Monitoring the Session

HB 2015

bill requiring water conservation plans for new MUDs

Did not pass

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. Erin ZwienerDHouse 45

Initial review · graded Oct 22, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the consideration of water conservation by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality when determining whether to grant or deny a petition for the creation of certain municipal utility districts.

Caption from analyzed text · version H.

Summary

Applies near the Hill Country Priority Groundwater Management Area.

The bill requires anyone petitioning to create a municipal utility district in a county that touches the Hill Country Priority Groundwater Management Area to include a water conservation plan meeting existing state standards. It also tells the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to weigh whether such a district would have an unreasonable effect on water conservation when deciding to approve it. Developers seeking new utility districts in that region face an extra filing requirement and review factor for petitions filed on or after September 1, 2025.

Labels

Labels: ACROSS THE AISLE. Joint authors: 1 Republican, 1 Democrat. Party as the Legislative Reference Library lists it for the 89th Legislature.GOT HALFWAY. Passed the House on May 15, 2025. Died in the Senate: received, never referred to a committee.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB2015 · 2025-01-22

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the consideration of water conservation by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality when determining whether to grant or deny a petition for the creation of certain municipal utility districts.

WHAT IT DOES

Applies near the Hill Country Priority Groundwater Management Area.

The bill requires anyone petitioning to create a municipal utility district in a county that touches the Hill Country Priority Groundwater Management Area to include a water conservation plan meeting existing state standards. It also tells the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to weigh whether such a district would have an unreasonable effect on water conservation when deciding to approve it. Developers seeking new utility districts in that region face an extra filing requirement and review factor for petitions filed on or after September 1, 2025.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version H · May 8, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Land & Resource Management
  4. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  5. Considered in public hearing
  6. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  7. Left pending in committee
  8. Considered in public hearing
  9. Committee substitute considered in committee
  10. Reported favorably as substituted
  11. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  12. Committee report distributed
  13. Committee report sent to Calendars
  14. Considered in Calendars
  15. Placed on General State Calendar
  16. Recommitted to committee
  17. Considered in formal meeting
  18. Committee substitute considered in committee
  19. Reported favorably as substituted
  20. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  21. Committee report distributed
  22. Committee report sent to Calendars
  23. Considered in Calendars
  24. Placed on General State Calendar
  25. Read 2nd time
  26. Passed to engrossment
  27. Record vote RV#2562
  28. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  29. Read 3rd time
  30. Passed
  31. Record vote RV#2669
  32. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  33. Reported engrossed
  34. Received from the House
FILED UNDER

DEBT AND SPECIAL DISTRICTS

THE TEXT

…“include a water conservation plan that meets the requirements of Section 13.146, regardless of whether that section applies to the district”

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The bill adds a water conservation plan requirement to petitions creating new municipal utility districts in Hill Country counties, tightening the path to new special districts there.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 114 yea · 30 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · May 15, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$25,000.00

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$25,000.00

Cash
$25,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$25,000.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 12, 2024 to Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101012412, 101032309, 101061964, 101072091.

Texas Sands PAC$22,000.00

Texas Sands PAC

$22,000.00

Cash
$22,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$22,000.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 12, 2024 to Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101012412, 101032309, 101061964, 101072091.

Sandy Spears$11,545.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$25,000.00

Cash
$25,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$25,000.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 12, 2024 to Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101012412, 101032309, 101061964, 101072091.

×

Texas Sands PAC

$22,000.00

Cash
$22,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$22,000.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 12, 2024 to Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101012412, 101032309, 101061964, 101072091.

Votes2

House May 15, 2025

Yea
114
Nay
30
Present, not voting
2
Absent
0
Excused
4
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 2669

HB 2015 was passed by (Record 2669): 114 Yeas, 30 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 114 (published)
  • Nay: 30 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 4 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 14, 2025

Yea
92
Nay
43
Present, not voting
3
Absent
6
Excused
6
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 2562

CSHB 2015 was passed to engrossment by (Record 2562): 92 Yeas, 43 Nays, 3 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 92 (published)
  • Nay: 43 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 3 (published)
  • Absent: 6 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 6 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses14
For
8
Against
3
On
3
Names

For

  • City of Houston1 registration
  • Conference of Urban Counties1 registration
  • Environmental Defense Fund1 registration
  • Lone Star Chapter Sierra Club1 registration
  • Self2 registrations
  • Self; Environment Texas1 registration
  • Texas Municipal League1 registration

Against

  • Allen Boone Humphries Robinson LLP1 registration
  • Coats Rose PC1 registration
  • Texas Association of Builders1 registration

On

  • TCEQ2 registrations
  • Texas On-Site Wastewater Association1 registration
Sources

14 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version H · May 8, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version H by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas House · Filed Jan 22, 2025

05/15/2025 S Received from the House

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · House Committee Report · Engrossed

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Land & Resource Management · Committee vote 8 aye, 0 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee

Companion

SB 2887 by Cook (identical)

Subjects

HILL COUNTRY PRIORITY GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT AREA (D94KR)

Environment--Water

Special Districts & Authorities--Municipal Utility Districts

Special Districts & Authorities--Water & Utility

Water--Conservation (I097L)

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, TEXAS COMMISSION ON

Text

The text as introduced · 475 words

89R3055 MP-D

By: Zwiener
H.B. No. 2015

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the consideration of water conservation by the Texas

Commission on Environmental Quality when determining whether to

grant or deny a petition for the creation of a municipal utility

district.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 54.015, Water Code, is amended to read as

follows:

Sec. 54.015. CONTENTS OF PETITION. The petition shall:

(1) describe the boundaries of the proposed district

by metes and bounds or by lot and block number, if there is a

recorded map or plat and survey of the area;

(2) state the general nature of the work proposed to be

done, the necessity for the work, and the cost of the project as

then estimated by those filing the petition; [ and ]

(3) include a water conservation plan that meets the

requirements of Section 13.146, regardless of whether that section

applies to the district; and

(4) include a name of the district which shall be

generally descriptive of the locale of the district followed by the

words Municipal Utility District, or if a district is located

within one county, it may be designated "__________ County

Municipal Utility District No. ______." (Insert the name of the

county and proper consecutive number.) The proposed district shall

not have the same name as any other district in the same county.

SECTION 2. Section 54.021(b), Water Code, is amended to

read as follows:

(b) In determining if the project is feasible and

practicable and if it is necessary and would be a benefit to the

land included in the district, the commission shall consider:

(1) the availability of comparable service from other

systems, including but not limited to water districts,

municipalities, and regional authorities;

(2) the reasonableness of projected construction

costs, tax rates, and water and sewer rates; and

(3) whether or not the district and its system and

subsequent development within the district will have an

unreasonable effect on the following:

(A) land elevation;

(B) subsidence;

(C) groundwater level within the region;

(D) recharge capability of a groundwater source;

(E) natural run-off rates and drainage;

(F) water quality; [ and ]

(G) water conservation; and

(H) total tax assessments on all land located

within a district.

SECTION 3. This Act applies only to a petition requesting

the creation of a municipal utility district that is filed with the

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality on or after the effective

date of this Act. A petition requesting the creation of a municipal

utility district that was filed with the commission before the

effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect on the

date the petition was filed, and the former law is continued in

effect for that purpose.

SECTION 4. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.