Monitoring the Session

HB 1650

bill giving bail bond sureties four years to seek refunds

Died in committee

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. Terry CanalesDHouse 40

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to a special bill of review to reform a final judgment of forfeiture of a bail bond.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Up from two years after a final forfeiture judgment.

The bill gives bail bond sureties four years instead of two after a final bond forfeiture judgment to ask the court to reform the judgment and refund some or all of the forfeited bond. It touches bail bond companies and other sureties, the counties that collect forfeited bond money, and the courts that hear these requests. On the ground, sureties get twice as long to try to win back forfeited money, but only for forfeiture judgments entered on or after September 1, 2025.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 1709 (Died in committee) and this bill (Died in committee). Checked against 88R only.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 1709 (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.GOT HALFWAY. Passed the House on May 10, 2025. Died in the Senate: never got out of the Criminal Justice committee.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB1650 · 2024-12-18

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to a special bill of review to reform a final judgment of forfeiture of a bail bond.

WHAT IT DOES

Up from two years after a final forfeiture judgment.

The bill gives bail bond sureties four years instead of two after a final bond forfeiture judgment to ask the court to reform the judgment and refund some or all of the forfeited bond. It touches bail bond companies and other sureties, the counties that collect forfeited bond money, and the courts that hear these requests. On the ground, sureties get twice as long to try to win back forfeited money, but only for forfeiture judgments entered on or after September 1, 2025.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · April 14, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Criminal Jurisprudence
  4. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  5. Considered in public hearing
  6. Left pending in committee
  7. Considered in formal meeting
  8. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  9. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  10. Committee report distributed
  11. Committee report sent to Calendars
  12. Considered in Calendars
  13. Placed on General State Calendar
  14. Read 2nd time
  15. Passed to engrossment
  16. Record vote RV#1979
  17. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  18. Read 3rd time
  19. Passed
  20. Record vote RV#2056
  21. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  22. Reported engrossed
  23. Received from the House
  24. Read first time
  25. Referred to Criminal Justice
ALSO NOTED · NOT CHARGED (1)

CARVE-OUT · analysis confidence 30%

THE TEXT

…“the surety on the bond may file with the court a special bill of review”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The only party that gains the longer window is the bail bond surety. But the caption openly names this bail bond forfeiture process, so the benefit is honestly described.

FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 102 yea · 29 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · May 10, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Aug 9, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Associated General Contractors of Texas PAC$65,000.00

Associated General Contractors of Texas PAC

$65,000.00

Cash
$65,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$65,000.00

Also funds 120 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 19, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 6, 2024 to Oct 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100986692, 101072185.

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$35,000.00

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$35,000.00

Cash
$35,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$35,000.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Aug 9, 2024 to Sep 29, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100986692, 101030306, 101068017, 101072185.

Curtis E. Ford$30,605.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Associated General Contractors of Texas PAC

$65,000.00

Cash
$65,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$65,000.00

Also funds 120 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 19, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 6, 2024 to Oct 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100986692, 101072185.

×

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$35,000.00

Cash
$35,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$35,000.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Aug 9, 2024 to Sep 29, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100986692, 101030306, 101068017, 101072185.

Votes2

House May 10, 2025

Yea
102
Nay
29
Present, not voting
2
Absent
0
Excused
17
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 2056

HB 1650 was passed by (Record 2056): 102 Yeas, 29 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 102 (published)
  • Nay: 29 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 17 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 9, 2025

Yea
132
Nay
6
Present, not voting
1
Absent
5
Excused
6
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 1979

HB 1650 was passed to engrossment by (Record 1979): 132 Yeas, 6 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 132 (published)
  • Nay: 6 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 5 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 6 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · April 14, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R HB 1709

by Rep. Canales, same lead author · Died in committee · same text

Introduced text

Last action, May 4, 2023: Referred to Criminal Justice

Relating to a special bill of review to reform a final judgment of forfeiture of a bail bond.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas House · Filed Dec 18, 2024

05/21/2025 S Referred to Criminal Justice

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · House Committee Report · Engrossed

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Criminal Jurisprudence · Committee vote 9 aye, 2 nay · Out of committee

Senate committee · Criminal Justice · Final status: Died in committee

Subjects

Criminal Procedure--Bail & Pretrial Release

Text

The text as introduced · 266 words

89R2946 CMO-D

By: Canales
H.B. No. 1650

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to a special bill of review to reform a final judgment of

forfeiture of a bail bond.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Article 22.17(a), Code of Criminal Procedure, is

amended to read as follows:

(a) Not later than the fourth anniversary of [ two years

after ] the date a final judgment is entered in a bond forfeiture

proceeding, the surety on the bond may file with the court a special

bill of review. A special bill of review may include a request, on

equitable grounds, that the final judgment be reformed and that all

or part of the bond amount be remitted to the surety, after

deducting the costs of court, any reasonable costs to the county for

the return of the principal, and the interest accrued on the bond

amount from the date of forfeiture. The court in its discretion may

grant or deny the bill in whole or in part.

SECTION 2. Article 22.17(a), Code of Criminal Procedure, as

amended by this Act, applies only to a bail bond for which a final

judgment of forfeiture is entered on or after the effective date of

this Act. A bail bond for which a final judgment of forfeiture is

entered before the effective date of this Act is governed by the law

in effect on the date the judgment was entered, and the former law

is continued in effect for that purpose.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.