Monitoring the Session

HB 1910

Schatzline Bill Orders Cities Of 100,000 To Require Panhandling Permits

Died in committee

Verdict: Smells

SmellsInitial review
Rep. Nate SchatzlineRHouse 93
All 3 charges, and why
Caption mismatch

THE TEXT

“A municipality with a population of 100,000 or more shall adopt and enforce an ordinance”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The caption speaks of the 'authority' of local governments to regulate panhandling, but the text orders larger cities to adopt and enforce a permit ordinance. It also adds private lawsuits and state grant cutoffs the caption never mentions.

Caption mismatch
Dragnet

THE CAPTION

“relating to the authority of a political subdivision to regulate panhandling on public property”

Caption, introduced version (I)

THE TEXT

“"Panhandle" means to solicit an immediate donation or transfer of money or another thing of value from an individual, regardless of the solicitor's purpose or intended use of the money or thing of value.”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The definition covers any request for an immediate donation regardless of purpose. That reaches street performers, political or campaign fundraisers, and groups that are not 501(c)(3) charities, not just the panhandling the caption names.

Dragnet
Carve-out

THE TEXT

“The term does not include a solicitation made on behalf of a charitable organization exempt from federal income taxation under Section 501(a), Internal Revenue Code of 1986”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

Solicitors for one tax class, 501(c)(3) charities, are exempt from the permit rule and the offense. Everyone else asking for the same money in the same spot still needs a permit.

Carve-out

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the authority of a political subdivision to regulate panhandling on public property; creating a criminal offense.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Caption: “authority.” Bill: “shall adopt and enforce.” Asking takes a paper permit and a 24-hour wait.

The bill requires every Texas city of 100,000 or more people to adopt a free permit system for asking for money on public property, and lets other local governments do the same. It touches people who ask strangers for money on sidewalks, streets and parks, plus the cities, counties and districts that must run the permits and cannot discourage enforcement. Asking without a permit becomes a Class C misdemeanor offense, permits are paper-only with a 24-hour wait and a 12-hour limit, and any person or the attorney general can sue a noncompliant local government for attorney's fees and cut off its state grants for two years.

Labels

Labels: CREATES AN OFFENSE. The caption of the graded version (introduced) reads: “relating to the authority of a political subdivision to regulate panhandling on public property; creating a criminal offense.”NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Jan 16, 2025 and referred to the House Intergovernmental Affairs committee. No public hearing. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB1910 · 2025-01-16

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the authority of a political subdivision to regulate panhandling on public property; creating a criminal offense.

WHAT IT DOES

Caption: “authority.” Bill: “shall adopt and enforce.” Asking takes a paper permit and a 24-hour wait.

The bill requires every Texas city of 100,000 or more people to adopt a free permit system for asking for money on public property, and lets other local governments do the same. It touches people who ask strangers for money on sidewalks, streets and parks, plus the cities, counties and districts that must run the permits and cannot discourage enforcement. Asking without a permit becomes a Class C misdemeanor offense, permits are paper-only with a 24-hour wait and a 12-hour limit, and any person or the attorney general can sue a noncompliant local government for attorney's fees and cut off its state grants for two years.

CHARGES

[x] CAPTION MISMATCHanalysis confidence 50%

THE TEXT

“A municipality with a population of 100,000 or more shall adopt and enforce an ordinance”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The caption speaks of the 'authority' of local governments to regulate panhandling, but the text orders larger cities to adopt and enforce a permit ordinance. It also adds private lawsuits and state grant cutoffs the caption never mentions.

[x] DRAGNETanalysis confidence 50%

THE CAPTION

“relating to the authority of a political subdivision to regulate panhandling on public property”

Caption, introduced version (I)

THE TEXT

“"Panhandle" means to solicit an immediate donation or transfer of money or another thing of value from an individual, regardless of the solicitor's purpose or intended use of the money or thing of value.”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The definition covers any request for an immediate donation regardless of purpose. That reaches street performers, political or campaign fundraisers, and groups that are not 501(c)(3) charities, not just the panhandling the caption names.

[x] CARVE-OUTanalysis confidence 40%

THE TEXT

“The term does not include a solicitation made on behalf of a charitable organization exempt from federal income taxation under Section 501(a), Internal Revenue Code of 1986”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

Solicitors for one tax class, 501(c)(3) charities, are exempt from the permit rule and the offense. Everyone else asking for the same money in the same spot still needs a permit.

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Intergovernmental Affairs
FILED UNDER

SPEECH AND LAWFARE

THE TEXT

“Any person who substantially prevails in an action under this section is entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees and costs from the political subdivision.”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill puts a permit requirement on asking people for money in public and lets any person sue local governments for fees if they fail to enforce it.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC Austin TX$55,000
Texans United for a Conservative Majority Victoria TX$10,000
Dan Patrick Campaign Austin TX$5,000

Derived from itemized gifts, Oct 27, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

$113,206 raised in 4 of 4 reports since Oct 27, 2024. Derived sum of published report totals. Flow, Oct 27, 2024 through Jun 30, 2026. State filing data as of Nov 4, 2026. 4 of 4 filed reports carry a published figure. Partial total. Regular reports do not cover Jul 9, 2025 to Aug 15, 2025, Aug 15, 2025 to Sep 4, 2025.

$220,212 spent since Oct 27, 2024. Derived sum of published report totals. Flow, Oct 27, 2024 through Jun 30, 2026. State filing data as of Nov 4, 2026. 4 of 4 filed reports carry a published figure.

$54,238 cash on hand. Published report total. Stock, as of Jun 30, 2026. State filing data as of Nov 4, 2026.

