SB 34
Zaffirini Bill Lets Counties Zone Data Centers, Maybe Substations Too
Filed
Verdict: Smells
Both charges, and why
Dragnet
THE CAPTION
“relating to county authority to regulate the development of certain”…
Caption, introduced version (I)
The definition of a large computational load lists electric infrastructure such as substations as a separate alternative, joined by "or." Read that way, utility substations count as covered loads even though the caption speaks of large electricity users. Elsewhere the bill bars counties from regulating transmission siting, which softens the reach.
DragnetNew fee, fund, board or appointees
The bill lets counties charge new application, inspection, administrative, and professional-review fees on these projects. The fees are capped at the county's actual costs.
New fee, fund, board or appointeesInitial review · graded Nov 9, 2026 · How we grade
Caption
relating to county authority to regulate the development of certain large electricity users.
Caption from analyzed text · version I.
Summary
Counties get zoning power over data centers and crypto mines. Penalties up to $10,000 a day!
This bill lets county commissioners courts create special zoning districts for big data centers, AI and crypto-mining sites, and other large power users in unincorporated areas. It reaches developers of those facilities and lets counties set rules on location, setbacks, noise, water, roads, and bonds, require special use permits, and freeze construction while a district is proposed. On the ground, counties gain power to deny or condition these projects, charge review fees, issue stop-work orders, and collect civil penalties of $500 to $10,000 per violation per day.
Receipt
The receipt
90R-SB34 · 2026-11-09
SOLD BY
ITEM
relating to county authority to regulate the development of certain large electricity users.
WHAT IT DOES
Counties get zoning power over data centers and crypto mines. Penalties up to $10,000 a day!
This bill lets county commissioners courts create special zoning districts for big data centers, AI and crypto-mining sites, and other large power users in unincorporated areas. It reaches developers of those facilities and lets counties set rules on location, setbacks, noise, water, roads, and bonds, require special use permits, and freeze construction while a district is proposed. On the ground, counties gain power to deny or condition these projects, charge review fees, issue stop-work orders, and collect civil penalties of $500 to $10,000 per violation per day.
CHARGES
[x] DRAGNETanalysis confidence 40%
THE CAPTION
“relating to county authority to regulate the development of certain”…
Caption, introduced version (I)
The definition of a large computational load lists electric infrastructure such as substations as a separate alternative, joined by "or." Read that way, utility substations count as covered loads even though the caption speaks of large electricity users. Elsewhere the bill bars counties from regulating transmission siting, which softens the reach.
[x] NEW FEE, FUND, BOARD OR APPOINTEESanalysis confidence 50%
The bill lets counties charge new application, inspection, administrative, and professional-review fees on these projects. The fees are capped at the county's actual costs.
TOTAL
No fiscal note in the loaded record.
HISTORY
- Received by the Secretary of the Senate
- Filed
FILED UNDER
DATA CENTERS, WATER AND THE GRID
The bill gives counties zoning and permit power over data centers and AI and crypto facilities, covering their water use, cooling, and infrastructure costs.
THE TEXT
…“fees including the reasonable cost of qualified consultants”…
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The bill authorizes counties to hire outside consultants to review applications and pass the cost to applicants.
THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
Donors
Not tied to this bill.
Sources
The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.
Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Killam Development Ltd.$72,700.00
Killam Development Ltd.
$72,700.00
- Cash
- $10,000.00
- Paid by others
- $62,700.00
- Total
- $72,700.00
Also funds 3 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Dec 9, 2024 to Sep 28, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.
Sources
Derived itemized flow · Dec 16, 2025 to Aug 20, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101011018, 101057658.
Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$60,000.00
Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC
$60,000.00
- Cash
- $60,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $60,000.00
Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Nov 11, 2024 to Aug 31, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100959783, 100987492, 101011018, 101035338, 101057658.
Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.
Killam Development Ltd.
$72,700.00
- Cash
- $10,000.00
- Paid by others
- $62,700.00
- Total
- $72,700.00
Also funds 3 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Dec 9, 2024 to Sep 28, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.
