HB 410
Masked Officer Bill Strips Immunity, Sets $10,000 Minimum Damages
Filed
Verdict: Smells
Both charges, and why
The hole
THE TEXT
“It is a defense to prosecution under this section that the officer wore the facial covering in a manner that complied with a policy of the employing law enforcement agency adopted under Article 2B.0352, Code of Criminal Procedure.”
Bill text, introduced version (I)
Each agency writes its own policy, and that policy is presumed compliant and stays in effect until someone challenges it and wins in court. An officer who follows a loose agency policy has a defense even when the mask falls outside the bill's listed exceptions.
The holeCaption mismatch
THE TEXT
“A peace officer may not assert official immunity as a defense to an action subject to this chapter.”
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The caption mentions face coverings and a new offense, but not the new civil lawsuit section. That section strips official immunity and sets $10,000 minimum damages. The broad caption arguably covers it, so this is a weak mismatch.
Caption mismatchInitial review · graded Nov 9, 2026 · How we grade
Caption
relating to the use of facial coverings in law enforcement; creating a criminal offense.
Caption from analyzed text · version I.
Summary
Caption: facial coverings. Bill: no official immunity if sued while masked. Agency policy still offers a defense.
The bill makes it a Class C misdemeanor offense for Texas peace officers, out-of-state officers, federal officers, and people acting for them to knowingly wear a mask or similar face covering on duty, with exceptions such as undercover work, tactical operations, SWAT duty, and court appearances. Every Texas law enforcement agency must post a policy limiting on-duty face coverings by December 1, 2027, and members of the public can challenge that policy and then go to court. Officers sued for assault, false arrest, or similar claims while masked in violation of the new law lose official immunity and face at least $10,000 in damages, starting in 2028.
Labels
Labels: CREATES AN OFFENSE. The caption of the graded version (introduced) reads: “relating to the use of facial coverings in law enforcement; creating a criminal offense.”
Receipt
The receipt
90R-HB410 · 2026-11-09
SOLD BY
ITEM
relating to the use of facial coverings in law enforcement; creating a criminal offense.
WHAT IT DOES
Caption: facial coverings. Bill: no official immunity if sued while masked. Agency policy still offers a defense.
The bill makes it a Class C misdemeanor offense for Texas peace officers, out-of-state officers, federal officers, and people acting for them to knowingly wear a mask or similar face covering on duty, with exceptions such as undercover work, tactical operations, SWAT duty, and court appearances. Every Texas law enforcement agency must post a policy limiting on-duty face coverings by December 1, 2027, and members of the public can challenge that policy and then go to court. Officers sued for assault, false arrest, or similar claims while masked in violation of the new law lose official immunity and face at least $10,000 in damages, starting in 2028.
CHARGES
[x] THE HOLEanalysis confidence 50%
THE TEXT
“It is a defense to prosecution under this section that the officer wore the facial covering in a manner that complied with a policy of the employing law enforcement agency adopted under Article 2B.0352, Code of Criminal Procedure.”
Bill text, introduced version (I)
Each agency writes its own policy, and that policy is presumed compliant and stays in effect until someone challenges it and wins in court. An officer who follows a loose agency policy has a defense even when the mask falls outside the bill's listed exceptions.
[x] CAPTION MISMATCHanalysis confidence 40%
THE TEXT
“A peace officer may not assert official immunity as a defense to an action subject to this chapter.”
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The caption mentions face coverings and a new offense, but not the new civil lawsuit section. That section strips official immunity and sets $10,000 minimum damages. The broad caption arguably covers it, so this is a weak mismatch.
TOTAL
No fiscal note in the loaded record.
HISTORY
- Filed
FILED UNDER
THE TEXT
…“a prevailing claimant is entitled to recover the greater of: (1) actual damages; or (2) statutory damages in the amount of $10,000.”
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The bill creates a lawsuit path against masked officers that bars official immunity and guarantees at least $10,000 to a winning claimant.
THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
Donors
Not tied to this bill.
Sources
The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.
Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$101,077.16
Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC
$101,077.16
- Cash
- $80,000.00
- Paid by others
- $21,077.16
- Total
- $101,077.16
Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Oct 1, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100983216, 101059340, 101067651, 101071574.
Legacy 44$100,000.00
Legacy 44
$100,000.00
- Cash
- $30,000.00
- Paid by others
- $70,000.00
- Total
- $100,000.00
Also funds 33 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Oct 21, 2024 to Oct 20, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Oct 29, 2024 to Sep 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100983216, 101067651.
Texas REALTORS Political Action Committee$56,517.22
Texas REALTORS Political Action Committee
$56,517.22
- Cash
- $37,500.00
- Paid by others
- $19,017.22
- Total
- $56,517.22
Also funds 140 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 2, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Nov 2, 2024 to Sep 2, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100983216, 101031005, 101067651.
Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.
Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC
$101,077.16
- Cash
- $80,000.00
- Paid by others
- $21,077.16
- Total
- $101,077.16
Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Oct 1, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100983216, 101059340, 101067651, 101071574.
Legacy 44
$100,000.00
- Cash
- $30,000.00
- Paid by others
- $70,000.00
- Total
- $100,000.00
Also funds 33 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Oct 21, 2024 to Oct 20, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Oct 29, 2024 to Sep 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100983216, 101067651.
Texas REALTORS Political Action Committee
$56,517.22
- Cash
- $37,500.00
- Paid by others
- $19,017.22
- Total
- $56,517.22
Also funds 140 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 2, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Nov 2, 2024 to Sep 2, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100983216, 101031005, 101067651.
Votes
No floor vote loaded for this bill.
Fiscal
No fiscal note in the loaded record.
How this was graded
Analysis of text version I by a super-expensive superintelligence, Nov 9, 2026, against the published rubric.
Sources
Texas House · Filed Nov 9, 2026
11/09/2026 H Filed
Texas Legislature Online · Introduced
Data snapshot Nov 10, 2026 at 2:33 AM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.
Subjects
Law Enforcement
Occupational Regulation--Other Trades & Professions
Text
The text as introduced · 1,230 words
90R320 JDK-D By: Morales of Maverick H.B. No. 410 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to the use of facial coverings in law enforcement; creating a criminal offense. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. The legislature finds that: (1) the visibility of a law enforcement officer's face is vital for promoting transparency, facilitating communication, and building trust between law enforcement agencies and the communities they serve; (2) when law enforcement officers are not readily identifiable, the risk of impersonation by an unauthorized individual is increased, which undermines public trust, endangers public safety, and hinders legitimate law enforcement operations; and (3) the use of facial coverings by law enforcement officers should not obscure an officer's identity, hinder accountability, or enable or conceal discriminatory or unlawful conduct. SECTION 2. Chapter 2B, Code of Criminal Procedure, is amended by adding Subchapter H to read as follows: SUBCHAPTER H. FACIAL COVERINGS Art. 2B.0351. DEFINITION. In this subchapter, "facial covering" has the meaning assigned by Section 39.08, Penal Code. Art. 2B.0352. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY POLICY ON FACIAL COVERING. (a) Each law enforcement agency shall adopt and post on the agency's Internet website a policy limiting the use of a facial covering in the performance of a peace officer's duties. The policy must: (1) include a purpose statement affirming the agency's commitment to: (A) transparency, accountability, and public trust; (B) restricting the use of facial coverings to specific, clearly defined, and limited circumstances; and (C) the principle that generalized and undifferentiated fear or apprehension regarding peace officer safety is insufficient to justify the use of a facial covering; (2) prohibit a peace officer from using a facial covering in the performance of the officer's duties unless the officer is wearing the covering for a purpose described by Section 39.08(d), Penal Code; and (3) prohibit a peace officer's supervisor from knowingly permitting the officer to violate the policy or any other law or regulation limiting the use of a facial covering. (b) A policy adopted by a law enforcement agency under this article is presumed to comply with the requirements of this article unless a member of the public or a political subdivision in which the law enforcement agency operates submits a written challenge to the policy's compliance to the head of the agency and the