Monitoring the Session

HB 1847

Collier Caseload Bill Requires Penalties Only Where State Grants Top 50%

Did not pass

Verdict: Smells

SmellsInitial review
Rep. Nicole CollierDHouse 95
Why it's charged
The hole

THE TEXT

…“Section 79.037 in an amount that equaled more than 50 percent of the”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The commission must punish noncompliance only in counties where state grants covered more than half of indigent defense spending. Any county that pays most of its own costs faces no required remedy for breaking the caseload limit.

The hole

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to a maximum allowable caseload for certain attorneys.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Counties paying most of their own indigent defense costs can break the limit with no required remedy.

The bill orders the Texas Indigent Defense Commission to set a maximum caseload for criminal defense attorneys by November 1, 2025, and post it online. Counties must make sure court-appointed lawyers for poor defendants, including lawyers in managed assigned counsel programs, are not handed cases that push them over that limit. The commission must write rules to push counties to comply, but it must impose a penalty only on counties where state grants paid more than half of local indigent defense costs the year before.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 414 (Died in committee) and this bill (Did not pass). Checked against 88R only.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 414 (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB1847 · 2025-01-15

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to a maximum allowable caseload for certain attorneys.

WHAT IT DOES

Counties paying most of their own indigent defense costs can break the limit with no required remedy.

The bill orders the Texas Indigent Defense Commission to set a maximum caseload for criminal defense attorneys by November 1, 2025, and post it online. Counties must make sure court-appointed lawyers for poor defendants, including lawyers in managed assigned counsel programs, are not handed cases that push them over that limit. The commission must write rules to push counties to comply, but it must impose a penalty only on counties where state grants paid more than half of local indigent defense costs the year before.

CHARGES

[x] THE HOLEanalysis confidence 50%

THE TEXT

…“Section 79.037 in an amount that equaled more than 50 percent of the”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The commission must punish noncompliance only in counties where state grants covered more than half of indigent defense spending. Any county that pays most of its own costs faces no required remedy for breaking the caseload limit.

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · April 28, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Criminal Jurisprudence
  4. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  5. Considered in public hearing
  6. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  7. Left pending in committee
  8. Considered in formal meeting
  9. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Aug 5, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$12,500.00

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$12,500.00

Cash
$12,500.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$12,500.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 16, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100970374, 101010492, 101057411.

Texas Sands PAC$12,000.00

Texas Sands PAC

$12,000.00

Cash
$12,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$12,000.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Aug 5, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100970374, 101057411.

Texas Medical Association Political Action Committee$11,000.00

Texas Medical Association Political Action Committee

$11,000.00

Cash
$11,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$11,000.00

Also funds 118 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Aug 12, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 16, 2024 to Jun 24, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100970374, 101010492.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$12,500.00

Cash
$12,500.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$12,500.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 16, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100970374, 101010492, 101057411.

×

Texas Sands PAC

$12,000.00

Cash
$12,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$12,000.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Aug 5, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100970374, 101057411.

×

Texas Medical Association Political Action Committee

$11,000.00

Cash
$11,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$11,000.00

Also funds 118 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Aug 12, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 16, 2024 to Jun 24, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100970374, 101010492.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · April 28, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R HB 414

by Rep. Collier, same lead author · Died in committee · same text

Introduced text

Last action, Mar 21, 2023: Left pending in subcommittee

Relating to a maximum allowable caseload for certain attorneys.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas House · Filed Jan 15, 2025

05/06/2025 H Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:19 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Criminal Jurisprudence · Committee vote 8 aye, 1 nay, 1 absent · Final status: Did not pass

Subjects

Criminal Procedure--Defense Counsel

Criminal Procedure--General

INDIGENT DEFENSE COMMISSION, TEXAS

Text

The text as introduced · 789 words

89R6427 EAS-F

By: Collier
H.B. No. 1847

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to a maximum allowable caseload for certain attorneys.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Article 26.04(b), Code of Criminal Procedure, is

amended to read as follows:

