Monitoring the Session

HB 149

Capriglione AI Bill Comes With A Someone-Else-Did-It Defense

Became law, effective Jan 1, 2026

Verdict: Smells

SmellsReviewed
Rep. Giovanni CapriglioneRHouse 98
Both charges, and why
New fee, fund, board or appointees

THE TEXT

…“hire an executive director and other personnel as necessary to”…

Bill text, Senate committee report version (S)

The bill creates a new seven-member appointed Texas Artificial Intelligence Council and lets it hire an executive director and staff. That is a new state body, though the council cannot issue binding rules.

New fee, fund, board or appointees
The hole

THE TEXT

“(1) another person uses the artificial intelligence”…

Bill text, Senate committee report version (S)

A defendant cannot be held liable when someone else uses its AI system in a banned way. It also escapes liability when it finds the violation through feedback, testing or an internal review. Paired with intent-only standards and a cure period, these defenses let much of the ordinary misuse case slip past the penalties.

The hole

Reviewed · Nov 1, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to regulation of the use of artificial intelligence systems in this state; providing civil penalties.

Caption from analyzed text · version S.

Summary

Penalties up to $200K, after a 60-day cure. Spot it in your own testing and you’re clear.

The bill sets statewide rules for artificial intelligence: state agencies must tell people when they are talking to an AI, and no one may build or use AI meant to push people toward self-harm, violence or illegal acts, to discriminate on purpose, or to make sexual content involving children, while government may not use AI for social scoring or certain biometric identification. It touches AI developers and users doing business in Texas, state agencies, and the attorney general, who alone enforces the rules through complaints, a 60-day cure period and civil penalties of up to $200,000 per violation. It also creates a testing 'sandbox' at the Department of Information Resources that waives some licensing laws for up to 36 months, creates a seven-member appointed AI council that may hire staff, and overrides local AI rules starting January 1, 2026.

Labels

Labels: BUZZER BEATER. Final vote May 30, 2025: the House concurred in the Senate amendments. 3 days before the session ended Jun 2, 2025.ACROSS THE AISLE. Joint authors: 4 Republicans, 1 Democrat. Party as the Legislative Reference Library lists it for the 89th Legislature.DOORSTOP: 5,164 WORDS. The bill as filed runs 5,164 words, counting the existing law it amends and the text it strikes. The median 89R bill as filed runs 441 words (derived, 8,702 graded bills, snapshot Oct 19, 2026).

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB149 · 2025-03-14

SOLD BY

+ 2 more authors, 5 coauthors

ITEM

relating to regulation of the use of artificial intelligence systems in this state; providing civil penalties.

WHAT IT DOES

Penalties up to $200K, after a 60-day cure. Spot it in your own testing and you’re clear.

The bill sets statewide rules for artificial intelligence: state agencies must tell people when they are talking to an AI, and no one may build or use AI meant to push people toward self-harm, violence or illegal acts, to discriminate on purpose, or to make sexual content involving children, while government may not use AI for social scoring or certain biometric identification. It touches AI developers and users doing business in Texas, state agencies, and the attorney general, who alone enforces the rules through complaints, a 60-day cure period and civil penalties of up to $200,000 per violation. It also creates a testing 'sandbox' at the Department of Information Resources that waives some licensing laws for up to 36 months, creates a seven-member appointed AI council that may hire staff, and overrides local AI rules starting January 1, 2026.

CHARGES

[x] NEW FEE, FUND, BOARD OR APPOINTEESanalysis confidence 80%

THE TEXT

…“hire an executive director and other personnel as necessary to”…

Bill text, Senate committee report version (S)

The bill creates a new seven-member appointed Texas Artificial Intelligence Council and lets it hire an executive director and staff. That is a new state body, though the council cannot issue binding rules.

[x] THE HOLEanalysis confidence 55%

THE TEXT

“(1) another person uses the artificial intelligence”…

Bill text, Senate committee report version (S)

A defendant cannot be held liable when someone else uses its AI system in a banned way. It also escapes liability when it finds the violation through feedback, testing or an internal review. Paired with intent-only standards and a cure period, these defenses let much of the ordinary misuse case slip past the penalties.

TOTAL

Net to General Revenue · FY 2026($14,590,033)

LBB estimate, flow · fiscal note version F · ( ) = negative · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version F · May 26, 2025

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB149, As Passed 2nd House: a negative impact of ($24,937,448) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

First year · FY 2026 · ($14,590,033)

Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Delivery of Government Efficiency
  4. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  5. Considered in public hearing
  6. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  7. Left pending in committee
  8. Considered in public hearing
  9. Committee substitute considered in committee
  10. Reported favorably as substituted
  11. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  12. Committee report distributed
  13. Committee report sent to Calendars
  14. Considered in Calendars
  15. Placed on General State Calendar
  16. Read 2nd time
  17. Amended 1-Capriglione
  18. Record vote RV#321
  19. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  20. Passed to engrossment as amended
  21. Record vote RV#322
  22. Read 3rd time
  23. Amended 1-Capriglione
  24. Record vote RV#375
  25. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  26. Passed as amended
  27. Record vote RV#376
  28. Reported engrossed
  29. Received from the House
  30. Read first time
  31. Referred to Business & Commerce
  32. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  33. Considered in public hearing
  34. Testimony taken in committee
  35. Left pending in committee
  36. Considered in public hearing
  37. Vote taken in committee
  38. Reported favorably as substituted
  39. Recommended for local & uncontested calendar
  40. Committee report printed and distributed
  41. Co-sponsor authorized
  42. Placed on intent calendar
  43. Motion to suspend regular order of business
  44. Motion withdrawn
  45. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  46. Read 2nd time
  47. Amendment(s) offered FA1 Schwertner
  48. Amended
  49. Vote recorded in Journal
  50. Amendment(s) offered FA2 Schwertner
  51. Amended
  52. Vote recorded in Journal
  53. Amendment(s) offered FA3 Schwertner
  54. Amended
  55. Vote recorded in Journal
  56. Passed to 3rd reading as amended
  57. Vote recorded in Journal
  58. Three day rule suspended
  59. Record vote
  60. Read 3rd time
  61. Passed
  62. Record vote
  63. Senate passage as amended reported
  64. Senate Amendments distributed
  65. Senate Amendments Analysis distributed
  66. House concurs in Senate amendment(s)
  67. Record vote RV#4059
  68. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  69. Text of Senate Amendment(s)
  70. House concurs in Senate amendment(s)-reported
  71. Reported enrolled
  72. Signed in the House
  73. Signed in the Senate
  74. Sent to the Governor
  75. Signed by the Governor
  76. Effective on 1/1/26
FILED UNDER

GOVERNMENT GROWTH UNDER A CONSERVATIVE BANNER

THE TEXT

…“hire an executive director and other personnel as necessary to”…

Bill text, Senate committee report version (S)

The bill creates a new appointed state AI council with authority to hire its own director and staff, attached to the Department of Information Resources.

SURVEILLANCE STATE

THE TEXT

…“identifiers involved in developing, training, evaluating,”…

Bill text, Senate committee report version (S)

The bill exempts the collection and storage of fingerprints, face geometry and voiceprints for training AI models from the state's biometric consent law unless the system is used to identify a specific person.

SPEECH AND LAWFARE

THE TEXT

…“subject to, a private right of action for a violation of this”…

Bill text, Senate committee report version (S)

The bill bars individuals from suing over AI violations, leaves enforcement to the attorney general alone, and gives defendants a cure period and broad liability defenses.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 146 yea · 3 nay

Senate · 31 yea · 0 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · Apr 23, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate: Final passage · May 23, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 31, 2024 to Oct 29, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Capital One Financial Corporation Associates Political Fund$5,000.00

Capital One Financial Corporation Associates Political Fund

$5,000.00

Cash
$5,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$5,000.00

Also funds 1 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Dec 14, 2024 to Jul 14, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Jul 14, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101030508.

Murt Arnold$5,000.00
Jason Itkin$5,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Capital One Financial Corporation Associates Political Fund

$5,000.00

Cash
$5,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$5,000.00

Also funds 1 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Dec 14, 2024 to Jul 14, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Jul 14, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101030508.

Votes8

House May 30, 2025

Yea
121
Nay
17
Present, not voting
2
Absent
4
Excused
6
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 4059

Representative Capriglione moved to concur in the senate amendments to HB 149. The motion to concur in the senate amendments to HB 149 prevailed by (Record 4059): 121 Yeas, 17 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 121 (published)
  • Nay: 17 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 4 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 6 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 23, 2025

Yea
31
Nay
0
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Sources

Senator Schwertner moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that CSHB 149 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0. The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 31 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 23, 2025

Yea
31
Nay
0
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Sources

Senator Schwertner moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that CSHB 149 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 31 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 23, 2025

Yea
Not printed
Nay
Not printed
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Voice vote. No numeric tally or individual yeas are inferred.

Sources

CSHB 149 as amended was passed to third reading by a viva voce vote.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: Not printed
  • Nay: Not printed
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House Apr 23, 2025

Yea
146
Nay
3
Present, not voting
1
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 376

HB 149, as amended, was passed by (Record 376): 146 Yeas, 3 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 146 (published)
  • Nay: 3 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House Apr 23, 2025

Yea
147
Nay
0
Present, not voting
1
Absent
2
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 375

Amendment No. 1 was adopted by (Record 375): 147 Yeas, 0 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 147 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 2 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House Apr 22, 2025

Yea
137
Nay
10
Present, not voting
1
Absent
1
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 322

CSHB 149, as amended, was passed to engrossment by (Record 322): 137 Yeas, 10 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 137 (published)
  • Nay: 10 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 1 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House Apr 22, 2025

Yea
147
Nay
0
Present, not voting
1
Absent
1
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 321

Amendment No. 1 was adopted by (Record 321): 147 Yeas, 0 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 147 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 1 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses29
For
9
Against
1
On
19
Names

For

  • Cicero Action1 registration
  • City of Dallas1 registration
  • City of San Antonio1 registration
  • Self3 registrations
  • Self; American Adjuster Association1 registration
  • Texas Public Policy Foundation2 registrations

