HB 4552
Gerdes DEI Bill Exempts Any Training Labeled Federal Compliance
Did not pass
Verdict: Smells
All 3 charges, and why
The hole
THE TEXT
“This section does not apply to a training, program, or activity relating to sexual harassment or developed for the purpose of ensuring compliance with applicable federal law.”
Bill text, House committee report version (H)
Unlike the narrower exceptions in the definitions, this blanket exemption needs no lawyer sign-off and no 'sole purpose' test. A race-based training labeled as federal compliance could pass through it. It is a gap, but the hiring and preference bans still cover the main case.
The holeDragnet
THE CAPTION
“relating to a prohibition on certain discriminatory activities by governmental entities and vendors of governmental entities”
Caption, House committee report version (H)
THE TEXT
“promoting, as an official position of a governmental entity, a particular opinion referencing unconscious or implicit bias, cultural appropriation, allyship, transgender ideology, microaggressions”…
Bill text, House committee report version (H)
The caption targets discriminatory activities. This definition also counts an official opinion on a list of ideas as discrimination, even with no differential treatment of anyone. Through the vendor clause, it reaches private contractors as well.
DragnetNew fee, fund, board or appointees
THE TEXT
“appoint an internal auditor for the specific purpose of conducting the assessment”…
Bill text, House committee report version (H)
State agencies outside the strategic-plan report system must create a new internal auditor post just to check compliance with this chapter. The pitch talks about stopping waste of tax dollars.
New fee, fund, board or appointeesNeeds review · Nov 1, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade
Caption
relating to a prohibition on certain discriminatory activities by governmental entities and vendors of governmental entities; providing for declaratory and injunctive relief and the withholding of certain funds from political subdivisions.
Caption from analyzed text · version H.
Summary
No lawyer sign-off needed. Meanwhile an official opinion on “allyship” counts as discrimination.
This bill bans state agencies, courts, the Legislature, cities, counties, special districts and charter schools from running DEI-style hiring, offices, trainings, preferences or official positions on listed concepts like implicit bias or disparate impact, and makes every government vendor promise not to do the same. Residents can complain to the attorney general, who can label a city or county noncompliant, have the comptroller hold back its sales tax money until it submits a fix, and sue for a court order. State agencies must report compliance every year, some must appoint an internal auditor, every government must adopt discipline rules up to firing, and vendors that break their promise can lose their contracts.
Labels
Labels: STALLED AFTER COMMITTEE. Voted out of the House State Affairs committee 9-6 on Apr 30, 2025. Never placed on a calendar. The bill died.
Receipt
The receipt
89R-HB4552 · 2025-03-12
SOLD BY
+ 2 more authors
ITEM
relating to a prohibition on certain discriminatory activities by governmental entities and vendors of governmental entities; providing for declaratory and injunctive relief and the withholding of certain funds from political subdivisions.
WHAT IT DOES
No lawyer sign-off needed. Meanwhile an official opinion on “allyship” counts as discrimination.
This bill bans state agencies, courts, the Legislature, cities, counties, special districts and charter schools from running DEI-style hiring, offices, trainings, preferences or official positions on listed concepts like implicit bias or disparate impact, and makes every government vendor promise not to do the same. Residents can complain to the attorney general, who can label a city or county noncompliant, have the comptroller hold back its sales tax money until it submits a fix, and sue for a court order. State agencies must report compliance every year, some must appoint an internal auditor, every government must adopt discipline rules up to firing, and vendors that break their promise can lose their contracts.
CHARGES
[x] THE HOLEanalysis confidence 40%
THE TEXT
“This section does not apply to a training, program, or activity relating to sexual harassment or developed for the purpose of ensuring compliance with applicable federal law.”
Bill text, House committee report version (H)
Unlike the narrower exceptions in the definitions, this blanket exemption needs no lawyer sign-off and no 'sole purpose' test. A race-based training labeled as federal compliance could pass through it. It is a gap, but the hiring and preference bans still cover the main case.
