Monitoring the Session

HB 117

Olcott Bill Bans Taxpayer-Funded Lobbying, Except For Sheriffs’ Groups

Filed

Verdict: Smells

SmellsReviewed
Rep. Mike OlcottRHouse 60
Why it's charged
Carve-out

THE TEXT

“Subsection (a) does not apply to an association or organization that solely represents elected sheriffs or individual law enforcement officers.”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

One class of association, sheriffs' and police officers' groups, is exempted from a lobbying-spending ban that reads as general policy for all political subdivisions. The main case of cities and counties hiring lobbyists stays covered, so this is a favor to one group rather than a hole in the ban.

Carve-out

On Nov 10, 2026 the editor checked this charge against the bill text and certified it as Smells.

Reviewed · Nov 10, 2026 · How we grade

Caption

relating to the use by a political subdivision of public funds for lobbying activities.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Cities and counties can’t pay lobbyists. Groups that “solely represents elected sheriffs” still can.

The bill bars cities, counties and other local governments from spending public money to hire registered lobbyists to lobby legislators, or to pay member associations that hire registered lobbyists. It touches local governments and their statewide associations, but it exempts groups that only represent elected sheriffs or individual law enforcement officers and still lets local officials, employees and association staff testify, share information and track bills. Taxpayers or residents can sue to stop banned spending and recover attorney's fees, existing contract terms for banned payments become void on September 1, 2027, and the old county-association rule against influencing legislation is rewritten to fit the new ban.

Labels

Labels: DO-OVER. Reworked text of a bill filed before that died: 89R HB 3257 (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R and 89R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 89R and 90R. Checked against 88R and 89R only.

Receipt

The receipt

90R-HB117 · 2026-11-09

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the use by a political subdivision of public funds for lobbying activities.

WHAT IT DOES

Cities and counties can’t pay lobbyists. Groups that “solely represents elected sheriffs” still can.

The bill bars cities, counties and other local governments from spending public money to hire registered lobbyists to lobby legislators, or to pay member associations that hire registered lobbyists. It touches local governments and their statewide associations, but it exempts groups that only represent elected sheriffs or individual law enforcement officers and still lets local officials, employees and association staff testify, share information and track bills. Taxpayers or residents can sue to stop banned spending and recover attorney's fees, existing contract terms for banned payments become void on September 1, 2027, and the old county-association rule against influencing legislation is rewritten to fit the new ban.

CHARGES

[x] CARVE-OUTanalysis confidence 60%

THE TEXT

“Subsection (a) does not apply to an association or organization that solely represents elected sheriffs or individual law enforcement officers.”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

One class of association, sheriffs' and police officers' groups, is exempted from a lobbying-spending ban that reads as general policy for all political subdivisions. The main case of cities and counties hiring lobbyists stays covered, so this is a favor to one group rather than a hole in the ban.

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Darlene Pendery$300,000Guy and Helen Mabee$100,800Guy Mabee$50,000

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Darlene Pendery$300,000.00
Guy and Helen Mabee$100,800.00
Guy Mabee$50,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by a super-expensive superintelligence, Nov 9, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 89R and now. Checked against 88R and 89R only.

89R HB 3257

by Rep. Olcott, same lead author · Died in committee · reworked

Introduced text

Last action, Mar 20, 2025: Referred to State Affairs

Relating to the use by a political subdivision of public funds for lobbying and certain other activities.

Caption, 89R bill history

Sources

Texas House · Filed Nov 9, 2026

11/09/2026 H Filed

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Nov 10, 2026 at 7:47 AM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Subjects

Ethics

Political Subdivisions

LOBBYISTS & LOBBYING

Text

The text as introduced · 921 words

90R2410 CJD-F

By: Olcott
H.B. No. 117

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the use by a political subdivision of public funds for

lobbying activities.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 556, Government Code, is amended by

adding Section 556.0056 to read as follows:

Sec. 556.0056. RESTRICTION ON USE OF PUBLIC FUNDS BY

POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS FOR LOBBYING ACTIVITIES. (a) A political

subdivision may not spend public funds:

(1) to hire or contract with an individual required to

register as a lobbyist under Chapter 305 for the purpose of lobbying

a member of the legislature; or

(2) to pay a nonprofit association or organization

that:

(A) primarily represents political subdivisions;

and

(B) hires or contracts with an individual

required to register as a lobbyist under Chapter 305.