Against

  • Americans for Prosperity1 registration

On

  • Clearview AI1 registration
  • Dallas Regional Chamber1 registration
  • Department of Informatin Resources1 registration
  • Department of Information Resources1 registration
  • Insurance Council of Texas1 registration
  • Office of the Attorney General1 registration
  • Self1 registration
  • Self; Americans for Prosperity1 registration
  • Self; The LIBRE Initiative1 registration
  • TechNet2 registrations
  • Texas Appleseed1 registration
  • Texas Association of Business2 registrations
  • Texas Department of Information Resources2 registrations
  • Texas DIR1 registration
  • Texas e-Health Alliance2 registrations
Sources

29 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal
Net to General Revenue · FY 2026($14,590,033)

LBB estimate, flow · fiscal note version F · ( ) = negative · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version F · May 26, 2025

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB149, As Passed 2nd House: a negative impact of ($24,937,448) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

First year · FY 2026 · ($14,590,033)

Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Adversarial review by claude-opus-5-5 at high effort: Smells.

Analysis of text version S by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas House · Filed Mar 14, 2025

06/22/2025 E Effective on 1/1/26

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · House Committee Report · Engrossed · Senate Committee Report · Enrolled

Data snapshot Nov 1, 2026 at 3:08 PM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors
Cosponsors

House committee · Delivery of Government Efficiency · Committee vote 13 aye, 0 nay · Out of committee

Senate committee · Business & Commerce · Committee vote 11 aye, 0 nay · Out of committee

Subjects

Artificial Intelligence (IQ7C5)

Business & Commerce--Trade Practices

Consumer Protection

Electronic Information Systems

Governor

Health Care Providers

Human Relations

Protection of Personal Information

State Agencies, Boards & Commissions

State Agencies, Boards & Commissions--Newly Proposed

TEXAS RESPONSIBLE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE GOVERNANCE ACT (PL6NT)

BIOMETRIC IDENTIFIERS & VOICEPRINTS

COMPUTERS & SOFTWARE

DISCRIMINATION

INTERNET

LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR

SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE

STAFF DEVELOPMENT & TRAINING

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE COUNCIL, TEXAS (V93LG)

ATTORNEY GENERAL

INFORMATION RESOURCES, DEPARTMENT OF

Text

The text as introduced · 5,164 words

By: Capriglione
H.B. No. 149

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the regulation of the use of artificial intelligence

systems in this state; providing civil penalties.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. This Act may be cited as the Texas Responsible

Artificial Intelligence Governance Act

SECTION 2. Title 11, Business & Commerce Code, is amended by

adding Subtitle D to read as follows:

SUBTITLE D. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PROTECTION

CHAPTER 551. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PROTECTION

SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 551.001. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:

(1) "Artificial intelligence system" means the use of

machine learning and related technologies that use data to train

statistical models for the purpose of enabling computer systems to

perform tasks normally associated with human intelligence or

perception, such as computer vision, speech or natural language

processing, and content generation.

(2) "Biometric identifier" means a retina or iris

scan, fingerprint, voiceprint, or record of hand or face geometry.

(3) "Council" means the Artificial Intelligence

Council established under Chapter 553.

(4) "Consumer" means an individual who is a resident

of this state acting only in an individual or household context.

The term does not include an individual acting in a commercial or

employment context.

(5) "Deploy" means to put into effect or

commercialize.

(6) "Deployer" means a person doing business in this

state that deploys an artificial intelligence system.

(7) "Developer" means a person doing business in this

state that develops an artificial intelligence system.

(8) "Distributor" means a person, other than the

Developer or Deployer, that makes an artificial intelligence system

available in the market for a commercial purpose.

(9) "Health care service or treatment" means a health

care treatment, service, or procedure designed to maintain, treat,

diagnose, prevent, alleviate, cure, or heal a patient's physical or

mental condition, illness, injury, or disease, including

preventative care.

(10) "Interactive computer service" has the meaning

assigned by Section 323.001, Business and Commerce Code.

(11) "Personal data" has the meaning assigned to it by

Section 541.001, Business and Commerce Code.

(12) "Personal data" has the meaning assigned to it by

Section 541.001, Business and Commerce Code.

(13) "Political viewpoint discrimination" means the

intentional limitation of a person's ability to express or receive

the expression of another person based solely on the person's

political beliefs, opinions, or affiliation.

(14) "Sensitive personal attribute" means race,

political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, ethnic

orientation, mental health diagnosis, or sex. The term does not

include conduct that would be classified as an offense under

Chapter 21, Penal Code.

Sec. 551.002. APPLICABILITY OF CHAPTER. This chapter

applies to a person that:

(1) conducts business, promotes, or advertises in this

state or produces a product or service consumed by residents of this

state; or

(2) engages in the development, distribution, or

deployment of an artificial intelligence system in this state; and

Sec. 551.003. SANDBOX PROGRAM EXCEPTION. Excluding

violations of Subchapter B, this chapter does not apply to the

development of an artificial intelligence system that is used

exclusively for research, training, testing, or other

pre-deployment activities performed by active participants of the

sandbox program in compliance with Chapter 552.

