Monitoring the Session

HB 363

bill requiring a draft MUD petition with the county clerk

Died in committee

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. Keith BellRHouse 4

Initial review · graded Oct 22, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the filing with the county clerk of certain counties of a draft of a petition requesting the creation of a municipal utility district.

Caption from analyzed text · version H.

Summary

Filed 30 days before the real petition goes to the state.

This bill makes anyone asking the state to create certain new municipal utility districts first file a draft of the petition with the county clerk. The draft must be filed in each county where the district would sit, at least 30 days before the real petition goes to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. The final petition must then come with proof of that early filing, such as a sworn statement, so counties see the plan before the state process starts.

Labels

Labels: ACROSS THE AISLE. Joint authors: 4 Republicans, 1 Democrat. Party as the Legislative Reference Library lists it for the 89th Legislature.GOT HALFWAY. Passed the House on Apr 25, 2025. Died in the Senate: never got out of the Local Government committee.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB363 · 2024-11-12

SOLD BY

+ 2 more authors, 3 coauthors

ITEM

relating to the filing with the county clerk of certain counties of a draft of a petition requesting the creation of a municipal utility district.

WHAT IT DOES

Filed 30 days before the real petition goes to the state.

This bill makes anyone asking the state to create certain new municipal utility districts first file a draft of the petition with the county clerk. The draft must be filed in each county where the district would sit, at least 30 days before the real petition goes to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. The final petition must then come with proof of that early filing, such as a sworn statement, so counties see the plan before the state process starts.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version H · March 21, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Land & Resource Management
  4. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  5. Considered in public hearing
  6. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  7. Left pending in committee
  8. Considered in public hearing
  9. Committee substitute considered in committee
  10. Reported favorably as substituted
  11. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  12. Committee report distributed
  13. Committee report sent to Calendars
  14. Considered in Calendars
  15. Considered in Calendars
  16. Placed on General State Calendar
  17. Read 2nd time
  18. Passed to engrossment
  19. Record vote RV#508
  20. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  21. Read 3rd time
  22. Passed
  23. Record vote RV#559
  24. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  25. Reported engrossed
  26. Received from the House
  27. Read first time
  28. Referred to Local Government
FILED UNDER

DEBT AND SPECIAL DISTRICTS

THE TEXT

…“the applicant must file a draft of the petition with the county clerk of each county in which the proposed district is to be located”

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The bill adds a 30-day early notice step to the county before certain new municipal utility districts can be petitioned for at the state level.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 134 yea · 0 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · Apr 25, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Josh Stevens$50,000Carla Enna$50,000Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$35K

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 31, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Josh Stevens$50,000.00
Carla Enna$50,000.00
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$35,000.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$35,000.00

Cash
$35,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$35,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 30, 2025 to Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101007782, 101027129, 101068150.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$35,000.00

Cash
$35,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$35,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 30, 2025 to Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101007782, 101027129, 101068150.

Votes2

House Apr 25, 2025

Yea
134
Nay
0
Present, not voting
2
Absent
5
Excused
9
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 559

HB 363 was passed by (Record 559): 134 Yeas, 0 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 134 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 5 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 9 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House Apr 24, 2025

Yea
129
Nay
0
Present, not voting
1
Absent
4
Excused
16
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 508

CSHB 363 was passed to engrossment by (Record 508): 129 Yeas, 0 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 129 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 4 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 16 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses16
For
15
Against
1
On
0
Names

For

  • Allen Boone Humphries Robinson LLP1 registration
  • Association of Water Board Directors2 registrations
  • BGE, Inc.1 registration
  • Conference of Urban counties1 registration
  • County Judges and Commissioners Assocation of Texas1 registration
  • Eliss County and County Judges and Commissioners Association1 registration
  • Kaufman county1 registration
  • RW Baird1 registration
  • Schwartz, Page & Harding, L.L.P.1 registration
  • Self1 registration
  • Self; City of Fate1 registration
  • Self; Johnson Development1 registration
  • Texas Association of Builders1 registration
  • Travis County Commissioners Court1 registration

Against

  • Coats Rose PC1 registration
Sources

16 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version H · March 21, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version H by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas House · Filed Nov 12, 2024

04/29/2025 S Referred to Local Government

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · House Committee Report · Engrossed

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors

House committee · Land & Resource Management · Committee vote 9 aye, 0 nay · Out of committee

Senate committee · Local Government · Final status: Died in committee

Companion

SB 102 by Hall (identical)

Subjects

County Government--General

Special Districts & Authorities--Municipal Utility Districts

Water--General

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, TEXAS COMMISSION ON

Text

The text as introduced · 584 words

89R1010 SCP-F

By: Bell of Kaufman
H.B. No. 363

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the notice and petition for the creation of a municipal

utility district in certain counties.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Sections 54.001(4) and (5), Water Code, are

amended to read as follows:

(4) "Commission" means the Texas [ Natural Resource

Conservation ] Commission on Environmental Quality .

(5) "Executive director" means the executive director

of the commission [ Texas Natural Resource Conservation

Commission ].

SECTION 2. Subchapter B, Chapter 54, Water Code, is amended

by adding Section 54.0135 to read as follows:

Sec. 54.0135. PRE-PETITION NOTICE TO CERTAIN COUNTIES. (a)

This section applies only to a proposed district described by

Section 54.0161(a).

(b) Before a petition requesting creation of a proposed

district is filed with the commission under Section 54.014, notice

must be sent by certified mail to the commissioners court of each

county in which the proposed district is to be located. The notice

must:

(1) generally describe the boundaries of the land to

be included in the proposed district, including, if possible, by

metes and bounds or by lot and block number if there is a recorded

map or plat and survey of the area to be included in the district;

and

(2) inform the commissioners court of the right to:

(A) respond to the notice provided under this

section;

(B) review the petition requesting creation of

the proposed district; and

(C) submit a written opinion on the creation of

the proposed district under Section 54.0161.

(c) Notice under this section must be sent by certified mail

at least 30 days before the date a petition requesting creation of

the proposed district is filed with the commission under Section

54.014.

SECTION 3. Section 54.015, Water Code, is amended to read as

follows:

Sec. 54.015. CONTENTS OF PETITION. The petition shall:

(1) describe the boundaries of the proposed district

by metes and bounds or by lot and block number, if there is a

recorded map or plat and survey of the area;

(2) state the general nature of the work proposed to be

done, the necessity for the work, and the cost of the project as

then estimated by those filing the petition; [ and ]

(3) include a name of the district which shall be

generally descriptive of the locale of the district followed by the

words Municipal Utility District, or if a district is located

within one county, it may be designated "__________ County

Municipal Utility District No. ______." (Insert the name of the

county and proper consecutive number.) The proposed district shall

not have the same name as any other district in the same county ; and

(4) for a district described by Section 54.0161(a),

include a copy of the notice described by Section 54.0135 .

SECTION 4. Section 54.0135, Water Code, as added by this

Act, and Section 54.015, Water Code, as amended by this Act, apply

only to a petition requesting creation of a municipal utility

district that is filed with the Texas Commission on Environmental

Quality on or after the effective date of this Act. A petition

requesting creation of a municipal utility district that was filed

with the commission before the effective date of this Act is

governed by the law in effect on the date the petition was filed,

and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose.

SECTION 5. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.