(b) Subsection (a) does not apply to an association or

organization that solely represents elected sheriffs or individual

law enforcement officers.

(c) Subsection (a) does not prohibit:

(1) an officer or employee of a political subdivision

from providing information for a member of the legislature or

appearing before a legislative committee;

(2) an elected officer of a political subdivision from

advocating for or against or otherwise influencing or attempting to

influence the outcome of legislation pending before the legislature

while acting as an officer of the political subdivision;

(3) an employee of a political subdivision from

advocating for or against or otherwise influencing or attempting to

influence the outcome of legislation pending before the legislature

if those actions would not require a person to register as a

lobbyist under Chapter 305;

(4) a political subdivision from reimbursing an

officer or full-time employee of the political subdivision for

direct travel expenses incurred by the officer or employee for

engaging in an activity described by Subdivision (1), (2), or (3);

or

(5) a full-time employee of a nonprofit association or

organization that primarily represents political subdivisions

from:

(A) providing legislative services related to

bill tracking, bill analysis, and legislative alerts;

(B) communicating directly with a member of the

legislature to provide information if the communication would not

require a person to register as a lobbyist under Chapter 305; or

(C) testifying for or against legislation before

the legislature.

(d) If a political subdivision engages in an activity

prohibited by Subsection (a), a taxpayer or resident of the

political subdivision is entitled to appropriate injunctive relief

to prevent further activity prohibited by that subsection and

further payment of public funds related to that activity.

(e) A taxpayer or resident who prevails in an action under

Subsection (d) is entitled to recover from the political

subdivision the taxpayer's or resident's reasonable attorney's fees

and costs incurred in bringing the action.

SECTION 2. Section 89.002, Local Government Code, is

amended to read as follows:

Sec. 89.002. STATE ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES. (a) Except as

provided by Section 556.0056, Government Code, the [ The ]

commissioners court may spend, in the name of the county, money from

the county's general fund for membership fees and dues of a

nonprofit state association of counties if:

(1) a majority of the court votes to approve

membership in the association;

(2) the association exists for the betterment of

county government and the benefit of all county officials;

(3) the association is not affiliated with a labor

organization; and

(4) [ neither the association nor an employee of the

association directly or indirectly influences or attempts to

influence the outcome of any legislation pending before the

legislature, except that this subdivision does not prevent a person

from providing information for a member of the legislature or

appearing before a legislative committee at the request of the

committee or the member of the legislature; and

[ (5) ] neither the association nor an employee of the

association directly or indirectly contributes any money,

services, or other valuable thing to a political campaign or

endorses a candidate or group of candidates for public office.

(b) If any association or organization supported wholly or

partly by payments of tax receipts from political subdivisions

engages in an activity described by Subsection (a)(4) [ or (5) ], a

taxpayer of a political subdivision that pays fees or dues to the

association or organization is entitled to appropriate injunctive

relief to prevent any further activity described by Subsection

(a)(4) [ or (5) ] or any further payments of fees or dues.

SECTION 3. Section 556.0056, Government Code, as added by

this Act, applies only to an expenditure or payment of public funds

by a political subdivision that is made on or after the effective

date of this Act, including an expenditure or payment of public

funds by a political subdivision that is made under a contract

entered into before, on, or after the effective date of this Act. A

contract term providing for an expenditure or payment prohibited by

Section 556.0056, Government Code, as added by this Act, is void on

the effective date of this Act.

SECTION 4. Section 89.002, Local Government Code, as

amended by this Act, applies only to the spending of money by a

county from the county's general fund that occurs on or after the

effective date of this Act. The spending of money by a county from

the county's general fund that occurs before the effective date of

this Act is governed by the law as it existed immediately before the

effective date of this Act, and that law is continued in effect for

that purpose.

SECTION 5. This Act takes effect September 1, 2027.