Monitoring the Session

HB 4087

Hayes Censorship Bill Offers $100K Damages, Then Exempts The Newsfeed

Died in committee

Verdict: Smells

SmellsInitial review
Rep. Richard HayesRHouse 57
Both charges, and why
The hole

THE TEXT

“(b) This chapter does not apply to a social media platform's”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill sells stronger remedies for censorship on social media, then removes the platform's newsfeed, its homepage and any service that is not a common carrier service from the chapter. The newsfeed is where users' posts are ordinarily shown or buried, so the most common case of reduced visibility may fall outside the ban.

The hole
Caption mismatch

THE TEXT

“(B) electronic mail , including direct messaging”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The caption advertises protection for expression sent through electronic mail messages, but the only email language in the body removes email and direct messaging from the definition of a social media platform. No section creates any new email protection.

Caption mismatch

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to censorship of or certain other interference with digital expression, including expression on social media platforms or through electronic mail messages.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Caption: electronic mail messages. Bill: the only email line removes email from the definition.

The bill rewrites the 2021 Texas social media law (H.B. 20) so users who prove a platform censored them can collect money damages, either actual damages or a flat $100,000 if their own expression was censored, or $1,000 if their ability to see someone else's expression was censored. It also narrows which services count as a social media platform and says the anti-censorship chapter does not reach a platform's newsfeed, its homepage, or any service that is not a common carrier service or not strongly like one. Large social media platforms and the Texans who sue them are affected, with new damage awards starting for claims that arise on or after September 1, 2025.

Labels

Labels: NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Mar 7, 2025 and referred to the House State Affairs committee. No public hearing. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB4087 · 2025-03-07

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to censorship of or certain other interference with digital expression, including expression on social media platforms or through electronic mail messages.

WHAT IT DOES

Caption: electronic mail messages. Bill: the only email line removes email from the definition.

The bill rewrites the 2021 Texas social media law (H.B. 20) so users who prove a platform censored them can collect money damages, either actual damages or a flat $100,000 if their own expression was censored, or $1,000 if their ability to see someone else's expression was censored. It also narrows which services count as a social media platform and says the anti-censorship chapter does not reach a platform's newsfeed, its homepage, or any service that is not a common carrier service or not strongly like one. Large social media platforms and the Texans who sue them are affected, with new damage awards starting for claims that arise on or after September 1, 2025.

CHARGES

[x] THE HOLEanalysis confidence 50%

THE TEXT

“(b) This chapter does not apply to a social media platform's”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill sells stronger remedies for censorship on social media, then removes the platform's newsfeed, its homepage and any service that is not a common carrier service from the chapter. The newsfeed is where users' posts are ordinarily shown or buried, so the most common case of reduced visibility may fall outside the ban.

[x] CAPTION MISMATCHanalysis confidence 50%

THE TEXT

“(B) electronic mail , including direct messaging”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The caption advertises protection for expression sent through electronic mail messages, but the only email language in the body removes email and direct messaging from the definition of a social media platform. No section creates any new email protection.

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to State Affairs
FILED UNDER

SPEECH AND LAWFARE

THE TEXT

“$100,000 if the user or the user's”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill lets users sue social media platforms for censorship and collect a flat $100,000 in statutory damages plus attorney's fees, without proving actual loss.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 28, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$204,650.12

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$204,650.12

Cash
$85,000.00
Paid by others
$119,650.12
Total
$204,650.12
mail $104,250.12polling $15,400.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 27, 2025 to Oct 20, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101010307, 101032268, 101069605, 101071583.

Texas Conservative Majority PAC$40,400.00

Texas Conservative Majority PAC

$40,400.00

Cash
$25,000.00
Paid by others
$15,400.00
Total
$40,400.00
polling $15,400.00

Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 22, 2026 to Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101069605, 101071583.

Michael Tenny$20,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$204,650.12

Cash
$85,000.00
Paid by others
$119,650.12
Total
$204,650.12
mail $104,250.12polling $15,400.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 27, 2025 to Oct 20, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101010307, 101032268, 101069605, 101071583.

×

Texas Conservative Majority PAC

$40,400.00

Cash
$25,000.00
Paid by others
$15,400.00
Total
$40,400.00
polling $15,400.00

Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 22, 2026 to Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101069605, 101071583.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas House · Filed Mar 7, 2025

03/27/2025 H Referred to State Affairs: Mar 27 2025 11:57AM

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:19 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · State Affairs · Final status: Died in committee

Companion

SB 1626 by Hughes (identical)

Subjects

Civil Remedies & Liabilities

Common Carriers

Electronic Information Systems

DISCRIMINATION

EMAIL & ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS

INTERNET

Text

The text as introduced · 962 words

89R3518 SRA-D

By: Hayes
H.B. No. 4087

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to censorship of or certain other interference with

digital expression, including expression on social media platforms

or through electronic mail messages.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. The legislature finds that:

