Monitoring the Session

SB 670

bill lets patients try unapproved sunscreen with a doctor’s note

Became law

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Bryan HughesRSenate 1

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to patient authorization to access certain investigational sun protection products.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Passed phase one, not federally approved. Written recommendation and consent needed.

The bill lets a patient use a sunscreen product with an ingredient that passed the first phase of a clinical trial but is not yet approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration, if the patient's doctor finds approved sunscreens less effective, recommends or prescribes it in writing, and the patient signs an informed consent form. It touches patients, their doctors, sunscreen makers who choose to offer these products, and state officials and the Texas Medical Board. On the ground, makers may supply these products for free or at cost, state officials may not block access, and the medical board may not punish a doctor solely for recommending one within the standard of care.

Labels

Labels: NO AUTOGRAPH. Became law without the governor's signature on Jun 20, 2025.INSTANT LAW. Took effect immediately, on Jun 20, 2025. 833 of the 1,185 graded 89R laws took effect Sep 1, 2025 (derived from the bill histories, snapshot Oct 19, 2026).CROSS-PARTY HANDOFF. Lead author Bryan Hughes (R) in the Senate. Lead sponsor Elizabeth "Liz" Campos (D) in the House. Party as the Legislative Reference Library lists it for the 89th Legislature.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB670 · 2024-12-19

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to patient authorization to access certain investigational sun protection products.

WHAT IT DOES

Passed phase one, not federally approved. Written recommendation and consent needed.

The bill lets a patient use a sunscreen product with an ingredient that passed the first phase of a clinical trial but is not yet approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration, if the patient's doctor finds approved sunscreens less effective, recommends or prescribes it in writing, and the patient signs an informed consent form. It touches patients, their doctors, sunscreen makers who choose to offer these products, and state officials and the Texas Medical Board. On the ground, makers may supply these products for free or at cost, state officials may not block access, and the medical board may not punish a doctor solely for recommending one within the standard of care.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version E · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · May 1, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Health & Human Services
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Testimony taken in committee
  8. Left pending in committee
  9. Considered in public hearing
  10. Vote taken in committee
  11. Reported favorably w/o amendments
  12. Recommended for local & uncontested calendar
  13. Committee report printed and distributed
  14. Placed on local & uncontested calendar
  15. Laid before the Senate
  16. Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
  17. Vote recorded in Journal
  18. Three day rule suspended
  19. Record vote
  20. Read 3rd time
  21. Passed
  22. Record vote
  23. Reported engrossed
  24. Received from the Senate
  25. Read first time
  26. Referred to Public Health
  27. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  28. Considered in public hearing
  29. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  30. Left pending in committee
  31. Considered in formal meeting
  32. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  33. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  34. Committee report distributed
  35. Committee report sent to Calendars
  36. Considered in Calendars
  37. Placed on General State Calendar
  38. Read 2nd time
  39. Passed to 3rd reading
  40. Record vote RV#3094
  41. Read 3rd time
  42. Passed
  43. Record vote RV#3143
  44. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  45. House passage reported
  46. Reported enrolled
  47. Signed in the Senate
  48. Signed in the House
  49. Sent to the Governor
  50. Filed without the Governor's signature
  51. Effective immediately
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 115 yea · 27 nay

Senate · 29 yea · 1 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · May 21, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate: Final passage · Apr 10, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

GOPAC Election Fund$250,000.00

GOPAC Election Fund

$250,000.00

Cash
$250,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$250,000.00

Also funds 2 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101028838, 101071548.

CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)$100,000.00

CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101067724.

Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC$100,000.00

Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 32 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Feb 20, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101071548.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

GOPAC Election Fund

$250,000.00

Cash
$250,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$250,000.00

Also funds 2 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101028838, 101071548.

×

CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101067724.

×

Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 32 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Feb 20, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101071548.

Votes5

House May 21, 2025

Yea
115
Nay
27
Present, not voting
2
Absent
4
Excused
2
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3143

SB 670 was passed by (Record 3143): 115 Yeas, 27 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 115 (published)
  • Nay: 27 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 4 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 2 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 20, 2025

Yea
126
Nay
14
Present, not voting
1
Absent
5
Excused
4
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3094

SB 670 was passed to third reading by (Record 3094): 126 Yeas, 14 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 126 (published)
  • Nay: 14 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 5 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 4 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 10, 2025

Final passage

Yea
29
Nay
1
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

The journal row lists three votes in order: passage to engrossment, suspension of the three-day rule, and final passage. This entry records final passage. Repeated tallies belong to separate votes.

Sources

SB 670 (Hughes) Relating to patient authorization to access certain investigational sun protection products. (viva voce vote) (29-1) "Nay" Eckhardt (29-1) "Nay" Eckhardt

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 29 (published)
  • Nay: 1 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 10, 2025

Suspension of the three-day rule

Yea
29
Nay
1
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

The journal row lists three votes in order: passage to engrossment, suspension of the three-day rule, and final passage. This entry records suspension of the three-day rule. Repeated tallies belong to separate votes.

Sources

SB 670 (Hughes) Relating to patient authorization to access certain investigational sun protection products. (viva voce vote) (29-1) "Nay" Eckhardt (29-1) "Nay" Eckhardt

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 29 (published)
  • Nay: 1 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 10, 2025

Passage to engrossment

Yea
Not printed
Nay
Not printed
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

The journal row lists three votes in order: passage to engrossment, suspension of the three-day rule, and final passage. This entry records passage to engrossment. Repeated tallies belong to separate votes.

