Monitoring the Session

HB 24

Orr Zoning Bill Lifts The Protest Bar To 60 Percent

Became law, effective Sep 1, 2025

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. Angelia OrrRHouse 13

Initial review · graded Oct 22, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to procedures for changes to a zoning regulation or district boundary.

Caption from analyzed text · version S.

Summary

For housing-only changes, up from 20 percent. A valid protest forces only a simple majority.

The bill rewrites the state zoning rules so that neighbors have less power to block city zoning changes that allow more housing. Citywide and corridor rezonings that add housing are exempt from the neighbor protest process, a protest against a housing-only change needs owners of 60 percent of nearby land instead of 20 percent, and a valid protest of that kind only forces a simple majority vote instead of a three-fourths vote. Cities must also post hearing notices online, home-rule cities must put up notice signs on affected property, and any housing-adding zoning change becomes legally untouchable if no lawsuit is filed within 60 days.

Labels

Labels: ACROSS THE AISLE. Joint authors: 3 Republicans, 2 Democrats. Party as the Legislative Reference Library lists it for the 89th Legislature.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB24 · 2025-03-04

SOLD BY

+ 2 more authors, 19 coauthors

ITEM

relating to procedures for changes to a zoning regulation or district boundary.

WHAT IT DOES

For housing-only changes, up from 20 percent. A valid protest forces only a simple majority.

The bill rewrites the state zoning rules so that neighbors have less power to block city zoning changes that allow more housing. Citywide and corridor rezonings that add housing are exempt from the neighbor protest process, a protest against a housing-only change needs owners of 60 percent of nearby land instead of 20 percent, and a valid protest of that kind only forces a simple majority vote instead of a three-fourths vote. Cities must also post hearing notices online, home-rule cities must put up notice signs on affected property, and any housing-adding zoning change becomes legally untouchable if no lawsuit is filed within 60 days.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version F · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version F · May 25, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Land & Resource Management
  4. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  5. Withdrawn from schedule
  6. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  7. Considered in public hearing
  8. Committee substitute considered in committee
  9. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  10. Left pending in committee
  11. Considered in public hearing
  12. Committee substitute considered in committee
  13. Reported favorably as substituted
  14. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  15. Committee report distributed
  16. Committee report sent to Calendars
  17. Considered in Calendars
  18. Placed on Major State Calendar
  19. Read 2nd time
  20. Postponed 5/5/25 10:00 AM
  21. Laid out as postponed business
  22. Postponed 5/5/25 2:00 PM
  23. Laid out as postponed business
  24. Point of order withdrawn Rule 8, Section 1(a)(1)
  25. Amended 1-Orr
  26. Passed to engrossment as amended
  27. Read 3rd time
  28. Amended 1-Romero
  29. Record vote RV#1397
  30. Amendment(s) offered 2-Hopper
  31. Point of order sustained (amendment) Rule 11, Section 2
  32. Postponed 5/6/25 1:00 PM
  33. Laid out as postponed business
  34. Passed as amended
  35. Record vote RV#1504
  36. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  37. Reported engrossed
  38. Received from the House
  39. Read first time
  40. Referred to Local Government
  41. Posting rule suspended
  42. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  43. Considered in public hearing
  44. Testimony taken in committee
  45. Vote taken in committee
  46. Reported favorably as substituted
  47. Recommended for local & uncontested calendar
  48. Committee report printed and distributed
  49. Placed on intent calendar
  50. Placed on local & uncontested calendar
  51. Laid before the Senate
  52. Read 2nd time & passed to 3rd reading
  53. Vote recorded in Journal
  54. Three day rule suspended
  55. Record vote
  56. Read 3rd time
  57. Passed
  58. Record vote
  59. Senate passage as amended reported
  60. Senate Amendments distributed
  61. Senate Amendments Analysis distributed
  62. House concurs in Senate amendment(s)
  63. Record vote RV#4016
  64. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  65. Text of Senate Amendment(s)
  66. House concurs in Senate amendment(s)-reported
  67. Reported enrolled
  68. Signed in the House
  69. Signed in the Senate
  70. Sent to the Governor
  71. Signed by the Governor
  72. Effective on 9/1/25
FILED UNDER