Sec. 551.004. DISCLOSURE OF AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

SYSTEM TO CONSUMERS. (a) A government agency that makes available

an artificial intelligence system that is intended to interact with

consumers shall disclose to each consumer, before or at the time of

interaction:

(1) that the consumer is interacting with an

artificial intelligence system;

(b) Disclosure is required under subsection (a) of this

section regardless of whether it would be obvious to a reasonable

person that the person is interacting with an artificial

intelligence system.

(c) All disclosures under subsection (a) shall be clear and

conspicuous and written in plain language, and avoid the use of a

dark pattern as defined by 541.001, Business & Commerce Code.

(d) All disclosures under subsection (a) may be linked to a

separate webpage of the developer or deployer.

(e) Any requirement in this section that may conflict with

state or federal law may be exempt.

(f) Any disclosure in a Health care service or treatment may

be prescribed to a consumer through entry waiver forms.

SUBCHAPTER B. PROHIBITED USES

Sec. 551.051. MANIPULATION OF HUMAN BEHAVIOR TO INCITE HARM

OR CRIMINALITY. An artificial intelligence system shall not be

intentionally developed or deployed to incite or encourage a person

to:

(1) commit physical self-harm, including suicide;

(2) harm another person; or

(3) engage in criminal activity.

Sec. 551.052. MANIPULATION OF HUMAN BEHAVIOR TO CIRCUMVENT

INFORMED DECISION-MAKING. An artificial intelligence system shall

not intentionally use Deceptive Trade Practices, as defined by

Chapter 17 of the Texas Business and Commerce Code

Sec.551.053. SOCIAL SCORING. (a) The use by a government

entity of AI systems for the evaluation or classification of

natural persons or groups of persons over a certain period of time

based on their social behavior or known, inferred or predicted

personal or personality characteristics, with the social score

leading to all of the following shall be prohibited:

(i) detrimental or unfavorable treatment of certain

natural persons or groups of persons in social contexts that are

unrelated to the contexts in which the data was originally

generated or collected;

(ii) detrimental or unfavorable treatment of certain

natural persons or groups of persons that is unjustified or

disproportionate to their social behavior or its gravity; and

(iii) infringement, constraining, or otherwise

chilling of any right guaranteed under the United States

Constitution, the Texas Constitution, federal law, or Texas law.

(b) This section applies to government entities using

artificial intelligence systems to constrain civil liberties, not

any artificial intelligence system developed or deployed for

commercial purposes.

Sec. 551.054. CAPTURE OF BIOMETRIC IDENTIFIERS USING

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. (a) A government entity in this state

shall not develop or deploy an artificial intelligence system

developed with biometric identifiers of individuals and the

targeted or untargeted gathering of images or other media from the

internet or any other publicly available source shall not be

deployed for the purpose of uniquely identifying a specific

individual, if it would infringe, constrain, or otherwise chill any

right guaranteed under the United States Constitution, the Texas

Constitution, federal law, or Texas law.

(b) An individual is not considered to be informed nor to

have provided consent for such purpose pursuant to Section 503.001,

Business and Commerce Code, based solely upon the existence on the

internet, or other publicly available source, of an image or other

media containing one or more biometric identifiers.

(c) This section applies to systems designed for government

entities to constrain civil liberties, not any artificial

intelligence system developed or deployed for commercial purposes

or any other government entity purpose.

Sec. 551.056. POLITICAL VIEWPOINT DISCRIMINATION. (a) An

artificial intelligence system shall not be developed or deployed

in a manner that intentionally results in political viewpoint

discrimination or otherwise intentionally infringes upon a

person's freedom of association or ability to freely express the

person's beliefs or opinions.

(b) An interactive computer service may not, through the use

of an artificial intelligence system:

(1) block, ban, remove, de-platform, demonetize,

debank, de-boost, restrict, or otherwise discriminate against a

user based on the user's political speech; or

(2) modify or manipulate a user's content or posting

for the purpose of censoring the user's political speech.

(c) The prohibitions in subsection (b) apply regardless of

whether the actions of the interactive computer service are

automated or conducted with human oversight.

(d) This section does not apply to speech that:

(1) is illegal under federal or state law;

(2) constitutes a credible threat of violence or

incitement to imminent lawless action;

(3) contains obscene material as defined by Section

43.21, Penal Code;

(4) Contains unlawful deep fake video or image in

violation of Section 21.165, Penal Code; or

(5) violates intellectual property rights under

applicable law.

(e) This section shall be construed to be consistent with

applicable federal law, including 47 U.S.C. Section 230, and the

United States Constitution.

Sec. 551.058. UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATION. An artificial

intelligence system shall not be developed or deployed with the

intent to unlawfully discriminate against a protected class in

violation of the laws of this state or federal law. Disparate impact

alone is not sufficient to show intent to discriminate.

Sec. 551.061. CERTAIN SEXUALLY EXPLICIT VIDEOS, IMAGES, AND

CHILD PORNOGRAPHY. An artificial intelligence system shall not be

developed or deployed with the sole intent of producing, assisting

or aiding in producing, or distributing unlawful visual material in

violation of Section 43.26, Penal Code or an unlawful deep fake

video or image in violation of Section 21.165, Penal Code. Factors

to be considered in evaluating the primary purpose or function of an

artificial intelligence system shall include marketing materials

and terms of use associated with the system.

