Monitoring the Session

HB 3929

Lambert Securities Bill Hands Buyers The Seller’s Legal Claims

Died in committee

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. Stan LambertRHouse 71

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to choice of law and assignment or acquisition of claims and demands in connection with certificated and uncertificated securities.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Bought it to sue? That defense is out. The chosen law, amendments too, applies retroactively.

The bill changes Texas commercial law on securities. It says that buying a security carries with it the seller's legal claims against the issuer, trustees, underwriters and guarantors, and it bars those parties from defending a case by arguing the buyer bought the security in order to sue. It also lets the law chosen in a security's terms, and later changes to it, including amendments made by less than unanimous consent, apply retroactively, starting September 1, 2025.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB3929 · 2025-03-06

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to choice of law and assignment or acquisition of claims and demands in connection with certificated and uncertificated securities.

WHAT IT DOES

Bought it to sue? That defense is out. The chosen law, amendments too, applies retroactively.

The bill changes Texas commercial law on securities. It says that buying a security carries with it the seller's legal claims against the issuer, trustees, underwriters and guarantors, and it bars those parties from defending a case by arguing the buyer bought the security in order to sue. It also lets the law chosen in a security's terms, and later changes to it, including amendments made by less than unanimous consent, apply retroactively, starting September 1, 2025.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · April 8, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Trade, Workforce & Economic Development
  4. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  5. Considered in public hearing
  6. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  7. Committee substitute considered in committee
  8. Left pending in committee
FILED UNDER

SPEECH AND LAWFARE

THE TEXT

…“the purchaser, based on the intent of the purchaser, or an assignor”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill blocks issuers and related parties from defending a case on the ground that the buyer acquired the security in order to sue, which makes it easier to buy securities and litigate over them.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Douglas Robison$5,000Kurt Arnold$5,000Jason Itkin$5,000

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Nov 7, 2024 to Jun 23, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Douglas Robison$5,000.00
Kurt Arnold$5,000.00
Jason Itkin$5,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · April 8, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas House · Filed Mar 6, 2025

04/09/2025 H Left pending in committee

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:19 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Trade, Workforce & Economic Development · Final status: Died in committee

Companion

SB 1239 by Middleton (identical)

Subjects

Business & Commerce--General

Civil Remedies & Liabilities

Financial--General

Text

The text as introduced · 545 words

89R9915 AJA-F

By: Lambert
H.B. No. 3929

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to choice of law and assignment or acquisition of claims

and demands in connection with certificated and uncertificated

securities.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 8.110, Business & Commerce Code, is

amended by adding Subsection (g) to read as follows:

(g) If a security is determined not to be valid under the

local law of the issuer's jurisdiction, the law of the jurisdiction

agreed by the issuer of the security to govern the construction or

interpretation of documents evidencing or containing the terms of

the security and matters arising out of or relating to the security

and documents, including the enforceability of the security and the

rights and remedies available to a purchaser of such a security,

governs the consequences to the issuer and the purchaser of the

invalidity.

SECTION 2. Section 8.302, Business & Commerce Code, is

amended by adding Subsections (d) and (e) to read as follows:

(d) The rights acquired by a purchaser of a certificated or

uncertificated security, unless otherwise agreed in writing,

include, without limitation, all of the following claims and

demands of the transferor, regardless of whether the claims and

demands are known to exist:

(1) a claim or demand for damages or rescission

against the issuer or other party to the security;

(2) a claim or demand for damages against the trustee,

depositary, or other party under any indenture under which the

security was issued or is outstanding;

(3) a claim or demand for damages against any issuer,

underwriter, trustee, depositary, guarantor, or other party to the

obligations of the issuer; and

(4) a claim or demand to enforce any rights of a

securityholder under the terms of the security, including rights

arising prior to the date of the transfer.

(e) Except as specifically provided by statute with respect

to assignments of the claims and demands of a transferor to the

purchaser of a certificated or uncertificated security, no issuer

or other party subject to any obligation, or to any claim or demand

for damages, with respect to any such security may assert a defense

to such an obligation, claim, or demand, or assert a claim against

the purchaser, based on the intent of the purchaser, or an assignor

or assignee of the purchaser, to assert or pursue through

litigation or other lawful means the enforcement of the purchaser's

rights thereto.

SECTION 3. Section 271.005, Business & Commerce Code, is

amended by adding Subsections (a-1) and (c) to read as follows:

(a-1) Unless otherwise agreed in writing, the choice of

governing law specified in the terms applicable to a certificated

or uncertificated security issued in a qualified transaction,

including any change in that governing law, applies retroactively

to all issues relating to the security.

(c) A security issued in a qualified transaction may be

modified or amended, in accordance with the security's terms, to

permit amendment of the terms of the security by less than unanimous

consent, and to choose the law of a different jurisdiction to govern

the security. An amendment described by this subsection applies

retroactively unless otherwise agreed by the parties in writing.

SECTION 4. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.