SPEECH AND LAWFARE

THE TEXT

…“is conclusively presumed valid and to have occurred in accordance with all applicable statutes and ordinances if an action to annul or invalidate the change has not been filed before the 60th day after the effective date of the change”

Bill text, Senate committee report version (S)

The bill shields zoning changes that add housing from any legal challenge filed more than 60 days after they take effect.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 83 yea · 56 nay

Senate · 30 yea · 1 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · May 6, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate: Final passage · May 25, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 31, 2024 to Oct 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$434,355.69

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$434,355.69

Cash
$185,000.00
Paid by others
$249,355.69
Total
$434,355.69
advertising $241,605.69polling $7,750.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 23, 2025 to Oct 16, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101007596, 101032794, 101035908, 101040770, 101058009, 101071193.

Texas Sands PAC$154,250.00

Texas Sands PAC

$154,250.00

Cash
$137,000.00
Paid by others
$17,250.00
Total
$154,250.00
polling $17,250.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 9, 2024 to Oct 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101012337, 101032794, 101035908, 101071193.

Dustin Burrows Campaign$136,250.00

Dustin Burrows Campaign

$136,250.00

Cash
$119,000.00
Paid by others
$17,250.00
Total
$136,250.00
polling $17,250.00

Also funds 39 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 13, 2025 to Sep 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 13, 2025 to Jan 28, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101032794, 101040770.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$434,355.69

Cash
$185,000.00
Paid by others
$249,355.69
Total
$434,355.69
advertising $241,605.69polling $7,750.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 23, 2025 to Oct 16, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101007596, 101032794, 101035908, 101040770, 101058009, 101071193.

×

Texas Sands PAC

$154,250.00

Cash
$137,000.00
Paid by others
$17,250.00
Total
$154,250.00
polling $17,250.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 9, 2024 to Oct 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101012337, 101032794, 101035908, 101071193.

×

Dustin Burrows Campaign

$136,250.00

Cash
$119,000.00
Paid by others
$17,250.00
Total
$136,250.00
polling $17,250.00

Also funds 39 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 13, 2025 to Sep 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 13, 2025 to Jan 28, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101032794, 101040770.

Votes6

House May 29, 2025

Yea
104
Nay
30
Present, not voting
1
Absent
10
Excused
5
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 4016

Representative Orr moved to concur in the senate amendments to HB 24. The motion to concur in the senate amendments to HB 24 prevailed by (Record 4016): 104 Yeas, 30 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 104 (published)
  • Nay: 30 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 10 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 5 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 25, 2025

Final passage

Yea
30
Nay
1
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

The journal row lists three votes in order: passage to third reading, suspension of the three-day rule, and final passage. This entry records final passage. Repeated tallies belong to separate votes.

Sources

CSHB 24 (Hughes) Relating to procedures for changes to a zoning regulation or district boundary. (viva voce vote) (30-1) "Nay" Creighton (30-1) "Nay" Creighton

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 30 (published)
  • Nay: 1 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 25, 2025

Suspension of the three-day rule

Yea
30
Nay
1
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

The journal row lists three votes in order: passage to third reading, suspension of the three-day rule, and final passage. This entry records suspension of the three-day rule. Repeated tallies belong to separate votes.

Sources

CSHB 24 (Hughes) Relating to procedures for changes to a zoning regulation or district boundary. (viva voce vote) (30-1) "Nay" Creighton (30-1) "Nay" Creighton

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 30 (published)
  • Nay: 1 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 25, 2025

Passage to third reading

Yea
Not printed
Nay
Not printed
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

The journal row lists three votes in order: passage to third reading, suspension of the three-day rule, and final passage. This entry records passage to third reading. Repeated tallies belong to separate votes.

Voice vote. No numeric tally or individual yeas are inferred.

