Monitoring the Session

HB 3472

Refuse A Vaccine? Olcott Bill Bars Anyone From Penalizing You

Died in committee

Verdict: Smells

SmellsInitial review
Rep. Mike OlcottRHouse 60
Both charges, and why
Caption mismatch

THE TEXT

…“take an adverse action or impose any penalty against an individual”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The caption talks only about informed consent before health care is provided. The body also bans any person, not just providers, from penalizing someone for refusing a service or a vaccine, which the caption does not mention.

Caption mismatch
The hole

THE TEXT

…“service was administered that informed consent was voluntarily”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

A practitioner sued for providing a coerced service can defend by showing the patient said consent was voluntary. A patient pressured by someone else will often say that anyway, so the defense can let a practitioner escape the $5,000 damages.

The hole

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to informed consent requirements before the provision of health care services.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Caption: informed consent. Bill: employers too. Say it was voluntary and the practitioner can escape the $5,000.

The bill adds a new Health and Safety Code chapter that bars health care practitioners from treating a person lawfully residing in Texas without informed consent, and bars anyone from coercing that person into a health care service, including a vaccine. It reaches practitioners, health care facilities, and any other person, such as an employer, who takes adverse action against someone for refusing a service, and it gives health care facility workers a religious or medical exemption from required services. The attorney general can sue to stop violations, and a person can sue a practitioner who violates the chapter for at least $5,000 plus fees, with a defense if the patient said before treatment that consent was voluntary.

Labels

Labels: NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Feb 27, 2025 and referred to the House Public Health committee. No public hearing. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB3472 · 2025-02-27

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to informed consent requirements before the provision of health care services.

WHAT IT DOES

Caption: informed consent. Bill: employers too. Say it was voluntary and the practitioner can escape the $5,000.

The bill adds a new Health and Safety Code chapter that bars health care practitioners from treating a person lawfully residing in Texas without informed consent, and bars anyone from coercing that person into a health care service, including a vaccine. It reaches practitioners, health care facilities, and any other person, such as an employer, who takes adverse action against someone for refusing a service, and it gives health care facility workers a religious or medical exemption from required services. The attorney general can sue to stop violations, and a person can sue a practitioner who violates the chapter for at least $5,000 plus fees, with a defense if the patient said before treatment that consent was voluntary.

CHARGES

[x] CAPTION MISMATCHanalysis confidence 55%

THE TEXT

…“take an adverse action or impose any penalty against an individual”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The caption talks only about informed consent before health care is provided. The body also bans any person, not just providers, from penalizing someone for refusing a service or a vaccine, which the caption does not mention.

[x] THE HOLEanalysis confidence 45%

THE TEXT

…“service was administered that informed consent was voluntarily”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

A practitioner sued for providing a coerced service can defend by showing the patient said consent was voluntary. A patient pressured by someone else will often say that anyway, so the defense can let a practitioner escape the $5,000 damages.

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Public Health
FILED UNDER

SPEECH AND LAWFARE

THE TEXT

…“practitioner who violates this chapter is liable to the individual”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill creates a private lawsuit against health care practitioners with a $5,000 damages floor and recovery of attorney's fees.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Darlene Pendery$300,000Guy and Helen Mabee$100,800Guy Mabee$50,000

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Darlene Pendery$300,000.00
Guy and Helen Mabee$100,800.00
Guy Mabee$50,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas House · Filed Feb 27, 2025

03/24/2025 H Referred to Public Health: Mar 24 2025 2:16PM

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:19 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Public Health · Final status: Died in committee

Companion

SB 754 by Middleton (identical)

Subjects

Civil Remedies & Liabilities

Health Care Providers

Health--General

Health--Other Diseases & Medical Conditions

INFORMED CONSENT

ATTORNEY GENERAL

Text

The text as introduced · 1,212 words

89R2091 JDK-D

By: Olcott
H.B. No. 3472

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to informed consent requirements before the provision of

health care services.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. The legislature finds that:

(1) this state is responsible for ensuring individuals

lawfully residing in this state have the right to provide or

withhold consent for any health care service;

(2) the decision in Canterbury v. Spence , 464 F.2d 772

(D.C. Cir. 1972), establishing the concept of informed consent, has

become a bedrock principle of the laws of this country and of each

state;

(3) the American Medical Association's Code of Medical

Ethics Opinion 2.1.1 recognizes an individual's right to be fully

informed of a recommended health care service allowing the

individual to make an informed decision regarding the individual's

course of treatment, including whether to obtain or decline a

particular health care service;

(4) under 42 C.F.R. Section 482.13, a hospital is

required as a condition of participation in Medicare to establish a

process for obtaining the informed consent of a patient before

providing a health care service to the patient and to ensure "[t]he

patient or his or her representative (as allowed under State law)

has the right to make informed decisions regarding his or her care";

(5) the United States Supreme Court, in Jacobson v.