[x] DRAGNETanalysis confidence 55%
THE CAPTION
“relating to a prohibition on certain discriminatory activities by governmental entities and vendors of governmental entities”
Caption, House committee report version (H)
THE TEXT
“promoting, as an official position of a governmental entity, a particular opinion referencing unconscious or implicit bias, cultural appropriation, allyship, transgender ideology, microaggressions”…
Bill text, House committee report version (H)
The caption targets discriminatory activities. This definition also counts an official opinion on a list of ideas as discrimination, even with no differential treatment of anyone. Through the vendor clause, it reaches private contractors as well.
[x] NEW FEE, FUND, BOARD OR APPOINTEESanalysis confidence 45%
THE TEXT
“appoint an internal auditor for the specific purpose of conducting the assessment”…
Bill text, House committee report version (H)
State agencies outside the strategic-plan report system must create a new internal auditor post just to check compliance with this chapter. The pitch talks about stopping waste of tax dollars.
TOTAL
No first-year general revenue figure available here.
LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source
Sources
Fiscal note · version H · May 3, 2025
The bill would prohibit certain activities that pertain to race, sex, ethnicity, and other factors among state agencies, local governments, and vendors doing business with state agencies and local governmental entities. This analysis assumes that state agencies could absorb costs associated with implementing the bill within existing resources. However, the number of state contracts that may be impacted by the provisions of this bill and the related fiscal consequences cannot be estimated. Therefore, the fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined.
LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.
Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.
HISTORY
- Filed
- Read first time
- Referred to State Affairs
- Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
- Considered in public hearing
- Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
- Left pending in committee
- Considered in public hearing
- Committee substitute considered in committee
- Reported favorably as substituted
- Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
- Committee report distributed
- Committee report sent to Calendars
FILED UNDER
THE TEXT
“This section does not apply to a training, program, or activity relating to sexual harassment or developed for the purpose of ensuring compliance with applicable federal law.”
Bill text, House committee report version (H)
The ban leaves an open door for any race- or sex-based training framed as federal compliance, with no lawyer approval required.
GOVERNMENT GROWTH UNDER A CONSERVATIVE BANNER
THE TEXT
“appoint an internal auditor for the specific purpose of conducting the assessment”…
Bill text, House committee report version (H)
The bill orders some state agencies to create new internal auditor positions to police compliance.
THE TEXT
…“engage in activity that, were the vendor a governmental entity, would violate Section 621.051”
Bill text, House committee report version (H)
Private companies that sell to any Texas government must certify they will not engage in banned activity, including promoting listed opinions, or risk termination and a ban on future contracts.
THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
Donors
Not tied to this bill.
Sources
The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.
Derived itemized flow · Oct 30, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$316,248.00
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC
$316,248.00
- Cash
- $220,000.00
- Paid by others
- $96,248.00
- Total
- $316,248.00
Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Jun 25, 2025 to Sep 29, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101010282, 101029052, 101035831, 101036569, 101070133.
Dustin Burrows Campaign$88,800.00
Dustin Burrows Campaign
$88,800.00
- Cash
- $75,000.00
- Paid by others
- $13,800.00
- Total
- $88,800.00
Also funds 39 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Sep 13, 2025 to Sep 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Dec 29, 2025 to Jan 26, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101029052, 101035831, 101036569.
Texas Conservative Majority PAC$67,750.00
Texas Conservative Majority PAC
$67,750.00
- Cash
- $25,000.00
- Paid by others
- $42,750.00
- Total
- $67,750.00
Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Feb 13, 2026 to Feb 20, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101036569.
Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC
$316,248.00
- Cash
- $220,000.00
- Paid by others
- $96,248.00
- Total
- $316,248.00
Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Jun 25, 2025 to Sep 29, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101010282, 101029052, 101035831, 101036569, 101070133.
Dustin Burrows Campaign
$88,800.00
- Cash
- $75,000.00
- Paid by others
- $13,800.00
- Total
- $88,800.00
Also funds 39 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Sep 13, 2025 to Sep 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Dec 29, 2025 to Jan 26, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101029052, 101035831, 101036569.
Texas Conservative Majority PAC
$67,750.00
- Cash
- $25,000.00
- Paid by others
- $42,750.00
- Total
- $67,750.00
Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Feb 13, 2026 to Feb 20, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101036569.
Votes
No floor vote loaded for this bill.