Sources

CSHB 24 (Hughes) Relating to procedures for changes to a zoning regulation or district boundary. (viva voce vote) (30-1) "Nay" Creighton (30-1) "Nay" Creighton

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: Not printed
  • Nay: Not printed
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 6, 2025

Yea
83
Nay
56
Present, not voting
1
Absent
9
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 1504

HB 24, as amended, was passed by (Record 1504): 83 Yeas, 56 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 83 (published)
  • Nay: 56 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 9 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 6, 2025

Yea
147
Nay
1
Present, not voting
2
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 1397

Amendment No. 1 was adopted by (Record 1397): 147 Yeas, 1 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 147 (published)
  • Nay: 1 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses64
For
57
Against
6
On
1
Names

For

  • AURA ATX1 registration
  • Austin AURA1 registration
  • Austin Chamber of Commerce1 registration
  • Austin Housing Coalition1 registration
  • Baptist General Convention of Texas Christian Life Commission1 registration
  • Caritas of Austin1 registration
  • Cicero Action1 registration
  • Dallas Area Habitat for Humanity1 registration
  • Dallas Housing Coalition1 registration
  • Farm&City3 registrations
  • Real Estate Council of Austin2 registrations
  • Self8 registrations
  • Self; Americans for Prosperity, Texas1 registration
  • Self; Aura1 registration
  • Self; BCS Habitat for Humanity1 registration
  • Self; Environment Texas1 registration
  • Self; Habitat for Humanity1 registration
  • Self; Institute for Justice1 registration
  • Self; Real estate council of San Antonio1 registration
  • Self; SonWest Co1 registration
  • Self; Texas Appleseed1 registration
  • Self; Texas Habitat for Humanity1 registration
  • Texans For Housing1 registration
  • Texans for Housing1 registration
  • Texans for Reasonable Solutions1 registration
  • Texans for reasonable solutions.org1 registration
  • Texas 20362 registrations
  • Texas Affiliation of Affordable Housing Providers( TAAHP)1 registration
  • Texas Association of Builders4 registrations
  • Texas Association of Business1 registration
  • Texas Conference of Catholic Bishops1 registration
  • Texas Conservative Coalition Research Institute1 registration
  • Texas Farm Bureau2 registrations
  • Texas Manufactured Housing Association1 registration
  • Texas Municipal League1 registration
  • Texas Public Policy Foundation2 registrations
  • Texas realtors1 registration
  • Texas Society of Architects2 registrations
  • The Real Estate Council (Dallas)1 registration
  • The Texas Catholic Conference of Bishops1 registration

Against

  • City of Irving1 registration
  • Self5 registrations

On

  • City of Dallas1 registration
Sources

64 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version F · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version F · May 25, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version S by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas House · Filed Mar 4, 2025

06/20/2025 E Effective on 9/1/25

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · House Committee Report · Engrossed · Senate Committee Report · Enrolled

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:19 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors

House committee · Land & Resource Management · Committee vote 6 aye, 1 nay, 2 absent · Out of committee

Senate committee · Local Government · Committee vote 6 aye, 0 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee

Companion

SB 844 by Hughes (identical)

Subjects

City Government--Land Use & Zoning

Civil Remedies & Liabilities

PUBLIC NOTICE

SIGNS

ATTORNEY GENERAL

Text

The text as introduced · 968 words

89R3967 SCL-F

By: Orr
H.B. No. 24

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to procedures for changes to a zoning regulation or

district boundary.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Subchapter A, Chapter 211, Local Government

Code, is amended by adding Section 211.0061 to read as follows:

Sec. 211.0061. PROTEST PROCEDURES FOR CERTAIN PROPOSED

CHANGES. (a) This section applies only to a proposed change to a

zoning regulation or district boundary:

(1) requested by an owner of real property that is

subject to the proposed change; or

(2) initiated by a municipality that has the effect of

making residential development more restrictive than the previous

regulation.

(b) A protest of a proposed change to a zoning regulation or

district boundary must be written and signed by the owners of at

least 60 percent of either:

(1) the area of the lots or land covered by the

proposed change; or

(2) the area of the lots or land immediately adjoining

the area covered by the proposed change and extending 200 feet from

that area.

(d) If a proposed change to a regulation or district

boundary is protested in accordance with Subsection (b), the

proposed change must receive, in order to take effect, the

affirmative vote of at least:

(1) three-fourths of all members of the governing body

for a protest described by Subsection (b)(1); or

(2) a majority of all members of the governing body for

a protest described by Subsection (b)(2).

