HB 478
Garcia Bill Makes 250-Bed Custodial Facilities Prove Fire, Ambulance Capacity
Filed
Verdict: No flags
Initial review · graded Nov 9, 2026 · How we grade
Caption
relating to local governmental review of emergency services capacity assessments for large custodial facilities.
Caption from analyzed text · version I.
Summary
Holding 250 or more people? Local fire and ambulance must sign off before opening or expanding.
The bill makes every city and county set up a process requiring anyone who wants to open or substantially expand a facility holding 250 or more people in custody or under supervision to first get an emergency services capacity assessment from the local fire and ambulance provider. It touches operators of large custodial facilities, plus the cities, counties and emergency services districts that provide fire protection and emergency medical care to them. The facility cannot open or grow unless the local provider finds enough fire and ambulance capacity, or the operator signs and follows a deal to fix the gaps, and cities and counties can sue to enforce this starting January 1, 2028.
Receipt
The receipt
90R-HB478 · 2026-11-09
SOLD BY
ITEM
relating to local governmental review of emergency services capacity assessments for large custodial facilities.
WHAT IT DOES
Holding 250 or more people? Local fire and ambulance must sign off before opening or expanding.
The bill makes every city and county set up a process requiring anyone who wants to open or substantially expand a facility holding 250 or more people in custody or under supervision to first get an emergency services capacity assessment from the local fire and ambulance provider. It touches operators of large custodial facilities, plus the cities, counties and emergency services districts that provide fire protection and emergency medical care to them. The facility cannot open or grow unless the local provider finds enough fire and ambulance capacity, or the operator signs and follows a deal to fix the gaps, and cities and counties can sue to enforce this starting January 1, 2028.
CHARGES
[ ] NONE FOUND
TOTAL
No fiscal note in the loaded record.
HISTORY
- Filed
FILED UNDER
No verified beat found.
THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
Donors
Not tied to this bill.
Sources
The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.
Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Oct 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$11,500.00
Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC
$11,500.00
- Cash
- $11,500.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $11,500.00
Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Dec 5, 2024 to Sep 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100978474, 101016612, 101060352, 101067943.
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$10,000.00
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC
$10,000.00
- Cash
- $10,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $10,000.00
Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · on Dec 14, 2024. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100978474.
House Democratic Campaign Committee$7,000.00
House Democratic Campaign Committee
$7,000.00
- Cash
- $7,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $7,000.00
Also funds 9 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · on Apr 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101060352.
Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.
Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC
$11,500.00
- Cash
- $11,500.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $11,500.00
Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Dec 5, 2024 to Sep 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100978474, 101016612, 101060352, 101067943.
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC
$10,000.00
- Cash
- $10,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $10,000.00
Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · on Dec 14, 2024. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100978474.
House Democratic Campaign Committee
$7,000.00
- Cash
- $7,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $7,000.00
Also funds 9 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · on Apr 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101060352.
Votes
No floor vote loaded for this bill.
Fiscal
No fiscal note in the loaded record.
How this was graded
Analysis of text version I by a super-expensive superintelligence, Nov 9, 2026, against the published rubric.
Sources
Texas House · Filed Nov 9, 2026
11/09/2026 H Filed
Texas Legislature Online · Introduced
Data snapshot Nov 10, 2026 at 2:34 AM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.
