HB 15
Meyer Bill Takes Emails And Texts Out Of Shareholder Records
Companion SB 29 became law
Verdict: Smells
Why it's charged
The hole
THE TEXT
…“records of the corporation shall not include e-mails, text messages”…
Bill text, House committee report version (H)
The stated purpose promises to keep strong owner protections and transparency. This definition removes emails and texts, where much internal business now happens, from what shareholders can inspect unless the message itself carries out a corporate action. The inspection right still reaches formal records, so the promise is weakened, not wiped out.
The holeNeeds review · Nov 1, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade
Caption
relating to the formation, governance, and internal management of domestic entities.
Caption from analyzed text · version H.
Summary
Directors get a good-faith presumption. Companies can require up to 3% ownership to file derivative suits.
The bill rewrites Texas business entity law so that directors, officers and managers of publicly listed companies, and of companies that opt in, are presumed to act in good faith. Owners can sue them only by rebutting that presumption and proving fraud, intentional misconduct, an ultra vires act or a knowing violation of law. It also lets companies cap who may file derivative suits at up to three percent ownership, allows jury-trial waivers, bars email and text messages from shareholder records requests, lets LLC agreements eliminate fiduciary duties, and sets up court hearings to certify directors as independent.
Labels
Labels:
Receipt
The receipt
89R-HB15 · 2025-02-27
SOLD BY
+ 2 more authors, 2 coauthors
ITEM
relating to the formation, governance, and internal management of domestic entities.
WHAT IT DOES
Directors get a good-faith presumption. Companies can require up to 3% ownership to file derivative suits.
The bill rewrites Texas business entity law so that directors, officers and managers of publicly listed companies, and of companies that opt in, are presumed to act in good faith. Owners can sue them only by rebutting that presumption and proving fraud, intentional misconduct, an ultra vires act or a knowing violation of law. It also lets companies cap who may file derivative suits at up to three percent ownership, allows jury-trial waivers, bars email and text messages from shareholder records requests, lets LLC agreements eliminate fiduciary duties, and sets up court hearings to certify directors as independent.
CHARGES
[x] THE HOLEanalysis confidence 50%
THE TEXT
…“records of the corporation shall not include e-mails, text messages”…
Bill text, House committee report version (H)
The stated purpose promises to keep strong owner protections and transparency. This definition removes emails and texts, where much internal business now happens, from what shareholders can inspect unless the message itself carries out a corporate action. The inspection right still reaches formal records, so the promise is weakened, not wiped out.
TOTAL
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source
Sources
Fiscal note · version H · April 6, 2025
No first-year general revenue figure available here.
LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.
Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.
HISTORY
- Filed
- Read first time
- Referred to Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
- Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
- Considered in public hearing
- Committee substitute considered in committee
- Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
- Left pending in committee
- Considered in formal meeting
- Committee substitute considered in committee
- Reported favorably as substituted
- Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
- Committee report distributed
- Committee report sent to Calendars
- Considered in Calendars
- Placed on General State Calendar
- Read 2nd time
- Postponed 4/30/25 5:30 PM
- Companion considered in lieu of CSSB 29
- Laid on the table subject to call
FILED UNDER
THE TEXT
…“shareholders has a cause of action against a director or officer of”…
Bill text, House committee report version (H)
The bill builds a lawsuit shield for directors and officers of listed or opted-in companies, blocking owner suits unless they first rebut a good-faith presumption and then prove fraud, intentional misconduct, an ultra vires act or a knowing violation of law.
THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
Donors
Not tied to this bill.
Sources
The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.
Derived itemized flow · Oct 28, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$530,160.35
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC
$530,160.35
- Cash
- $275,000.00
- Paid by others
- $255,160.35
- Total
- $530,160.35
Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Jun 23, 2025 to Oct 16, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101012321, 101035164, 101040580, 101060247, 101069424, 101072232.
Texas Conservative Majority PAC$422,350.00
Texas Conservative Majority PAC
$422,350.00
- Cash
- $150,000.00
- Paid by others
- $272,350.00
- Total
- $422,350.00
Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Feb 18, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101040580, 101069424, 101072232.
Texas Sands PAC$262,000.00
Texas Sands PAC
$262,000.00
- Cash
- $262,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $262,000.00
Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Nov 13, 2024 to Sep 25, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100988696, 101040580, 101072232.
Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC
$530,160.35
- Cash
- $275,000.00
- Paid by others
- $255,160.35
- Total
- $530,160.35
Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Jun 23, 2025 to Oct 16, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101012321, 101035164, 101040580, 101060247, 101069424, 101072232.
Texas Conservative Majority PAC
$422,350.00
- Cash
- $150,000.00
- Paid by others
- $272,350.00
- Total
- $422,350.00
Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Feb 18, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101040580, 101069424, 101072232.
Texas Sands PAC
$262,000.00
- Cash
- $262,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $262,000.00
Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Nov 13, 2024 to Sep 25, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100988696, 101040580, 101072232.
Votes
No floor vote loaded for this bill.
Witnesses11
- For
- 11
- Against
- 0
- On
- 0
Names
For
- Archer Aviation1 registration
- AT&T1 registration
- Nasdaq, Inc.1 registration
- Self1 registration
- Self; Texas Trial Lawyers Association1 registration
- TBLF1 registration
- Texans for Lawsuit Reform1 registration
- Texas Association of Business1 registration
- Texas Pacific Land Corp.1 registration
- The Alliance for Corporate Excellence1 registration
- TXSE Group Inc (Texas Stock Exchange)1 registration
Sources
11 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.
Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.
House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.
Fiscal
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source
Sources
Fiscal note · version H · April 6, 2025
No first-year general revenue figure available here.
LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.
Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.
How this was graded
Analysis of text version H by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.
Sources
Texas House · Filed Feb 27, 2025
05/01/2025 H Laid on the table subject to call
Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · House Committee Report
Data snapshot Nov 1, 2026 at 1:33 PM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.
House committee · Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence · Committee vote 7 aye, 4 nay · Out of committee
Companion
SB 29 by Hughes (identical)
Subjects
Business & Commerce--General
Corporations & Associations
Courts--General
Financial--General
SECRETARY OF STATE
Text
The text as introduced · 3,155 words
89R15624 PRL-F By: Meyer H.B. No. 15 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to business entities. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. Section 1.002(55-a), Business Organizations Code, is amended to read as follows: (55-a) "National securities exchange" means : (A) an exchange registered as a national securities exchange under Section 6, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78f) ; or (B) a stock exchange that: (i) has its principal office in this state; and (ii) has received approval by the securities commissioner under Subchapter C, Chapter 4005, Government Code . SECTION 2. Subchapter B, Chapter 1, Business Organizations Code, is amended by adding Section 1.056 to read as follows: Sec. 1.056. LAWS GOVERNING FORMATION, INTERNAL AFFAIRS, AND GOVERNANCE OF DOMESTIC ENTITY. (a) The plain meaning of the text of this code may not be supplanted, contravened, or modified by the laws or judicial decisions of any other state. (b) The managerial officials of a domestic entity, in exercising their powers with respect to the domestic entity, may consider the laws and judicial decisions of other states and the practices observed by entities formed in those other states. The failure or refusal of a managerial official to consider, or to conform the exercise of the managerial official's powers to, the laws, judicial decisions, or practices of another state does not constitute or imply a breach of this code or of any duty existing under the laws of this state. SECTION 3. Section 2.115(b), Business Organizations Code, is amended to read as follows: (b) The governing documents of a domestic entity [ may require ], consistent with applicable state and federal jurisdictional requirements, may require: (1) that any internal entity claims shall be brought only in a court in this state ; and (2) that one or more courts in this state having jurisdiction shall serve as the exclusive forum and venue for any internal entity claims . SECTION 4. Subchapter B, Chapter 2, Business Organizations Code, is amended by adding Section 2.116 to read as follows: Sec. 2.116. WAIVER OF TRIAL BY JURY. (a) In this section, "internal entity claim" has the meaning assigned by Section 2.115. (b) The governing documents of a domestic entity may contain an enforceable waiver of the right to a jury trial concerning any internal entity claim, regardless of whether the applicable governing document is signed by the members, owners, officers, or governing persons. (c) A waiver of jury trial in the governing documents of a domestic entity shall be a knowing and informed waiver of a person who: (1) voted for or affirmatively ratified the governing document containing the waiver; (2) acquired an equity security of the domestic entity at a time at which the waiver was included in the governing documents; or (3) is otherwise shown by evidence satisfactory to an appropriate court to have knowingly and informedly consented or acquiesced