Witnesses25
- For
- 2
- Against
- 23
- On
- 0
Names
For
- Do No Harm Action1 registration
- Self; American Energy Institute1 registration
Against
- Every Texan1 registration
- IDRA (Intercultural Development Research Association)1 registration
- Legal Defense Fund1 registration
- Self13 registrations
- Self; Austin justice coalition1 registration
- Self; Equality Texas1 registration
- Self; Equity Action1 registration
- Self; Texas Unitarian Universalist Justice Ministry2 registrations
- Self; Texas Values Action1 registration
- Texas Civil Rights Project1 registration
Sources
25 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.
Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.
House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.
Fiscal
No first-year general revenue figure available here.
LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source
Sources
Fiscal note · version H · May 3, 2025
The bill would prohibit certain activities that pertain to race, sex, ethnicity, and other factors among state agencies, local governments, and vendors doing business with state agencies and local governmental entities. This analysis assumes that state agencies could absorb costs associated with implementing the bill within existing resources. However, the number of state contracts that may be impacted by the provisions of this bill and the related fiscal consequences cannot be estimated. Therefore, the fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined.
LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.
Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.
How this was graded
Analysis of text version H by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.
Sources
Texas House · Filed Mar 12, 2025
05/09/2025 H Committee report sent to Calendars
Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · House Committee Report
Data snapshot Nov 1, 2026 at 1:56 PM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.
House committee · State Affairs · Committee vote 9 aye, 6 nay · Out of committee
Subjects
Civil Remedies & Liabilities
Education--Primary & Secondary--Charter Schools
Education--Primary & Secondary--General
Human Relations
Political Subdivisions
Purchasing--General
Purchasing--Local
Purchasing--State
State Agencies, Boards & Commissions
State Finances--Management & Control
TEXAS ANTIDISCRIMINATION ACT (PJ3XT)
AUDITS & AUDITORS
DISCRIMINATION
ATTORNEY GENERAL
COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
Text
The text as introduced · 1,333 words
89R18142 TYPED By: Gerdes H.B. No. 4552 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to the Texas Antidiscrimination Act. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. This Act may be cited as the Texas Antidiscrimination Act. SECTION 2. Subtitle A, Title 6, Government Code, is amended by adding Chapter 621 to read as follows: CHAPTER 621. PROHIBITION ON DISCRIMINATORY INITIATIVES Sec. 621.001. LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS; PURPOSE. (a) The legislature finds that: (1) Section 3, Article I, Texas Constitution (Equal Protection Clause), provides that "[a]ll freemen, when they form a social compact, have equal rights, and no man, or set of men, is entitled to exclusive separate public emoluments, or privileges, but in consideration of public service;" (2) Section 3a, Article I, Texas Constitution (Equal Rights Amendment), provides that "[e]quality under the law shall not be denied or abridged because of sex, race, color, creed, or national origin;" (3) The Texas Constitution's Equal Rights Amendment was designed expressly to provide protection which supplements the federal guarantees of equal treatment; (4) The Texas Constitution's Equal Rights Amendment is more extensive and provides more specific protection than both the United States and Texas due-process and equal-protection guarantees; and (5) The discriminatory initiatives described in this chapter are antithetical to Texas Constitution's Equal Protection Clause and Equal Rights Amendment and lack a rational relationship to a legitimate governmental purpose such that the initiatives violate Texas's Equal Protection Clause and Equal Rights Amendment; and (6) Texans deserve a government committed to serving every person with equal dignity and respect and to expending precious taxpayer resources only on making Texas great for all Texans. (b) The purpose of this act is to prevent the unlawful discrimination that is antithetical to the Texas Constitution's Equal Protection Clause and Equal Rights Amendment. This act does not create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the governmental entities listed in Section 621.002(2), except as provided by Section 621.004. Sec. 621.002. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter: (1) "Discriminatory office" means an office, division, or other unit of a governmental entity established for the purpose of: (A) influencing hiring or employment practices or workforce composition at the entity with respect to race, sex, color, or ethnicity, other than through the use of color-blind, race-neutral, and sex-neutral hiring processes in accordance with any applicable state and federal antidiscrimination laws; (B) promoting differential treatment or providing special benefits to individuals on the basis of race, sex, color, or ethnicity; (C) promoting policies or procedures designed or implemented in reference to race, sex, color, or ethnicity, other than policies or procedures: (i) approved in writing by the attorney general; and (ii) implemented for the sole