Monitoring the Session

HB 459

Bucy Bill Limits Using Defendants’ Songs And Poems As Evidence

Filed

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. John H. Bucy IIIDHouse 136

Initial review · graded Nov 9, 2026 · How we grade

Caption

relating to the admissibility of a defendant's work of creative expression in a criminal trial.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Prosecutors need a hearing first. The judge must find the work was meant literally.

This bill limits when prosecutors can use a defendant's own songs, poems, art, film or other creative work as evidence against them in a criminal trial. It touches criminal defendants, prosecutors and judges in every Texas criminal case. Starting September 1, 2027, the state must give notice and win a hearing outside the jury's presence, where the judge must find that the work was meant literally, closely matches the alleged offense, bears on a disputed fact, and is more useful as proof than unfairly prejudicial.

Receipt

The receipt

90R-HB459 · 2026-11-09

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the admissibility of a defendant's work of creative expression in a criminal trial.

WHAT IT DOES

Prosecutors need a hearing first. The judge must find the work was meant literally.

This bill limits when prosecutors can use a defendant's own songs, poems, art, film or other creative work as evidence against them in a criminal trial. It touches criminal defendants, prosecutors and judges in every Texas criminal case. Starting September 1, 2027, the state must give notice and win a hearing outside the jury's presence, where the judge must find that the work was meant literally, closely matches the alleged offense, bears on a disputed fact, and is more useful as proof than unfairly prejudicial.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 28, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Agave Democratic Infrastructure Fund$56,000.00

Agave Democratic Infrastructure Fund

$56,000.00

Cash
$25,000.00
Paid by others
$31,000.00
Total
$56,000.00
consulting $31,000.00

Also funds 5 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Nov 22, 2024 to Oct 12, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 22, 2024 to Oct 12, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100986907, 101059773, 101069326, 101072293.

Adam Loewy$20,000.00
Texas Sands PAC$17,000.00

Texas Sands PAC

$17,000.00

Cash
$17,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$17,000.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 9, 2024 to Sep 29, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100986907, 101032801, 101059773, 101072293.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Agave Democratic Infrastructure Fund

$56,000.00

Cash
$25,000.00
Paid by others
$31,000.00
Total
$56,000.00
consulting $31,000.00

Also funds 5 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Nov 22, 2024 to Oct 12, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 22, 2024 to Oct 12, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100986907, 101059773, 101069326, 101072293.

×

Texas Sands PAC

$17,000.00

Cash
$17,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$17,000.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 9, 2024 to Sep 29, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100986907, 101032801, 101059773, 101072293.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by a super-expensive superintelligence, Nov 9, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas House · Filed Nov 9, 2026

11/09/2026 H Filed

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Nov 10, 2026 at 2:33 AM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Subjects

Arts & Humanities

Criminal Procedure--General

Text

The text as introduced · 386 words

90R2593 AJZ-D

By: Bucy
H.B. No. 459

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the admissibility of a defendant's work of creative

expression in a criminal trial.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 38, Code of Criminal Procedure, is

amended by adding Article 38.52 to read as follows:

Art. 38.52. ADMISSIBILITY OF DEFENDANT'S WORK OF CREATIVE

EXPRESSION. (a) In this article, "work of creative expression"

means an expression or application of creativity or imagination in

the production or arrangement of forms, sounds, words, movements,

or symbols that is eligible for federal copyright protection under

17 U.S.C. Section 102. The term includes music, dance, performance

art, visual art, poetry, literature, and film.

(b) A defendant's work of creative expression is not

admissible against the defendant in a criminal trial, whether

offered in the guilt or innocence phase or the punishment phase of

the trial, unless:

(1) the attorney representing the state notifies the

defendant of the state's intention to offer the work of creative

expression as evidence in the trial; and

(2) in a hearing conducted outside the presence of the

jury, the judge finds by a preponderance of the evidence that:

(A) the substance of the defendant's work of

creative expression:

(i) was intended literally rather than

figuratively or fictionally or, if the work is derivative, was

intended as the defendant's own creative expression based on the

literal part of the work;

(ii) was created near in time to or closely

matches the facts of the alleged offense; and

(iii) relates to a disputed factual issue

about the alleged offense or includes factual detail not otherwise

publicly available; and

(B) the probative value of the defendant's work

of creative expression substantially outweighs the danger of unfair

prejudice.

SECTION 2. The change in law made by this Act applies to the

admissibility of a work of creative expression in a criminal

proceeding that commences on or after the effective date of this

Act. The admissibility of a work of creative expression in a

criminal proceeding that commences before the effective date of

this Act is governed by the law in effect on the date the proceeding

commenced, and the former law is continued in effect for that

purpose.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2027.