SUBCHAPTER C. ENFORCEMENT AND CONSUMER PROTECTIONS

Sec. 551.101. CONSTRUCTION AND APPLICATION. (a) This

chapter shall be broadly construed and applied to promote its

underlying purposes, which are:

(1) to facilitate and advance the responsible

development and use of artificial intelligence systems;

(2) to protect individuals and groups of individuals

from known, and unknown but reasonably foreseeable, risks

associated with artificial intelligence;

(3) to provide transparency regarding those risks in

the development, deployment, or use of artificial intelligence

systems; and

(4) to provide reasonable notice regarding the use of

artificial intelligence systems by state agencies.

Sec. 551.102. ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY. The attorney general

has authority to enforce this chapter. Excluding, researching,

training, testing, or the conducting of other pre-deployment or

post-deployment activities by active participants of the sandbox

program, in compliance with Chapter 552, does not subject a

developer or deployer to penalties or actions.

Sec. 551.103. INTERNET WEBSITE AND COMPLAINT MECHANISM.

The attorney general shall post on the attorney general's Internet

website an online mechanism through which a consumer may submit a

complaint under this chapter to the attorney general.

Sec. 551.104. INVESTIGATIVE AUTHORITY. (a) If the

attorney general receives a complaint alleging a violation of this

chapter through the online mechanism established under Section

551.103, the attorney general may issue a civil investigative

demand. The attorney general shall issue such demands in

accordance with and under the procedures established under Section

15.10.

(b) The attorney general may request from the associated

party, pursuant to a civil investigative demand issued under

Subsection (a), any one of the following;

(1) A High Level Statement disclosing the purpose,

intended use cases, and deployment context of, and benefits

afforded by, the artificial intelligence system;

(2) a High Level description of the categories of data

the artificial intelligence system processes as inputs and the

outputs the artificial intelligence system produces;

(3) any metrics used to evaluate the performance and

known limitations of the artificial intelligence system;

(4) a High Level description of the post-deployment

monitoring and user safeguards provided concerning the artificial

intelligence system, including the oversight, use, and learning

process established by the deployer to address issues arising from

the deployment of the artificial intelligence system;

(5) a high-level summary of the type of data used to

program or train the artificial intelligence system; or

(6) Any other relevant documentation reasonably

necessary for the attorney general to conduct an investigation and

determine liability or fault of the offender.

(c) The attorney general may not institute an action for a

civil penalty against a developer or deployer for artificial

intelligence systems that remain isolated from customer

interaction in a pre-deployment environment.

Sec. 551.105. NOTICE OF VIOLATION OF CHAPTER; OPPORTUNITY

TO CURE. (a) Before bringing an action under Section 551.106, the

attorney general shall notify a developer, distributor, or deployer

in writing, not later than the 60th day before bringing the action,

identifying the specific provisions of this chapter the attorney

general alleges have been or are being violated. The attorney

general may not bring an action against the developer or deployer

if:

(1) within the 60-day period, the developer or

deployer cures the identified violation; and

(2) the developer or deployer provides the attorney

general a written statement that the developer or deployer:

(A) cured the alleged violation;

(B) notified the consumer, if technically

feasible, and the council that the developer or deployer's

violation was addressed, if the consumer's contact information has

been made available to the developer or deployer and the attorney

general;

(C) provided supportive documentation to show

how the violation was cured; and

(D) made changes to internal policies, if

necessary, to reasonably ensure that no such further violations are

likely to occur.

(b) In any action brought forward by the attorney general or

any violation of this chapter, it shall be an affirmative defense

that the developer, deployer, or other person:

(1) discovers and cures an identified violation under

Subchapter B through:

(A) feedback that the developer, deployer, or

other person encourages deployers or users to provide to such

developer, deployer, or other person;

(B) testing, such as adversarial testing or

red-teaming;

(C) an internal review process; and is otherwise

in compliance with the latest version of the Artificial

Intelligence Risk Management Framework published by the National

Institute of Standards and Technology, ISO/IEC 42001, or another

nationally or internationally recognized risk management framework

for artificial intelligence systems; or

(D) following guidelines set by state agencies as

appropriate.

Sec. 551.106. CIVIL PENALTY; INJUNCTION. (a) The attorney

general may bring an action in the name of this state to restrain or

enjoin the person from violating this chapter and seek injunctive

relief.

(b) The attorney general may recover reasonable attorney's

fees and other reasonable expenses incurred in investigating and

bringing an action under this section.

(c) The attorney general may assess and collect an

administrative fine against a developer or deployer who fails to

timely cure a violation or who breaches a written statement

provided to the attorney general, of not less than $10,000 and not

more than $12,000 per uncured violation.

(d) The attorney general may assess and collect an

administrative fine against a developer or deployer who fails to

timely cure a violation that is determined to be uncurable, of not

less than $80,000 and not more than $200,000 per violation after

conviction of such violation.

(e) A developer or deployer who was found in violation of

and continues to operate with the provisions of this chapter shall

be assessed an administrative fine of not less than $2,000 and not

more than $40,000 per day.

