Monitoring the Session

SB 505

bill on demanding answers about election irregularities

Did not pass

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Paul BettencourtRSenate 7

Initial review · graded Oct 22, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to processes to address election irregularities; providing a civil penalty.

Caption from analyzed text · version H.

Summary

20-day and 10-day deadlines, then an audit the county pays for.

The bill lets candidates, party chairs, presiding judges and ballot-measure committee heads demand a written explanation and documents from the county clerk or other election authority about apparent election irregularities, with 20-day and 10-day deadlines to answer. If they are still not satisfied, they can ask the secretary of state for an audit, paid for by the county. If the audit finds a violation, the secretary can order oversight of any county, fire an elections administrator at the end of that oversight, and fine the election authority $500 per unfixed violation, with the fine repeating daily if the state cannot fix the problem itself.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R SB 1039 (Did not pass) and this bill (Did not pass). Checked against 88R only.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R SB 1039 (Did not pass). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.GOT HALFWAY. Passed the Senate on Apr 16, 2025. Died in the House: voted out of the Elections committee 6-2, then taken up on the floor on May 27, 2025 and postponed.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB505 · 2024-11-25

SOLD BY

+ 5 more authors, 2 coauthors

ITEM

relating to processes to address election irregularities; providing a civil penalty.

WHAT IT DOES

20-day and 10-day deadlines, then an audit the county pays for.

The bill lets candidates, party chairs, presiding judges and ballot-measure committee heads demand a written explanation and documents from the county clerk or other election authority about apparent election irregularities, with 20-day and 10-day deadlines to answer. If they are still not satisfied, they can ask the secretary of state for an audit, paid for by the county. If the audit finds a violation, the secretary can order oversight of any county, fire an elections administrator at the end of that oversight, and fine the election authority $500 per unfixed violation, with the fine repeating daily if the state cannot fix the problem itself.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

Net to General Revenue · FY 2026($595,624)

LBB estimate, flow · fiscal note version H · ( ) = negative · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version H · May 21, 2025

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB505, Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted: a negative impact of ($1,151,323) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. The cost of provisions of the bill related to administrative oversight of county elections by the Secretary of State cannot be determined at this time because the number and size of counties potentially subject to such oversight cannot be estimated. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

First year · FY 2026 · ($595,624)

Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to State Affairs
  5. Co-author authorized
  6. Co-author authorized
  7. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  8. Considered in public hearing
  9. Testimony taken in committee
  10. Left pending in committee
  11. Considered in public hearing
  12. Vote taken in committee
  13. Reported favorably w/o amendments
  14. Committee report printed and distributed
  15. Placed on intent calendar
  16. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  17. Record vote
  18. Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
  19. Record vote
  20. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  21. Record vote
  22. Read 3rd time
  23. Passed
  24. Record vote
  25. Reported engrossed
  26. Received from the Senate
  27. Read first time
  28. Referred to Elections
  29. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  30. Considered in public hearing
  31. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  32. Left pending in committee
  33. Considered in formal meeting
  34. Committee substitute considered in committee
  35. Reported favorably as substituted
  36. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  37. Committee report distributed
  38. Committee report sent to Calendars
  39. Considered in Calendars
  40. Placed on General State Calendar
  41. Read 2nd time
  42. Postponed 5/27/25 11:30 PM
  43. Laid out as postponed business
  44. Point of order withdrawn
  45. Postponed 6/3/25 10:00 AM
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

Senate · 20 yea · 11 nay

Sources

Senate: Final passage · Apr 16, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Donors report through Friends of Paul Bettencourt.

