Monitoring the Session

HB 1043

Bhojani Study Bill Guarantees The Texas Blockchain Council A Seat

Died in committee

Verdict: Smells

SmellsReviewed
Rep. Salman BhojaniDHouse 92
All 3 charges, and why
Study, task force, commission, report

THE TEXT

“Not later than January 1, 2027, the”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill orders a study and a report to the legislature due January 1, 2027, and nothing else operative happens before the Act expires September 1, 2027. The caption promises a study, so the pattern fires but matches the pitch.

Study, task force, commission, report
Carve-out

THE TEXT

“(6) the Texas Blockchain Council.”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

Every other working group member is described by category, but this one organization is named by statute and guaranteed a seat. The seat is only to discuss ideas and give feedback, so the favor is small.

Carve-out
New fee, fund, board or appointees

THE TEXT

…“framework for a working group to discuss ideas, give feedback, and”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill tells the office to build a new working group of representatives from counties, title insurers, banks, regulators and one named council. The caption promises a study, not less government, so the pattern fires at moderate strength.

New fee, fund, board or appointees

Reviewed · Nov 1, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to a study by the General Land Office on the establishment and implementation by the General Land Office of a distributed ledger-based title registry pilot program.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Every other seat is described by category. This one gets a name. Report due January 1, 2027.

The bill orders the General Land Office to study a pilot program that would record property title transfers on a distributed ledger alongside the recording methods counties use now. It touches the Land Office, at least two counties that a pilot would include, and a working group drawn from counties, title insurance agents and companies, the banking industry, regulators and the Texas Blockchain Council. No title recording changes under this bill; the office adopts rules for the study by October 1, 2025, sends a report to the legislature by January 1, 2027, and the Act expires September 1, 2027.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 5067 (Did not pass) and this bill (Died in committee). Checked against 88R only.DO-OVER. Reworked text of a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 5067 (Did not pass). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.ACROSS THE AISLE. Joint authors: 3 Republicans, 2 Democrats. Party as the Legislative Reference Library lists it for the 89th Legislature.GOT HALFWAY. Passed the House on May 2, 2025. Died in the Senate: left pending in the Business & Commerce committee.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB1043 · 2024-11-12

SOLD BY

+ 2 more authors, 1 coauthor

ITEM

relating to a study by the General Land Office on the establishment and implementation by the General Land Office of a distributed ledger-based title registry pilot program.

WHAT IT DOES

Every other seat is described by category. This one gets a name. Report due January 1, 2027.

The bill orders the General Land Office to study a pilot program that would record property title transfers on a distributed ledger alongside the recording methods counties use now. It touches the Land Office, at least two counties that a pilot would include, and a working group drawn from counties, title insurance agents and companies, the banking industry, regulators and the Texas Blockchain Council. No title recording changes under this bill; the office adopts rules for the study by October 1, 2025, sends a report to the legislature by January 1, 2027, and the Act expires September 1, 2027.

CHARGES

[x] STUDY, TASK FORCE, COMMISSION, REPORTanalysis confidence 90%

THE TEXT

“Not later than January 1, 2027, the”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill orders a study and a report to the legislature due January 1, 2027, and nothing else operative happens before the Act expires September 1, 2027. The caption promises a study, so the pattern fires but matches the pitch.

[x] CARVE-OUTanalysis confidence 50%

THE TEXT

“(6) the Texas Blockchain Council.”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

Every other working group member is described by category, but this one organization is named by statute and guaranteed a seat. The seat is only to discuss ideas and give feedback, so the favor is small.

[x] NEW FEE, FUND, BOARD OR APPOINTEESanalysis confidence 60%

THE TEXT

…“framework for a working group to discuss ideas, give feedback, and”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill tells the office to build a new working group of representatives from counties, title insurers, banks, regulators and one named council. The caption promises a study, not less government, so the pattern fires at moderate strength.

