Monitoring the Session

SB 467

reappraisal when a homestead building is completely destroyed

Became law

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Angela PaxtonRSenate 8

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the reappraisal for ad valorem taxation purposes of real property on which a building completely destroyed by a casualty is located.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Ask in writing within 180 days.

The bill lets a homeowner whose house or other building on their homestead is completely destroyed by a casualty ask the county appraisal district, in writing within 180 days, to reappraise the property. It touches homestead owners, chief appraisers, local tax assessors and collectors, and the comptroller, who must write guidelines for the process by September 1, 2026. Taxes for that year are split, with the old value applying to the days before the loss and the lower value to the days after, and tax bills are corrected or overpayments refunded.

Labels

Labels: BUZZER BEATER. Final vote May 30, 2025: the Senate concurred in the House amendments. 3 days before the session ended Jun 2, 2025.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R SB 1454 (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.ACROSS THE AISLE. Joint authors: 1 Republican, 1 Democrat. Party as the Legislative Reference Library lists it for the 89th Legislature.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB467 · 2024-11-22

SOLD BY

+ 1 coauthor

ITEM

relating to the reappraisal for ad valorem taxation purposes of real property on which a building completely destroyed by a casualty is located.

WHAT IT DOES

Ask in writing within 180 days.

The bill lets a homeowner whose house or other building on their homestead is completely destroyed by a casualty ask the county appraisal district, in writing within 180 days, to reappraise the property. It touches homestead owners, chief appraisers, local tax assessors and collectors, and the comptroller, who must write guidelines for the process by September 1, 2026. Taxes for that year are split, with the old value applying to the days before the loss and the lower value to the days after, and tax bills are corrected or overpayments refunded.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version H · May 15, 2025

Passage of the bill would allow a temporary tax exemption on an improvement to a residence homestead property that is completely destroyed by a fire. Contingent on adoption of a constitutional amendment, taxable property values could be reduced and the related costs to the Foundation School Fund could be increased through the operation of the school finance formulas.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Local Government
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Left pending in committee
  8. Considered in public hearing
  9. Vote taken in committee
  10. Reported favorably as substituted
  11. Committee report printed and distributed
  12. Placed on intent calendar
  13. Co-author authorized
  14. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  15. Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
  16. Vote recorded in Journal
  17. Three day rule suspended
  18. Record vote
  19. Read 3rd time
  20. Passed
  21. Record vote
  22. Reported engrossed
  23. Received from the Senate
  24. Read first time
  25. Referred to Ways & Means
  26. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  27. Considered in public hearing
  28. Committee substitute considered in committee
  29. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  30. Left pending in committee
  31. Considered in formal meeting
  32. Committee substitute considered in committee
  33. Reported favorably as substituted
  34. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  35. Committee report distributed
  36. Committee report sent to Calendars
  37. Considered in Calendars
  38. Placed on General State Calendar
  39. Read 2nd time
  40. Passed to 3rd reading
  41. Record vote RV#3618
  42. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  43. Read 3rd time
  44. Passed
  45. Record vote RV#3658
  46. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  47. House passage as amended reported
  48. House amendment(s) laid before the Senate
  49. Read
  50. Senate concurs in House amendment(s)
  51. Record vote
  52. Reported enrolled
  53. Senate concurs in House amendment(s)-reported
  54. Signed in the Senate
  55. Signed in the House
  56. Sent to the Governor
  57. Signed by the Governor
  58. See remarks for effective date
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 140 yea · 0 nay

Senate · 31 yea · 0 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · May 27, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate: Final passage · Apr 29, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

James Stanton$47,500Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$40KGary Blake$30,000

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

James Stanton$47,500.00
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$40,000.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$40,000.00

Cash
$40,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$40,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 11, 2024 to Jun 30, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100982305, 101012314.

Gary Blake$30,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$40,000.00

Cash
$40,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$40,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 11, 2024 to Jun 30, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100982305, 101012314.

Votes6

Senate May 30, 2025

Yea
31
Nay
0
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Sources

Senator Paxton moved to concur in the House amendment to SB 467. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 31 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 27, 2025

Yea
140
Nay
0
Present, not voting
2
Absent
5
Excused
3
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3658

SB 467 was passed by (Record 3658): 140 Yeas, 0 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 140 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 5 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 3 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 27, 2025

Yea
144
Nay
0
Present, not voting
1
Absent
4
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3618

CSSB 467 was passed to third reading by (Record 3618): 144 Yeas, 0 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 144 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 4 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 29, 2025

Yea
31
Nay
0
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Sources

Senator Paxton moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that CSSB 467 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0. The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 31 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 29, 2025

Yea
31
Nay
0
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Sources

Senator Paxton moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that CSSB 467 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 31 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 29, 2025

Yea
Not printed
Nay
Not printed
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Voice vote. No numeric tally or individual yeas are inferred.