(b) Procedures adopted under Subsection (a) shall:

(1) authorize only the judges of the county courts,

statutory county courts, and district courts trying criminal cases

in the county, or the judges' designee, to appoint counsel for

indigent defendants in the county;

(2) apply to each appointment of counsel made by a

judge or the judges' designee in the county;

(3) ensure that each indigent defendant in the county

who is charged with a misdemeanor punishable by confinement or with

a felony and who appears in court without counsel has an opportunity

to confer with appointed counsel before the commencement of

judicial proceedings;

(4) require appointments for defendants in capital

cases in which the death penalty is sought to comply with any

applicable requirements under Articles 11.071 and 26.052;

(5) ensure that each attorney appointed from a public

appointment list to represent an indigent defendant perform the

attorney's duty owed to the defendant in accordance with the

adopted procedures, the requirements of this code, and applicable

rules of ethics; [ and ]

(6) ensure that appointments are allocated among

qualified attorneys in a manner that is fair, neutral, and

nondiscriminatory ; and

(7) ensure that an appointment will not result in the

applicable attorney having a caseload that is larger than the

maximum allowable caseload established under Section 79.043,

Government Code .

SECTION 2. Article 26.047(c), Code of Criminal Procedure,

is amended to read as follows:

(c) The commissioners court or commissioners courts shall

require a written plan of operation from an entity operating a

program under this article. The plan of operation must include:

(1) a budget for the program, including salaries;

(2) a description of each personnel position,

including the program's director;

(3) the maximum allowable caseload for each attorney

appointed by the program , not to exceed the maximum allowable

caseload established under Section 79.043, Government Code ;

(4) provisions for training personnel of the program

and attorneys appointed under the program;

(5) a description of anticipated overhead costs for

the program;

(6) a policy regarding licensed investigators and

expert witnesses used by attorneys appointed under the program;

(7) a policy to ensure that appointments are

reasonably and impartially allocated among qualified attorneys;

and

(8) a policy to ensure that an attorney appointed

under the program does not accept appointment in a case that

involves a conflict of interest for the attorney that has not been

waived by all affected clients.

SECTION 3. Subchapter C, Chapter 79, Government Code, is

amended by adding Section 79.043 to read as follows:

Sec. 79.043. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE CASELOAD FOR CRIMINAL

DEFENSE ATTORNEYS. (a) The commission shall establish a maximum

allowable caseload for a criminal defense attorney that,

considering the attorney's total caseload, including appointments

made under Article 26.04, Code of Criminal Procedure, appointments

made under Title 3, Family Code, and other work, would allow the

attorney to give each criminal defendant the time and effort

necessary to ensure effective and diligent representation.

(b) The maximum allowable caseload described by Subsection

(a) is not required to be a specific number and may vary according

to one or more formulas established by the commission.

(c) The commission shall revise the maximum allowable

caseload described by Subsection (a) as necessary.

(d) The commission shall post the maximum allowable

caseload described by Subsection (a) on the commission's Internet

website.

(e) The commission shall adopt rules to promote compliance

by each county in this state with the maximum allowable caseload

described by Subsection (a). The commission shall impose a remedy

for noncompliance occurring in any county in which the commission

provided, for the preceding state fiscal year, grant funds under

Section 79.037 in an amount that equaled more than 50 percent of the

county's expenditures on indigent defense services for that year.

SECTION 4. Not later than November 1, 2025, the Texas

Indigent Defense Commission shall establish and post on its

Internet website the maximum allowable caseload described by

Section 79.043, Government Code, as added by this Act.

SECTION 5. The changes in law made by this Act apply only to

a criminal case in which the indictment or information is filed on

or after November 1, 2025. A criminal case in which the indictment

or information was filed before November 1, 2025, is governed by the

law in effect immediately before the effective date of this Act, and

the former law is continued in effect for that purpose.

SECTION 6. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.