to the waiver. SECTION 5. Section 4.051, Business Organizations Code, is amended to read as follows: Sec. 4.051. GENERAL RULE. (a) A filing instrument submitted to the secretary of state takes effect on filing, except as permitted by Section 4.052 or as provided by the provisions of this code that apply to the entity making the filing or other law. (b) Subject to Subsection (c), a revised filing instrument, curing the deficiencies in the initial rejected filing instrument identified by the secretary of state, is considered filed as of the date of the delivery to the secretary of state of the initial rejected filing instrument and takes effect as specified in this subchapter if the revised filing instrument: (1) is delivered to the secretary of state not later than the 10th business day following the date on which the notice of rejection is mailed by the secretary of state; (2) is found to be acceptable by the secretary of state; and (3) is the first revised filing instrument. (c) Subsection (b) applies to a filing instrument that creates or forms a new domestic entity or amends the name of an existing domestic entity only if: (1) the name of the new domestic entity or the amended name of the existing domestic entity, as applicable, was reserved under Subchapter C, Chapter 5, or was registered under Subchapter D, Chapter 5, with the secretary of state by or on behalf of the filer on or before the date the initial rejected filing instrument is delivered to the secretary of state; and (2) the name reservation or registration remains in effect at least until the revised filing instrument delivered to the secretary of state under Subsection (b) takes effect. SECTION 6. Section 21.218, Business Organizations Code, is amended by amending Subsection (b) and adding Subsections (b-2) and (b-3) to read as follows: (b) On written demand stating a proper purpose, a holder of shares of a corporation for at least six months immediately preceding the holder's demand, or a holder of at least five percent of all of the outstanding shares of a corporation, is entitled to examine and copy, at a reasonable time at the corporation's principal place of business or other location approved by the corporation and the holder, the corporation's books, records of account, minutes, share transfer records, and other records, whether in written or other tangible form, if the records are [ record is ] reasonably related to and appropriate to examine and copy for that proper purpose. For purposes of this subsection, the records of the corporation shall not include e-mails, text messages or similar electronic communications, or information from social media accounts unless the particular e-mail, communication, or social media information affects an action by the corporation. (b-2) This subsection applies only to a corporation that has a class or series of voting shares listed on a national securities exchange or that has made an affirmative election to be governed by Section 21.419. For purposes of Subsection (b), a written demand shall not be for a proper purpose if the corporation reasonably determines that the demand is in connection with: (1) an active or pending derivative proceeding in the right of the corporation under Subchapter L that is or is expected to be instituted or maintained by the holder or the holder's affiliate; or (2) an active or pending civil lawsuit to which the corporation, or its affiliate, and the holder, or the holder's affiliate, are or are expected to be adversarial named parties. (b-3) Subsection (b-2) does not impair any rights of: (1) the holder or the holder's affiliate to obtain discovery of records from the corporation in: (A) a civil lawsuit described by Subsection (b-2)(2); or (B) the derivative proceeding subject to Section 21.556; or (2) the holder to obtain a court order to compel production of records of the corporation for examination by the holder as provided by Subsection (c). SECTION 7. Section 21.416, Business Organizations Code, is amended by adding Subsection (g) to read as follows: (g) This subsection applies only to a corporation that has a class or series of voting shares listed on a national securities exchange or that has made an affirmative election to be governed by Section 21.419. The board of directors may adopt resolutions that authorize the formation of a committee of independent and disinterested directors to review and approve transactions, whether or not contemplated at the time of the committee's formation or a petition under Section 21.4161, involving the corporation or any of its subsidiaries and a controlling shareholder, director, or officer. SECTION 8. Subchapter I, Chapter 21, Business Organizations Code, is amended by adding Section 21.4161 to read as follows: Sec. 21.4161. DETERMINATION OF INDEPENDENT AND DISINTERESTED DIRECTORS. (a) A corporation that adopts a resolution to authorize the formation of a committee of independent and disinterested directors under Section 21.416(g) may petition a court having appropriate jurisdiction to hold an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the directors appointed to the committee are independent and disinterested with respect to any transactions involving the corporation or any of its subsidiaries and a controlling shareholder, director, or officer. (b) In the petition, the corporation shall designate legal counsel to act on behalf of the corporation and its shareholders, other than the controlling