88R HB 414
by Rep. Collier, same lead author · Died in committee · same text
Introduced textLast action, Mar 21, 2023: Left pending in subcommittee
Relating to a maximum allowable caseload for certain attorneys.
Caption, 88R bill history
HB 1847
Did not pass
THE TEXT
…“Section 79.037 in an amount that equaled more than 50 percent of the”…
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The commission must punish noncompliance only in counties where state grants covered more than half of indigent defense spending. Any county that pays most of its own costs faces no required remedy for breaking the caseload limit.
The holeInitial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade
relating to a maximum allowable caseload for certain attorneys.
Caption from analyzed text · version I.
Counties paying most of their own indigent defense costs can break the limit with no required remedy.
The bill orders the Texas Indigent Defense Commission to set a maximum caseload for criminal defense attorneys by November 1, 2025, and post it online. Counties must make sure court-appointed lawyers for poor defendants, including lawyers in managed assigned counsel programs, are not handed cases that push them over that limit. The commission must write rules to push counties to comply, but it must impose a penalty only on counties where state grants paid more than half of local indigent defense costs the year before.
Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 414 (Died in committee) and this bill (Did not pass). Checked against 88R only.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 414 (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.
89R-HB1847 · 2025-01-15
relating to a maximum allowable caseload for certain attorneys.
Counties paying most of their own indigent defense costs can break the limit with no required remedy.
The bill orders the Texas Indigent Defense Commission to set a maximum caseload for criminal defense attorneys by November 1, 2025, and post it online. Counties must make sure court-appointed lawyers for poor defendants, including lawyers in managed assigned counsel programs, are not handed cases that push them over that limit. The commission must write rules to push counties to comply, but it must impose a penalty only on counties where state grants paid more than half of local indigent defense costs the year before.
[x] THE HOLEanalysis confidence 50%
THE TEXT
…“Section 79.037 in an amount that equaled more than 50 percent of the”…
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The commission must punish noncompliance only in counties where state grants covered more than half of indigent defense spending. Any county that pays most of its own costs faces no required remedy for breaking the caseload limit.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source
Fiscal note · version I · April 28, 2025
No first-year general revenue figure available here.
LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.
Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.
No verified beat found.
THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
Not tied to this bill.
The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.
Derived itemized flow · Aug 5, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
$12,500.00
Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · Oct 16, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100970374, 101010492, 101057411.
$12,000.00
Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · Aug 5, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100970374, 101057411.
$11,000.00
Also funds 118 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Aug 12, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · Oct 16, 2024 to Jun 24, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100970374, 101010492.
Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.
$12,500.00
Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · Oct 16, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100970374, 101010492, 101057411.
$12,000.00
Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · Aug 5, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100970374, 101057411.
$11,000.00
Also funds 118 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Aug 12, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · Oct 16, 2024 to Jun 24, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100970374, 101010492.
No floor vote loaded for this bill.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source
Fiscal note · version I · April 28, 2025
No first-year general revenue figure available here.
LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.
Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.
Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.
Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.
by Rep. Collier, same lead author · Died in committee · same text
Introduced textLast action, Mar 21, 2023: Left pending in subcommittee
Relating to a maximum allowable caseload for certain attorneys.
Caption, 88R bill history
Texas House · Filed Jan 15, 2025
05/06/2025 H Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
Texas Legislature Online · Introduced
Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:19 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.
House committee · Criminal Jurisprudence · Committee vote 8 aye, 1 nay, 1 absent · Final status: Did not pass
Criminal Procedure--Defense Counsel
Criminal Procedure--General
INDIGENT DEFENSE COMMISSION, TEXAS
The text as introduced · 789 words
89R6427 EAS-F By: Collier H.B. No. 1847 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to a maximum allowable caseload for certain attorneys. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. Article 26.04(b), Code of Criminal Procedure, is amended to read as follows: (b) Procedures adopted under Subsection (a) shall: (1) authorize only the judges of the county courts, statutory county courts, and district courts trying criminal cases in the county, or the judges' designee, to appoint counsel for indigent defendants in the county; (2) apply to each appointment of counsel made by a judge or the judges' designee in the county; (3) ensure that each indigent defendant in the county who is charged with a misdemeanor punishable by confinement or with a felony and who appears in court without counsel has an opportunity to confer with appointed counsel before the commencement of judicial proceedings; (4) require appointments for defendants in capital cases in which the death penalty is sought to comply with any applicable requirements under Articles 11.071 and 26.052; (5) ensure that each attorney appointed from a public appointment list to represent an indigent defendant perform the attorney's duty owed to the defendant in accordance with the adopted procedures, the requirements of this code, and applicable rules of ethics; [ and ] (6) ensure that appointments are allocated among qualified attorneys in a manner that is fair, neutral, and nondiscriminatory ; and (7) ensure that an appointment will not result in the applicable attorney having a caseload that is larger than the maximum allowable caseload established under Section 79.043, Government Code . SECTION 2. Article 26.047(c), Code of Criminal Procedure, is amended to read as follows: (c) The commissioners court or commissioners courts shall require a written plan of operation from an entity operating a program under this article. The plan of operation must include: (1) a budget for the program, including salaries; (2) a description of each personnel position, including the program's director; (3) the maximum allowable caseload for each attorney appointed by the program , not to exceed the maximum allowable caseload established under Section 79.043, Government Code ; (4) provisions for training personnel of the program and attorneys appointed under the program; (5) a description of anticipated overhead costs for the program; (6) a policy regarding licensed investigators and expert witnesses used by attorneys appointed under the program; (7) a policy to ensure that appointments are reasonably and impartially allocated among qualified attorneys; and (8) a policy to ensure that an attorney appointed under the program does not accept appointment in a case that involves a conflict of interest for the attorney that has not been waived by all affected clients. SECTION 3. Subchapter C, Chapter 79, Government Code, is amended by adding Section 79.043 to read as follows: Sec. 79.043. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE CASELOAD FOR CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS. (a) The commission shall establish a maximum allowable caseload for a criminal defense attorney that, considering the attorney's total caseload, including appointments made under Article 26.04, Code of Criminal Procedure, appointments made under Title 3, Family Code, and other work, would allow the attorney to give each criminal defendant the time and effort necessary to ensure effective and diligent representation. (b) The maximum allowable caseload described by Subsection (a) is not required to be a specific number and may vary according to one or more formulas established by the commission. (c) The commission shall revise the maximum allowable caseload described by Subsection (a) as necessary. (d) The commission shall post the maximum allowable caseload described by Subsection (a) on the commission's Internet website. (e) The commission shall adopt rules to promote compliance by each county in this state with the maximum allowable caseload described by Subsection (a). The commission shall impose a remedy for noncompliance occurring in any county in which the commission provided, for the preceding state fiscal year, grant funds under Section 79.037 in an amount that equaled more than 50 percent of the county's expenditures on indigent defense services for that year. SECTION 4. Not later than November 1, 2025, the Texas Indigent Defense Commission shall establish and post on its Internet website the maximum allowable caseload described by Section 79.043, Government Code, as added by this Act. SECTION 5. The changes in law made by this Act apply only to a criminal case in which the indictment or information is filed on or after November 1, 2025. A criminal case in which the indictment or information was filed before November 1, 2025, is governed by the law in effect immediately before the effective date of this Act, and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose. SECTION 6. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.