Monitoring the Session

HB 4248

Reynolds Bill’s 3% Sales Tax Cap Fits Maybe One City

Died in committee

Verdict: Certified scam

Certified scamReviewed
Rep. Ron ReynoldsDHouse 27
Why it's charged
Rider: Bracket bill

THE CAPTION

“relating to the authority to impose municipal sales and use taxes;”

Caption, introduced version (I)

THE RIDER

…“in a county with a population of more than four million; or”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The quoted clause closes new Subsection (b)(3)(D), which reaches only a municipality with a population of more than 70,000 that is located in two counties, with 90 percent of its territory in a county of more than 800,000 and the rest in a county of more than four million. Those stacked descriptors aim a bill whose caption speaks of municipal sales taxes in general at a very small set of places, possibly one.

Rider: Bracket bill

On Nov 1, 2026 the editor checked this charge against the bill text and certified it.

Reviewed · Nov 1, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the authority to impose municipal sales and use taxes; authorizing an increase in the rate of a tax.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Over 70,000 people, two counties, 90% in one over 800,000, the rest in one over 4M.

The bill adds a new exception to the Tax Code rule that bars some cities in counties touched by a large regional transportation authority from adopting an extra local sales tax. The exception reaches only a city with more than 70,000 people that sits in two counties, with 90 percent of its territory in a county of more than 800,000 and the rest in a county of more than four million. A city that fits that description could, with voter approval, raise its combined local sales tax rate up to three percent, while other cities under this section stay under the two percent cap.

Labels

Labels: NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Mar 10, 2025 and referred to the House Ways & Means committee. No public hearing. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB4248 · 2025-03-10

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the authority to impose municipal sales and use taxes; authorizing an increase in the rate of a tax.

WHAT IT DOES

Over 70,000 people, two counties, 90% in one over 800,000, the rest in one over 4M.

The bill adds a new exception to the Tax Code rule that bars some cities in counties touched by a large regional transportation authority from adopting an extra local sales tax. The exception reaches only a city with more than 70,000 people that sits in two counties, with 90 percent of its territory in a county of more than 800,000 and the rest in a county of more than four million. A city that fits that description could, with voter approval, raise its combined local sales tax rate up to three percent, while other cities under this section stay under the two percent cap.

CERTIFIED SCAM CHARGES

[x] RIDER: BRACKET BILLanalysis confidence 80%

THE CAPTION

“relating to the authority to impose municipal sales and use taxes;”

Caption, introduced version (I)

THE RIDER

…“in a county with a population of more than four million; or”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The quoted clause closes new Subsection (b)(3)(D), which reaches only a municipality with a population of more than 70,000 that is located in two counties, with 90 percent of its territory in a county of more than 800,000 and the rest in a county of more than four million. Those stacked descriptors aim a bill whose caption speaks of municipal sales taxes in general at a very small set of places, possibly one.

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Ways & Means
ALSO NOTED · NOT CHARGED (1)

CARVE-OUT · analysis confidence 60%

THE TEXT

“(f-1) A municipality described by Subsection (b)(3)(D) may”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

New Subsection (f-1) gives only the municipality described by Subsection (b)(3)(D) a combined sales tax ceiling of three percent, while Subsection (f) keeps other municipalities under this section at two percent.

FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

Certified scam

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 29, 2024 to Oct 19, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texas Sands PAC$30,000.00

Texas Sands PAC

$30,000.00

Cash
$30,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$30,000.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 5, 2024 to Feb 19, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100982635, 101040208.

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$25,000.00

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$25,000.00

Cash
$25,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$25,000.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 27, 2024 to Jan 16, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100982635, 101028685, 101035822.

Texas House Democratic Campaign Committee$7,000.00

Texas House Democratic Campaign Committee

$7,000.00

Cash
$7,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$7,000.00

Also funds 9 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Oct 15, 2024 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Apr 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101057584.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texas Sands PAC

$30,000.00

Cash
$30,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$30,000.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 5, 2024 to Feb 19, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100982635, 101040208.

×

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$25,000.00

Cash
$25,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$25,000.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 27, 2024 to Jan 16, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100982635, 101028685, 101035822.

×

Texas House Democratic Campaign Committee

$7,000.00

Cash
$7,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$7,000.00

Also funds 9 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Oct 15, 2024 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Apr 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101057584.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Adversarial review by claude-opus-5-5 at high effort: Certified scam.

Confirming read by claude-fable-5-1 at high effort: Certified scam.

Opus 5.5 reviewed the candidate before Fable's confirmation read.

Analysis of text version I by claude-fable-5-1, Oct 21, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas House · Filed Mar 10, 2025

03/31/2025 H Referred to Ways & Means: Mar 31 2025 4:34PM

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Nov 1, 2026 at 5:18 PM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Ways & Means · Final status: Died in committee

Subjects

City Government--Finance

Taxation--Sales

Text

The text as introduced · 545 words

89R12842 JBD-F

By: Reynolds
H.B. No. 4248

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the authority to impose municipal sales and use taxes;

authorizing an increase in the rate of a tax.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 321.101, Tax Code, is amended by

amending Subsections (b) and (f) and adding Subsection (f-1) to

read as follows:

(b) A municipality that is not disqualified may, by a

majority vote of the qualified voters of the municipality voting at

an election held for that purpose, adopt an additional sales and use

tax for the benefit of the municipality in accordance with this

chapter. A municipality is disqualified from adopting the

additional sales and use tax if the municipality:

(1) is included within the boundaries of a rapid

transit authority created under Chapter 451, Transportation Code;

(2) is included within the boundaries of a regional

transportation authority created under Chapter 452, Transportation

Code, by a principal municipality having a population of less than

1.1 million according to the most recent federal decennial census,

unless the municipality has a population of 400,000 or more and is

located in more than one county;

(3) is wholly or partly located in a county that

contains territory within the boundaries of a regional

transportation authority created under Chapter 452, Transportation

Code, by a principal municipality having a population in excess of

1.1 million according to the most recent federal decennial census,

unless:

(A) the municipality is a contiguous

municipality; [ or ]

(B) the municipality is not included within the

boundaries of the authority and is located wholly or partly in a

county in which fewer than 250 persons are residents of both the

county and the authority according to the most recent federal

census; [ or ]

(C) the municipality is not and on January 1,

1993, was not included within the boundaries of the authority; or

(D) the municipality:

(i) has a population of more than 70,000;

and

(ii) is located in two counties, with 90

percent of the municipality's territory located in a county with a

population of more than 800,000 and the remaining territory located

in a county with a population of more than four million; or

(4) imposes a tax authorized by Chapter 453,

Transportation Code.

(f) Subject to Subsection (f-1), a [ A ] municipality may not

adopt or increase a sales and use tax or an additional sales and use

tax under this section if as a result of the adoption or increase of

the tax the combined rate of all sales and use taxes imposed by the

municipality and other political subdivisions of this state having

territory in the municipality would exceed two percent at any

location in the municipality.

(f-1) A municipality described by Subsection (b)(3)(D) may

not adopt or increase a sales and use tax or an additional sales and

use tax under this section if as a result of the adoption or

increase of the tax the combined rate of all sales and use taxes

imposed by the municipality and other political subdivisions of

this state having territory in the municipality would exceed three

percent at any location in the municipality.

SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.