(f) There is a rebuttable presumption that a developer,

distributor, or deployer used reasonable care as required under

this chapter if the developer, distributor, or deployer complied

with their duties in preventing violations under Subchapter B.

(g) A developer, distributor, or deployer may seek an

expedited hearing or other process, including a request for

declaratory judgment, if the developer, distributor, or deployer

believes its actions have not violated this chapter.

Sec. 551.107. ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS BY STATE AGENCIES. (a) A

state agency may sanction an individual licensed, registered, or

certified by that agency for violations of Subchapter B, including:

(1) the suspension, probation, or revocation of a

license, registration, certificate, or other form of permission to

engage in an activity; and

(2) monetary penalties up to $100,000.

(b) a state agency may not sanction an individual that is

licensed, registered, or certified by that agency for violations of

Subchapter B until individuals or entities have been sentenced for

violations of this chapter, and received recommendations from the

attorney general for subsequent enforcement.

Sec. 551.108. CONSUMER RIGHTS AND REMEDIES. A consumer may

appeal decision made by an artificial intelligence system which has

an adverse impact on their health, welfare, safety, or fundamental

rights, and shall have the right to obtain from the deployer clear

and meaningful explanations of the role of the artificial

intelligence system in the decision-making procedure and the main

elements of the decision taken.

SUBCHAPTER D. CONSTRUCTION OF CHAPTER; LOCAL PREEMPTION

Sec. 551.151. CONSTRUCTION OF CHAPTER. This chapter may

not be construed as imposing a requirement on a developer, a

deployer, or other person that adversely affects the rights or

freedoms of any person, including the right of free speech.

Sec. 551.152. LOCAL PREEMPTION. This chapter supersedes

and preempts any ordinance, resolution, rule, or other regulation

adopted by a political subdivision regarding the use of artificial

intelligence systems.

CHAPTER 552. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REGULATORY SANDBOX PROGRAM

SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 552.001. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:

(1) "Applicable agency" means a state agency

responsible for regulating a specific sector impacted by an

artificial intelligence system.

(2) "Consumer" means a person who engages in

transactions involving an artificial intelligence system or is

directly affected by the use of such a system.

(3) "Council" means the Artificial Intelligence

Council established by Chapter 553.

(4) "Department" means the Texas Department of

Information Resources

(5) "Program participant" means a person or business

entity approved to participate in the sandbox program.

(6) "Sandbox program" means the regulatory framework

established under this chapter that allows temporary testing of

artificial intelligence systems in a controlled, limited manner

without full regulatory compliance.

SUBCHAPTER B. SANDBOX PROGRAM FRAMEWORK

Sec. 552.051. ESTABLISHMENT OF SANDBOX PROGRAM. (a) The

department, in coordination with the council, shall administer the

Artificial Intelligence Regulatory Sandbox Program to facilitate

the development, testing, and deployment of innovative artificial

intelligence systems in Texas.

(b) The sandbox program is designed to:

(1) promote the safe and innovative use of artificial

intelligence across various sectors including healthcare, finance,

education, and public services;

(2) encourage the responsible deployment of

artificial intelligence systems while balancing the need for

consumer protection, privacy, and public safety; and

(3) provide clear guidelines for artificial

intelligence developers to test systems while temporarily exempt

from certain regulatory requirements.

Sec. 552.052. APPLICATION PROCESS. (a) A person or

business entity seeking to participate in the sandbox program must

submit an application to the council.

(b) The application must include:

(1) a detailed description of the artificial

intelligence system and its intended use;

(2) a benefit assessment that addresses potential

impacts on consumers, privacy, or public safety;

(3) a plan for mitigating any adverse consequences

during the testing phase; and

(4) proof of compliance with federal artificial

intelligence laws and regulations, where applicable.

Sec. 552.053. DURATION AND SCOPE OF PARTICIPATION. A

participant may test and deploy an artificial intelligence system

under the sandbox program for a period of up to 36 months, unless

extended by the department for good cause.

SUBCHAPTER C. OVERSIGHT AND COMPLIANCE

Sec. 552.101. AGENCY COORDINATION. (a) The department

shall coordinate with all relevant state regulatory agencies to

oversee the operations of the sandbox participants.

(b) The council or a relevant agency may recommend to the

department that a participant's sandbox privileges be revoked if

the artificial intelligence system:

(1) poses undue risk to public safety or welfare;

(2) violates any federal or state laws that the

sandbox program cannot override.

Sec. 552.102. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. (a) Each sandbox

participant must submit quarterly reports to the department, which

shall include:

(1) system performance metrics;

(2) updates on how the system mitigates any risks

associated with its operation; and

(3) feedback from consumers and affected stakeholders

that are using a product that has been deployed from this section.

(b) The department must submit an annual report to the

legislature detailing:

(1) the number of participants in the sandbox program;

(2) the overall performance and impact of artificial

intelligence systems tested within the program; and

(3) recommendations for future legislative or

regulatory reforms.

(c) The council shall maintain the confidentiality of the

intellectual property, trade secrets, and other sensitive

information of the sandbox.

