Monitoring the Session

SB 506

Bettencourt Ballot Bill Lets Voters Flag Misleading City Propositions

Became law, effective Sep 1, 2025

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Paul BettencourtRSenate 7

Initial review · graded Oct 22, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to requirements for certain ballot propositions and to related procedures and provisions.

Caption from analyzed text · version H.

Summary

Lose in court and the city clears every proposition with the Secretary for four years.

The bill requires ballot propositions to state the question clearly and neutrally so voters are not misled, and it lets a registered voter ask the Secretary of State to review a home-rule city's charter or petition-driven proposition within seven days of its publication. It touches home-rule cities, their voters and petition organizers: cities must redraft propositions the Secretary finds misleading, courts may write the ballot language themselves, winning plaintiffs may recover attorney's fees from the city, and a city that loses in court must clear its propositions with the Secretary for four years. It also bars a local government from putting a competing or conflicting measure on the same ballot as a petition-initiated measure, and the changes apply to petitions submitted on or after January 1, 2026.

Labels

Labels: BUZZER BEATER. Final vote May 30, 2025: the Senate concurred in the House amendments. 3 days before the session ended Jun 2, 2025.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R SB 221 (Did not pass). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB506 · 2024-11-25

SOLD BY

+ 2 more authors, 1 coauthor

ITEM

relating to requirements for certain ballot propositions and to related procedures and provisions.

WHAT IT DOES

Lose in court and the city clears every proposition with the Secretary for four years.

The bill requires ballot propositions to state the question clearly and neutrally so voters are not misled, and it lets a registered voter ask the Secretary of State to review a home-rule city's charter or petition-driven proposition within seven days of its publication. It touches home-rule cities, their voters and petition organizers: cities must redraft propositions the Secretary finds misleading, courts may write the ballot language themselves, winning plaintiffs may recover attorney's fees from the city, and a city that loses in court must clear its propositions with the Secretary for four years. It also bars a local government from putting a competing or conflicting measure on the same ballot as a petition-initiated measure, and the changes apply to petitions submitted on or after January 1, 2026.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version F · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version F · May 29, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to State Affairs
  5. Co-author authorized
  6. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  7. Considered in public hearing
  8. Testimony taken in committee
  9. Left pending in committee
  10. Considered in public hearing
  11. Vote taken in committee
  12. Reported favorably as substituted
  13. Recommended for local & uncontested calendar
  14. Committee report printed and distributed
  15. Placed on intent calendar
  16. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  17. Record vote
  18. Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
  19. Record vote
  20. Three day rule suspended
  21. Record vote
  22. Read 3rd time
  23. Passed
  24. Record vote
  25. Reported engrossed
  26. Received from the Senate
  27. Read first time
  28. Referred to Elections
  29. Considered in formal meeting
  30. Committee substitute considered in committee
  31. Reported favorably as substituted
  32. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  33. Committee report distributed
  34. Committee report sent to Calendars
  35. Considered in Calendars
  36. Placed on General State Calendar
  37. Read 2nd time
  38. Amended 1-Paul
  39. Record vote RV#3774
  40. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  41. Amended 2-Bucy
  42. Record vote RV#3775
  43. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  44. Amendment(s) offered 3-Tepper
  45. Point of order withdrawn (amendment) Rule 11, Section 2
  46. Amendment withdrawn 3-Tepper
  47. Passed to 3rd reading as amended
  48. Record vote RV#3776
  49. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  50. Read 3rd time
  51. Passed
  52. Record vote RV#3882
  53. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  54. House passage as amended reported
  55. House amendment(s) laid before the Senate
  56. Read
  57. Senate concurs in House amendment(s)
  58. Record vote
  59. Senate concurs in House amendment(s)-reported
  60. Reported enrolled
  61. Signed in the Senate
  62. Signed in the House
  63. Sent to the Governor
  64. Signed by the Governor
  65. Effective on 9/1/25
FILED UNDER

SPEECH AND LAWFARE

THE TEXT

“The court may award a plaintiff or relator who substantially prevails in a mandamus action described by Subsection (a) the party's reasonable attorney's fees, expenses, and court costs.”

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The bill waives city immunity so voters who win ballot-language suits can make the city pay their legal fees.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 102 yea · 37 nay

Senate · 23 yea · 8 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · May 28, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate: Final passage · Apr 30, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Donors report through Friends of Paul Bettencourt.

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

Votes9

Senate May 30, 2025

Yea
24
Nay
7
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Bettencourt moved to concur in the House amendments to SB 506. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 24, Nays 7.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 24 (published)
  • Nay: 7 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 28, 2025

Yea
102
Nay
37
Present, not voting
1
Absent
3
Excused
7
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3882

SB 506 was passed by (Record 3882): 102 Yeas, 37 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 102 (published)
  • Nay: 37 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 3 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 7 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 27, 2025

Yea
111
Nay
21
Present, not voting
1
Absent
14
Excused
3
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3776

CSSB 506, as amended, was passed to third reading by (Record 3776): 111 Yeas, 21 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 111 (published)
  • Nay: 21 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 14 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 3 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 27, 2025