Voice vote. No numeric tally or individual yeas are inferred.

Sources

SB 670 (Hughes) Relating to patient authorization to access certain investigational sun protection products. (viva voce vote) (29-1) "Nay" Eckhardt (29-1) "Nay" Eckhardt

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: Not printed
  • Nay: Not printed
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses7
For
6
Against
1
On
0
Names

For

  • Make Texans Healthy Again2 registrations
  • Self1 registration
  • Self; Texas Right To Know1 registration
  • Texas Dermatological Society2 registrations

Against

  • Self1 registration
Sources

7 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version E · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · May 1, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Dec 19, 2024

06/20/2025 E Effective immediately

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report · Enrolled

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Sponsors

House committee · Public Health · Committee vote 12 aye, 0 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee

Senate committee · Health & Human Services · Committee vote 8 aye, 0 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee

Subjects

Health Care Providers

Health--General

INFORMED CONSENT

PATIENT RIGHTS & PROTECTION

PHYSICIANS

MEDICAL BOARD, TEXAS

Text

The text as introduced · 837 words

89R7803 LRM-D

By: Hughes
S.B. No. 670

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to patient authorization to access certain

investigational sun protection products.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. (a) The legislature finds that:

(1) the process for the approval of investigational

sun protection products in the United States takes many years;

(2) some patients do not have the luxury of waiting

until an investigational sun protection product receives final

approval from the United States Food and Drug Administration;

(3) the standards of the United States Food and Drug

Administration for the use of investigational sun protection

products may deny patients the benefits of potentially life-saving

products;

(4) patients have a fundamental right to attempt to

preserve their health and lives by accessing available

investigational sun protection products;

(5) the use of available investigational sun

protection products is a decision the patient in consultation with

the patient's physician should make to preserve the patient's

health or life and is not a decision the government should make; and

(6) the decision to use an investigational sun

protection product should be made with full awareness of the

potential risks, benefits, and consequences to the patient.

(b) It is the intent of the legislature to allow patients

the option of using investigational sun protection products.

SECTION 2. Subtitle C, Title 6, Health and Safety Code, is

amended by adding Chapter 491 to read as follows:

CHAPTER 491. PATIENT ACCESS TO INVESTIGATIONAL SUN PROTECTION

PRODUCTS

SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 491.001. DEFINITION. In this chapter,

"investigational sun protection product" means a sun protection

product containing an ingredient that has successfully completed

phase one of a clinical trial but has not yet been approved for

general use by the United States Food and Drug Administration and

remains under investigation in the clinical trial.

SUBCHAPTER B. ELIGIBLE PATIENT ACCESS TO INVESTIGATIONAL SUN

PROTECTION PRODUCTS

Sec. 491.051. PATIENT ELIGIBILITY. A patient is eligible

to access and use an investigational sun protection product if the

patient's physician:

(1) in consultation with the patient, has considered

all other sun protection products currently approved by the United

States Food and Drug Administration and determined those products

are less effective in comparison to an investigational sun

protection product; and

(2) recommends or prescribes in writing an

investigational sun protection product for the patient.

Sec. 491.052. INFORMED CONSENT. (a) Before recommending

or prescribing an investigational sun protection product, a

physician must require an eligible patient to sign a written

informed consent form.

(b) If the patient is a minor or lacks the mental capacity to

provide informed consent, a parent or legal guardian may provide

informed consent on the patient's behalf.

(c) The Texas Medical Board by rule may adopt a form for the

informed consent required under this section.

Sec. 491.053. PROVISION OF INVESTIGATIONAL SUN PROTECTION

PRODUCT. (a) A manufacturer of an investigational sun protection

product may make available in accordance with this chapter and any

rules adopted under this chapter the manufacturer's product to

eligible patients who provide to the manufacturer the informed

consent required under Section 491.052.

(b) This chapter does not require a manufacturer to make

available an investigational sun protection product to an eligible

patient.

(c) A manufacturer may:

(1) provide an investigational sun protection product

to an eligible patient without receiving compensation; or

(2) require an eligible patient to pay the

manufacturer's costs of, or costs associated with, the manufacture

of the product.

Sec. 491.054. NO CAUSE OF ACTION CREATED. This chapter does

not create a private or state cause of action against a manufacturer

of an investigational sun protection product or against any other

person or entity involved in the care of an eligible patient using

the product for any harm to the eligible patient resulting from the

product.

Sec. 491.055. STATE MAY NOT INTERFERE WITH ACCESS TO

INVESTIGATIONAL SUN PROTECTION PRODUCTS. An official, employee, or

agent of this state may not block or attempt to block an eligible

patient's access to an investigational sun protection product under

this chapter.

SUBCHAPTER C. HEALTH INSURANCE

Sec. 491.101. EFFECT ON HEALTH CARE COVERAGE FOR CLINICAL

TRIAL ENROLLEES. This chapter does not affect the coverage of

enrollees in clinical trials under Chapter 1379, Insurance Code.

SUBCHAPTER D. PHYSICIANS

Sec. 491.151. PROHIBITED ACTION AGAINST PHYSICIAN'S

LICENSE. Notwithstanding any other law, the Texas Medical Board

may not revoke, fail to renew, suspend, or take any action against a

physician's license under Subchapter B, Chapter 164, Occupations

Code, based solely on the physician's recommendation to or

prescription for an eligible patient regarding access to an

investigational sun protection product, provided the

recommendation or prescription for the patient meets the medical

standard of care and the requirements of this chapter.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives

a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as

provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this

Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this

Act takes effect September 1, 2025.