CHAPTER 553. TEXAS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE COUNCIL

SUBCHAPTER A. CREATION AND ORGANIZATION OF COUNCIL

Sec. 553.001. CREATION OF COUNCIL. (a) The Artificial

Intelligence Council is administratively attached to the Texas

Department of Information Resources, and the office shall provide

administrative support to the council as provided by this section.

(b) The office and the council shall enter into a memorandum

of understanding detailing:

(1) the administrative support the council requires

from the office to fulfill the purposes of this chapter;

(2) the reimbursement of administrative expenses to

the office; and

(3) any other provisions available by law to ensure

the efficient operation of the council as attached to the office.

(c) The purpose of the council is to:

(1) ensure artificial intelligence systems are

ethical and in the public's best interest and do not harm public

safety or undermine individual freedoms by finding gaps in the

Penal Code and Chapter 82, Civil Practice and Remedies Code and

making recommendations to the Legislature.

(2) identify existing laws and regulations that impede

innovation in artificial intelligence development and recommend

appropriate reforms;

(3) analyze opportunities to improve the efficiency

and effectiveness of state government operations through the use of

artificial intelligence systems and make recommendations to

applicable state agencies regarding the use of artificial

intelligence to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of agency

operations;

(4) investigate and evaluate potential instances of

regulatory capture, including undue influence by technology

companies or disproportionate burdens on smaller innovators

through the use of artificial intelligence systems;

(5) investigate and evaluate the influence of

technology companies on other companies and determine the existence

or use of tools or processes designed to censor competitors or users

through the use of artificial intelligence systems;

(6) offer guidance and recommendations to the state

legislature on the ethical and legal use of artificial

intelligence;

(7) conduct and publish a study of the current

artificial intelligence regulatory environment; and

(8) in coordination with the Department of Information

Resources, monitor the Artificial Intelligence Regulatory Sandbox

Program established under Chapter 552 and make recommendations for

improvements to the program.

Sec. 553.002. COUNCIL MEMBERSHIP. (a) The council is

composed of 10 members as follows:

(1) four members of the public appointed by the

governor;

(2) two members of the public appointed by the

lieutenant governor;

(3) two members of the public appointed by the speaker

of the house of representatives;

(4) one senator appointed by the lieutenant governor

as a nonvoting member; and

(5) one member of the house of representatives

appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives as a

nonvoting member.

(b) Voting members of the council serve staggered four-year

terms, with the terms of four members expiring every two years.

(c) The governor shall appoint a chair from among the

members, and the council shall elect a vice chair from its

membership.

(d) The council may establish an advisory board composed of

individuals from the public who possess expertise directly related

to the council's functions, including technical, ethical,

regulatory, and other relevant areas.

Sec. 553.003. QUALIFICATIONS. (a) Members of the council

must be Texas residents and have knowledge or expertise in one or

more of the following areas:

(1) artificial intelligence technologies;

(2) data privacy and security;

(3) ethics in technology or law;

(4) public policy and regulation;

(5) risk management related to artificial

intelligence systems;

(6) expertise in improving the efficiency and

effectiveness of government operations; or

(7) expertise in anti-competitive practices and

market fairness.

Sec. 553.004. STAFF AND ADMINISTRATION. (a) The council

may employ an executive director and other personnel as necessary

to perform its duties.

(b) The council, its administration, and its staff must not

account for more than 4% of the budget of the department of

information resources.

SUBCHAPTER B. POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE COUNCIL

Sec. 553.101. ISSUANCE OF ADVISORY REPORTS. (a) The

council may issue reports to the state legislature regarding the

use of artificial intelligence systems in the state.

(b) The council may issue reports on state use of artificial

intelligence systems regarding:

(1) the compliance of artificial intelligence systems

with Texas law;

(2) the ethical implications of artificial

intelligence deployments in the state;

(3) data privacy and security concerns related to

artificial intelligence systems; or

(4) potential liability or legal risks associated with

the use of AI.

Sec. 553.102. TRAINING AND EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH. The

council shall conduct training programs for state agencies and

local governments on the use of artificial intelligence systems.

Sec. 553.103. LIMITATION OF AUTHORITY. (a) The council may

not:

(1) Promulgate rules, regulations, binding guidance, or

anything construed as regulations or guidance on any entity or

agency; or

(2) Interfere with or override state agency operations.

(b) The council's duties are limited to providing evaluations,

SECTION 3. Section 503.001, Business & Commerce Code is

amended by adding Subsection (c-3) to read as follows:

(c-3) This section does not apply to the training,

processing, or storage of biometric identifiers involved in

artificial intelligence systems, as defined by Section 551.001,

unless performed for the purpose of uniquely identifying a specific

individual. If a biometric identifier captured for the purpose of

training an artificial intelligence system is subsequently used for

a commercial purpose, the person possessing the biometric

identifier is subject to this section's provisions for the

possession and destruction of a biometric identifier and the

associated penalties.

