Monitoring the Session

SB 6

King Grid Bill Puts Transmission Cost Rules After The Election

Became law

Verdict: Smells

SmellsNeeds review
Sen. Phil KingRSenate 10
Both charges, and why
Delayed start

THE TEXT

…“31, 2026, the commission shall amend commission rules to ensure”…

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

One of the bill's four stated goals is making sure transmission costs are properly allocated. The rule change that delivers it is not due until December 31, 2026, after the November 3, 2026 election.

Delayed start
New fee, fund, board or appointees

THE TEXT

…“$100,000 to be paid to the interconnecting electric utility or”…

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The bill creates a new flat study fee of at least $100,000 for large load screening studies. The money goes to utilities, not a state fund, and the caption openly covers costs, so this is a minor instance.

New fee, fund, board or appointees

Needs review · Nov 1, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the planning for, interconnection and operation of, and costs related to providing service for certain electrical loads.

Caption from analyzed text · version H.

Summary

Due December 31, 2026, after the November 3 election. Big users pay study fees from $100,000.

The bill sets new state rules for very large electricity users, usually 75 megawatts or more at one site, that want to connect to the Texas grid. It reaches those big customers, the utilities and co-ops that serve them, and ERCOT, which runs the grid. Big users must pay study fees and connection costs, put up financial security, report their backup generators, and accept being cut off or switched to backup power in grid emergencies, while the utility commission must rework how transmission costs are charged by the end of 2026.

Labels

Labels: INSTANT LAW. Took effect immediately, on Jun 20, 2025. 833 of the 1,185 graded 89R laws took effect Sep 1, 2025 (derived from the bill histories, snapshot Oct 19, 2026).

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB6 · 2025-02-12

SOLD BY

+ 8 coauthors

ITEM

relating to the planning for, interconnection and operation of, and costs related to providing service for certain electrical loads.

WHAT IT DOES

Due December 31, 2026, after the November 3 election. Big users pay study fees from $100,000.

The bill sets new state rules for very large electricity users, usually 75 megawatts or more at one site, that want to connect to the Texas grid. It reaches those big customers, the utilities and co-ops that serve them, and ERCOT, which runs the grid. Big users must pay study fees and connection costs, put up financial security, report their backup generators, and accept being cut off or switched to backup power in grid emergencies, while the utility commission must rework how transmission costs are charged by the end of 2026.

CHARGES

[x] DELAYED STARTanalysis confidence 45%

THE TEXT

…“31, 2026, the commission shall amend commission rules to ensure”…

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

One of the bill's four stated goals is making sure transmission costs are properly allocated. The rule change that delivers it is not due until December 31, 2026, after the November 3, 2026 election.

[x] NEW FEE, FUND, BOARD OR APPOINTEESanalysis confidence 35%

THE TEXT

…“$100,000 to be paid to the interconnecting electric utility or”…

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The bill creates a new flat study fee of at least $100,000 for large load screening studies. The money goes to utilities, not a state fund, and the caption openly covers costs, so this is a minor instance.

TOTAL

Net to General Revenue · FY 2026($1,319,206)

LBB estimate, flow · fiscal note version F · ( ) = negative · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version F · May 28, 2025

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB6, As Passed 2nd House: a negative impact of ($2,638,412) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

First year · FY 2026 · ($1,319,206)

Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Business & Commerce
  5. Co-author authorized
  6. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  7. Considered in public hearing
  8. Testimony taken in committee
  9. Left pending in committee
  10. Co-author authorized
  11. Considered in public hearing
  12. Vote taken in committee
  13. Reported favorably as substituted
  14. Committee report printed and distributed
  15. Co-author authorized
  16. Placed on intent calendar
  17. Co-author authorized
  18. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  19. Read 2nd time
  20. Amendment(s) offered FA1 King
  21. Amended
  22. Vote recorded in Journal
  23. Passed to engrossment as amended
  24. Vote recorded in Journal
  25. Three day rule suspended
  26. Record vote
  27. Read 3rd time
  28. Passed
  29. Record vote
  30. Reported engrossed
  31. Received from the Senate
  32. Read first time
  33. Referred to State Affairs
  34. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  35. Considered in public hearing
  36. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  37. Left pending in committee
  38. Considered in formal meeting
  39. Committee substitute considered in committee
  40. Reported favorably as substituted
  41. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  42. Committee report distributed
  43. Committee report sent to Calendars
  44. Considered in Calendars
  45. Placed on General State Calendar
  46. Read 2nd time
  47. Amendment(s) offered 1-King
  48. Amendment amended 2-Anchía
  49. Record vote RV#3402
  50. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  51. Amendment adopted as amended 1-King
  52. Record vote RV#3403
  53. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  54. Amended 3-Turner
  55. Record vote RV#3404
  56. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  57. Amended 4-Darby
  58. Record vote RV#3405
  59. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  60. Point of order withdrawn Rule 4, Section 32(c)(2)
  61. Recommitted to committee
  62. Considered in formal meeting
  63. Committee substitute considered in committee
  64. Reported favorably as substituted
  65. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  66. Committee report distributed
  67. Committee report sent to Calendars
  68. Considered in Calendars
  69. Placed on Major State Calendar
  70. Read 2nd time
  71. Amendment(s) offered 1-King
  72. Amendment amended 2-Anchía
  73. Record vote RV#3555
  74. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  75. Amendment adopted as amended 1-King
  76. Record vote RV#3556
  77. Amended 3-Raymond and McLaughlin
  78. Record vote RV#3557
  79. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  80. Statement of Leg. Intent Recorded in Journal
  81. Passed to 3rd reading as amended
  82. Record vote RV#3558
  83. Read 3rd time
  84. Passed
  85. Record vote RV#3643
  86. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  87. House passage as amended reported
  88. House amendment(s) laid before the Senate
  89. Read
  90. Senate concurs in House amendment(s)
  91. Record vote
  92. Senate concurs in House amendment(s)-reported
  93. Reported enrolled
  94. Co-author authorized
  95. Signed in the Senate
  96. Signed in the House
  97. Sent to the Governor
  98. Signed by the Governor
  99. Effective immediately
FILED UNDER

DATA CENTERS, WATER AND THE GRID

THE TEXT

…“any necessary equipment to allow the load to be curtailed during”…

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The bill decides how giant power users connect to the grid, what they pay to do so, and when they can be cut off or sent to backup power during emergencies.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 103 yea · 25 nay

Senate · 31 yea · 0 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · May 27, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate: Final passage · Mar 19, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$30KErle Nye, Jr.$20,000Gideon Powell$20,000

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$30,300.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$30,300.00

Cash
$30,000.00
Paid by others
$300.00
Total
$30,300.00
fundraiser $300.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 12, 2024 to Sep 26, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100982783, 101007450, 101026985.

Erle Nye, Jr.$20,000.00
Gideon Powell$20,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$30,300.00

Cash
$30,000.00
Paid by others
$300.00
Total
$30,300.00
fundraiser $300.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 12, 2024 to Sep 26, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100982783, 101007450, 101026985.

Votes13

Senate May 29, 2025

Yea
31
Nay
0
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Sources

Senator King moved to concur in the House amendments to SB 6. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 31 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 27, 2025

Yea
103
Nay
25
Present, not voting
2
Absent
18
Excused
2
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3643

SB 6 was passed by (Record 3643): 103 Yeas, 25 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 103 (published)
  • Nay: 25 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 18 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 2 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 26, 2025

Yea
117
Nay
24
Present, not voting
1
Absent
7
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3558

CSSB 6, as amended, was passed to third reading by (Record 3558): 117 Yeas, 24 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 117 (published)
  • Nay: 24 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 7 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 26, 2025

Yea
100
Nay
40
Present, not voting
2
Absent
7
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3557

Amendment No. 3 was adopted by (Record 3557): 100 Yeas, 40 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 100 (published)
  • Nay: 40 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 7 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 26, 2025

Yea
136
Nay
3
Present, not voting
4
Absent
6
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3556

Amendment No. 1, as amended, was adopted by (Record 3556): 136 Yeas, 3 Nays, 4 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 136 (published)
  • Nay: 3 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 4 (published)
  • Absent: 6 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 26, 2025

Yea
108
Nay
19
Present, not voting
1
Absent
21
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3555

Amendment No. 2 was adopted by (Record 3555): 108 Yeas, 19 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 108 (published)
  • Nay: 19 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 21 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 23, 2025

Yea
95
Nay
40
Present, not voting
2
Absent
5
Excused
8
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3405

Amendment No. 4 was adopted by (Record 3405): 95 Yeas, 40 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 95 (published)
  • Nay: 40 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 5 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 8 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 23, 2025

