HB 4078
Leach Bill Makes City, State And County Fund A Downtown Nonprofit
Died in committee
Verdict: Smells
All 3 charges, and why
Bracket bill
THE TEXT
“This subchapter applies to a municipality with a population between 900,000 and 2,000,000, according to the most recent decennial census”…
Bill text, introduced version (I)
A population window of 900,000 to 2,000,000, a January 1, 2025 cutoff and a 'largest district' limit narrow the bill to one downtown district in each of a handful of big cities. The caption says only 'certain municipalities' and never names which.
Bracket billCarve-out
THE TEXT
…“shall each appropriate to a management organization described by this subchapter an amount equal to the revenue collected through an existing special assessment of properties located in the district.”
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The bill orders the city and the state to each pay a nonprofit, built to the bill's own board design, an amount equal to the district's assessment revenue, and gives this only to the largest downtown district in each covered city. That is a favor to one uniquely described entity dressed as general policy.
Carve-outNew fee, fund, board or appointees
THE TEXT
“(5) one director is appointed by the Governor of the State of Texas,”…
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The bill requires a seven-director board with new appointments by the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Speaker, city and county, and makes that body a 'governmental body' for open-records purposes. These are new appointed positions the bill itself creates.
New fee, fund, board or appointeesInitial review · graded Oct 21, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade
Caption
relating to public improvement districts located in certain municipalities.
Caption from analyzed text · version I.
Summary
Cities of 900K to 2M. City and state each match the district’s assessment revenue, county adds half.
The bill takes the largest downtown public improvement district in any city of 900,000 to 2,000,000 people, makes it permanent, and forces the city to hand its money and management to a nonprofit with a seven-member board picked by the city, county, Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Speaker and the ten largest property owners. The city and the state must each pay that nonprofit an amount equal to what the district's property assessment raises, the county must pay one half of that, and the assessment rate is frozen at its January 1, 2025 level. The nonprofit must spend first on the bill's top listed priorities, including ending what it calls "vagrancy" (begging, camping or sleeping in public), and any property owner in the district can sue it and recover attorney's fees.
Labels
Labels: NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Mar 7, 2025 and referred to the House Intergovernmental Affairs committee. No public hearing. The bill died.
Receipt
The receipt
89R-HB4078 · 2025-03-07
SOLD BY
+ 1 coauthor
ITEM
relating to public improvement districts located in certain municipalities.
WHAT IT DOES
Cities of 900K to 2M. City and state each match the district’s assessment revenue, county adds half.
The bill takes the largest downtown public improvement district in any city of 900,000 to 2,000,000 people, makes it permanent, and forces the city to hand its money and management to a nonprofit with a seven-member board picked by the city, county, Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Speaker and the ten largest property owners. The city and the state must each pay that nonprofit an amount equal to what the district's property assessment raises, the county must pay one half of that, and the assessment rate is frozen at its January 1, 2025 level. The nonprofit must spend first on the bill's top listed priorities, including ending what it calls "vagrancy" (begging, camping or sleeping in public), and any property owner in the district can sue it and recover attorney's fees.
CHARGES
[x] BRACKET BILLanalysis confidence 60%
THE TEXT
“This subchapter applies to a municipality with a population between 900,000 and 2,000,000, according to the most recent decennial census”…
Bill text, introduced version (I)
A population window of 900,000 to 2,000,000, a January 1, 2025 cutoff and a 'largest district' limit narrow the bill to one downtown district in each of a handful of big cities. The caption says only 'certain municipalities' and never names which.
[x] CARVE-OUTanalysis confidence 65%
THE TEXT
…“shall each appropriate to a management organization described by this subchapter an amount equal to the revenue collected through an existing special assessment of properties located in the district.”
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The bill orders the city and the state to each pay a nonprofit, built to the bill's own board design, an amount equal to the district's assessment revenue, and gives this only to the largest downtown district in each covered city. That is a favor to one uniquely described entity dressed as general policy.