TOTAL

Net to General Revenue · FY 2026($480,000)

LBB estimate, flow · fiscal note version E · ( ) = negative · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · May 22, 2025

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB1043, As Engrossed: a negative impact of ($480,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

First year · FY 2026 · ($480,000)

Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Delivery of Government Efficiency
  4. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  5. Considered in public hearing
  6. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  7. Left pending in committee
  8. Considered in formal meeting
  9. Committee substitute considered in committee
  10. Reported favorably as substituted
  11. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  12. Committee report distributed
  13. Committee report sent to Calendars
  14. Considered in Calendars
  15. Placed on General State Calendar
  16. Read 2nd time
  17. Passed to engrossment
  18. Record vote RV#1196
  19. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  20. Read 3rd time
  21. Passed
  22. Record vote RV#1302
  23. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  24. Reported engrossed
  25. Received from the House
  26. Read first time
  27. Referred to Business & Commerce
  28. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  29. Considered in public hearing
  30. Testimony taken in committee
  31. Left pending in committee
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 113 yea · 20 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · May 2, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

6301 ECC LLC$36,400.00

6301 ECC LLC

$36,400.00

Cash
$0.00
Paid by others
$36,400.00
Total
$36,400.00
Other filed descriptions $36,400.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 1, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 1, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100978329, 101005348, 101026340, 101056439, 101069774, 101071921.

Sam Mahrouq$25,000.00
Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$21,000.00

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$21,000.00

Cash
$21,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$21,000.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 4, 2024 to Oct 9, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100978329, 101026340, 101056439, 101071921.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

6301 ECC LLC

$36,400.00

Cash
$0.00
Paid by others
$36,400.00
Total
$36,400.00
Other filed descriptions $36,400.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 1, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 1, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100978329, 101005348, 101026340, 101056439, 101069774, 101071921.

×

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$21,000.00

Cash
$21,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$21,000.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 4, 2024 to Oct 9, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100978329, 101026340, 101056439, 101071921.

Votes2

House May 2, 2025

Yea
113
Nay
20
Present, not voting
2
Absent
3
Excused
12
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 1302

HB 1043 was passed by (Record 1302): 113 Yeas, 20 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 113 (published)
  • Nay: 20 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 3 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 12 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 1, 2025

Yea
116
Nay
27
Present, not voting
2
Absent
2
Excused
3
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 1196

CSHB 1043 was passed to engrossment by (Record 1196): 116 Yeas, 27 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 116 (published)
  • Nay: 27 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 2 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 3 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses1
For
1
Against
0
On
0
Names

For

  • Self; Texas Blockchain Council1 registration
Sources

1 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal
Net to General Revenue · FY 2026($480,000)

LBB estimate, flow · fiscal note version E · ( ) = negative · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · May 22, 2025

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB1043, As Engrossed: a negative impact of ($480,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

First year · FY 2026 · ($480,000)

Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Adversarial review by claude-fable-5-1 at high effort: Smells.

Analysis of text version I by claude-fable-5-1, Oct 21, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R HB 5067

by Rep. Bhojani, same lead author · Did not pass · reworked

Introduced text

Last action, May 11, 2023: Committee report sent to Calendars

Relating to a study by the General Land Office on the establishment and implementation by the General Land Office of a distributed ledger-based title registry pilot program.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas House · Filed Nov 12, 2024

05/23/2025 S Left pending in committee

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · House Committee Report · Engrossed

Data snapshot Nov 1, 2026 at 3:08 PM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors

House committee · Delivery of Government Efficiency · Committee vote 11 aye, 0 nay, 2 absent · Out of committee

Senate committee · Business & Commerce · Final status: Died in committee

Subjects

Electronic Information Systems

Interim Studies

Property Interests--Real Property

Science & Technology

GENERAL LAND OFFICE

INFORMATION RESOURCES, DEPARTMENT OF

INSURANCE, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF

Text

The text as introduced · 866 words

89R803 SHH-F

By: Bhojani
H.B. No. 1043

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to a study by the General Land Office on the establishment

and implementation by the General Land Office of a distributed

ledger-based title registry pilot program.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS. In this Act:

(1) "Distributed ledger" means a peer-to-peer network

that operates without a central administrator or database and uses

a distributed network of devices to utilize cryptography to

immutably record and verify the accuracy of data.