Subjects
City Government--Land Use & Zoning
County Government--Land Use & Zoning
Health--Emergency Services & Personnel
Text
The text as introduced · 805 words
90R4052 DNC-D By: Garcia of Bexar H.B. No. 478 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to local governmental review of emergency services capacity assessments for large custodial facilities. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. Subtitle C, Title 11, Local Government Code, is amended by adding Chapter 366 to read as follows: CHAPTER 366. EMERGENCY SERVICES CAPACITY ASSESSMENT FOR LARGE CUSTODIAL FACILITIES Sec. 366.001. DEFINITION. In this chapter, "large custodial facility" means a facility designed or used to confine, detain, house under secure custody, or otherwise maintain continuous physical custody or supervision of 250 or more individuals. Sec. 366.002. PROCEDURES FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES CAPACITY ASSESSMENT AND DETERMINATION. (a) The governing body of a municipality for an area located in the municipality and the commissioners court of a county for an area located in the unincorporated area of the county shall establish a procedure to require a person who proposes to operate or substantially expand a large custodial facility in the area to obtain an emergency services capacity assessment from the municipality, county, emergency services district, or other local governmental entity primarily responsible for providing fire protection and emergency medical services to the facility. (b) A procedure established under this section must: (1) require an assessment to include the information described by Section 366.003; (2) require the local governmental entity performing the assessment to: (A) determine, based on objective criteria, whether sufficient emergency services capacity exists to serve the facility; and (B) identify specific deficiencies that support a determination that sufficient capacity does not exist; (3) provide for public notice; (4) provide deadlines that provide sufficient time for an operator to submit and the local governmental entity to review information necessary to complete the assessment; (5) include a procedure to resolve a dispute over a local governmental entity's determination of whether sufficient capacity exists; (6) exempt a temporary facility established in connection with a declared disaster; (7) prohibit a person proposing to operate or substantially expand a large custodial facility from evading the assessment requirement under this chapter by opening a facility in stages, characterizing construction as expansion of an existing facility, changing the operator of a facility, or incrementally increasing the capacity of a facility; (8) specify the appropriate local governmental entity that has the authority to review the emergency services capacity assessment for: (A) fire protection services; and (B) emergency medical services; and (9) require review by only one local governmental entity for fire protection services and only one local governmental entity for emergency medical services. Sec. 366.003. CONTENTS OF EMERGENCY SERVICES CAPACITY ASSESSMENT. An emergency services capacity assessment required under Section 366.002 must consider: (1) projected fire protection and emergency medical services call volume; (2) anticipated ambulance and emergency transport demand; (3) anticipated effects on emergency response times; (4) required staffing levels and emergency response apparatus; (5) fire suppression and rescue capacity; (6) emergency access and evacuation requirements; (7) hazardous materials and mass casualty response capabilities; (8) anticipated reliance on mutual aid agreements; and (9) additional personnel, equipment, facilities, infrastructure, or other resources reasonably necessary to adequately serve the large custodial facility that is the subject of the assessment. Sec. 366.004. REQUIREMENTS TO OPERATE OR EXPAND FACILITY. (a) A person may not operate or substantially expand a large custodial facility unless: (1) the appropriate local governmental entity determines under an emergency services capacity assessment required under Section 366.002 that sufficient emergency services capacity exists to serve the facility; or (2) the person enters into and complies with an agreement to mitigate the identified deficiency in emergency services capacity in accordance with Section 366.005. (b) This chapter does not authorize a municipality or county to prohibit a person from operating or substantially expanding a large custodial facility if the person satisfies Subsection (a). Sec. 366.005. MITIGATION AGREEMENT. A mitigation agreement described by Section 366.004 must: (1) identify the specific deficiencies in emergency services capacity that the agreement addresses; (2) include an enforcement mechanism; and (3) provide for: (A) options for funding additional personnel or facilities attributable to the facility's impact; (B) dedicated on-site emergency response capabilities; (C) options for contracting supplemental fire protection or emergency medical services; (D) construction necessary for emergency-access infrastructure; (E) participation in mutually agreed upon capital improvements; or (F) other measures that adequately address the identified deficiencies. Sec. 366.006. ENFORCEMENT. A municipality or county may bring an action against a person who violates this chapter for appropriate equitable relief. SECTION 2. (a) Not later than December 1, 2027, each municipality and county shall establish procedures to implement Chapter 366, Local Government Code, as added by this Act. (b) Notwithstanding Chapter 366, Local Government Code, as added by this Act, a person is not required to comply with that chapter until January 1, 2028. SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2027.