Massachusetts , 197 U.S. 11 (1905), upheld mandatory vaccination

policies imposed by state and local governments to combat smallpox,

and in PruneYard Shopping Ctr. v. Robins , 447 U.S. 74, 81 (1980),

acknowledged a state may provide "individual liberties more

expansive than those conferred by the Federal Constitution";

(6) any attempt to compel or coerce an individual

lawfully residing in this state into obtaining a health care

service contrary to the individual's preference is inconsistent

with the principles of informed consent; and

(7) Chapter 174, Health and Safety Code, as added by

this Act, prohibits any person from compelling or coercing an

individual lawfully residing in this state into obtaining a health

care service, including the administration of vaccines.

SECTION 2. Subtitle H, Title 2, Health and Safety Code, is

amended by adding Chapter 174 to read as follows:

CHAPTER 174. INFORMED CONSENT REQUIREMENTS FOR

HEALTH CARE SERVICES

Sec. 174.001. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:

(1) "Health care facility" means a facility licensed,

certified, or otherwise authorized to provide health care services

in the ordinary course of business.

(2) "Health care practitioner" means an individual who

holds a license, certificate, or other authorization to engage in a

health care profession in this state.

(3) "Health care service" means a service a health

care practitioner or health care facility provides to an individual

to diagnose, prevent, treat, alleviate, cure, or heal a human

health condition, illness, injury, or disease. The term includes

the administration of a vaccine.

Sec. 174.002. EFFECT ON OTHER LAW. (a) To the extent of a

conflict between this chapter and other law, this chapter controls.

(b) The requirements provided by this chapter are in

addition to another applicable requirement for a health care

service provided by other law.

Sec. 174.003. PROHIBITED COERCION TO OBTAIN HEALTH CARE

SERVICE. A health care practitioner or another person may not

coerce or compel an individual lawfully residing in this state into

obtaining a health care service contrary to the individual's

preference.

Sec. 174.004. REQUIRED INFORMED CONSENT. (a) Except as

otherwise provided by other law, a health care practitioner may not

provide to an individual lawfully residing in this state a health

care service unless the practitioner obtains the informed consent

of the individual or a person authorized to consent on behalf of the

individual, including:

(1) a guardian in accordance with Chapter 1151,

Estates Code;

(2) an individual authorized to provide consent under

Section 32.001, Family Code;

(3) a parent in accordance with the rights and duties

described by Section 151.001, Family Code; and

(4) an agent under a medical power of attorney in

accordance with Chapter 166.

(b) For purposes of this section:

(1) an individual lacks the capacity to provide

informed consent for a health care service if the individual has

been coerced or compelled into obtaining the service; and

(2) a health care practitioner who advises or

recommends a health care service is not considered to have coerced

or compelled the individual into obtaining the service based solely

on that advice or recommendation.

Sec. 174.005. PROHIBITED ADVERSE ACTION. A person may not

take an adverse action or impose any penalty against an individual

lawfully residing in this state for the individual's refusal or

failure to obtain a health care service, including a refusal or

failure to receive immunization in accordance with state law.

Sec. 174.006. EXEMPTION FROM HEALTH CARE SERVICE

REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS IN HEALTH CARE FACILITIES. An

individual who is employed by, providing services in, or receiving

training in a health care facility that requires the individual to

obtain a health care service is exempt from the required service if

the individual requests orally or in writing an exemption based on:

(1) a sincerely held religious belief, observance, or

practice that is incompatible with the administration of the

service; or

(2) a recognized medical condition for which the

service is contraindicated.

Sec. 174.007. INJUNCTION. (a) The attorney general may

bring an action for injunctive relief against a person to prevent

the person from violating this chapter. In an order issuing an

injunction under this section, a court may include reasonable

requirements to prevent further violations of this chapter.

(b) The attorney general may recover court costs,

reasonable attorney's fees, investigation costs, witness fees, and

deposition expenses incurred in bringing an action under Subsection

(a).

Sec. 174.008. CIVIL LIABILITY. (a) A health care

practitioner who violates this chapter is liable to the individual

who is the subject of the violation for damages in an amount of not

less than $5,000.

(b) The prevailing party in an action brought under this

section may recover reasonable expenses incurred as a result of the

action, including court costs, reasonable attorney's fees,

investigation costs, witness fees, and deposition expenses.

(c) A health care practitioner may assert as an affirmative

defense to an action brought under Subsection (a) that the

individual who is the subject of the violation on which the action

is based or a person legally authorized to consent on behalf of the

individual stated to the practitioner before the health care

service was administered that informed consent was voluntarily

provided.

SECTION 3. Chapter 174, Health and Safety Code, as added by

this Act, applies only to a health care service provided on or after

the effective date of this Act.

SECTION 4. If any provision of this Act or its application

to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does

not affect other provisions or applications of this Act that can be

given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to

this end the provisions of this Act are declared severable.

SECTION 5. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives

a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as

provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this

Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this

Act takes effect September 1, 2025.