SECTION 2. Section 211.006(e), Local Government Code, is

transferred to Section 211.0061, Local Government Code, as added by

this Act, redesignated as Section 211.0061(c), Local Government

Code, and amended to read as follows:

(c) [ (e) ] In computing the percentage of land area under

Subsection (b) [ (d) ], the area of streets and alleys shall be

included.

SECTION 3. Subchapter A, Chapter 211, Local Government

Code, is amended by adding Sections 211.0063, 211.0064, 211.0065,

211.0067, and 211.0069 to read as follows:

Sec. 211.0063. NOTICE FOR OTHER PROPOSED CHANGES. The

notice described by Section 211.006(a) or 211.007(d), as

applicable, is the only notice required for a proposed change to a

zoning regulation or district boundary that is not described by

Section 211.0061(a).

Sec. 211.0064. CIVIL ACTION TO COMPEL ADOPTION OF OTHER

PROPOSED CHANGES. (a) The following persons may bring an action

against a municipality for declaratory and injunctive relief to

compel the municipality to adopt a proposed change to a zoning

regulation or district boundary that is not described by Section

211.0061(a):

(1) a person who applies for a change to a zoning

regulation or district boundary applicable to the area subject to

the proposed change;

(2) a person eligible to apply for residency in a

housing development project in the area subject to the proposed

change; or

(3) a nonprofit organization.

(b) In an action brought under Subsection (a), a court

shall:

(1) ensure that its order or judgment is implemented;

and

(2) award a prevailing claimant reasonable attorney's

fees and costs incurred in bringing the action.

(c) Notwithstanding any other law, including Chapter 15,

Civil Practice and Remedies Code, an action brought under

Subsection (a) may be brought in:

(1) the county in which all or a substantial part of

the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred;

(2) the county of residence for any one of the natural

person defendants at the time the cause of action accrued;

(3) the county of the principal office in this state of

any one of the defendants that is not a natural person; or

(4) the county of residence for the claimant if the

claimant is a natural person residing in this state.

(d) If an action is brought under Subsection (a) in any one

of the venues described by Subsection (c), the action may not be

transferred to a different venue without the written consent of all

parties.

(e) Notwithstanding any other law, the Fifteenth Court of

Appeals has exclusive intermediate appellate jurisdiction over an

action brought under Subsection (a).

Sec. 211.0065. PRESUMPTION OF VALIDITY FOR LESS RESTRICTIVE

OTHER PROPOSED CHANGES. (a) This section applies only to a

proposed change to a zoning regulation or district boundary that:

(1) is not described by Section 211.0061(a); and

(2) has the effect of making residential development

less restrictive than the previous regulation.

(b) A proposed change is conclusively presumed valid and to

have occurred in accordance with all applicable statutes and

ordinances if an action to annul or invalidate the change has not

been filed before the 60th day after the effective date of the

change.

Sec. 211.0067. ATTORNEY GENERAL ENFORCEMENT OF PROPOSED

CHANGE PROVISIONS. (a) In this section:

(1) "No-new-revenue tax rate" means the

no-new-revenue tax rate calculated under Chapter 26, Tax Code.

(2) "Tax year" has the meaning assigned by Section

1.04, Tax Code.

(b) A person may submit a complaint to the attorney general

of a suspected violation of Section 211.0061, 211.0063, or

211.0065.

(c) Notwithstanding any other law, if the attorney general

determines that a municipality has violated Section 211.0061,

211.0063, or 211.0065, the municipality may not adopt an ad valorem

tax rate that exceeds the municipality's no-new-revenue tax rate

for the three tax years that begin on or after the date of the

determination.

Sec. 211.0069. EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGE PROVISIONS ON

CERTAIN RULES AND RESTRICTIONS. Sections 211.0061, 211.0063,

211.0064, 211.0065, and 211.0067 do not limit the applicability of

a historic preservation rule, deed restriction, or homeowners

association rule.

SECTION 4. Section 211.006(d), Local Government Code, is

repealed.

SECTION 5. The changes in law made by this Act apply only to

a proposal to change a municipal zoning regulation or district

boundary made on or after the effective date of this Act.

SECTION 6. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.