purpose of ensuring compliance with any applicable federal law enacted before September 1, 2025; (D) conducting trainings, programs, or activities designed or implemented in reference to race, sex, color, ethnicity, gender identity, or sexual orientation, other than trainings, programs, or activities: (i) developed by an attorney; (ii) approved in writing by the attorney general; and (iii) conducted for the sole purpose of ensuring compliance with any applicable court order or state or federal law enacted before September 1, 2025; or (E) promoting, as an official position of the entity, a particular opinion referencing unconscious or implicit bias, cultural appropriation, allyship, transgender ideology, microaggressions, group marginalization, anti-racism, systemic oppression, social justice, intersectionality, neo-pronouns, heteronormativity, disparate impact, gender theory, racial or sexual privilege, or any related formulation of these concepts. (2) "Governmental entity" means: (A) a department, commission, board, office, or other agency that is in the executive branch of state government and that was created by the constitution or a statute, other than an institution of higher education as defined by Section 61.003, Education Code; (B) the legislature or a legislative state agency; (C) the supreme court, the court of criminal appeals, a court of appeals, a district court, or the Texas Judicial Council or another agency in the judicial branch of state government; (D) a county, municipality, special purpose district, including a school district, or any other political subdivision of this state; or (E) an open-enrollment charter school established under Subchapter D, Chapter 12, Education Code. Sec. 621.003. RESPONSIBILITY OF GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY REGARDING DISCRIMINATORY INITIATIVES. (a) A governmental entity shall ensure that each unit of the entity does not, except as required by federal law: (1) does not, except as required by federal law: (A) establish or maintain a discriminatory office; (B) hire or assign an employee of the entity or contract with a third party to perform the duties of a discriminatory office; (C) compel, require, induce, or solicit any person to provide a discriminatory statement or give preferential consideration to any person based on the provision of a discriminatory statement; (D) give preference on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin to an applicant for employment, an employee, or a participant in any function of the entity; or (E) require as a condition of employment any person to participate in discriminatory training, which: (i) includes a training, program, or activity designed or implemented in reference to race, sex, color, ethnicity, gender identity, or sexual orientation; and (ii) does not include a training, program, or activity developed for the purpose of ensuring compliance with any applicable federal law; and (2) adopts policies and procedures for appropriately disciplining, including by termination, an employee or contractor of the entity who engages in conduct in violation of Subdivision (1). (b) Subsection (a)(1) may not be construed to apply to: (1) academic course instruction; (2) scholarly research or a creative work by a school district's or open-enrollment charter school's students or faculty; (3) an activity of a student organization registered with or recognized by a school district or open-enrollment charter school; (4) guest speakers or performers on short-term engagements; (5) a program or activity to enhance student academic achievement or postgraduate outcomes that allows participation without regard to race, sex, color, or ethnicity; or (6) data collection. Sec. 621.004. COMPLAINT; ENFORCEMENT. (a) A person who has a reasonable belief that a governmental entity is violating this chapter may file a complaint with the attorney general. (b) If the attorney general determines that a governmental entity named in a complaint received under Subsection (a) is violating this chapter, the attorney general may file a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the governmental entity to comply with this chapter. (c) A mandamus action under Subsection (b) must be filed in: (1) Travis County, if the governmental entity is an entity described by Section 621.002(2)(A)-(C); or (2) the county in which the governmental entity is located, if the governmental entity is an entity described by Section 621.002(2)(D) or (E). SECTION 3. Subchapter Z, Chapter 2252, Government Code, is amended by adding Section 2252.911 to read as follows: Sec. 2252.911. PROHIBITED CONSIDERATIONS IN CONTRACTING. (a) In this section, "governmental entity" has the meaning assigned by Section 2252.001, except that the term does not include an institution of higher education as defined by Section 61.003, Education Code. (b) Notwithstanding any other law, a governmental entity may not award a contract or provide preferential or discriminatory treatment to a person submitting a bid for a contract on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, sex, gender identity, or sexual orientation. SECTION 4. The changes in law made by Section 3 of this Act apply only to a contract entered into on or after the effective date of this Act. A contract entered into before that date is governed by the law in effect on the date the contract was entered into, and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose. SECTION 5. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this Act takes effect September 1, 2025.

