Monitoring the Session

SB 239

Cook Bill Makes TxDOT Weigh Local Highway Designs

Filed

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Molly CookDSenate 15

Initial review · graded Nov 9, 2026 · How we grade

Caption

relating to design considerations of transportation projects by the Texas Department of Transportation.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Cities and counties can offer a voted alternative design. TxDOT must also weigh past highway harm.

The bill adds two new factors the Texas Department of Transportation must consider when it designs highway construction or rebuilding projects. It touches TxDOT and the cities, counties and metropolitan planning organizations near those projects, which can now put forward a voted alternative design for projects under federal environmental review. On the ground, TxDOT must weigh those local alternative designs unless it finds them frivolous, unreasonable or meant to delay, and must also weigh harm earlier highway projects did to affected communities.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 5154 by Rep. Morales Shaw (Died in committee) and 89R SB 2899 (Died in committee). Checked against 88R and 89R only.DO-OVER. Reworked text of a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 5154 by Rep. Morales Shaw (Died in committee) and 89R SB 2899 (Died in committee). Filed in 3 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R and 89R only.TRY NO. 3. Filed in 3 sessions: 88R, 89R and 90R. Checked against 88R and 89R only.

Receipt

The receipt

90R-SB239 · 2026-11-09

SOLD BY

+ 1 more author

ITEM

relating to design considerations of transportation projects by the Texas Department of Transportation.

WHAT IT DOES

Cities and counties can offer a voted alternative design. TxDOT must also weigh past highway harm.

The bill adds two new factors the Texas Department of Transportation must consider when it designs highway construction or rebuilding projects. It touches TxDOT and the cities, counties and metropolitan planning organizations near those projects, which can now put forward a voted alternative design for projects under federal environmental review. On the ground, TxDOT must weigh those local alternative designs unless it finds them frivolous, unreasonable or meant to delay, and must also weigh harm earlier highway projects did to affected communities.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$15KGregory Stocks$10,000Amber Alonso$6,500

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$15,000.00

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$15,000.00

Cash
$15,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$15,000.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 13, 2024 to Jun 5, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100987960, 101029944, 101057026.

Gregory Stocks$10,000.00
Amber Alonso$6,500.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$15,000.00

Cash
$15,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$15,000.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 13, 2024 to Jun 5, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100987960, 101029944, 101057026.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by a super-expensive superintelligence, Nov 9, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 3 times: 88R, 89R and now. Checked against 88R and 89R only.

88R HB 5154

by Rep. Morales Shaw, different lead author · Died in committee · reworked

Introduced text

Last action, Mar 24, 2023: Referred to Transportation

Relating to design considerations of transportation projects by the Texas Department of Transportation.

Caption, 88R bill history

89R SB 2899

by Sen. Cook, same lead author · Died in committee · reworked

Introduced text

Last action, Apr 7, 2025: Referred to Transportation

Relating to design considerations of transportation projects by the Texas Department of Transportation.

Caption, 89R bill history

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Nov 9, 2026

11/09/2026 S Filed

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Nov 10, 2026 at 2:40 AM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Subjects

Environment--General

Highways

TRANSPORTATION, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF

Text

The text as introduced · 322 words

90R808 CXP-F

By: Cook of Harris, et al.
S.B. No. 239

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to design considerations of transportation projects by the

Texas Department of Transportation.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 201.615, Transportation Code, is amended

by amending Subsection (a) and adding Subsection (d) to read as

follows:

(a) The department shall consider the following factors

when developing transportation projects that involve the

construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or resurfacing of a

highway, other than a maintenance resurfacing project:

(1) the extent to which the project promotes safety;

(2) the durability of the project;

(3) the economy of maintenance of the project;

(4) the impact of the project on:

(A) the natural and artificial environment;

(B) the scenic and aesthetic character of the

area in which the project is located;

(C) preservation efforts; and

(D) each affected local community and its

economy;

(5) the access for other modes of transportation,

including those that promote physically active communities; [ and ]

(6) except as provided by Subsection (c), the

aesthetic character of the project, including input from each

affected local community ;

(7) except as provided by Subsection (d), an

alternative design for the project that has been approved by a vote

of the governing body of a municipality, county, or metropolitan

planning organization that represents an affected local community

only if the project is subject to review under the National

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. Section 4321 et seq.);

and

(8) the negative impacts to an affected local

community from previous transportation projects .

(d) Subsection (a)(7) does not apply to a transportation

project if the department finds that an alternative design for a

transportation project approved by the governing body of a

municipality, county, or metropolitan planning organization is

frivolous, unreasonable, or intended to delay a transportation

project.

SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 2027.