Yea
80
Nay
59
Present, not voting
2
Absent
1
Excused
8
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3404

Amendment No. 3 was adopted by (Record 3404): 80 Yeas, 59 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 80 (published)
  • Nay: 59 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 1 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 8 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 23, 2025

Yea
117
Nay
21
Present, not voting
2
Absent
2
Excused
8
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3403

Amendment No. 1, as amended, was adopted by (Record 3403): 117 Yeas, 21 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 117 (published)
  • Nay: 21 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 2 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 8 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 23, 2025

Yea
125
Nay
6
Present, not voting
3
Absent
6
Excused
10
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3402

Amendment No. 2 was adopted by (Record 3402): 125 Yeas, 6 Nays, 3 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 125 (published)
  • Nay: 6 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 3 (published)
  • Absent: 6 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 10 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Mar 19, 2025

Yea
31
Nay
0
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Sources

Senator King moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that CSSB 6 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0. The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 31 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Mar 19, 2025

Yea
31
Nay
0
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Sources

Senator King moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that CSSB 6 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 31 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Mar 19, 2025

Yea
Not printed
Nay
Not printed
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Voice vote. No numeric tally or individual yeas are inferred.

Sources

CSSB 6 as amended was passed to engrossment by a viva voce vote.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: Not printed
  • Nay: Not printed
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses27
For
3
Against
2
On
22
Names

For

  • Lone Star Chapter Sierra Club1 registration
  • Self2 registrations

Against

  • Self2 registrations

On

  • Association of Electric Companies of Texas1 registration
  • CPS Energy1 registration
  • Crusoe1 registration
  • Data Center Coalition1 registration
  • Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT)1 registration
  • Enchanted Rock1 registration
  • Kings Branch Data1 registration
  • Lancium1 registration
  • New APR Energy LLC1 registration
  • Office of Public Utility Counsel1 registration
  • Powering Texans2 registrations
  • Public Utility Commission1 registration
  • Self; Cholla Inc.1 registration
  • Self; Hunt Energy Network1 registration
  • Switch, Inc.1 registration
  • Texas Assocation of Manufactures1 registration
  • Texas Blockchain Council1 registration
  • Texas Electric Cooperatives1 registration
  • Texas Energy Buyers Alliance1 registration
  • Texas Public Power Association1 registration
  • TXOGA1 registration
Sources

27 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal
Net to General Revenue · FY 2026($1,319,206)

LBB estimate, flow · fiscal note version F · ( ) = negative · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version F · May 28, 2025

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB6, As Passed 2nd House: a negative impact of ($2,638,412) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

First year · FY 2026 · ($1,319,206)

Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version H by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Feb 12, 2025

06/20/2025 E Effective immediately

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report · Enrolled

Data snapshot Nov 1, 2026 at 2:02 PM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors

House committee · State Affairs · Committee vote 12 aye, 0 nay, 3 absent · Out of committee

Senate committee · Business & Commerce · Committee vote 10 aye, 0 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee

Subjects

City Government--Utilities

Utilities--Electric

ELECTRIC RELIABILITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS (ERCOT)

PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION

Text

The text as introduced · 1,871 words

89R12894 JXC-F

By: King, Schwertner
S.B. No. 6

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to electricity planning and infrastructure costs for large

loads.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 35.004(d), Utilities Code, is amended to

read as follows:

(d) The commission shall price wholesale transmission

services within ERCOT based on the postage stamp method of pricing

under which a transmission-owning utility's rate is based on the

ERCOT utilities' combined annual costs of transmission, other than

costs described by Subsections (d-2) and (d-3), divided by the

total demand placed on the combined transmission systems of all

such transmission-owning utilities within a power region. For

purposes of establishing the postage stamp rate, each

distribution-owning utility in ERCOT shall report the additional

billing determinants that would be created by applying the minimum

transmission charge calculation under Section 36.010 to the

distribution-owning utility's service area. An electric utility

subject to the freeze period imposed by Section 39.052 may treat

transmission costs in excess of transmission revenues during the

freeze period as an expense for purposes of determining annual

costs in the annual report filed under Section 39.257.