[x] NEW FEE, FUND, BOARD OR APPOINTEESanalysis confidence 70%
THE TEXT
“(5) one director is appointed by the Governor of the State of Texas,”…
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The bill requires a seven-director board with new appointments by the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Speaker, city and county, and makes that body a 'governmental body' for open-records purposes. These are new appointed positions the bill itself creates.
TOTAL
No fiscal note in the loaded record.
HISTORY
- Filed
- Read first time
- Referred to Intergovernmental Affairs
- Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
- Withdrawn from schedule
FILED UNDER
THE TEXT
…“shall exist in perpetuity and shall not terminate except by Act of the Legislature.”
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The bill makes the largest downtown improvement district in covered cities permanent, so neither the city nor the county can end it.
THE TEXT
…“a "management organization" means a nonprofit organization that is contracted to implement supplemental services”…
Bill text, introduced version (I)
City, county and state money must be paid to a nonprofit that runs district services instead of to a government agency.
THE TEXT
…“shall have standing to sue a management organization described by this subchapter to seek injunctive relief or specific performance”…
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The bill creates a new right for district property owners to sue the nonprofit, awards them court costs and attorney's fees when they substantially prevail, and waives immunity.
THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
Donors
Not tied to this bill.
Sources
The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.
Derived itemized flow · Oct 28, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$1,141,482.69
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC
$1,141,482.69
- Cash
- $555,000.00
- Paid by others
- $586,482.69
- Total
- $1,141,482.69
Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Jun 25, 2025 to Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101004498, 101024562, 101039760, 101044787, 101067510, 101072948.
Texas Conservative Majority PAC$273,017.05
Texas Conservative Majority PAC
$273,017.05
- Cash
- $35,000.00
- Paid by others
- $238,017.05
- Total
- $273,017.05
Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Feb 9, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101039760, 101044787, 101067510, 101072948.
Republican Party of Texas$182,117.94
Republican Party of Texas
$182,117.94
- Cash
- $0.00
- Paid by others
- $182,117.94
- Total
- $182,117.94
Also funds 12 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Oct 31, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101072948.
Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC
$1,141,482.69
- Cash
- $555,000.00
- Paid by others
- $586,482.69
- Total
- $1,141,482.69
Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Jun 25, 2025 to Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101004498, 101024562, 101039760, 101044787, 101067510, 101072948.
Texas Conservative Majority PAC
$273,017.05
- Cash
- $35,000.00
- Paid by others
- $238,017.05
- Total
- $273,017.05
Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Feb 9, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101039760, 101044787, 101067510, 101072948.
Republican Party of Texas
$182,117.94
- Cash
- $0.00
- Paid by others
- $182,117.94
- Total
- $182,117.94
Also funds 12 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Oct 31, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101072948.
Votes
No floor vote loaded for this bill.
Fiscal
No fiscal note in the loaded record.
How this was graded
Adversarial review by claude-fable-5-1 at high effort: Smells.
Analysis of text version I by claude-fable-5-1, Oct 21, 2026, against the published rubric.
Sources
Texas House · Filed Mar 7, 2025
04/29/2025 H Withdrawn from schedule
Texas Legislature Online · Introduced
Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:19 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.