Yea
136
Nay
0
Present, not voting
1
Absent
10
Excused
3
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3775

Amendment No. 2 was adopted by (Record 3775): 136 Yeas, 0 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 136 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 10 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 3 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 27, 2025

Yea
133
Nay
7
Present, not voting
2
Absent
5
Excused
3
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3774

Amendment No. 1 was adopted by (Record 3774): 133 Yeas, 7 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 133 (published)
  • Nay: 7 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 5 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 3 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 30, 2025

Yea
23
Nay
8
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 23, Nays 8.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 23 (published)
  • Nay: 8 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 30, 2025

Yea
25
Nay
6
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Bettencourt moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that CSSB 506 be placed on its third reading and final passage: CSSB 506, Relating to requirements for certain petitions requesting an election and ballot propositions and to related procedures and provisions. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 25, Nays 6.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 25 (published)
  • Nay: 6 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 30, 2025

Yea
23
Nay
8
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read second time and was passed to engrossment by the following vote: Yeas 23, Nays 8. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 23 (published)
  • Nay: 8 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 30, 2025

Yea
23
Nay
8
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Bettencourt moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration CSSB 506 at this time on its second reading: CSSB 506, Relating to requirements for certain petitions requesting an election and ballot propositions and to related procedures and provisions. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 23, Nays 8.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 23 (published)
  • Nay: 8 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses6
For
3
Against
2
On
1
Names

For

  • Self1 registration
  • Self; Harris county ballot security1 registration
  • TMPA1 registration

Against

  • ACLU of Texas1 registration
  • Texas Civil Rights Project1 registration

On

  • Texas Secretary of State1 registration
Sources

6 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version F · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version F · May 29, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version H by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R SB 221

by Sen. Bettencourt, same lead author · Did not pass · same text

Introduced text

Last action, May 18, 2023: Postponed

Relating to requirements for certain petitions requesting an election and ballot propositions.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Nov 25, 2024

06/20/2025 E Effective on 9/1/25

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report · Enrolled

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:19 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors

House committee · Elections · Committee vote 6 aye, 2 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee

Senate committee · State Affairs · Committee vote 10 aye, 0 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee

Companion

HB 1783 by Paul (identical)

Subjects

City Government--General

Elections--Initiative, Referendum & Recall

SECRETARY OF STATE

Text

The text as introduced · 1,486 words

89R1594 MLH-D

By: Bettencourt, et al.
S.B. No. 506

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to requirements for certain petitions requesting an

election and ballot propositions and to related procedures and

provisions.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 52.072, Election Code, is amended by

adding Subsection (g) to read as follows:

(g) A proposition must substantially submit the question

with such definiteness, certainty, and facial neutrality that the

voters are not misled.

SECTION 2. Chapter 233, Election Code, is amended by adding

Section 233.0115 to read as follows:

Sec. 233.0115. BALLOT LANGUAGE MANDAMUS ACTION. If a court

orders a new election under Section 233.011, a person may seek from

the court a writ of mandamus to compel the governing body of a city

to comply with the requirement that a ballot proposition must

substantially submit the question with such definiteness,

certainty, and facial neutrality that the voters are not misled, as

provided by Section 273.102.

SECTION 3. Section 253.094(b), Election Code, is amended to

read as follows:

(b) A corporation or labor organization may not make a

political contribution in connection with a recall election,

including the circulation and submission of a petition to call an

election. This subsection does not prohibit a religious

organization from circulating or submitting a petition in

connection with a recall election.

SECTION 4. Chapter 273, Election Code, is amended by adding

Subchapter F to read as follows:

SUBCHAPTER F. BALLOT PROPOSITION LANGUAGE ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS

Sec. 273.101. REVIEW BY SECRETARY OF STATE. (a) Not later

than the seventh day after the date on which a home-rule city

publishes in the election order or by other means ballot

proposition language proposing an amendment to the city charter or

a voter-initiated initiative or referendum as requested by

petition, a registered voter eligible to vote in the election may

submit the proposition for review by the secretary of state.

(b) The secretary of state shall review the proposition not

later than the seventh day after the date the secretary receives the

submission to determine whether the proposition is misleading,

inaccurate, or prejudicial.

(c) If the secretary of state determines that the

proposition is misleading, inaccurate, or prejudicial, the city

shall draft a proposition to cure the defects and give notice of the

new proposition using the method of giving notice prescribed for

notice of an election under Section 4.003.

(d) A proposition drafted by a city under Subsection (c) to

cure the defects may be submitted to the secretary of state under

Subsection (a). If the secretary of state determines that the city

has on its third attempt drafted a proposition that is misleading,

inaccurate, or prejudicial, the secretary of state shall draft the

ballot proposition.

Sec. 273.102. MANDAMUS ACTIONS. (a) In an action in a

court of competent jurisdiction seeking a writ of mandamus to

compel the city's governing body to comply with the requirement

that a ballot proposition must substantially submit the question

with such definiteness, certainty, and facial neutrality that the

voters are not misled, the court shall make its determination

without delay and may order the city to use ballot proposition

language drafted by the court.