(2) "Hybrid model" means a method of recording title

to real property in which basic information from the deed is

recorded on a public ledger with an identifier to the full document

that is held on a separate, permissioned distributed ledger.

(3) "Office" means the General Land Office.

(4) "Onchain recordation" means recording and

verifying the accuracy of data through a central administrator or

database.

(5) "Pilot program" means the distributed

ledger-based title registry pilot program to be studied under this

Act.

(6) "Public ledger" means a method of recording titles

in which all records are documented on a publicly accessible

distributed ledger where the county provides free public access to

all documents.

(7) "Rural county" means a county that is outside the

boundaries of a primary metropolitan statistical area or a

metropolitan statistical area.

(8) "Study" means the study conducted under this Act

by the General Land Office on the establishment and implementation

by the office of a distributed ledger-based title registry pilot

program.

(9) "Urban county" means a county that is partially or

entirely inside the boundaries of a primary metropolitan

statistical area.

SECTION 2. STUDY ON PILOT PROGRAM. (a) The office shall

conduct a study on establishing and implementing, in partnership

with the working group established by Section 3 of this Act, a

distributed ledger-based title registry pilot program to record

title transfers with distributed ledger technology.

(b) A pilot program considered by the study must:

(1) include at least two counties of which at least one

is a rural county and one is an urban county and determine the

potential impact of the pilot program on those types of counties in

particular and counties generally;

(2) incorporate the recording of property liens

simultaneously with existing recording methods so as to not disrupt

current processes;

(3) collect cost data sufficient to allow comparison

of the costs to a participating county of:

(A) continuing to facilitate onchain

recordation; and

(B) adapting to a distributed ledger;

(4) determine whether existing data must be migrated

to an immutable and public ledger for backwards compatibility;

(5) evaluate both the public ledger and hybrid model

as methods of recording to compare:

(A) costs;

(B) security;

(C) transparency; and

(D) overall complexity;

(6) provide for the recording of title transfers in

connection with the pilot program in addition to existing recording

methods;

(7) determine the ability to expand the pilot program

methods to other types of documents and information relating to

real property;

(8) incorporate the requirements of existing statutes

related to the recording of property liens; and

(9) ensure data privacy and proper protection against

fraud.

(c) The goals of the study shall include:

(1) establishing a protocol for implementation of

distributed ledger-based recording;

(2) identifying counties to be included in a pilot

program;

(3) determining the costs of the pilot program and of

converting to a statewide distributed ledger system;

(4) developing protocols for:

(A) working with the selected counties to

implement the program by training, educating, and collaborating

with the counties to ensure that the pilot program is successful,

efficient, and complies with a budget established by the office;

and

(B) partnering with a software company to create

an application programming interface to integrate existing systems

with the distributed ledger system and ensure that title transfer

records are seamlessly incorporated;

(5) identifying and considering issues concerning

transparency and regulation of a distributed ledger-based title

registry system;

(6) determining funding sources for and other

available resources to support implementation of the pilot program;

and

(7) determining appropriate vendor selection

processes.

SECTION 3. WORKING GROUP. The office shall establish a

framework for a working group to discuss ideas, give feedback, and

explore other opportunities relating to the study. The working

group shall consist of representatives from:

(1) counties;

(2) title insurance agents;

(3) title insurance companies;

(4) the banking industry;

(5) appropriate regulators; and

(6) the Texas Blockchain Council.

SECTION 4. PARTICIPATION OF REGULATORS. The office shall

engage appropriate regulators to provide information for the study

regarding the manner in which regulators could participate in

crafting guidance for a pilot program that would include protection

for all parties involved in a real estate transaction the title

transfer for which is recorded with distributed ledger technology.

SECTION 5. RULES. Not later than October 1, 2025, the

office shall adopt rules necessary to administer the study.

SECTION 6. REPORT. Not later than January 1, 2027, the

office shall submit to the legislature a report on the findings of

the study and any recommendations for legislative or other action.

SECTION 7. EXPIRATION. This Act expires September 1, 2027.

SECTION 8. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Act takes effect September

1, 2025.