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

Votes4

Senate Apr 16, 2025

Yea
20
Nay
11
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 20, Nays 11. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 20 (published)
  • Nay: 11 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 16, 2025

Yea
20
Nay
11
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Bettencourt moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration SB 505 at this time on its third reading and final passage: SB 505, Relating to processes to address election irregularities; providing a civil penalty. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 20, Nays 11.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 20 (published)
  • Nay: 11 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 15, 2025

Yea
20
Nay
11
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read second time and was passed to engrossment by the following vote: Yeas 20, Nays 11. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 20 (published)
  • Nay: 11 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 15, 2025

Yea
20
Nay
11
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Bettencourt moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration SB 505 at this time on its second reading: SB 505, Relating to processes to address election irregularities; providing a civil penalty. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 20, Nays 11.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 20 (published)
  • Nay: 11 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses77
For
26
Against
43
On
8
Names

For

  • Self15 registrations
  • Self; Citizens Defending Freedom2 registrations
  • Self; Harris county ballot security2 registrations
  • Self; SREC Committeeman SD31 registration
  • Self; SREC Committeewoman SD31 registration
  • Self; SREC SD111 registration
  • Self; State Republican Executive Committee1 registration
  • Self; State Republican Executive Committeeman SD24, Self1 registration
  • Self; Texas Eagle Forum1 registration
  • True Texas Ellections LLC1 registration

Against

  • ACLU of Texas2 registrations
  • Common Cause Texas2 registrations
  • Common cause texas1 registration
  • Every Texan1 registration
  • Self31 registrations
  • Self; Lone Star Chapter of the Sierra Club1 registration
  • Self; No1 registration
  • Self; Texas Democratic Party1 registration
  • Self; TX Impact1 registration
  • Texas Civil Rights Project2 registrations

On

  • Harris County Commissioners Court2 registrations
  • Self1 registration
  • Self; County and District Clerks Assoc1 registration
  • Self; Texas Association of County Election Officials1 registration
  • Texas Secretary of State2 registrations
  • The County and District Clerks’ Association of Texas1 registration
Sources

77 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal
Net to General Revenue · FY 2026($595,624)

LBB estimate, flow · fiscal note version H · ( ) = negative · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version H · May 21, 2025

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB505, Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted: a negative impact of ($1,151,323) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. The cost of provisions of the bill related to administrative oversight of county elections by the Secretary of State cannot be determined at this time because the number and size of counties potentially subject to such oversight cannot be estimated. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

First year · FY 2026 · ($595,624)

Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version H by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R SB 1039

by Sen. Bettencourt, same lead author · Did not pass · same text

Introduced text

Last action, May 23, 2023: Placed on General State Calendar

Relating to processes to address election irregularities; providing a civil penalty.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Nov 25, 2024

05/27/2025 H Postponed

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors

House committee · Elections · Committee vote 6 aye, 2 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee

Senate committee · State Affairs · Committee vote 9 aye, 1 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee

Companion

HB 968 by Toth (similar)

HB 989 by Toth (similar)

HB 3491 by Toth (very similar)

Subjects

Civil Remedies & Liabilities

Elections--Administration

Elections--Election Officers

Elections--General

AUDITS & AUDITORS

ATTORNEY GENERAL

SECRETARY OF STATE

Text

The text as introduced · 1,039 words

89R1595 MPF-D

By: Bettencourt, et al.
S.B. No. 505

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to processes to address election irregularities;

providing a civil penalty.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Title 16, Election Code, is amended by adding

Chapter 280 to read as follows:

CHAPTER 280. REQUEST TO ADDRESS ELECTION IRREGULARITY

Sec. 280.001. REQUEST FOR EXPLANATION. (a) A person

described by Subsection (f) may issue a written request to the

county clerk or other authority conducting an election for an

explanation and supporting documentation for:

(1) an action taken by an election officer that

appears to violate this code;

(2) irregularities in results in a precinct or at a

polling place or early voting polling place;

(3) inadequacy or irregularity of documentation

required to be maintained under this code; or

(4) discrepancies in the results of a reconciliation

of ballots between the number of voters and the number of votes

cast.

(b) Not later than the 20th day after the date a request is

received under Subsection (a), the county clerk or other authority

shall provide the requestor the requested explanation and any

supporting documentation.