(1) although H.B. 20, as passed by the 87th

Legislature, 2nd Called Session, 2021, clearly applies to social

media platforms only in their role as common carriers in

facilitating public forums for public debate, the legislation has

been misunderstood to apply more broadly and therefore requires

clarification;

(2) an effective state remedy for social media

censorship is essential because:

(A) the federal government has massively used the

dominant social media platforms to abridge the freedom of speech;

(B) the combination of qualified immunity

impeding damages for past censorship and doctrinal limits on

injunctions against the breadth of future censorship leaves Texans

and other Americans without adequate judicial remedies for federal

censorship;

(C) dominant common carriers, especially when

given exaggerated dominance by federal privilege, pressure, and

coordination, must be available to persons of all points of view,

without discrimination; and

(D) the public square, which is now mainly on the

Internet and is enabled by the dominant social media platforms,

must be available to persons of all points of view, without

discrimination;

(3) damages are necessary for violations of H.B. 20

because, even though private enforcement of the legislation has

never been enjoined, the platforms subject to the legislation have

never complied with it;

(4) the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution bars

the federal government from "abridging" the freedom of speech or of

the press, not merely coercing or otherwise "prohibiting" it;

(5) states have a structurally essential role, dating

back to the Sedition Act of 1798, of protecting individuals from

federal censorship; and

(6) since H.B. 20 was originally enacted:

(A) abundant evidence has come to light that the

federal government has massively used dominant social media

platforms to abridge the freedom of speech;

(B) it has become clear that common carrier

legislation like H.B. 20 is the only sort of legal mechanism that

can promptly and effectively prevent federal censorship through the

social media platforms; and

(C) this state has a compelling and even

existential interest in adopting this law to prevent the federal

threat to the freedom of speech.

SECTION 2. Section 120.001(1), Business & Commerce Code, is

amended to read as follows:

(1) "Social media platform" means an Internet website

or application that is open to the public, allows a user to create

an account, and enables users to communicate with other users for

the primary purpose of posting information, comments, messages, or

images. The term does not include:

(A) an Internet service provider as defined by

Section 324.055;

(B) electronic mail , including direct messaging

or other electronically conveyed mail ; or

(C) an online service, application, or website:

(i) that :

(a) consists primarily of news,

sports, entertainment, or other information or content that is not

user generated but is preselected by the provider; or

(b) primarily provides banking,

financial, transportation, sales, or another service that is not a

communications service; and

(ii) for which any chat, comments, or

interactive functionality is incidental to, directly related to, or

dependent on the provision of the content or service described by

Subparagraph (i).

SECTION 3. Section 143A.005, Civil Practice and Remedies

Code, is amended to read as follows:

Sec. 143A.005. LIMITATION ON EFFECT OF CHAPTER ;

INTERPRETATION OF CHAPTER . (a) This chapter does not subject a

social media platform to damages or other legal remedies to the

extent the social media platform is protected from those remedies

under federal law.

(b) This chapter does not apply to a social media platform's

newsfeed, the platform's own homepage, or any other service that

is:

(1) intended to convey a particularized message where

the likelihood is great that such a message would be understood by

the viewer;

(2) not a common carrier service;

(3) not strongly analogous to a common carrier

service; or

(4) not primarily providing transmission of users'

expression.

(c) Nothing in this chapter may be interpreted to permit a

social media platform to discriminate in the carriage of users'

expression by disseminating the platform's own commentary or

expression in a manner that delays or otherwise diminishes the

visibility of a user's expression, or delays or otherwise denies

equal access to a user's expression, or otherwise censors a user's

expression, on the basis of viewpoint in violation of this chapter.

SECTION 4. Section 143A.007(b), Civil Practice and Remedies

Code, is amended to read as follows:

(b) If the user proves that the social media platform

violated this chapter with respect to the user, the user is entitled

to recover:

(1) declaratory relief under Chapter 37, including

costs and reasonable and necessary attorney's fees under Section

37.009; [ and ]

(2) injunctive relief ;

(3) either:

(A) actual damages; or

(B) at the election of the user, statutory

damages in the amount of:

(i) $100,000 if the user or the user's

expression was censored in violation of Section 143A.002; or

(ii) $1,000 if the user's ability to receive

another person's expression was censored in violation of Section

143A.002; and

(4) reasonable and necessary attorney's fees .

SECTION 5. Section 143A.007(b), Civil Practice and Remedies

Code, as amended by this Act, applies only to a cause of action that

accrues on or after the effective date of this Act. A cause of

action that accrued before the effective date of this Act is

governed by the law as it existed immediately before the effective

date of this Act, and that law is continued in effect for that

purpose.

SECTION 6. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.