Monitoring the Session

SB 844

Hughes Zoning Bill Raises Neighbor Protest Bar To 60 Percent

Did not pass

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Bryan HughesRSenate 1

Initial review · graded Oct 22, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to procedures for changes to a zoning regulation or district boundary.

Caption from analyzed text · version H.

Summary

Up from 20 percent, unless the change would allow gambling! Citywide housing rezonings skip protests entirely.

The bill narrows the rule that lets nearby property owners force a city council supermajority vote when they protest a zoning change. Citywide or corridor-wide rezonings that allow more housing are taken out of the protest process entirely, and neighbors now need 60 percent of nearby land, not 20 percent, to protest an ordinary change, unless the change would allow gambling. On the ground, most neighbor protests now need only a simple council majority to overcome, notice must also go on city websites, and any zoning change that allows more housing cannot be challenged in court after 60 days.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB844 · 2025-01-17

SOLD BY

+ 1 coauthor

ITEM

relating to procedures for changes to a zoning regulation or district boundary.

WHAT IT DOES

Up from 20 percent, unless the change would allow gambling! Citywide housing rezonings skip protests entirely.

The bill narrows the rule that lets nearby property owners force a city council supermajority vote when they protest a zoning change. Citywide or corridor-wide rezonings that allow more housing are taken out of the protest process entirely, and neighbors now need 60 percent of nearby land, not 20 percent, to protest an ordinary change, unless the change would allow gambling. On the ground, most neighbor protests now need only a simple council majority to overcome, notice must also go on city websites, and any zoning change that allows more housing cannot be challenged in court after 60 days.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version E · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · May 1, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Local Government
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Testimony taken in committee
  8. Left pending in committee
  9. Considered in public hearing
  10. Vote taken in committee
  11. Reported favorably as substituted
  12. Committee report printed and distributed
  13. Co-author authorized
  14. Placed on intent calendar
  15. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  16. Vote recorded in Journal
  17. Read 2nd time
  18. Amendment(s) offered FA1 Hall
  19. Amended
  20. Vote recorded in Journal
  21. Passed to engrossment as amended
  22. Vote recorded in Journal
  23. Three day rule suspended
  24. Record vote
  25. Read 3rd time
  26. Passed
  27. Record vote
  28. Reported engrossed
  29. Received from the Senate
  30. Read first time
  31. Referred to Land & Resource Management
  32. Considered in formal meeting
  33. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  34. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  35. Committee report distributed
  36. Committee report sent to Calendars
FILED UNDER

SPEECH AND LAWFARE

THE TEXT

…“is conclusively presumed valid and to have occurred in accordance with all applicable statutes and ordinances if an action to annul or invalidate the change has not been filed before the 60th day after the effective date of the change”

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The bill shields zoning changes that allow more housing from any lawsuit filed after a 60-day window.

SIGNED FOR BY

Senate · 30 yea · 1 nay

Sources

Senate: Final passage · Apr 23, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

GOPAC Election Fund$250,000.00

GOPAC Election Fund

$250,000.00

Cash
$250,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$250,000.00

Also funds 2 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101028838, 101071548.

CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)$100,000.00

CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101067724.

Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC$100,000.00

Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 32 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Feb 20, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101071548.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

GOPAC Election Fund

$250,000.00

Cash
$250,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$250,000.00

Also funds 2 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101028838, 101071548.

×

CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101067724.

×

Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 32 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Feb 20, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101071548.

Votes3

Senate Apr 23, 2025

Yea
30
Nay
1
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 30, Nays 1. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 30 (published)
  • Nay: 1 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 23, 2025

Yea
30
Nay
1
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

Sources

Senator Hughes moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that CSSB 844 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 30, Nays 1.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 30 (published)
  • Nay: 1 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 23, 2025

Yea
Not printed
Nay
Not printed
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

Voice vote. No numeric tally or individual yeas are inferred.

Sources

CSSB 844 as amended was passed to engrossment by a viva voce vote.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: Not printed
  • Nay: Not printed
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses28
For
27
Against
1
On
0
Names

For

  • AURA ATX1 registration
  • Caritas of Austin1 registration
  • Farm&City1 registration
  • Real Estate Council of Austin1 registration
  • Self3 registrations
  • Self; Dallas Housing Coalition1 registration
  • Self; Environment Texas1 registration
  • Self; Habitat for Humanity1 registration
  • Self; Reason Foundation1 registration
  • Self; Texans for Housing1 registration
  • Self; Texans for Reasonable Solutions1 registration
  • Self; Texas Affiliation of Affordable Housing Providers (TAAHP)1 registration
  • Self; Texas Appleseed1 registration
  • Texans for Housing1 registration
  • Texans for Reasonable Solutions1 registration
  • Texas 20361 registration
  • Texas Association of Builders2 registrations
  • Texas Farm Bureau1 registration
  • Texas Municipal League1 registration
  • Texas Public Policy Foundation1 registration
  • Texas Realtors1 registration
  • Texas Society of Architects1 registration
  • The Texas Catholic Conference of Bishops1 registration
  • Tx Association of Business1 registration

Against

  • City of Georgetown1 registration
Sources

28 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version E · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · May 1, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version H by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Jan 17, 2025

05/06/2025 H Committee report sent to Calendars

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:19 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors
Cosponsors

House committee · Land & Resource Management · Committee vote 5 aye, 1 nay, 3 absent · Out of committee

Senate committee · Local Government · Committee vote 4 aye, 1 nay, 2 absent · Out of committee

Companion

HB 24 by Orr (identical)

Subjects

City Government--Land Use & Zoning

Civil Remedies & Liabilities

ATTORNEY GENERAL

Text

The text as introduced · 968 words

89R3967 SCL-F

By: Hughes
S.B. No. 844

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to procedures for changes to a zoning regulation or

district boundary.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Subchapter A, Chapter 211, Local Government

Code, is amended by adding Section 211.0061 to read as follows:

Sec. 211.0061. PROTEST PROCEDURES FOR CERTAIN PROPOSED

CHANGES. (a) This section applies only to a proposed change to a

zoning regulation or district boundary:

(1) requested by an owner of real property that is

subject to the proposed change; or

(2) initiated by a municipality that has the effect of

making residential development more restrictive than the previous

regulation.