shareholder, director, or officer involved in the transaction, and shall give notice to the shareholders of the designated counsel and the petition. (c) If the corporation has a class of its shares listed on a national securities exchange, the notice required by Subsection (b) may be provided through the filing of a current report with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78 et seq.), and any rules promulgated under that Act. (d) Promptly after receiving a petition, and not earlier than the 10th day after the date the notice required under Subsection (b) is given, the court shall hold a preliminary hearing to determine the appropriate legal counsel to represent the corporation and its shareholders, other than the controlling shareholder, director, or officer involved in the transaction, whether or not the same as the legal counsel identified in the petition. Any other legal counsel representing a shareholder, other than the controlling shareholder, director, or officer involved in the transaction, may participate in the hearing to request designation by the court as the appropriate legal counsel. (e) After the court determines the appropriate legal counsel under Subsection (d), the court shall promptly hold an evidentiary hearing as to whether the directors on the committee are independent and disinterested with respect to transactions involving the corporation or any of its subsidiaries and a controlling shareholder, director, or officer. The appropriate legal counsel determined under Subsection (d) and legal counsel for the corporation may participate in the hearing. After hearing and reviewing the evidence presented, the court shall make its determination as to whether the directors on the committee are independent and disinterested. (f) The court's determination that the directors are independent and disinterested under Subsection (e) shall be dispositive in the absence of facts, not presented to the court, constituting evidence sufficient to prove that one or more of those directors is not independent and disinterested with respect to a particular transaction involving the corporation or any of its subsidiaries and a controlling shareholder, director, or officer. SECTION 9. Section 21.418, Business Organizations Code, is amended by adding Subsection (f) to read as follows: (f) This subsection applies only to a corporation that has a class or series of voting shares listed on a national securities exchange or has made an affirmative election to be governed by Section 21.419. Regardless of whether the conditions of Subsection (b) are satisfied, neither the corporation nor any of the corporation's shareholders will have a cause of action against any director or officer for breach of duty with respect to the making, authorization, or performance of the contract or transaction because the director or officer had the relationship or interest described by Subsection (a) or took any of the actions authorized by Subsection (d) unless the cause of action is permitted by Section 21.419. SECTION 10. Subchapter I, Chapter 21, Business Organizations Code, is amended by adding Section 21.419 to read as follows: Sec. 21.419. PRESUMPTIONS FOR DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF CERTAIN CORPORATIONS. (a) This section applies only to a corporation that has: (1) a class or series of voting shares listed on a national securities exchange; or (2) included in its governing documents a statement affirmatively electing to be governed by this section. (b) In taking or declining to take any action on any matters of a corporation's business, a director or officer is presumed to act: (1) in good faith; (2) on an informed basis; (3) in furtherance of the interests of the corporation; and (4) in obedience to the law and the corporation's governing documents. (c) Neither a corporation nor any of the corporation's shareholders has a cause of action against a director or officer of the corporation as a result of any act or omission in the person's capacity as a director or officer unless: (1) the claimant rebuts one or more of the presumptions established by Subsection (b); and (2) it is proven by the claimant that: (A) the director's or officer's act or omission constituted a breach of one or more of the person's duties as a director or officer; and (B) the breach involved fraud, intentional misconduct, an ultra vires act, or a knowing violation of law. (d) The presumptions established by this section: (1) are in addition to any legal presumption arising under common law or this code, in favor of any managerial official of a corporation to which this section applies; and (2) do not abrogate, preempt, or lessen any other defense, presumption, immunity, or privilege under other constitutional, statutory, case, or common law or rule provisions, in favor of any managerial official of any domestic entity, including any corporation to which this section does not apply. (e) In alleging fraud, intentional misconduct, an ultra vires act, or a knowing violation of the law under Subsection (c)(2)(B), a party must state with particularity the circumstances constituting the fraud, intentional misconduct, ultra vires act, or knowing violation of law. (f) This section does not limit the effect of a provision contained in the certificate of formation or similar instrument of a corporation limiting monetary liability of a governing person as permitted by Section 7.001. SECTION 11. Section 21.551(2), Business Organizations