Notwithstanding Section 36.201, the commission may approve

wholesale rates that may be periodically adjusted to ensure timely

recovery of transmission investment. Notwithstanding Section

36.054(a), if the commission determines that conditions warrant the

action, the commission may authorize the inclusion of construction

work in progress in the rate base for transmission investment

required by the commission under Section 39.203(e).

SECTION 2. Subchapter A, Chapter 36, Utilities Code, is

amended by adding Section 36.010 to read as follows:

Sec. 36.010. MINIMUM TRANSMISSION CHARGE. To ensure that

all users of the transmission system in the ERCOT power region

contribute to transmission cost recovery, the commission shall

implement minimum rates that require all retail customers in that

region served behind-the-meter to pay retail transmission charges

based on a percentage of the customer's non-coincident peak demand

from the utility system as identified in the customer's service

agreement. A municipally owned utility or electric cooperative

that has not adopted customer choice shall pass through the minimum

wholesale transmission rate to the utility's or cooperative's

retail customers in a manner determined by the utility or

cooperative.

SECTION 3. Subchapter B, Chapter 37, Utilities Code, is

amended by adding Section 37.0561 to read as follows:

Sec. 37.0561. PLANNING REQUIREMENTS FOR LARGE LOADS. (a)

The commission by rule shall establish standards for

interconnecting large load customers at transmission voltage in the

ERCOT power region in a manner designed to support business

development in this state while minimizing the potential for

stranded infrastructure costs.

(b) The standards must apply only to customers with a load

that exceeds a demand threshold established by the commission based

on the size of loads that significantly impact transmission needs

in the ERCOT power region. The commission shall establish a demand

threshold of 75 megawatts unless the commission determines that a

lower threshold is necessary to accomplish the purposes described

by Subsection (a).

(c) The standards must require each large load customer

seeking interconnection to disclose to the interconnecting

electric utility or municipally owned utility whether the customer

is pursuing a duplicate request for electric service, inside or

outside this state, the approval of which would result in the

customer materially changing or withdrawing the interconnection

request. The commission by rule shall prohibit an electric utility

or municipally owned utility from selling, sharing, or disclosing

information submitted to the utility under this subsection.

(d) The standards must require each interconnected large

load customer to disclose to the independent organization certified

under Section 39.151 for the ERCOT power region information about

the customer's on-site backup generating facilities. To achieve

firm load shed during an energy emergency alert, the independent

organization certified under Section 39.151 for the ERCOT power

region may, after reasonable notice, direct the applicable electric

utility or municipally owned utility to require the large load

customer to deploy the customer's on-site backup generating

facility. This subsection does not:

(1) authorize a violation of any emissions limitation

in state or federal law or a violation of any other environmental

regulation; or

(2) prohibit a large load from participating in a

service authorized by Section 39.170(b).

(e) The standards must set a flat study fee of at least

$100,000 for initial transmission screening studies for large loads

above the minimum demand threshold determined under Subsection (b).

Any unused portion of the initial transmission screening study fee

must be applied as a credit toward security for procurement or

interconnection agreements at the same geographic site.

(f) The standards must include a method for a large load

customer to demonstrate that the customer controls the site where

the load will be located through an ownership interest or another

legal interest acceptable to the commission.

(g) The standards must include uniform financial commitment

standards for the development of transmission infrastructure

needed to serve a large load customer before an electric utility or

municipally owned utility may submit a project for review by ERCOT

based on the large load customer's demand. The standards must

provide that satisfactory proof of financial commitment may

include:

(1) security provided on a dollar per megawatt basis

as set by the commission;

(2) security provided under an agreement that requires

a large load customer to pay for significant equipment or services

in advance of signing an agreement to establish electric delivery

service; or

(3) another form of financial commitment acceptable to

the commission.

(h) Security provided under Subsection (g)(1) must be

refunded, in whole or in part, as the large load customer meets the

customer's requested load ramp milestones and sustains operations

for a prescribed period of time as determined by the commission.

(i) The commission may not limit the authority of a

municipally owned utility or an electric cooperative to impose

retail electric service requirements for large load customers in

addition to the standards adopted under this section.

SECTION 4. Section 39.002, Utilities Code, is amended to

read as follows:

Sec. 39.002. APPLICABILITY. This chapter, other than

Sections 39.151, 39.1516, 39.155, 39.157(e), 39.161, 39.162,

39.163, 39.169, 39.170, 39.203, 39.9051, 39.9052, and 39.914(e),

and Subchapters M and N, does not apply to a municipally owned

utility or an electric cooperative. Sections 39.157(e) and 39.203

apply only to a municipally owned utility or an electric

cooperative that is offering customer choice. If there is a

conflict between the specific provisions of this chapter and any

other provisions of this title, except for Chapters 40 and 41, the

provisions of this chapter control.