SECTION 4. Sec.541.104(a), Business & Commerce Code is

amended to read as follows:

Sec. 541.104. DUTIES OF PROCESSOR. (a) A processor shall

adhere to the instructions of a controller and shall assist the

controller in meeting or complying with the controller's duties or

requirements under this chapter, including:

(1) assisting the controller in responding to consumer

rights requests submitted under Section 541.051 by using

appropriate technical and organizational measures, as reasonably

practicable, taking into account the nature of processing and the

information available to the processor;

(2) assisting the controller with regard to complying

with the [ requirement ] requirements relating to the security of

processing personal data , and if applicable, the data collected,

stored, and processed by artificial intelligence systems and to the

notification of a breach of security of the processor's system

under Chapter 521, taking into account the nature of processing and

the information available to the processor; and

(3) providing necessary information to enable the

controller to conduct and document data protection assessments

under Section 541.105.

SECTION 5. Section 325.011, Government Code, is amended to

read as follows:

Sec. 325.011. CRITERIA FOR REVIEW. The commission and its

staff shall consider the following criteria in determining whether

a public need exists for the continuation of a state agency or its

advisory committees or for the performance of the functions of the

agency or its advisory committees:

(1) the efficiency and effectiveness with which the

agency or the advisory committee operates;

(2)(A) an identification of the mission, goals, and

objectives intended for the agency or advisory committee and of the

problem or need that the agency or advisory committee was intended

to address; and

(B) the extent to which the mission, goals, and

objectives have been achieved and the problem or need has been

addressed;

(3)(A) an identification of any activities of the

agency in addition to those granted by statute and of the authority

for those activities; and

(B) the extent to which those activities are

needed;

(4) an assessment of authority of the agency relating

to fees, inspections, enforcement, and penalties;

(5) whether less restrictive or alternative methods of

performing any function that the agency performs could adequately

protect or provide service to the public;

(6) the extent to which the jurisdiction of the agency

and the programs administered by the agency overlap or duplicate

those of other agencies, the extent to which the agency coordinates

with those agencies, and the extent to which the programs

administered by the agency can be consolidated with the programs of

other state agencies;

(7) the promptness and effectiveness with which the

agency addresses complaints concerning entities or other persons

affected by the agency, including an assessment of the agency's

administrative hearings process;

(8) an assessment of the agency's rulemaking process

and the extent to which the agency has encouraged participation by

the public in making its rules and decisions and the extent to which

the public participation has resulted in rules that benefit the

public;

(9) the extent to which the agency has complied with:

(A) federal and state laws and applicable rules

regarding equality of employment opportunity and the rights and

privacy of individuals; and

(B) state law and applicable rules of any state

agency regarding purchasing guidelines and programs for

historically underutilized businesses;

(10) the extent to which the agency issues and

enforces rules relating to potential conflicts of interest of its

employees;

(11) the extent to which the agency complies with

Chapters 551 and 552 and follows records management practices that

enable the agency to respond efficiently to requests for public

information;

(12) the effect of federal intervention or loss of

federal funds if the agency is abolished;

(13) the extent to which the purpose and effectiveness

of reporting requirements imposed on the agency justifies the

continuation of the requirement; [ and ]

(14) an assessment of the agency's cybersecurity

practices using confidential information available from the

Department of Information Resources or any other appropriate state

agency ; and

(15) an assessment, using information available from

the Department of Information Resources, the Attorney General, or

any other appropriate state agency, of the agency's use of

artificial intelligence systems in its operations and its oversight

of the use of artificial intelligence systems by entities or

persons under the agency's jurisdiction, and any related impact on

the agency's ability to achieve its mission, goals, and objectives .

SECTION 6. Section 2054.068(b), Government Code, is amended

to read as follows:

(b) The department shall collect from each state agency

information on the status and condition of the agency's information

technology infrastructure, including information regarding:

(1) the agency's information security program;

(2) an inventory of the agency's servers, mainframes,

cloud services, and other information technology equipment;

(3) identification of vendors that operate and manage

the agency's information technology infrastructure; [ and ]

(4) any additional related information requested by

the department ; and

(5) an evaluation of the use, or considered use, of

artificial intelligence systems by each state agency.

SECTION 7. Section 2054.0965(b), Government Code, is

amended to read as follows:

Sec. 2054.0965. INFORMATION RESOURCES DEPLOYMENT REVIEW.

(b) Except as otherwise modified by rules adopted by the

department, the review must include:

(1) an inventory of the agency's major information

systems, as defined by Section 2054.008, and other operational or

logistical components related to deployment of information

resources as prescribed by the department;

(2) an inventory of the agency's major databases ,

artificial intelligence systems, and applications;

(3) a description of the agency's existing and planned

telecommunications network configuration;

(4) an analysis of how information systems,

components, databases, applications, and other information

resources have been deployed by the agency in support of:

(A) applicable achievement goals established

under Section 2056.006 and the state strategic plan adopted under

Section 2056.009;

(B) the state strategic plan for information

resources; and

(C) the agency's business objectives, mission,

and goals;

(5) agency information necessary to support the state

goals for interoperability and reuse; and

(6) confirmation by the agency of compliance with

state statutes, rules, and standards relating to information

resources.

SECTION 8. Not later than September 1, 2026, the attorney

general shall post on the attorney general's Internet website the

online mechanism required by Section 551.041, Business & Commerce

Code, as added by this Act.

SECTION 9. This Act takes effect January 1, 2026.