House committee · Intergovernmental Affairs · Final status: Died in committee
Subjects
Charitable & Nonprofit Organizations
City Government--Finance
City Government--General
County Government--Finance
Governor
Special Districts & Authorities--Miscellaneous
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE
Text
The text as introduced · 1,010 words
By: Leach H.B. No. 4078 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to public improvement districts located in certain municipalities. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. Chapter 372, Local Government Code, is amended by adding Subchapter E to read as follows: SUBCHAPTER E. DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS IN CERTAIN MUNICIPALITIES Sec. 372.201. APPLICABILITY; CONTINUED SERVICES. (a) This subchapter applies to a municipality with a population between 900,000 and 2,000,000, according to the most recent decennial census that as of January 1, 2025 had created a public improvement district located in the municipality's downtown area or central business district and to a county in which such municipality is located. (b) This subchapter applies only to the largest public improvement district located in a municipality's downtown area or central business district that existed as of January 1, 2025. (c) This subchapter may not be interpreted to relieve any municipality or county from providing services to an area included in a district or to release the municipality or county from the obligation it has to provide municipal or county services to that area. A public improvement district recognized under this subchapter is intended to supplement and not supplant municipal and county services in the area of the district. Sec. 372.202. PERPETUAL EXISTENCE. Notwithstanding any other law, a public improvement district located in a municipality's downtown area or central business district and subject to this subchapter shall exist in perpetuity and shall not terminate except by Act of the Legislature. Sec. 372.203. CONTRACT WITH MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION. (a) In this subchapter, a "management organization" means a nonprofit organization that is contracted to implement supplemental services and improvements in a public improvement district subject to this subchapter. A management organization shall be an eligible management organization, as defined by section 372.204. (b) A municipality subject to this subchapter shall contract with a management organization to implemental supplemental services and improvements in a public improvement district subject to this subchapter. (c) The municipality shall delegate full authority to the management organization to oversee and manage the implementation of supplemental services and improvements in the public improvement district, including the receipt, handling, and use of funds collected pursuant to this subchapter, exclusively for the priorities defined in Section 372.006. (d) A management organization shall be considered a "governmental body" for purposes of Chapter 552, Government Code. Sec. 372.204. ELIGIBLE MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATIONS (a) A municipality may not contract with a management organization pursuant to section 372.203 unless the management organization is an eligible management organization, as defined by subsection (b). (b) An "eligible management organization" means a nonprofit organization that has provisions in its articles of incorporation, certificate of formation, bylaws, or other governing documents which provide for the following requirements: (1) the organization's governing board is composed of seven directors, (2) directors serve staggered four year terms; however three directors selected at random may be designated to serve an initial two-year term in order to implement this provision, (3) one director is appointed by the municipality in which the public improvement district is located, (4) one director is appointed by the county in which the public improvement district is located, (5) one director is appointed by the Governor of the State of Texas, (6) one director is appointed by the Lieutenant Governor of the State of Texas, (7) one director is appointed by the Speaker of the Texas House of Representatives, and (8) two directors are elected by the ten largest owners of assessed property value, excluding exempt property, located in the public improvement district, through means of election specified by the organization's governing documents; such elected directors shall be ineligible to serve consecutive terms. Sec. 372.005. ADDITIONAL FUNDING REQUIREMENT. (a) A municipality subject to this subchapter and the State of Texas through a general appropriations act, shall each appropriate to a management organization described by this subchapter an amount equal to the revenue collected through an existing special assessment of properties located in the district. (b) A county subject to this subchapter shall appropriate to a management organization described by this subchapter an amount equal to one half of the revenue collected through an existing special assement of properties located in the district. (c) The funding requirements under subsection (a) and (b) shall be appropriated in addition to the revenue collected through existing special assessments imposed in the public improvement district. (d) A municipality or county subject to this subchapter which imposes and collects a special assessment in a public improvement district that is subject to this subchapter shall not change the rate of the assessment that was assessed on January 1, 2025. Sec. 372.006. PRIORITIES. (a) Under this section, "vagrancy" means the habitual act of loitering, begging, panhandling, scavenging, camping, sleeping, or otherwise remaining idle for extended periods of time in a public place without a lawful purpose. (b) A management organization described by this subchapter shall prioritize spending of assessed or appropriated funds on supplemental services in order of priority of (i) eliminating crime, (ii) eliminating vagrancy, (iii) improving cleanliness, (iv) beautification, and (v) other projects to improve the district. (c) Appropriations to a management organization by the State described by this subchapter and received under Section 372.005(a) shall be used exclusively for the purposes of eliminating crime and vagrancy. Sec. 372.007. ENFORCEMENT. (a) An owner of property located in a public improvement district subject to this subchapter shall have standing to sue a management organization described by this subchapter to seek injunctive relief or specific performance in a district court to enforce compliance with this subchapter, other state law, or the management organization's governing documents. A property owner shall not be entitled to money damages in a suit under this section. (b) A property owner who substantially prevails in a suit brought pursuant to subsection (a) shall be entitled to costs of court and reasonable attorney's fees. (c) Sovereign and governmental immunity to suit and liability is abolished and waived to the extent of liability under this section. SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.
