Monitoring the Session

SB 707

King Bill Lets Lawmakers Declare Ordinary Federal Rules ‘Unconstitutional’

Died in committee

Verdict: Smells

SmellsReviewed
Sen. Phil KingRSenate 10
Why it's charged
Dragnet

THE CAPTION

“relating to the authority of the legislature to determine that”…

Caption, introduced version (I)

THE TEXT

“prohibits or limits the ability of this state”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The caption frames the power as finding federal directives 'unconstitutional.' The definition also counts any federal directive that merely limits the state's ability to provide for welfare or 'promote the prosperity' of Texans, which reaches ordinary federal rules well beyond actual constitutional violations.

Dragnet

Reviewed · Nov 1, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the authority of the legislature to determine that certain federal directives are unconstitutional and to prohibit certain government officers and employees from enforcing or assisting in the enforcement of the directive.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Any directive that “limits the ability of this state” qualifies. Legislators and their staffs are exempt.

The bill creates a process for the Texas Legislature to declare, by concurrent resolution, that a federal law, executive order, or agency rule is an 'unconstitutional federal directive' and to bar state and local officials from enforcing it or helping to enforce it. It reaches officers and employees of the state, counties, cities, school districts, special districts, and open-enrollment charter schools, but it exempts the lieutenant governor, legislators, and their staffs. Nothing is banned on day one; a ban arrives only when a later resolution passes, and filing that resolution first needs approval from the speaker, the lieutenant governor, or a two-thirds vote of the chamber.

Labels

Labels: GOT HALFWAY. Passed the Senate on Apr 1, 2025. Died in the House: never got out of the State Affairs committee.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB707 · 2025-01-06

SOLD BY

+ 4 coauthors

ITEM

relating to the authority of the legislature to determine that certain federal directives are unconstitutional and to prohibit certain government officers and employees from enforcing or assisting in the enforcement of the directive.

WHAT IT DOES

Any directive that “limits the ability of this state” qualifies. Legislators and their staffs are exempt.

The bill creates a process for the Texas Legislature to declare, by concurrent resolution, that a federal law, executive order, or agency rule is an 'unconstitutional federal directive' and to bar state and local officials from enforcing it or helping to enforce it. It reaches officers and employees of the state, counties, cities, school districts, special districts, and open-enrollment charter schools, but it exempts the lieutenant governor, legislators, and their staffs. Nothing is banned on day one; a ban arrives only when a later resolution passes, and filing that resolution first needs approval from the speaker, the lieutenant governor, or a two-thirds vote of the chamber.

CHARGES

[x] DRAGNETanalysis confidence 50%

THE CAPTION

“relating to the authority of the legislature to determine that”…

Caption, introduced version (I)

THE TEXT

“prohibits or limits the ability of this state”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The caption frames the power as finding federal directives 'unconstitutional.' The definition also counts any federal directive that merely limits the state's ability to provide for welfare or 'promote the prosperity' of Texans, which reaches ordinary federal rules well beyond actual constitutional violations.

TOTAL

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · February 26, 2025

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. However, if the legislature were to prohibit certain government officers and employees from enforcing or assisting in the enforcement of a federal directive that the legislature determined to be unconstitutional, there could be an indeterminant fiscal impact related to any federal funding tied to that federal directive.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to State Affairs
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Testimony taken in committee
  8. Left pending in committee
  9. Considered in public hearing
  10. Vote taken in committee
  11. Reported favorably w/o amendments
  12. Committee report printed and distributed
  13. Co-author authorized
  14. Placed on intent calendar
  15. Not again placed on intent calendar
  16. Co-author authorized
  17. Placed on intent calendar
  18. Co-author authorized
  19. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  20. Record vote
  21. Read 2nd time
  22. Amendment(s) offered FA1 Birdwell
  23. Amended
  24. Vote recorded in Journal
  25. Passed to engrossment as amended
  26. Record vote
  27. Co-author authorized
  28. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  29. Record vote
  30. Read 3rd time
  31. Passed
  32. Record vote
  33. Reported engrossed
  34. Received from the Senate
  35. Read first time
  36. Referred to State Affairs
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

Senate · 20 yea · 11 nay

Sources

Senate: Final passage · Apr 1, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$30KErle Nye, Jr.$20,000Gideon Powell$20,000

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$30,300.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$30,300.00

Cash
$30,000.00
Paid by others
$300.00
Total
$30,300.00
fundraiser $300.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 12, 2024 to Sep 26, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100982783, 101007450, 101026985.

Erle Nye, Jr.$20,000.00
Gideon Powell$20,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$30,300.00

Cash
$30,000.00
Paid by others
$300.00
Total
$30,300.00
fundraiser $300.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 12, 2024 to Sep 26, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100982783, 101007450, 101026985.

