Monitoring the Session

SB 987

criminal courts need no civil process first

Did not pass

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Paul BettencourtRSenate 7

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the subject matter jurisdiction of the criminal trial courts of this state over certain criminal actions.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

One subsection added to Section 571.171 of the Government Code.

This bill adds one subsection to Section 571.171 of the Government Code saying that section does not make people finish civil or administrative processes before a criminal trial court gets jurisdiction over a criminal case. It touches prosecutors, defendants and criminal trial courts handling cases tied to that section. On the ground, a criminal case can go forward in a court that otherwise has jurisdiction without first waiting on an administrative remedy, and this applies to cases already filed as well as new ones.

Labels

Labels: QUICK READ: 131 WORDS. The bill as filed runs 131 words, counting the existing law it amends and the text it strikes. The median 89R bill as filed runs 441 words (derived, 8,702 graded bills, snapshot Oct 19, 2026).GOT HALFWAY. Passed the Senate on Mar 26, 2025. Died in the House: never got out of the State Affairs committee.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB987 · 2025-01-29

SOLD BY

+ 1 coauthor

ITEM

relating to the subject matter jurisdiction of the criminal trial courts of this state over certain criminal actions.

WHAT IT DOES

One subsection added to Section 571.171 of the Government Code.

This bill adds one subsection to Section 571.171 of the Government Code saying that section does not make people finish civil or administrative processes before a criminal trial court gets jurisdiction over a criminal case. It touches prosecutors, defendants and criminal trial courts handling cases tied to that section. On the ground, a criminal case can go forward in a court that otherwise has jurisdiction without first waiting on an administrative remedy, and this applies to cases already filed as well as new ones.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version H · May 23, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to State Affairs
  5. Posting rule suspended
  6. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  7. Considered in public hearing
  8. Testimony taken in committee
  9. Left pending in committee
  10. Co-author authorized
  11. Considered in public hearing
  12. Vote taken in committee
  13. Reported favorably w/o amendments
  14. Committee report printed and distributed
  15. Placed on intent calendar
  16. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  17. Record vote
  18. Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
  19. Record vote
  20. Three day rule suspended
  21. Record vote
  22. Read 3rd time
  23. Passed
  24. Record vote
  25. Reported engrossed
  26. Received from the Senate
  27. Read first time
  28. Referred to State Affairs
  29. Considered in formal meeting
  30. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  31. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  32. Committee report distributed
  33. Committee report sent to Calendars
  34. Considered in Calendars
  35. Placed on General State Calendar
  36. Read 2nd time
  37. Point of order withdrawn Rule 8, Section 1(a)(1)
  38. Recommitted to committee
  39. Considered in formal meeting
  40. Committee substitute considered in committee
  41. Reported favorably as substituted
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

Senate · 28 yea · 3 nay

Sources

Senate: Final passage · Mar 26, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Donors report through Friends of Paul Bettencourt.

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

Votes4

Senate Mar 26, 2025

Yea
28
Nay
3
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 28, Nays 3. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 28 (published)
  • Nay: 3 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Mar 26, 2025

Yea
28
Nay
3
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Bettencourt moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that SB 987 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 28, Nays 3.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 28 (published)
  • Nay: 3 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Mar 26, 2025

Yea
28
Nay
3
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read second time and was passed to engrossment by the following vote: Yeas 28, Nays 3. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 28 (published)
  • Nay: 3 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Mar 26, 2025

Yea
28
Nay
3
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Bettencourt moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration SB 987 at this time on its second reading: SB 987, Relating to the subject matter jurisdiction of the criminal trial courts of this state over certain criminal actions. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 28, Nays 3.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 28 (published)
  • Nay: 3 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses7
For
6
Against
0
On
1
Names

For

  • Dallas County Criminal District Attorney John Creuzot1 registration
  • Fort Bend County District Attorney1 registration
  • Self4 registrations

On

  • Office of State Prosecuting Attorney1 registration
Sources

7 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version H · May 23, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Jan 29, 2025

05/23/2025 H Reported favorably as substituted

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors

House committee · State Affairs · Committee vote 13 aye, 0 nay, 2 absent · Final status: Did not pass

Senate committee · State Affairs · Committee vote 11 aye, 0 nay · Out of committee

Companion

SB 873 by Birdwell (duplicate)

Subjects

Courts--Prosecuting Attorneys

Criminal Procedure--General

Criminal Procedure--Trial

Elections--General

Text

The text as introduced · 131 words

89R4340 CJD-D

By: Bettencourt
S.B. No. 987

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the subject matter jurisdiction of the criminal trial

courts of this state over certain criminal actions.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 571.171, Government Code, is amended by

adding Subsection (d) to read as follows:

(d) This section does not require the exhaustion of civil,

including administrative, remedies as a prerequisite to the vesting

in a trial court of subject matter jurisdiction over a criminal

action for which the trial court would otherwise have jurisdiction

under other law.

SECTION 2. This Act applies to a criminal action commenced

before, on, or after the effective date of this Act.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.