SECTION 5. Subchapter D, Chapter 39, Utilities Code, is

amended by adding Sections 39.169 and 39.170 to read as follows:

Sec. 39.169. CO-LOCATION OF RETAIL CUSTOMER WITH EXISTING

GENERATION RESOURCE. (a) A power generation company, municipally

owned utility, or electric cooperative must submit a notice to the

commission and the independent organization certified under

Section 39.151 for the ERCOT power region before implementing a new

net metering arrangement between a facility registered with the

independent organization as a generation resource and an

unaffiliated retail customer if:

(1) the retail customer's demand would exceed 10

percent of the nameplate capacity of the existing generation

resource; and

(2) the facility owner has not proposed to construct

an equal amount of replacement capacity in the same general area.

(b) For the purposes of Subsection (a)(2), nameplate

capacity from dispatchable thermal generation is considered to be

replaced only if the replacement capacity is from dispatchable

thermal generation.

(c) The new net metering arrangement must be requested or

consented to by the electric cooperative, electric utility, or

municipally owned utility certificated to provide retail electric

service at the location.

(d) With input from the independent organization certified

under Section 39.151 for the ERCOT power region, not later than the

180th day after the date the commission receives the notice under

Subsection (a), the commission shall approve, deny, or impose

reasonable conditions on a proposed net metering arrangement

described by Subsection (a) as necessary to maintain system

reliability. The conditions may include requirements:

(1) that behind-the-meter load ramp down during

certain events;

(2) that generation reenter energy markets in the

ERCOT power region during certain events; and

(3) that the generation resource will be held liable

for stranded or underutilized transmission assets resulting from

the behind-the-meter operation.

(e) If the commission does not approve, deny, or impose

reasonable conditions on a proposed net metering arrangement

before the expiration of the deadline established by Subsection

(d), the commission is considered to have approved the arrangement.

Sec. 39.170. LARGE LOAD DEMAND MANAGEMENT SERVICE. (a) The

commission shall require the independent organization certified

under Section 39.151 for the ERCOT power region to ensure that each

electric cooperative, electric utility, and municipally owned

utility serving a transmission-voltage large load customer that is

subject to the standards adopted under Section 37.0561 installs, or

requires to be installed, before the customer is interconnected,

equipment that allows the load to be remotely disconnected during

firm load shed. This subsection applies only to a load

interconnected after December 31, 2025, that is not:

(1) load operated by a critical load industrial

customer, as defined by Section 17.002; or

(2) designated as a critical natural gas facility

under Section 38.074.

(b) The commission shall require the independent

organization certified under Section 39.151 for the ERCOT power

region to develop a reliability service to competitively procure

demand reductions from large load customers subject to the

standards adopted under Section 37.0561 in advance of a projected

energy emergency alert event. The service must provide at least a

24-hour notice to large load customers that participate in the

service and shall require each participating large load to remain

curtailed for the duration of the energy emergency alert event or

until the load can be recalled safely. A large load customer may

not offer for the service megawatts that curtail in response to the

wholesale price of electricity, as determined by the independent

organization certified under Section 39.151 for the ERCOT power

region, or that otherwise participate in a different reliability or

ancillary service.

SECTION 6. (a) The Public Utility Commission of Texas shall

evaluate whether the existing methodology used to allocate

wholesale transmission costs to distribution providers under

Section 35.004(d), Utilities Code, continues to appropriately

assign costs for transmission investment. The commission shall

also evaluate whether:

(1) the current methodology, including the four

coincident peak methodology, for allocating transmission costs by

transmission and distribution utilities in the ERCOT power region

to their customer classes results in a just and reasonable

allocation; or

(2) alternative methodologies should be considered.

(b) The Public Utility Commission of Texas shall open a

rulemaking project regarding the evaluation required under

Subsection (a) of this section not later than the 90th day after the

effective date of this Act. If the commission determines in the

project that a commission rule should be amended, the commission

shall adopt the final rule not later than December 31, 2026.

SECTION 7. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives

a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as

provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this

Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this

Act takes effect September 1, 2025.