Monitoring the Session

HB 2559

bill makes city development moratoriums much harder

Became law, effective Sep 1, 2025

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. Jared PattersonRHouse 106

Initial review · graded Oct 19, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the imposition by a municipality of a moratorium on property development in certain circumstances.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Two hearings, two readings, and a three-fourths council vote.

This bill makes it much harder for a Texas city to pause property development with a moratorium. It requires 30 days' notice, two public hearings at least 30 days apart, two ordinance readings at least 28 days apart, and a three-fourths vote of the full city council, and it ends the temporary moratorium that used to start automatically after notice. Every moratorium, not just those on commercial property, now expires after 90 days unless the city makes written findings to extend it, with a hard 180-day cap and a two-year wait before a repeat moratorium on the same harm, property type or area.

Labels

Labels: ACROSS THE AISLE. Joint authors: 1 Republican, 1 Democrat. Party as the Legislative Reference Library lists it for the 89th Legislature.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB2559 · 2025-02-07

SOLD BY

+ 2 coauthors

ITEM

relating to the imposition by a municipality of a moratorium on property development in certain circumstances.

WHAT IT DOES

Two hearings, two readings, and a three-fourths council vote.

This bill makes it much harder for a Texas city to pause property development with a moratorium. It requires 30 days' notice, two public hearings at least 30 days apart, two ordinance readings at least 28 days apart, and a three-fourths vote of the full city council, and it ends the temporary moratorium that used to start automatically after notice. Every moratorium, not just those on commercial property, now expires after 90 days unless the city makes written findings to extend it, with a hard 180-day cap and a two-year wait before a repeat moratorium on the same harm, property type or area.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version E · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · May 2, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Land & Resource Management
  4. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  5. Considered in public hearing
  6. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  7. Left pending in committee
  8. Considered in public hearing
  9. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  10. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  11. Committee report distributed
  12. Committee report sent to Calendars
  13. Considered in Calendars
  14. Placed on General State Calendar
  15. Read 2nd time
  16. Passed to engrossment
  17. Record vote RV#670
  18. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  19. Read 3rd time
  20. Passed
  21. Record vote RV#759
  22. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  23. Reported engrossed
  24. Received from the House
  25. Read first time
  26. Referred to Local Government
  27. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  28. Considered in public hearing
  29. Testimony taken in committee
  30. Vote taken in committee
  31. Reported favorably w/o amendments
  32. Committee report printed and distributed
  33. Placed on intent calendar
  34. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  35. Record vote
  36. Read 2nd time & passed to 3rd reading
  37. Record vote
  38. Three day rule suspended
  39. Record vote
  40. Read 3rd time
  41. Passed
  42. Record vote
  43. Senate passage reported
  44. Reported enrolled
  45. Signed in the House
  46. Signed in the Senate
  47. Sent to the Governor
  48. Signed by the Governor
  49. Effective on 9/1/25
FILED UNDER

Beats not yet reviewed.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 127 yea · 17 nay

Senate · 26 yea · 5 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · Apr 29, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate: Final passage · May 19, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 28, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$132,750.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$132,750.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$32,750.00
Total
$132,750.00
polling $32,750.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 25, 2025 to Oct 7, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100996442, 101018590, 101035748, 101067950, 101072483.

Texas Sands PAC$84,800.00

Texas Sands PAC

$84,800.00

Cash
$68,000.00
Paid by others
$16,800.00
Total
$84,800.00
polling $16,800.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 4, 2024 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100976997, 101018590, 101035748, 101072483.

Texas Conservative Majority PAC$57,950.00

Texas Conservative Majority PAC

$57,950.00

Cash
$0.00
Paid by others
$57,950.00
Total
$57,950.00
canvassing $35,000.00polling $22,950.00

Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Feb 12, 2026 to Sep 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101035748, 101067950.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$132,750.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$32,750.00
Total
$132,750.00
polling $32,750.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 25, 2025 to Oct 7, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100996442, 101018590, 101035748, 101067950, 101072483.

×

Texas Sands PAC

$84,800.00

Cash
$68,000.00
Paid by others
$16,800.00
Total
$84,800.00
polling $16,800.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 4, 2024 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100976997, 101018590, 101035748, 101072483.

×

Texas Conservative Majority PAC

$57,950.00

Cash
$0.00
Paid by others
$57,950.00
Total
$57,950.00
canvassing $35,000.00polling $22,950.00

Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Feb 12, 2026 to Sep 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101035748, 101067950.

Votes6

Senate May 19, 2025

Yea
26
Nay
5
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 26, Nays 5. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 26 (published)
  • Nay: 5 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 19, 2025

Yea
26
Nay
5
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Bettencourt moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that HB 2559 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 26, Nays 5.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 26 (published)
  • Nay: 5 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 19, 2025

Yea
26
Nay
5
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read second time and was passed to third reading by the following vote: Yeas 26, Nays 5. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 26 (published)
  • Nay: 5 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 19, 2025

Yea
26
Nay
5
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Bettencourt moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration HB 2559 at this time on its second reading: HB 2559, Relating to the imposition by a municipality of a moratorium on property development in certain circumstances. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 26, Nays 5.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 26 (published)
  • Nay: 5 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House Apr 29, 2025

Yea
127
Nay
17
Present, not voting
2
Absent
3
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 759

HB 2559 was passed by (Record 759): 127 Yeas, 17 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 127 (published)
  • Nay: 17 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 3 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House Apr 28, 2025

Yea
118
Nay
26
Present, not voting
1
Absent
4
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 670

HB 2559 was passed to engrossment by (Record 670): 118 Yeas, 26 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 118 (published)
  • Nay: 26 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 4 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses49
For
47
Against
1
On
1
Names