challenge is determined to be accurate by the head of the agency. (c) A law enforcement agency shall amend a policy adopted under this article to comply with the requirements of this article not later than the 90th day after the date the agency receives a written challenge under Subsection (b) that is determined to be accurate. (d) If a complainant determines that a law enforcement agency has failed to adequately address the complainant's written challenge within the time period required by Subsection (c), the complainant may seek a writ of mandamus from a court of competent jurisdiction. A policy that has been challenged under this article remains in effect until a court enters a writ of mandamus ordering the agency to amend the policy to comply with the requirements of this article. SECTION 3. Chapter 39, Penal Code, is amended by adding Section 39.08 to read as follows: Sec. 39.08. UNLAWFUL USE OF FACIAL COVERING BY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER. (a) In this section, "facial covering" means a mask, helmet, or other similar accessory that, when worn on or about the wearer's face or head, substantially increases the difficulty of identifying the wearer, including a balaclava, tactical mask, gaiter, or ski mask. The term does not include: (1) a translucent face shield or clear mask that does not conceal the wearer's identity; (2) a respirator or surgical mask used to protect against the transmission of disease or infection; (3) a gas mask or other breathing apparatus necessary to protect the wearer from a toxin, a gas, smoke, or other hazardous environmental condition; (4) a mask, helmet, or device necessary for underwater respiration, including scuba diving equipment; or (5) eyewear necessary to protect from the use of retinal weapons, including a laser. (b) A peace officer, a law enforcement officer of another state or the federal government, or a person acting on behalf of a law enforcement officer of another state or the federal government commits an offense if the officer or person knowingly wears a facial covering in the performance of the officer's or person's duties. (c) An offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor. (d) It is an exception to the application of this section that the officer or person, as applicable, wore the facial covering for purposes of: (1) participating in an active undercover operation or assignment authorized by the law enforcement agency that employs the officer; (2) participating in a tactical operation during which protective gear is required for physical safety; (3) the performance of a duty of the special weapons and tactics team unit, if the officer is assigned to the unit; (4) compliance with an applicable occupational health and safety law or regulation; (5) the safe operation of a motorcycle or other vehicle operated by the officer or person in the performance of the officer's or person's duties; (6) protecting the officer's identity during a court proceeding; or (7) compliance with a reasonable accommodation that enables the officer to perform an essential element of the officer's job. (e) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that the officer wore the facial covering in a manner that complied with a policy of the employing law enforcement agency adopted under Article 2B.0352, Code of Criminal Procedure. SECTION 4. Title 5, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, is amended by adding Chapter 108A to read as follows: CHAPTER 108A. PEACE OFFICER LIABILITY ARISING FROM USE OF FACIAL COVERING Sec. 108A.001. DEFINITION. In this chapter, "peace officer" has the meaning assigned by Section 1.07, Penal Code, and includes a law enforcement officer of another state or the federal government, or a person acting on behalf of a law enforcement officer of another state or the federal government. Sec. 108A.002. APPLICABILITY OF CHAPTER. This chapter applies only to an action: (1) brought against a peace officer arising from the officer's conduct while the officer was wearing a facial covering in violation of Section 39.08, Penal Code; and (2) that alleges one of the following causes of action: (A) assault; (B) battery; (C) false imprisonment; (D) false arrest; (E) abuse of process; or (F) malicious prosecution. Sec. 108A.003. PROHIBITED DEFENSE. A peace officer may not assert official immunity as a defense to an action subject to this chapter. Sec. 108A.004. MINIMUM DAMAGES. Notwithstanding any other law, in an action subject to this chapter, a prevailing claimant is entitled to recover the greater of: (1) actual damages; or (2) statutory damages in the amount of $10,000. SECTION 5. Not later than December 1, 2027, each law enforcement agency in this state shall adopt the policy required by Article 2B.0352, Code of Criminal Procedure, as added by this Act. SECTION 6. Chapter 108A, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, as added by this Act, applies only to a cause of action that accrues on or after January 1, 2028. SECTION 7. (a) Except as provided by Subsection (b) of this section, this Act takes effect September 1, 2027. (b) Section 39.08, Penal Code, as added by this Act, takes effect January 1, 2028.