Votes4

Senate Apr 1, 2025

Yea
20
Nay
11
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 20, Nays 11. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 20 (published)
  • Nay: 11 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 1, 2025

Yea
20
Nay
11
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator King moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration SB 707 at this time on its third reading and final passage: SB 707, Relating to the authority of the legislature to determine that certain federal directives are unconstitutional and to prohibit certain government officers and employees from enforcing or assisting in the enforcement of the directive. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 20, Nays 11.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 20 (published)
  • Nay: 11 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Mar 31, 2025

Yea
20
Nay
11
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

SB 707 as amended was passed to engrossment by the following vote: Yeas 20, Nays 11.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 20 (published)
  • Nay: 11 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Mar 31, 2025

Yea
20
Nay
11
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator King moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration SB 707 at this time on its second reading: SB 707, Relating to the authority of the legislature to determine that certain federal directives are unconstitutional and to prohibit certain government officers and employees from enforcing or assisting in the enforcement of the directive. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 20, Nays 11.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 20 (published)
  • Nay: 11 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses9
For
7
Against
1
On
1
Names

For

  • Self1 registration
  • Self; Gun Owners of America3 registrations
  • Self; Texas Conservative Coalition Research Institute1 registration
  • Self; Texas Values1 registration
  • Texas.net, inc.1 registration

Against

  • Self1 registration

On

  • Self; Texas Constitutional Enforcement1 registration
Sources

9 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · February 26, 2025

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. However, if the legislature were to prohibit certain government officers and employees from enforcing or assisting in the enforcement of a federal directive that the legislature determined to be unconstitutional, there could be an indeterminant fiscal impact related to any federal funding tied to that federal directive.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Jan 6, 2025

04/22/2025 H Referred to State Affairs: Apr 22 2025 3:20PM

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed

Data snapshot Nov 1, 2026 at 2:05 PM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors

House committee · State Affairs · Final status: Died in committee

Senate committee · State Affairs · Committee vote 10 aye, 1 nay · Out of committee

Subjects

Legislature

State Agencies, Boards & Commissions

State Employees

FEDERAL RELATIONS

LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR

SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE

Text

The text as introduced · 701 words

89R2660 TJB-D

By: King
S.B. No. 707

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the authority of the legislature to determine that

certain federal directives are unconstitutional and to prohibit

certain government officers and employees from enforcing or

assisting in the enforcement of the directive.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Subtitle Z, Title 3, Government Code, is amended

by adding Chapter 394 to read as follows:

CHAPTER 394. UNCONSTITUTIONAL FEDERAL DIRECTIVES

Sec. 394.001. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:

(1) "Federal agency" means a department, agency,

authority, commission, council, board, office, bureau, or other

administrative unit of the executive branch of the United States.

(2) "Federal directive" means:

(A) a federal law;

(B) an executive order of the president of the

United States; or

(C) a federal agency rule, policy, order, or

standard.

(3) "Government officer or employee" means:

(A) an elected or appointed officer of this state

or a political subdivision, other than the lieutenant governor or a

member of the legislature;

(B) an employee of this state or a political

subdivision, other than an employee of the lieutenant governor or

of a member of the legislature; or

(C) a member of the governing body of an

open-enrollment charter school or an officer or employee of the

school.

(4) "Political subdivision" means a county,

municipality, school district, junior college district, special

district, or other subdivision of state government.

(5) "Unconstitutional federal directive" means a

federal directive that:

(A) infringes on a power or right reserved to the

state by the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution; or

(B) prohibits or limits the ability of this state

to:

(i) provide for the health, safety, and

welfare of the people of this state; or

(ii) promote the prosperity of the people

of this state.

Sec. 394.002. LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY. (a) The legislature

by concurrent resolution may:

(1) determine that a federal directive is an

unconstitutional federal directive; and

(2) prohibit a government officer or employee from

enforcing or assisting in the enforcement of the unconstitutional

federal directive.

(b) This section does not apply to a federal directive that

activates the state military forces as defined by Section 431.001.

Sec. 394.003. REQUIREMENTS TO FILE RESOLUTION. A member of

the legislature may not file a concurrent resolution described by

this section unless the filing is approved by:

(1) the speaker of the house of representatives, if

the member is a member of the house;

(2) the lieutenant governor, if the member is a member

of the senate; or

(3) the vote of two-thirds of the members present in

the house in which the member seeks to file the resolution.

Sec. 394.004. CONTENTS OF RESOLUTION. The legislature may

not adopt a concurrent resolution described by Section 394.002

unless the resolution:

(1) identifies the federal directive that the

legislature determines is an unconstitutional federal directive;

(2) explains the basis for the legislature's

determination;

(3) specifies whether a government officer or employee

is prohibited from enforcing or assisting in the enforcement of the

directive, including specific activities or forms of assistance

that the officer or employee may not engage in;

(4) specifies the government officers or employees to

whom the concurrent resolution applies, as applicable; and

(5) specifies any other requirement the legislature

considers appropriate to impose on a government officer or employee

in order to comply with the legislature's determination.

Sec. 394.005. REPEAL OF RESOLUTION. The legislature may

repeal a concurrent resolution adopted under this chapter only by

concurrent resolution filed and adopted in the manner prescribed

for the adoption of the resolution being repealed.

Sec. 394.006. LEGISLATIVE INACTION. The fact that the

legislature has not considered whether a federal directive is an

unconstitutional federal directive under this chapter does not:

(1) imply or create a presumption that the directive

is constitutional; or

(2) limit the authority of the attorney general to

challenge the constitutionality of the directive.

SECTION 2. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives

a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as

provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this

Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this

Act takes effect September 1, 2025.