(b) A protest of a proposed change to a zoning regulation or

district boundary must be written and signed by the owners of at

least 60 percent of either:

(1) the area of the lots or land covered by the

proposed change; or

(2) the area of the lots or land immediately adjoining

the area covered by the proposed change and extending 200 feet from

that area.

(d) If a proposed change to a regulation or district

boundary is protested in accordance with Subsection (b), the

proposed change must receive, in order to take effect, the

affirmative vote of at least:

(1) three-fourths of all members of the governing body

for a protest described by Subsection (b)(1); or

(2) a majority of all members of the governing body for

a protest described by Subsection (b)(2).

SECTION 2. Section 211.006(e), Local Government Code, is

transferred to Section 211.0061, Local Government Code, as added by

this Act, redesignated as Section 211.0061(c), Local Government

Code, and amended to read as follows:

(c) [ (e) ] In computing the percentage of land area under

Subsection (b) [ (d) ], the area of streets and alleys shall be

included.

SECTION 3. Subchapter A, Chapter 211, Local Government

Code, is amended by adding Sections 211.0063, 211.0064, 211.0065,

211.0067, and 211.0069 to read as follows:

Sec. 211.0063. NOTICE FOR OTHER PROPOSED CHANGES. The

notice described by Section 211.006(a) or 211.007(d), as

applicable, is the only notice required for a proposed change to a

zoning regulation or district boundary that is not described by

Section 211.0061(a).

Sec. 211.0064. CIVIL ACTION TO COMPEL ADOPTION OF OTHER

PROPOSED CHANGES. (a) The following persons may bring an action

against a municipality for declaratory and injunctive relief to

compel the municipality to adopt a proposed change to a zoning

regulation or district boundary that is not described by Section

211.0061(a):

(1) a person who applies for a change to a zoning

regulation or district boundary applicable to the area subject to

the proposed change;

(2) a person eligible to apply for residency in a

housing development project in the area subject to the proposed

change; or

(3) a nonprofit organization.

(b) In an action brought under Subsection (a), a court

shall:

(1) ensure that its order or judgment is implemented;

and

(2) award a prevailing claimant reasonable attorney's

fees and costs incurred in bringing the action.

(c) Notwithstanding any other law, including Chapter 15,

Civil Practice and Remedies Code, an action brought under

Subsection (a) may be brought in:

(1) the county in which all or a substantial part of

the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred;

(2) the county of residence for any one of the natural

person defendants at the time the cause of action accrued;

(3) the county of the principal office in this state of

any one of the defendants that is not a natural person; or

(4) the county of residence for the claimant if the

claimant is a natural person residing in this state.

(d) If an action is brought under Subsection (a) in any one

of the venues described by Subsection (c), the action may not be

transferred to a different venue without the written consent of all

parties.

(e) Notwithstanding any other law, the Fifteenth Court of

Appeals has exclusive intermediate appellate jurisdiction over an

action brought under Subsection (a).

Sec. 211.0065. PRESUMPTION OF VALIDITY FOR LESS RESTRICTIVE

OTHER PROPOSED CHANGES. (a) This section applies only to a

proposed change to a zoning regulation or district boundary that:

(1) is not described by Section 211.0061(a); and

(2) has the effect of making residential development

less restrictive than the previous regulation.

(b) A proposed change is conclusively presumed valid and to

have occurred in accordance with all applicable statutes and

ordinances if an action to annul or invalidate the change has not

been filed before the 60th day after the effective date of the

change.

Sec. 211.0067. ATTORNEY GENERAL ENFORCEMENT OF PROPOSED

CHANGE PROVISIONS. (a) In this section:

(1) "No-new-revenue tax rate" means the

no-new-revenue tax rate calculated under Chapter 26, Tax Code.

(2) "Tax year" has the meaning assigned by Section

1.04, Tax Code.

(b) A person may submit a complaint to the attorney general

of a suspected violation of Section 211.0061, 211.0063, or

211.0065.

(c) Notwithstanding any other law, if the attorney general

determines that a municipality has violated Section 211.0061,

211.0063, or 211.0065, the municipality may not adopt an ad valorem

tax rate that exceeds the municipality's no-new-revenue tax rate

for the three tax years that begin on or after the date of the

determination.

Sec. 211.0069. EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGE PROVISIONS ON

CERTAIN RULES AND RESTRICTIONS. Sections 211.0061, 211.0063,

211.0064, 211.0065, and 211.0067 do not limit the applicability of

a historic preservation rule, deed restriction, or homeowners

association rule.

SECTION 4. Section 211.006(d), Local Government Code, is

repealed.

SECTION 5. The changes in law made by this Act apply only to

a proposal to change a municipal zoning regulation or district

boundary made on or after the effective date of this Act.

SECTION 6. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.