For

  • AGC-Texas Building Branch1 registration
  • Allen Boone Humphries Robinson LLP2 registrations
  • Amherst1 registration
  • Condos for Texas1 registration
  • Dallas Builders Association1 registration
  • Greater Houston Builders Association1 registration
  • Habitat for Humanity Texas; Dominium1 registration
  • Howard Hughes Corporation1 registration
  • Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.1 registration
  • Independent Bankers Association of Texas1 registration
  • Independent bankers of tx1 registration
  • Lumbermen's Association of Texas1 registration
  • Lumbermen’s Association of Texas (LAT)1 registration
  • National Rental Home Council1 registration
  • Perry Homes1 registration
  • Real Estate Council of Austin2 registrations
  • Schwartz, Page & Harding, L.L.P.1 registration
  • Schwartz, Page & Harding, LLP1 registration
  • Self1 registration
  • Self; Dallas Builders Association1 registration
  • Self; David Weekley Homes1 registration
  • Self; East Texas Builders Association1 registration
  • Self; Greater Houston Builders Association1 registration
  • Self; Hba of greater austin1 registration
  • Stratus Properties, Inc.1 registration
  • Texans For Reasonable Solutions1 registration
  • Texans for Reasonable Solutions1 registration
  • Texas Apartment Association2 registrations
  • Texas Association of Builders4 registrations
  • Texas Forestry Association2 registrations
  • Texas Land Title Association2 registrations
  • Texas Manufactured Housing Association2 registrations
  • Texas Mortgage Bankers Association2 registrations
  • Texas Realtors1 registration
  • Texas realtors1 registration
  • Texas Society of Architects1 registration
  • The Real Estate Council (Dallas)1 registration

Against

  • City of Denton1 registration

On

  • Self1 registration
Sources

49 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version E · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · May 2, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 19, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas House · Filed Feb 7, 2025

06/20/2025 E Effective on 9/1/25

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · House Committee Report · Engrossed · Senate Committee Report · Enrolled

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors

House committee · Land & Resource Management · Committee vote 7 aye, 0 nay, 2 absent · Out of committee

Senate committee · Local Government · Committee vote 6 aye, 1 nay · Out of committee

Companion

SB 1882 by Bettencourt (similar)

Subjects

City Government--Land Use & Zoning

PUBLIC NOTICE

Text

The text as introduced · 706 words

89R6197 DNC-F

By: Patterson
H.B. No. 2559

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the imposition by a municipality of a moratorium on

property development in certain circumstances.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Sections 212.134(b), (c), and (f), Local

Government Code, are amended to read as follows:

(b) A public hearing must provide municipal residents and

affected parties an opportunity to be heard. The municipality

shall, not later than the 30th day before the date of a hearing:

(1) [ must ] publish notice of the time and place of the

[ a ] hearing in a newspaper of general circulation in the

municipality ; and

(2) send notice of the hearing by certified mail to any

person who has given written notice by certified or registered mail

to the municipal secretary requesting notice of the hearing within

two years preceding the date of adoption of the ordinance or

resolution setting the public hearing [ on the fourth day before the

date of the hearing ].

(c) The governing body of a municipality shall hold two

public hearings on a moratorium on property development proposed to

be adopted under this subchapter. The governing body may not hold

the second public hearing before the 30th day after the date of the

first public hearing [ Beginning on the fifth business day after the

date a notice is published under Subsection (b), a temporary

moratorium takes effect. During the period of the temporary

moratorium, a municipality may stop accepting permits,

authorizations, and approvals necessary for the subdivision of,

site planning of, or construction on real property ].

(f) Not later than the 12th day [ Within 12 days ] after the

date of the second [ first ] public hearing, the governing body of the

municipality shall begin [ make ] a final determination on the

imposition of a moratorium by giving the ordinance imposing the

moratorium at least two readings that are not less than 28 days

apart . The ordinance must receive the affirmative vote of at least

three-fourths of all members of the governing body on final reading

in order to take effect. [ Before an ordinance adopting a moratorium

may be imposed, the ordinance must be given at least two readings by

the governing body of the municipality. The readings must be

separated by at least four days. ] If the governing body

[ municipality ] fails to adopt an ordinance imposing a moratorium

within the period prescribed by this subsection, the municipality

may not adopt the [ an ] ordinance [ imposing a moratorium may not be

adopted, and the temporary moratorium imposed under Subsection (c)

expires ].

SECTION 2. Section 212.1362, Local Government Code, is

amended to read as follows:

Sec. 212.1362. EXPIRATION OF MORATORIUM [ ON COMMERCIAL

PROPERTY IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES ]; EXTENSION. (a) A moratorium

[ on commercial property ] adopted under this subchapter [ Section

212.1352 ] expires on the 90th day after the date the moratorium is

adopted unless the governing body of the municipality extends the

moratorium by:

(1) holding a public hearing on the proposed extension

of the moratorium; and

(2) adopting written findings that:

(A) identify the problem requiring the need for

extending the moratorium;

(B) describe the reasonable progress made to

alleviate the problem;

(C) specify a definite duration for the renewal

period of the moratorium; and

(D) include a summary of evidence demonstrating

that the problem will be resolved within the extended duration of

the moratorium.

(b) A municipality may not adopt a moratorium [ on commercial

property ] under this subchapter:

(1) [ Section 212.1352 ] that exceeds an aggregate of

180 days ; or

(2) [ . A municipality may not adopt a moratorium on

commercial property under Section 212.1352 ] before the second

anniversary of the expiration date of a previous moratorium if the

subsequent moratorium addresses the same harm, affects the same

type of [ commercial ] property, or affects the same geographical

area identified by the previous moratorium.

SECTION 3. The following provisions of the Local Government

Code are repealed:

(1) Sections 212.134(d) and (e); and

(2) Section 212.136.

SECTION 4. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.