$0 loans outstanding. Published report total. Stock, as of Jun 30, 2026. State filing data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived sum of itemized contributions in regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Unitemized contributions are not included. Flow, Oct 27, 2024 through Jun 30, 2026. State filing data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas House · Filed Jan 16, 2025

03/14/2025 H Referred to Intergovernmental Affairs: Mar 14 2025 2:36PM

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 6:51 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Intergovernmental Affairs · Final status: Died in committee

Subjects

City Government--General

County Government--General

Crimes--Miscellaneous

State Finances--Management & Control

PERMITS

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS

Text

The text as introduced · 1,020 words

89R5888 DNC-F

By: Schatzline
H.B. No. 1910

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the authority of a political subdivision to regulate

panhandling on public property; creating a criminal offense.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Subtitle C, Title 11, Local Government Code, is

amended by adding Chapter 366 to read as follows:

CHAPTER 366. PERMITS FOR PANHANDLING ON PUBLIC PROPERTY

Sec. 366.001. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:

(1) "Panhandle" means to solicit an immediate donation

or transfer of money or another thing of value from an individual,

regardless of the solicitor's purpose or intended use of the money

or thing of value. The term does not include a solicitation made on

behalf of a charitable organization exempt from federal income

taxation under Section 501(a), Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as an

organization described by Section 501(c)(3) of that code.

(2) "Political subdivision" means a county,

municipality, school district, junior college district, other

special district, or other political subdivision of this state.

(3) "Public property" means any property owned or

maintained by the federal government, the state government, or a

political subdivision, including a government-owned highway,

street, sidewalk, plaza, park, or other similar place.

Sec. 366.002. PANHANDLING PERMIT. (a) A municipality with

a population of 100,000 or more shall adopt and enforce an ordinance

requiring a permit for panhandling on public property within the

municipality's jurisdiction.

(b) A political subdivision other than a municipality

described by Subsection (a) may adopt and enforce an ordinance,

order, rule, or other measure requiring a permit for panhandling on

public property within the political subdivision's jurisdiction.

(c) An ordinance, order, rule, or other measure adopted

under this section:

(1) must require a person to obtain a panhandling

permit before panhandling on public property;

(2) may not require a fee to issue the permit;

(3) may impose reasonable time, place, and manner

restrictions on panhandling on public property for the purpose of

increasing public safety, preventing harassment, and eliminating

crime;

(4) may restrict the number of persons allowed to

panhandle in a specific location at a given time; and

(5) must provide that a permit may not be issued until

at least 24 hours after the time an individual submits an

application for the permit, or a longer period if the political

subdivision determines that a longer period is necessary to fulfill

the political subdivision's interest in public safety.

(d) An application for a panhandling permit must require the

applicant to provide:

(1) the applicant's name; and

(2) the date, time, and specific location where the

applicant seeks to panhandle.

(e) A panhandling permit:

(1) may not authorize panhandling at a specific

location for longer than 12 consecutive hours;

(2) must be printed on paper or another physical

medium;

(3) must be provided to an applicant in person at a

specified location in the political subdivision;

(4) may not be issued electronically; and

(5) must display any seal, watermark, or other indicia

the political subdivision determines necessary to prevent

counterfeiting or alteration of the permit.

(f) A person issued a panhandling permit shall:

(1) carry the permit while engaged in panhandling on

public property;

(2) restrict their panhandling to the date, time, and

specific location identified on the permit; and

(3) comply with each term of the permit.

(g) If a political subdivision imposes a limit on the number

of persons who may panhandle in a specific location at a given time,

the political subdivision shall allocate panhandling permits for

the specific location on a first-come, first-served basis.

(h) A political subdivision shall provide all applicants

for a panhandling permit with information about local and regional

resources that assist persons who are suffering from hunger or

homelessness.

Sec. 366.003. POLITICAL SUBDIVISION POLICY ON PANHANDLING

PERMITS. (a) A political subdivision may not adopt or enforce a

policy that prohibits or discourages the enforcement of an

ordinance, order, rule, or other measure adopted under Section

366.002.

(b) A political subdivision may not prohibit or discourage a

peace officer or prosecuting attorney from enforcing an ordinance,

order, rule, or other measure adopted under Section 366.002.

(c) This section does not prohibit a policy that encourages

diversion or a provision of services in lieu of citation or arrest.

Sec. 366.004. CERTAIN REGULATIONS NOT PREEMPTED. This

chapter does not preempt or otherwise affect the authority of a

political subdivision to adopt or enforce an ordinance, order,

rule, or other measure relating to panhandling on public property

that:

(1) is compatible with and equal to, or more stringent

than, the level of offense prescribed by Section 366.005; or

(2) relates to an issue not specifically addressed by

this chapter.

Sec. 366.005. OFFENSE. (a) A person commits an offense if

the person panhandles on public property in a political subdivision

that adopts an ordinance under Section 366.002 without obtaining a

permit.

(b) An offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor.

Sec. 366.006. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. (a) A person, including

the attorney general, may bring an action to enjoin a violation of

Section 366.002 or 366.003 in a district court in:

(1) Travis County;

(2) the county in which the principal office of the

political subdivision in which the violation occurs is located; or

(3) a county adjacent to the county in which the

principal office of the political subdivision in which the

violation occurs is located.

(b) Any person who substantially prevails in an action under

this section is entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees

and costs from the political subdivision.

(c) Governmental immunity of a political subdivision to

suit and from liability is waived to the extent of liability created

under this section.

Sec. 366.007. DENIAL OF STATE GRANT FUNDS. (a) A political

subdivision that is determined in an action under Section 366.006

to have violated Section 366.002 or 366.003 may not receive state

grant funds for the two years following the date of the

determination.

(b) The comptroller shall adopt rules to implement this

section uniformly among the state agencies from which state grant

funds are distributed to political subdivisions.

SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.