(c) A requestor who is not satisfied with the explanation

and supporting documentation provided under Subsection (b) may

issue a request for further explanation and supporting

documentation to the county clerk or other authority.

(d) Not later than the 10th day after the date a request is

received under Subsection (c), the county clerk or other authority

shall provide the requestor the requested explanation and any

supporting documentation.

(e) A requestor who is not satisfied with the explanation

and supporting documentation provided under Subsection (d) may

issue a request to the secretary of state for an audit of the issue

described by Subsection (a), as provided by Section 280.002.

(f) A person may make a request under this section if the

person participated in the relevant election as:

(1) a candidate;

(2) a county chair or state chair of a political party;

(3) a presiding judge;

(4) an alternate presiding judge; or

(5) the head of a specific-purpose political committee

that supports or opposes a ballot measure.

Sec. 280.002. AUDIT BY SECRETARY OF STATE. (a) A person to

whom Section 280.001(e) applies may submit a request for an audit to

the secretary of state for investigation. A request for an audit

must include copies of:

(1) the requests made by the person to the county clerk

or other authority conducting the election under Sections

280.001(a) and (c); and

(2) the explanations and any supporting documentation

provided by the county clerk or other authority to the person under

Sections 280.001(b) and (d).

(b) Not later than the 30th day after the date the secretary

of state receives a request for an audit under this section, the

secretary must determine whether the information submitted under

Subsection (a) sufficiently explains the irregularity identified

under Section 280.001(a). If the information is insufficient, the

secretary of state shall immediately begin an audit of the

identified irregularity at the expense of the county or other

authority conducting the election.

(c) The county clerk or other authority conducting the

election shall cooperate with the office of the secretary of state

and may not interfere with or obstruct the audit.

(d) On conclusion of the audit, the secretary of state shall

provide notice of the findings of the audit to the person who

submitted the request for the audit and the county clerk or other

authority conducting the election.

(e) The secretary of state may, in the secretary's

discretion, make a determination that a violation of this code has

occurred solely on the basis of evidence submitted under Subsection

(a) without conducting an audit. The secretary of state shall send

notice of the determination to the person who submitted the request

for the audit and to the county clerk or other authority conducting

the election.

(f) If, following an audit, the secretary of state

determines that a violation of this code has occurred, the

secretary may appoint a conservator to oversee elections in the

county where the violation occurred. The conservator shall serve

for two federal election cycles.

(g) A county for which a conservator is appointed under

Subsection (f) shall pay the costs of providing the conservator,

including the salary and benefits of the conservator.

Sec. 280.003. FINDING OF VIOLATION. (a) In addition to the

notice required under Section 280.002(d), the secretary of state

shall provide special notice to the county clerk or other authority

conducting an election detailing any violation of this code found

by the secretary under Section 280.002.

(b) If the county clerk or other authority conducting an

election does not remedy a violation detailed in a notice under

Subsection (a) by the 30th day after the date the clerk or other

authority receives the notice, the secretary of state shall assess

a civil penalty of $500 for each violation not remedied and, if

possible, remedy the violation on behalf of the county clerk or

other authority. The remedy provided under this subsection is in

addition to any other remedy available under law for a violation of

this code.

(c) If the secretary of state is not able to remedy the

violation on behalf of the county clerk or other authority, the

secretary shall assess an additional penalty under Subsection (b)

for each day the county clerk or other authority does not remedy the

violation until the violation is remedied.

(d) The secretary of state shall maintain a record of county

clerks or other authorities that conduct elections who have been

assessed a civil penalty under Subsection (b). The secretary of

state shall publish the record on the secretary of state's Internet

website.

(e) The attorney general may bring an action under this

section to recover a civil penalty that has not been paid.

(f) A civil penalty collected under this section shall be

deposited in the state treasury to the credit of the general revenue

fund.

SECTION 2. A person may make a request under Section

280.001, Election Code, as added by this Act, only for an election

held on or after the effective date of this Act.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.