6/5/25 10:00 AM
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

Senate · 29 yea · 2 nay

Sources

Senate: Final passage · May 14, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Donors report through Texans for Joan Huffman.

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

Votes3

Senate May 14, 2025

Yea
29
Nay
2
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 29, Nays 2. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 29 (published)
  • Nay: 2 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 14, 2025

Yea
29
Nay
2
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Huffman moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that SB 3073 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 29, Nays 2.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 29 (published)
  • Nay: 2 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 14, 2025

Yea
Not printed
Nay
Not printed
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

Voice vote. No numeric tally or individual yeas are inferred.

Sources

Senator Huffman moved to suspend the regular order of business, Senate Rule 5.14, and Senate Rule 7.12(a) to take up for consideration SB 3073 at this time on its second reading: SB 3073, Relating to the duty of a magistrate to make written findings in certain criminal proceedings. The motion prevailed. Senators Cook and Miles asked to be recorded as voting "Nay" on suspension of the regular order of business. The bill was read second time and was passed to engrossment by a viva voce vote.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: Not printed
  • Nay: Not printed
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses6
For
5
Against
1
On
0
Names

For

  • Phil Sorrells - Tarrant County Criminal District Attorney1 registration
  • Self1 registration
  • Self; Chambers County District Attorney’s Office1 registration
  • Self; Houston Police Officers’ Union1 registration
  • Texas Municipal Police Association (TMPA)1 registration

Against

  • Texas Civil Rights Project1 registration
Sources

6 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · May 13, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed May 13, 2025

05/27/2025 H Postponed

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors
Cosponsors

House committee · Criminal Jurisprudence · Committee vote 7 aye, 1 nay, 3 absent · Out of committee

Senate committee · Criminal Justice · Committee vote 6 aye, 1 nay · Out of committee

Companion

HB 75 by Smithee (similar)

Subjects

Criminal Procedure--Bail & Pretrial Release

MAGISTRATES

Text

The text as introduced · 197 words

89R30755 LHC-F

By: Huffman
S.B. No. 3073

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the duty of a magistrate to make written findings in

certain criminal proceedings.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Article 15.17, Code of Criminal Procedure, is

amended by adding Subsection (h) to read as follows:

(h) Not later than 24 hours after the time a magistrate

determines that no probable cause exists to believe that a person

committed the offense for which the person was arrested, the

magistrate shall enter in the record written findings to support

that finding.

SECTION 2. The change in law made by this Act applies only

to an offense committed on or after the effective date of this Act.

An offense committed before the effective date of this Act is

governed by the law in effect on the date the offense was committed,

and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose. For

purposes of this section, an offense was committed before the

effective date of this Act if any element of the offense occurred

before that date.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.