Monitoring the Session

SB 668

Hughes Bill Limits AI Disclosure To $100B Companies

Died in committee

Verdict: Smells

SmellsNeeds review
Sen. Bryan HughesRSenate 1
Why it's charged
Bracket bill

THE TEXT

…“person who generated, at least $100 billion in total revenue,”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

A $100 billion revenue floor limits a general-sounding AI disclosure law to a handful of the largest companies. The caption says nothing about that limit.

Bracket bill

Needs review · Nov 1, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the disclosure of information with regard to artificial intelligence.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Post your AI models and who changed them. A handful of companies have to.

The bill makes companies that use artificial intelligence to serve Texans post online the names of their AI models, what each model does, and which outside parties gave input that changed those models. It applies only to companies that took in at least $100 billion in revenue, or that are more than 25 percent owned by such a company, and it bars them from punishing people who report violations. The attorney general can inspect company records, enforce the rules as a deceptive trade practice, and send reports on what it finds to officials, starting September 1, 2025.

Labels

Labels: GOT HALFWAY. Passed the Senate on Apr 24, 2025. Died in the House: never got out of the Delivery of Government Efficiency committee.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB668 · 2024-12-19

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the disclosure of information with regard to artificial intelligence.

WHAT IT DOES

Post your AI models and who changed them. A handful of companies have to.

The bill makes companies that use artificial intelligence to serve Texans post online the names of their AI models, what each model does, and which outside parties gave input that changed those models. It applies only to companies that took in at least $100 billion in revenue, or that are more than 25 percent owned by such a company, and it bars them from punishing people who report violations. The attorney general can inspect company records, enforce the rules as a deceptive trade practice, and send reports on what it finds to officials, starting September 1, 2025.

CHARGES

[x] BRACKET BILLanalysis confidence 50%

THE TEXT

…“person who generated, at least $100 billion in total revenue,”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

A $100 billion revenue floor limits a general-sounding AI disclosure law to a handful of the largest companies. The caption says nothing about that limit.

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · April 2, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Business & Commerce
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Testimony taken in committee
  8. Left pending in committee
  9. Considered in public hearing
  10. Vote taken in committee
  11. Reported favorably w/o amendments
  12. Recommended for local & uncontested calendar
  13. Committee report printed and distributed
  14. Placed on local & uncontested calendar
  15. Laid before the Senate
  16. Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
  17. Vote recorded in Journal
  18. Three day rule suspended
  19. Record vote
  20. Read 3rd time
  21. Passed
  22. Record vote
  23. Reported engrossed
  24. Received from the Senate
  25. Read first time
  26. Referred to Delivery of Government Efficiency
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

Senate · 30 yea · 1 nay

Sources

Senate: Final passage · Apr 24, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

GOPAC Election Fund$250,000.00

GOPAC Election Fund

$250,000.00

Cash
$250,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$250,000.00

Also funds 2 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101028838, 101071548.

CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)$100,000.00

CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101067724.

Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC$100,000.00

Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 32 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Feb 20, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101071548.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

GOPAC Election Fund

$250,000.00

Cash
$250,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$250,000.00

Also funds 2 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101028838, 101071548.

×

CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101067724.

×

Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 32 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Feb 20, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101071548.

Votes3

Senate Apr 24, 2025

Final passage

Yea
30
Nay
1
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

The journal row lists three votes in order: passage to engrossment, suspension of the three-day rule, and final passage. This entry records final passage. Repeated tallies belong to separate votes.

Sources

SB 668 (Hughes) Relating to the disclosure of information with regard to artificial intelligence. (viva voce vote) (30-1) "Nay" Eckhardt (30-1) "Nay" Eckhardt

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 30 (published)
  • Nay: 1 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 24, 2025

Suspension of the three-day rule

Yea
30
Nay
1
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

The journal row lists three votes in order: passage to engrossment, suspension of the three-day rule, and final passage. This entry records suspension of the three-day rule. Repeated tallies belong to separate votes.

Sources

SB 668 (Hughes) Relating to the disclosure of information with regard to artificial intelligence. (viva voce vote) (30-1) "Nay" Eckhardt (30-1) "Nay" Eckhardt

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 30 (published)
  • Nay: 1 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 24, 2025

Passage to engrossment

Yea
Not printed
Nay
Not printed
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

The journal row lists three votes in order: passage to engrossment, suspension of the three-day rule, and final passage. This entry records passage to engrossment. Repeated tallies belong to separate votes.

