HB 459
Bucy Bill Limits Using Defendants’ Songs And Poems As Evidence
Filed
Verdict: No flags
Initial review · graded Nov 9, 2026 · How we grade
Caption
relating to the admissibility of a defendant's work of creative expression in a criminal trial.
Caption from analyzed text · version I.
Summary
Prosecutors need a hearing first. The judge must find the work was meant literally.
This bill limits when prosecutors can use a defendant's own songs, poems, art, film or other creative work as evidence against them in a criminal trial. It touches criminal defendants, prosecutors and judges in every Texas criminal case. Starting September 1, 2027, the state must give notice and win a hearing outside the jury's presence, where the judge must find that the work was meant literally, closely matches the alleged offense, bears on a disputed fact, and is more useful as proof than unfairly prejudicial.
Receipt
The receipt
90R-HB459 · 2026-11-09
SOLD BY
ITEM
relating to the admissibility of a defendant's work of creative expression in a criminal trial.
WHAT IT DOES
Prosecutors need a hearing first. The judge must find the work was meant literally.
This bill limits when prosecutors can use a defendant's own songs, poems, art, film or other creative work as evidence against them in a criminal trial. It touches criminal defendants, prosecutors and judges in every Texas criminal case. Starting September 1, 2027, the state must give notice and win a hearing outside the jury's presence, where the judge must find that the work was meant literally, closely matches the alleged offense, bears on a disputed fact, and is more useful as proof than unfairly prejudicial.
CHARGES
[ ] NONE FOUND
TOTAL
No fiscal note in the loaded record.
HISTORY
- Filed
FILED UNDER
No verified beat found.
THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
Donors
Not tied to this bill.
Sources
The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.
Derived itemized flow · Oct 28, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Agave Democratic Infrastructure Fund$56,000.00
Agave Democratic Infrastructure Fund
$56,000.00
- Cash
- $25,000.00
- Paid by others
- $31,000.00
- Total
- $56,000.00
Also funds 5 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Nov 22, 2024 to Oct 12, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
Sources
Derived itemized flow · Nov 22, 2024 to Oct 12, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100986907, 101059773, 101069326, 101072293.
Texas Sands PAC$17,000.00
Texas Sands PAC
$17,000.00
- Cash
- $17,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $17,000.00
Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Dec 9, 2024 to Sep 29, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100986907, 101032801, 101059773, 101072293.
Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.
Agave Democratic Infrastructure Fund
$56,000.00
- Cash
- $25,000.00
- Paid by others
- $31,000.00
- Total
- $56,000.00
Also funds 5 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Nov 22, 2024 to Oct 12, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
Sources
Derived itemized flow · Nov 22, 2024 to Oct 12, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100986907, 101059773, 101069326, 101072293.
Texas Sands PAC
$17,000.00
- Cash
- $17,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $17,000.00
Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Dec 9, 2024 to Sep 29, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100986907, 101032801, 101059773, 101072293.
Votes
No floor vote loaded for this bill.
Fiscal
No fiscal note in the loaded record.
How this was graded
Analysis of text version I by a super-expensive superintelligence, Nov 9, 2026, against the published rubric.
Sources
Texas House · Filed Nov 9, 2026
11/09/2026 H Filed
Texas Legislature Online · Introduced
Data snapshot Nov 10, 2026 at 2:33 AM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.
Subjects
Arts & Humanities
Criminal Procedure--General
Text
The text as introduced · 386 words
90R2593 AJZ-D By: Bucy H.B. No. 459 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to the admissibility of a defendant's work of creative expression in a criminal trial. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. Chapter 38, Code of Criminal Procedure, is amended by adding Article 38.52 to read as follows: Art. 38.52. ADMISSIBILITY OF DEFENDANT'S WORK OF CREATIVE EXPRESSION. (a) In this article, "work of creative expression" means an expression or application of creativity or imagination in the production or arrangement of forms, sounds, words, movements, or symbols that is eligible for federal copyright protection under 17 U.S.C. Section 102. The term includes music, dance, performance art, visual art, poetry, literature, and film. (b) A defendant's work of creative expression is not admissible against the defendant in a criminal trial, whether offered in the guilt or innocence phase or the punishment phase of the trial, unless: (1) the attorney representing the state notifies the defendant of the state's intention to offer the work of creative expression as evidence in the trial; and (2) in a hearing conducted outside the presence of the jury, the judge finds by a preponderance of the evidence that: (A) the substance of the defendant's work of creative expression: (i) was intended literally rather than figuratively or fictionally or, if the work is derivative, was intended as the defendant's own creative expression based on the literal part of the work; (ii) was created near in time to or closely matches the facts of the alleged offense; and (iii) relates to a disputed factual issue about the alleged offense or includes factual detail not otherwise publicly available; and (B) the probative value of the defendant's work of creative expression substantially outweighs the danger of unfair prejudice. SECTION 2. The change in law made by this Act applies to the admissibility of a work of creative expression in a criminal proceeding that commences on or after the effective date of this Act. The admissibility of a work of creative expression in a criminal proceeding that commences before the effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect on the date the proceeding commenced, and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose. SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2027.