SB 206
West Bill Cuts Payouts For Polluting Heavy Industry Under Zoning Changes
Filed
Verdict: No flags
Initial review · graded Nov 9, 2026 · How we grade
Caption
relating to payments made by municipalities in connection with nonconforming land uses after the adoption of or change to a zoning regulation or boundary.
Caption from analyzed text · version I.
Summary
Polluting heavy industrial sites forced out by zoning get only market value, set by the city.
This bill changes what a city must pay when it forces a property owner or tenant to stop a land use that a new or changed zoning rule no longer allows. For heavy industrial sites that the city finds are polluting and either endanger nearby residents or have been cited under safety or environmental laws, the owner or tenant gets only the property's market value, set by the city, instead of moving costs plus lost value or the choice to keep operating until costs are recovered. All other owners and tenants keep the current choice of payment or continued use, and the appeal, deadline and payment-split rules are updated to cover the new heavy-industry payment.
Receipt
The receipt
90R-SB206 · 2026-11-09
SOLD BY
ITEM
relating to payments made by municipalities in connection with nonconforming land uses after the adoption of or change to a zoning regulation or boundary.
WHAT IT DOES
Polluting heavy industrial sites forced out by zoning get only market value, set by the city.
This bill changes what a city must pay when it forces a property owner or tenant to stop a land use that a new or changed zoning rule no longer allows. For heavy industrial sites that the city finds are polluting and either endanger nearby residents or have been cited under safety or environmental laws, the owner or tenant gets only the property's market value, set by the city, instead of moving costs plus lost value or the choice to keep operating until costs are recovered. All other owners and tenants keep the current choice of payment or continued use, and the appeal, deadline and payment-split rules are updated to cover the new heavy-industry payment.
CHARGES
[ ] NONE FOUND
TOTAL
No fiscal note in the loaded record.
HISTORY
- Received by the Secretary of the Senate
- Filed
FILED UNDER
No verified beat found.
THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
Donors
Not tied to this bill.
Sources
The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.
Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Skyview Development LLC$36,332.00
Skyview Development LLC
$36,332.00
- Cash
- $0.00
- Paid by others
- $36,332.00
- Total
- $36,332.00
Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 1, 2024 to Jun 1, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.
Sources
Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Jun 1, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100987569, 101009506, 101058878, 101063137.
Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$20,000.00
Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC
$20,000.00
- Cash
- $20,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $20,000.00
Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Oct 11, 2024 to Oct 10, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100987569, 101063137.
Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.
Skyview Development LLC
$36,332.00
- Cash
- $0.00
- Paid by others
- $36,332.00
- Total
- $36,332.00
Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 1, 2024 to Jun 1, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.
Sources
Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Jun 1, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100987569, 101009506, 101058878, 101063137.
Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC
$20,000.00
- Cash
- $20,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $20,000.00
Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Oct 11, 2024 to Oct 10, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100987569, 101063137.
Votes
No floor vote loaded for this bill.
Fiscal
No fiscal note in the loaded record.
How this was graded
Analysis of text version I by a super-expensive superintelligence, Nov 9, 2026, against the published rubric.
Sources
Texas Senate · Filed Nov 9, 2026
11/09/2026 S Filed
Texas Legislature Online · Introduced
Data snapshot Nov 10, 2026 at 2:40 AM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.
Subjects
City Government--Land Use & Zoning
Civil Remedies & Liabilities
County Government--Land Use & Zoning
Property Interests--Real Property
Text
The text as introduced · 989 words
90R2138 DRS-D By: West S.B. No. 206 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to payments made by municipalities in connection with nonconforming land uses after the adoption of or change to a zoning regulation or boundary. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. Section 211.019, Local Government Code, is amended by amending Subsections (d), (f), (g), (i), (j), and (m) and adding Subsection (d-1) to read as follows: (d) Except as provided by Subsection (d-1), [ If a municipality requires ] a property owner or lessee who is required by a municipality to stop the nonconforming use of a property as described by Subsection (b) [ , the owner or lessee of the property ] is entitled to: (1) payment from the municipality in an amount equal to the sum of: (A) the costs incurred by the owner or lessee of the property that are directly attributable to ceasing the nonconforming use of the property, including expenses related to demolition, relocation, termination of a lease, or discharge of a mortgage; and (B) an amount equal to the greater of, as determined by the municipality, the diminution in the market value of the property, computed by subtracting the current market value of the property after the imposition of a requirement to stop the nonconforming use of the property from: (i) the market value of the property on the day before the date the notice was given under Section 211.006(a-1); or (ii) the market value of the property on the day before a person submits an application or request to the municipality to require or the municipality otherwise requires a person to stop using the property in a manner that is a nonconforming use as described by Subsection (b); or (2) continued nonconforming use of the property until the owner or lessee recovers the amount determined under Subdivision (1) through the owner or lessee's continued business activities according to generally accepted accounting principles. (d-1) A property owner or lessee of a property to which this subsection applies who is required by a municipality to stop the nonconforming use of the property as described by Subsection (b) is only entitled to a payment from the municipality in an amount equal to the market value of the property as determined by the municipality on the day before the municipality requires the person to stop using the property in a manner that is a nonconforming use. This subsection applies only to a property used by a property owner or lessee: (1) for a heavy industrial use; and (2) in a manner that: (A) is a nonconforming use as a result of the adoption of or change to a municipal zoning regulation; (B) generates pollution, as determined by the municipality; and (C) either: (i) creates a health or safety hazard to nearby residents, as determined by the municipality; or (ii) has resulted in the property owner or lessee being cited for a violation of a public safety or environmental law or regulation. (f) The owner or lessee of a property that is subject to a requirement to stop a nonconforming use of the property under this section and who is entitled to a remedy under Subsection (d) shall not later than the 30th day after the date the municipality gives the notice required by Subsection (e) respond in writing to the municipality indicating the remedy under Subsection (d) chosen by the owner or lessee. In the event of a conflict in the choice of remedy by the owner and a lessee of the property, the owner's choice of remedy shall control. In the event of a conflict in the choice of remedy by the owners of a property that has more than one owner, the choice of remedy made by an owner or owners holding the greater ownership interest in the property shall control. If the municipality does not receive timely notice from an owner or lessee, the municipality may choose the remedy provided under this section. (g) A person receiving a payment under Subsection (d)(1) or (d-1) must stop the nonconforming use not later than the 10th day after the date of the payment. (i) If more than one person seeks a payment from the municipality under Subsection (d)(1) or (d-1) , the municipality shall apportion the payment between each person based on the market value of the person's interest in the property. A person may appeal the apportionment in the manner provided by this section. (j) A person entitled to a remedy under this section may appeal a determination under Subsection (d) or (d-1) [ (d)(1) or (2) ] to the board of adjustment of the municipality not later than the 20th day after the date the determination is made. At the hearing before the board of adjustment, the municipality has the burden of proof to establish the correctness of its determination. (m) If the board of adjustment or court with jurisdiction over an appeal determines that an owner or lessee is entitled to: (1) a payment under this section in an amount different than the amount determined by the municipality under Subsection (d)(1) or (d-1) , the board of adjustment or court shall order, as applicable: (A) additional payment to the owner or lessee; or (B) the owner or lessee to reimburse the municipality; or (2) an amount of time to operate the nonconforming use that is different than the amount of time initially received under Subsection (d)(2), the board of adjustment or court shall order the municipality to allow an owner or lessee to continue the nonconforming use for additional or less time. SECTION 2. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this Act takes effect September 1, 2027.