Sources
Derived itemized flow · Dec 16, 2025 to Aug 20, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101011018, 101057658.
Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC
$60,000.00
- Cash
- $60,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $60,000.00
Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Nov 11, 2024 to Aug 31, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100959783, 100987492, 101011018, 101035338, 101057658.
Votes
No floor vote loaded for this bill.
Fiscal
No fiscal note in the loaded record.
How this was graded
Analysis of text version I by a super-expensive superintelligence, Nov 9, 2026, against the published rubric.
Sources
Texas Senate · Filed Nov 9, 2026
11/09/2026 S Filed
Texas Legislature Online · Introduced
Data snapshot Nov 10, 2026 at 2:39 AM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.
Subjects
County Government--Land Use & Zoning
Data Centers (IC4MU)
Utilities--Electric
PERMITS
PLATTING
Text
The text as introduced · 2,211 words
By: Zaffirini S.B. No. 34 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to county authority to regulate the development of certain large electricity users. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1 Chapter 231, Local Government Code, is amended by adding Subchapter N to read as follows: SUBCHAPTER N. COUNTY REGULATION OF LARGE-LOAD ELECTRICITY USERS Sec. 231.301. DEFINITIONS. In this subchapter: (1) "Large computational load facility" means a tract or one or more contiguous or noncontiguous tracts of land under common ownership or control that are developed or proposed for development for use by a large computational load. (2) "County large computational load zoning district" means a zoning district established under this subchapter. (3) "Large computational load" means a business that: (A) is primarily engaged in: (i) creating, executing, and delivering software applications and services; (ii) artificial intelligence training, deployment, and delivery; (iii) adding virtual currency transactions to a distributed ledger; or (iv) other computational activities at a data center; and (B) is a large load under Section 37.0561, Utilities Code; or (C) a substation, transmission or distribution facilities, or other electric infrastructure designed to serve the facility or project; and (D) in determining whether a facility or project meets the requirements of Paragraph (B), the county may aggregate related facilities, phases, contiguous or noncontiguous tracts, meters, or projects that are under common ownership or control or are developed, financed, constructed, or operated as part of a common plan. (4) "Project" includes the construction of a new large computational load or a material expansion, redevelopment, or change in the use of an existing facility. A material expansion is an increase in electricity demand of at least 10 megawatts. Sec. 231.302. APPLICABILITY. This subchapter applies only to the unincorporated area of a county. Sec. 231.303. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH LARGE COMPUTATIONAL LOAD ZONING DISTRICTS. (a) To protect the public health, safety, and welfare, promote the orderly development of the county, and ensure that county residents benefit from large computational load development, the commissioners court may establish one or more county large computational load zoning districts and regulate the location and development of large computational load and large computational load within a district consistent with this subchapter. (b) A district may include all or part of the unincorporated area of the county. The boundaries of the district must be described by metes and bounds or shown on a map adopted as part of the order establishing the district. (c) A zoning district or district boundary is not effective until adopted by the commissioners court after a public hearing. Before adopting a district or district boundary, the commissioners court shall provide public notice and hold a public hearing in accordance with procedures adopted by the court. (d) After the commissioners court provides notice of a hearing to establish or amend a county large computational load zoning district, a person may not begin construction or development of, or materially expand, redevelop, or materially change the use of, a county large computational load facility within the area described in the notice until the commissioners court: (1) adopts or rejects the proposed district or amendment; or (2) fails to take action on the proposed district or amendment before the 91st day after the date notice is provided. Sec. 231.304. ZONING REGULATIONS. (a) The commissioners court may adopt reasonable zoning regulations within a county large computational load zoning district governing county large computational load facilities and large computational load, including regulations addressing: (1) the location of a county large computational load facility; (2) minimum lot size and tract dimensions; (3) setbacks, buffers, landscaping, screening, and open-space requirements; (4) measures reasonably necessary to protect nearby residential, educational, medical, agricultural, or environmentally sensitive uses from incompatible development; (5) access roads, traffic mitigation, emergency access, and transportation impacts; (6) noise, vibration, exterior lighting, and other off-site impacts; (7) water supply, water conservation, cooling technology, wastewater service, stormwater management, drainage, floodplain