(b) The court may award a plaintiff or relator who

substantially prevails in a mandamus action described by Subsection

(a) the party's reasonable attorney's fees, expenses, and court

costs.

(c) Governmental immunity to suit is waived and abolished

only to the extent of the liability created by Subsection (b).

Sec. 273.103. MANDATORY SUBMISSION TO SECRETARY OF STATE.

Following a final nonappealable judgment containing a finding by a

court that a ballot proposition drafted by a city failed to

substantially submit the question with such definiteness,

certainty, and facial neutrality that the voters are not misled,

the city shall submit to the secretary of state for approval any

proposition to be voted on at an election held by the city before

the fourth anniversary of the court's finding.

Sec. 273.104. CITY REQUIRED TO PAY FOR LEGAL SERVICES.

Notwithstanding a home-rule city charter provision to the contrary,

a city may not accept legal services relating to a proceeding under

this subchapter without paying fair market value for those

services.

SECTION 5. Chapter 277, Election Code, is amended by

designating Sections 277.001, 277.002, 277.0021, 277.0022,

277.0023, 277.0024, and 277.003 as Subchapter A and adding a

subchapter heading to read as follows:

SUBCHAPTER A. PROVISIONS RELATING TO SIGNATURES, VALIDITY, AND

VERIFICATION OF PETITIONS

SECTION 6. Section 277.001, Election Code, is amended to

read as follows:

Sec. 277.001. APPLICABILITY OF SUBCHAPTER [ CHAPTER ]. This

subchapter [ chapter ] applies to a petition authorized or required

to be filed under a law outside this code in connection with an

election.

SECTION 7. Section 277.002, Election Code, is amended by

adding Subsection (g) to read as follows:

(g) The illegibility of a signature on a petition submitted

to a home-rule city is not a valid basis for invalidating the

signature if the information provided with the signature as

required by this section and other applicable law legibly provides

enough information to demonstrate that the signer:

(1) is eligible to have signed the petition; and

(2) signed the petition on or after the 180th day

before the date the petition was filed.

SECTION 8. Subchapter A, Chapter 277, Election Code, as

added by this Act, is amended by adding Section 277.005 to read as

follows:

Sec. 277.005. PETITION FORM; USE BY CITY AND OTHER PERSONS.

(a) The secretary of state shall prescribe a form, content, and

procedure for a petition.

(b) A home-rule city that uses a form that is different from

the official form prescribed under Subsection (a) may not

invalidate a petition because the petition does not contain

information that the petition form failed to provide for or to

require to be provided.

(c) A person who circulates or submits a petition is not

required to use a petition form prescribed by the secretary of state

or a home-rule city. A petition that does not use an officially

prescribed form must contain the substantial elements required to

be provided on the officially prescribed form.

SECTION 9. Chapter 277, Election Code, is amended by adding

Subchapter B to read as follows:

SUBCHAPTER B. SUBMISSION OF CERTAIN CITY PETITIONS

Sec. 277.031. APPLICABILITY OF SUBCHAPTER. This subchapter

applies to a home-rule city that has a procedure requiring the

governing body of the city to hold an election on receipt of a

petition requesting the election that complies with the applicable

requirements.

Sec. 277.032. CONFLICTS WITH CITY CHARTER OR OTHER LAW. (a)

The provisions of this subchapter apply notwithstanding any city

charter provision or other law.

(b) This subchapter may not be construed to interfere with

the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment Act

(Pub. L. No. 111-84, Sections 577-583(a)).

Sec. 277.033. DETERMINATION OF VALIDITY. The city

secretary shall determine the validity of a petition submitted

under this subchapter, including by verifying the petition

signatures, not later than the 30th day after the date the city

receives the petition.

Sec. 277.034. COLLECTOR REQUIREMENTS PROHIBITED. A city

may not restrict who may collect petition signatures.

SECTION 10. Sections 9.004(a) and (c), Local Government

Code, are amended to read as follows:

(a) Except as provided by Section 9.0045, the governing body

of a municipality on its own motion may submit a proposed charter

amendment to the municipality's qualified voters for their approval

at an election. The governing body shall submit a proposed charter

amendment to the voters for their approval at an election if the

submission is supported by a petition signed by a number of

registered [ qualified ] voters of the municipality equal to at least

five percent of the number of registered [ qualified ] voters of the

municipality on the date of the most recent election held

throughout the municipality or 20,000, whichever number is the

smaller.

(c) Notice of the election shall be published in a newspaper

of general circulation published in the municipality. The notice

must:

(1) include a substantial copy of the proposed

amendment in which language sought to be deleted by the amendment is

bracketed and stricken through and language sought to be added by

the amendment is underlined ;

(2) include an estimate of the anticipated fiscal

impact to the municipality if the proposed amendment is approved at

the election; and

(3) be published on the same day in each of two

successive weeks, with the first publication occurring before the

14th day before the date of the election.

SECTION 11. Section 277.004, Election Code, is repealed.

SECTION 12. Not later than January 1, 2026, the secretary of

state shall adopt a petition form as required by Section 277.005,

Election Code, as added by this Act.

SECTION 13. The changes in law made by this Act apply only

to a petition submitted on or after January 1, 2026.

SECTION 14. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.