Voice vote. No numeric tally or individual yeas are inferred.

Sources

SB 668 (Hughes) Relating to the disclosure of information with regard to artificial intelligence. (viva voce vote) (30-1) "Nay" Eckhardt (30-1) "Nay" Eckhardt

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: Not printed
  • Nay: Not printed
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses5
For
2
Against
3
On
0
Names

For

  • Self1 registration
  • Texas Public Policy Foundation1 registration

Against

  • TechNet1 registration
  • Texas Association of Business1 registration
  • Texas Civil Justice League1 registration
Sources

5 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · April 2, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Dec 19, 2024

04/28/2025 H Referred to Delivery of Government Efficiency: Apr 28 2025 4:21PM

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed

Data snapshot Nov 1, 2026 at 2:05 PM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Delivery of Government Efficiency · Final status: Died in committee

Senate committee · Business & Commerce · Committee vote 10 aye, 0 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee

Subjects

Artificial Intelligence (IQ7C5)

Business & Commerce--General

Electronic Information Systems

DISCRIMINATION

ATTORNEY GENERAL

Text

The text as introduced · 630 words

89R3016 MLH-D

By: Hughes
S.B. No. 668

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the disclosure of information with regard to artificial

intelligence.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Title 99, Business & Commerce Code, is amended by

adding Chapter 2003 to read as follows:

CHAPTER 2003. DISCLOSURES RELATED TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Sec. 2003.001. DEFINITION. In this chapter, "artificial

intelligence" means a machine-based system that:

(1) when given a set of objectives by an individual,

makes predictions, recommendations, or decisions that influence a

real or virtual environment; and

(2) uses inputs from an individual or machine to:

(A) perceive or interpret a real or virtual

environment;

(B) use automation to analyze a perception or

interpretation of a real or virtual environment; or

(C) use models to infer or form opinions on

information or a proposed action.

Sec. 2003.002. APPLICABILITY OF CHAPTER. (a) This chapter

applies only to a person who:

(1) uses artificial intelligence to provide services

to an individual in this state, including:

(A) answering questions;

(B) gathering information;

(C) summarizing information;

(D) generating textual, audio, or visual

material; or

(E) providing information to be used in

connection with a lending, underwriting, risk assessment,

investing, or hiring decision; and

(2) generated, or is more than 25 percent owned by a

person who generated, at least $100 billion in total revenue,

including revenue generated by subsidiaries, according to

generally accepted accounting principles.

(b) Artificial intelligence is considered to be used to

provide a service to an individual under Subsection (a)(1)

regardless of whether the individual can directly access the

artificial intelligence.

Sec. 2003.003. DUTY TO DISCLOSE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

INFORMATION. (a) A person regulated by this chapter shall

disclose, on the person's Internet website or in another location

electronically accessible by an individual in this state:

(1) the name of each artificial intelligence model

used by the person;

(2) a brief description of the functions and purposes

of each model disclosed under Subdivision (1);

(3) to the best of the person's knowledge and belief,

the name of each public or private third party that has provided

input on an artificial intelligence model that the person has

implemented;

(4) a description of the specific input provided by

each third party disclosed under Subdivision (3); and

(5) any changes made to an artificial intelligence

model based on input provided by a third party disclosed under

Subdivision (3).

(b) An individual who uses a service described by Section

2003.002(a)(1) who provides input on an artificial intelligence

model is not considered a third party for purposes of this section

if the individual's input was provided:

(1) in the individual's personal capacity; and

(2) based on the individual's own experience as a user

of that service.

Sec. 2003.004. DISCRIMINATION AND RETALIATION PROHIBITED.

A person may not discipline, retaliate against, or otherwise

discriminate against an individual who in good faith reports a

suspected violation of this chapter to the attorney general or any

other appropriate authority.

Sec. 2003.005. COOPERATION WITH ATTORNEY GENERAL. A person

shall allow the attorney general to access the records of the person

to the extent necessary to ensure the person is in substantial

compliance with this chapter.

Sec. 2003.006. ENFORCEMENT. (a) A violation of this

chapter is a deceptive trade practice under Subchapter E, Chapter

17, and is actionable under that subchapter.

(b) The attorney general may issue reports to the governor,

the legislature, or any other federal, state, or local government

official regarding any information obtained investigating a person

under this chapter or enforcing a provision of this chapter.

(c) A report under Subsection (b) may be public or

confidential.

(d) The remedies under this section are cumulative of other

remedies provided by law.

SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.