Code, is amended to read as follows: (2) "Shareholder" includes : (A) a shareholder as defined by Section 1.002 ; (B) [ or ] a beneficial owner whose shares are held in a voting trust or by a nominee on the beneficial owner's behalf ; or (C) two or more shareholders acting in concert under an informal or formal agreement or understanding with respect to a derivative proceeding . SECTION 12. Section 21.552(a), Business Organizations Code, is amended to read as follows: (a) Subject to Subsection (b), a shareholder may not institute or maintain a derivative proceeding unless: (1) the shareholder: (A) was a shareholder of the corporation at the time of the act or omission complained of; or (B) became a shareholder by operation of law originating from a person that was a shareholder at the time of the act or omission complained of; [ and ] (2) the shareholder fairly and adequately represents the interests of the corporation in enforcing the right of the corporation ; and (3) for a corporation with common shares listed on a national securities exchange or that has made an affirmative election to be governed by Section 21.419, at the time the derivative proceeding is instituted, the shareholder beneficially owns a number of the common shares sufficient to meet the required ownership threshold to institute a derivative proceeding in the right of the corporation identified in the corporation's certificate of formation or bylaws, provided that the required ownership threshold does not exceed three percent of the outstanding shares of the corporation . SECTION 13. Section 21.554, Business Organizations Code, is amended by amending Subsection (b) and adding Subsections (c), (d), (e), and (f) to read as follows: (b) The court shall appoint a panel under Subsection (a)(3) if the court determines [ finds ] that the individuals recommended by the corporation are independent and disinterested and are otherwise qualified with respect to expertise, experience, independent judgment, and other factors considered appropriate by the court under the circumstances to make the determinations. An individual appointed by the court to a panel under this section may not be held liable to the corporation or the corporation's shareholders for an action taken or omission made by the individual in that capacity, except for an act or omission constituting fraud or wilful misconduct. (c) Before the corporation's determination of how to proceed on the allegations under Subsection (a), the corporation may petition the court in which the derivative proceeding has been instituted, or a court having proper jurisdiction if no derivative proceeding has been instituted, to request a determination as to whether the directors identified or appointed under Subsection (a)(1) or (2) are independent and disinterested with respect to the allegations made in the demand. (d) For purposes of Subsection (c), if a derivative proceeding was not instituted, the corporation must promptly deliver a copy of the petition to the shareholder making the demand who will have the right, if promptly exercised, to challenge the petition before the court makes its determination. (e) After hearing and reviewing the evidence presented, the court shall make its determination as to whether the directors are independent and disinterested. (f) A court's determination that the directors or individuals are independent and disinterested under this section shall be dispositive in the absence of discovery of facts, not presented to the court, constituting evidence sufficient to prove that one or more of those directors or individuals are not independent and disinterested. SECTION 14. Section 21.561, Business Organizations Code, is amended by adding Subsection (c) to read as follows: (c) For purposes of Subsection (b), a substantial benefit to the corporation does not include additional or amended disclosures made to the shareholders, regardless of materiality. SECTION 15. Section 21.562(a), Business Organizations Code, is amended to read as follows: (a) In a derivative proceeding brought in the right of a foreign corporation, the matters covered by this subchapter are governed by the laws of the jurisdiction of formation of the foreign corporation, except for Sections 21.555, 21.560, and 21.561, which with respect to foreign corporations are procedural provisions and do not relate to the internal affairs of the foreign corporation, unless applying the laws of the jurisdiction of formation of the foreign corporation requires otherwise with respect to Section 21.555. SECTION 16. (a) Section 4.051, Business Organizations Code, as amended by this Act, applies only to a filing instrument submitted to the secretary of state on or after the effective date of this Act. A filing instrument submitted to the secretary of state before the effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect on the date the filing instrument was submitted, and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose. (b) Sections 21.552(a) and 21.561, Business Organizations Code, as amended by this Act, apply only to a derivative proceeding instituted on or after the effective date of this Act. A derivative proceeding instituted before the effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect on the date the proceeding was instituted, and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose. SECTION 17. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this Act takes effect September 1, 2025.