management, and land subsidence risks, as applicable; (8) fire protection, emergency response, law enforcement, and other public safety considerations; (9) improvements, mitigation measures, capacity requirements, and service arrangements necessary to address project-related demands on county roads, bridges, drainage and flood-mitigation infrastructure, facilities, services, and county infrastructure capacity; (10) disclosure of information necessary for the county to evaluate impacts on public infrastructure, water resources, emergency services, public safety, and county finances, subject to Chapter 552, Government Code; (11) reasonable mitigation measures, road-use agreements, infrastructure agreements, and cost-sharing agreements reasonably related to project impacts and necessary to ensure that project-related county infrastructure, mitigation, remediation, and service costs are borne by the project rather than county taxpayers; (12) performance bonds, closure bonds, site- restoration commitments, and other financial assurances necessary to ensure compliance and address abandonment, prolonged inactivity, decommissioning, demolition, remediation, removal of equipment or hazardous materials, and final site restoration; and (13) any other reasonable land-use regulation directly related to the public health, safety, or welfare or the orderly development of the county. (b) A zoning regulation adopted under this section must be reasonably related to a documented or reasonably foreseeable impact of a large computational load and may not be arbitrary or unrelated to a purpose authorized by this subchapter. (c) The county may determine the amount, form, duration, issuer, renewal requirements, and conditions for release of a performance bond, closure bond, letter of credit, or other financial assurance. The amount must be reasonably related to the anticipated cost of compliance, mitigation, remediation, decommissioning, or site restoration. (d) A county may not adopt regulations that directly conflict with a regulation adopted by a state agency. Sec. 231.305. SPECIAL USE PERMIT. (a) The commissioners court may require a person to obtain a special use permit before developing, constructing, materially expanding, redeveloping, or materially changing a county large computational load facility within a county large computational load zoning district. (b) An application for a special use permit may require: (1) submission of site plans and engineering studies; (2) information regarding traffic, water supply, wastewater, drainage, floodplain, emergency service, public safety, and county infrastructure impact analyses; (3) information regarding anticipated electric demand, energization schedules, load growth, and electric infrastructure associated with the project; (4) identification of any proposed water source and information regarding the availability of an adequate long-term water supply; (5) supporting documentation prepared or certified by a professional engineer licensed in this state demonstrating that the proposed electric, water, wastewater, and other utility service and any required infrastructure improvements are reasonably capable of serving the projected demand of the project without impairing existing service; (6) documentation that the project has been submitted to any applicable review or interconnection process required by the Public Utility Commission of Texas or administered by the Electric Reliability Council of Texas or another entity with jurisdiction; (7) information reasonably necessary to identify and evaluate measures to mitigate documented adverse impacts within the county's authority under this subchapter. (c) Before acting on a special use permit, the commissioners court may provide public notice and may hold a public hearing in accordance with procedures adopted by the court. (d) The county may determine whether an application is complete and may require the applicant to submit additional information reasonably necessary to evaluate the application. A permit application is not considered filed until the county determines that the application is complete. (e) The commissioners court may approve, conditionally approve, or deny a special use permit based on compliance with this subchapter and zoning regulations adopted under this subchapter. The county may make the final decision and any conditions imposed on the permit available to the public in a manner prescribed by the commissioners court. (f) A permit may be denied if the applicant fails to demonstrate compliance with applicable zoning regulations or fails to adequately address a documented or reasonably foreseeable impact within the county's authority under this subchapter. (g) After notice and an opportunity to cure, the county may suspend or revoke a special use permit for a material violation of this subchapter, a zoning regulation, or a condition of the permit. (h) The county may issue a stop-work order if construction or development is occurring without a required permit or in material violation of a zoning regulation or permit condition. The order remains effective until the violation is corrected or the order is modified or withdrawn by the county or a court. (i) The commissioners court may impose reasonable application, inspection, administrative, and professional-review fees including the reasonable cost of qualified consultants retained by the county, in an amount not to exceed the county's actual costs of administering