Sources

The bill was read second time and was passed to engrossment by a viva voce vote.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: Not printed
  • Nay: Not printed
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses9
For
7
Against
1
On
1
Names

For

  • Self; GC Tax Office1 registration
  • Self; Office of Nueces County Tax Assessor Collector, Kevin Kieschnick1 registration
  • Self; South Texans’ Property Rights Association2 registrations
  • Self; Texas association of property tax professionals1 registration
  • Texas Realtors2 registrations

Against

  • Self1 registration

On

  • Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts1 registration
Sources

9 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version H · May 15, 2025

Passage of the bill would allow a temporary tax exemption on an improvement to a residence homestead property that is completely destroyed by a fire. Contingent on adoption of a constitutional amendment, taxable property values could be reduced and the related costs to the Foundation School Fund could be increased through the operation of the school finance formulas.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R SB 1454

by Sen. Paxton, same lead author · Died in committee · same text

Introduced text

Last action, May 8, 2023: Left pending in committee

Relating to the reappraisal for ad valorem taxation purposes of real property on which a building completely destroyed by a casualty is located.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Nov 22, 2024

06/20/2025 E See remarks for effective date

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report · Enrolled

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors

House committee · Ways & Means · Committee vote 11 aye, 0 nay, 2 absent · Out of committee

Senate committee · Local Government · Committee vote 7 aye, 0 nay · Out of committee

Subjects

Disaster Preparedness & Relief

Property Interests--Homestead

Taxation--Property-Appraisals & Appraisal Districts

Taxation--Property-Exemptions

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS

Text

The text as introduced · 749 words

89R747 RDS-D

By: Paxton, Zaffirini
S.B. No. 467

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the reappraisal for ad valorem taxation purposes of

real property on which a building completely destroyed by a

casualty is located.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Subchapter A, Chapter 23, Tax Code, is amended by

adding Section 23.025 to read as follows:

Sec. 23.025. REAPPRAISAL OF PROPERTY DESTROYED BY CASUALTY.

(a) A property owner may request the chief appraiser of an

appraisal district in which a residence homestead owned and

occupied by the property owner is located to reappraise property

that is the property owner's residence homestead if a building

located on the property is completely destroyed by a casualty. The

owner must make the request in writing not later than the 180th day

after the date the casualty occurs.

(b) Except as provided by this subsection, the chief

appraiser shall reappraise property described by Subsection (a) if

requested to do so by the owner of the property. The chief

appraiser is not required to reappraise the property if the

property qualifies for an exemption under Section 11.35 as the

result of the same casualty.

(c) The comptroller, in consultation with appraisal

districts, shall develop guidelines for determining the process for

reappraising property under this section, including for

determining whether property is completely destroyed by a casualty

and for calculating an appropriate value of any residence homestead

exemption and appraisal limitation applied during or after the tax

year for which the property is reappraised.

(d) The chief appraiser shall complete the reappraisal of

property as soon as practicable after a request is made.

(e) The chief appraiser shall include in the appraisal

records:

(1) the date the casualty occurred;

(2) the appraised value of the property before the

casualty occurred;

(3) the appraised value of the property immediately

after the casualty occurred; and

(4) any other information required to be included in

the records.

(f) The amount of the taxes imposed by a taxing unit on

property reappraised under this section for the tax year in which a

casualty occurs is calculated by:

(1) multiplying the amount of the taxes that otherwise

would be imposed by the taxing unit on the property for the entire

year by a fraction, the denominator of which is 365 and the

numerator of which is the number of days that elapsed before the

date the casualty occurred;

(2) multiplying the amount of the taxes that would be

imposed by the taxing unit on the property for the entire year based

on the reappraised value of the property by a fraction, the

denominator of which is 365 and the numerator of which is the number

of days, including the date the casualty occurred, remaining in the

tax year; and

(3) adding the amounts calculated under Subdivisions

(1) and (2).

(g) If property is reappraised under this section, the

assessor for each taxing unit shall calculate the amount of the tax

due on the property as provided by this section. If the property is

reappraised after the amount of the tax due on the property is

calculated, the assessor shall recalculate the amount of the tax

due on the property and correct the tax roll. If the tax bill has

been mailed and the tax on the property has not been paid, the

assessor shall mail a corrected tax bill to the person in whose name

the property is listed on the tax roll or to the person's authorized

agent. If the tax on the property has been paid, the tax collector

for the taxing unit shall refund to the person who paid the tax the

amount by which the payment exceeded the tax due.

SECTION 2. Not later than September 1, 2026, the

comptroller shall develop guidelines required by Section 23.025,

Tax Code, as added by this Act, and shall distribute those

guidelines to each appraisal district.

SECTION 3. The change in law made by this Act applies to the

reappraisal of real property on which a building completely

destroyed by a casualty is located only if the casualty occurs on or

after the effective date of this Act.

SECTION 4. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives

a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as

provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this

Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this

Act takes effect September 1, 2025.