this subchapter and reviewing the application. (j) Information submitted under this section is subject to Chapter 552, Government Code. A county may not enter into an agreement requiring the county to withhold information from public disclosure except to the extent withholding is authorized by that chapter or other law. Sec. 231.306. ELECTRIC REGULATION; PROJECT INFORMATION. (a) This subchapter does not authorize a county to regulate: (l) electric rates or electric service; (1-a) water rates or water service; (2) generation permitting; (3) transmission or distribution facility siting or interconnection standards; and (4) the operations of the Public Utility Commission of Texas or the Electric Reliability Council of Texas; (b) In evaluating a project under this subchapter, a county may request and consider information regarding: (1) anticipated electric demand; (2) the timing and scale of load growth; (3) planned substations, transmission or distribution facilities, or other electric infrastructure associated with the project; (4) the status of the project in any applicable review or interconnection process required or administered by the Public Utility Commission of Texas or the Electric Reliability Council of Texas; and (5) measures proposed to reduce impacts on county infrastructure, emergency services, public safety, water supplies, and neighboring property. (c) Nothing in this section prohibits a county from requesting or considering information concerning electric demand, energization schedules, substations, transmission or distribution infrastructure, interconnection status, reliability impacts, or curtailment capability for the purpose of evaluating land use, roads, drainage, water, emergency services, public safety, neighboring property, or county financial impacts. Sec. 231.307. NONCONFORMING USES. (a) A county large computational load facility lawfully developed, or a large computational load lawfully operating before the effective date of a zoning regulation adopted under this subchapter may continue as a lawful nonconforming use. (b) Zoning regulations adopted under this subchapter apply to a material expansion, redevelopment, or change in use of a nonconforming county large computational load facility or large computational load. In evaluating an expansion, redevelopment, or change in use, the county may consider the cumulative impacts of the existing county large computational load facility or large computational load and the proposed activity. (c) A county large computational load facility or large computational load is not entitled to nonconforming-use status solely because land has been purchased, a project has been announced, utility service has been requested, or a preliminary application has been submitted. Sec. 231.308. ENFORCEMENT. (a) A county may bring an action for injunctive relief to prevent or restrain a violation of this subchapter, a zoning regulation adopted under this subchapter, or a special use permit issued under this subchapter. (b) A person who violates this subchapter, a zoning regulation adopted under this subchapter, or a special use permit issued under this subchapter is liable to the county for a civil penalty of not less than $500 or more than $10,000 for each violation for each day the violation continues. (c) The county attorney or district attorney may bring an action under this section in a district court in the county. (d) A county that prevails in an enforcement action under this section may recover reasonable attorney's fees, court costs, investigative costs, and expert-witness fees. Sec. 231.309. CONSTRUCTION OF SUBCHAPTER. (a) This subchapter shall be liberally construed to accomplish its purposes of protecting the public health, safety, and welfare; promoting the orderly development of each county; and protecting neighboring property and public infrastructure; (b) This subchapter may not be construed to authorize a county to regulate electric rates, electric service, wholesale electric markets, electric reliability standards, or a matter assigned by state or federal law to the Public Utility Commission of Texas, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, or a federal agency. Sec. 231.310. COORDINATION WITH COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATION. (a) Notwithstanding Section 232.001(h), a county may require an applicant for a plat or replat of property located within a large computational load zoning district to submit information, analyses, studies, plans, agreements, and financial assurances authorized by this subchapter or regulations adopted under this subchapter. (b) Notwithstanding Section 232.0025, an application for a plat or replat of property located within a county large computational load zoning district is not considered complete, and the period within which the commissioners court or county authority must approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the application does not begin, until: (1) the county determines that the application includes the information required under this subchapter, regulations adopted under this subchapter, and Chapter 232; and (2) any special use permit required for the development proposed in the application has been finally approved; (c) The denial of a special use permit required for development proposed in a plat or replat application constitutes grounds for disapproval of the plat or replat application. SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 2027.