Monitoring the Session

HB 4972

Cain’s Utility Transfer Ban Has A Bond Ordinance Escape Hatch

Died in committee

Verdict: Smells

SmellsInitial review
Rep. Briscoe CainRHouse 128
Why it's charged
The hole

THE TEXT

…“authorized in the indenture, deed of trust, or ordinance providing”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The new ban says cities may not move utility revenue into the general fund, but the rewritten bond section says cities may do so anyway "notwithstanding" the ban, if the city's own bond ordinance or bond papers allow it. A city that has issued utility revenue bonds can write that permission into the ordinance it adopts, which lets the main case escape the ban.

The hole

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the authority of a municipality to transfer revenue of a municipal utility to the general fund of the municipality.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Ban on utility transfers, unless the bond ordinance allows them. The city writes the ordinance!

The bill bans Texas cities from moving money earned by city-owned utilities, including drainage utilities, into the city's general fund. It touches every city that owns or controls a utility, and utilities run by nonprofits whose boards are appointed by cities. It also rewrites the utility bond law so a city can still make those transfers when its own bond ordinance or bond papers allow it, so many cities may keep the money moving.

Labels

Labels: NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Mar 13, 2025 and referred to the House Intergovernmental Affairs committee. No public hearing. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB4972 · 2025-03-13

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the authority of a municipality to transfer revenue of a municipal utility to the general fund of the municipality.

WHAT IT DOES

Ban on utility transfers, unless the bond ordinance allows them. The city writes the ordinance!

The bill bans Texas cities from moving money earned by city-owned utilities, including drainage utilities, into the city's general fund. It touches every city that owns or controls a utility, and utilities run by nonprofits whose boards are appointed by cities. It also rewrites the utility bond law so a city can still make those transfers when its own bond ordinance or bond papers allow it, so many cities may keep the money moving.

CHARGES

[x] THE HOLEanalysis confidence 65%

THE TEXT

…“authorized in the indenture, deed of trust, or ordinance providing”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The new ban says cities may not move utility revenue into the general fund, but the rewritten bond section says cities may do so anyway "notwithstanding" the ban, if the city's own bond ordinance or bond papers allow it. A city that has issued utility revenue bonds can write that permission into the ordinance it adopts, which lets the main case escape the ban.

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Intergovernmental Affairs
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Adam Loewy$7,500Emerson Hankamer$5,205Teans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$5K

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 28, 2024 to May 28, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Adam Loewy$7,500.00
Emerson Hankamer$5,205.08
Teans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$5,000.00

Teans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$5,000.00

Cash
$5,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$5,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Jul 3, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Jul 3, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101033926.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Teans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$5,000.00

Cash
$5,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$5,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Jul 3, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Jul 3, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101033926.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas House · Filed Mar 13, 2025

04/03/2025 H Referred to Intergovernmental Affairs: Apr 3 2025 12:38PM

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:19 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Intergovernmental Affairs · Final status: Died in committee

Subjects

City Government--Finance

City Government--Utilities

Text

The text as introduced · 387 words

89R2686 CS-D

By: Cain
H.B. No. 4972

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the authority of a municipality to transfer revenue of a

municipal utility to the general fund of the municipality.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 1502.059, Government Code, is amended to

read as follows:

Sec. 1502.059. TRANSFER OF REVENUE TO GENERAL FUND.

Notwithstanding Section 1502.058(a) of this chapter, Section

552.049 or Section 552.916, Local Government Code, or a similar law

or municipal charter provision, a municipality and its officers and

utility trustees may transfer to the municipality's general fund

and may use for general or special purposes revenue of any

municipally owned utility system in the amount and to the extent

authorized in the indenture, deed of trust, or ordinance providing

for and securing payment of public securities issued under this

chapter or similar law.

SECTION 2. Section 552.049, Local Government Code, is

amended to read as follows:

Sec. 552.049. SEGREGATION OF INCOME. (a) The income of a

drainage utility system must be segregated and completely

identifiable in municipal accounts.

(b) A [ If drainage charges are solely for the cost of

service, the ] municipality may not transfer the income of a

drainage utility system [ charges in whole or in part ] to the

municipal general fund [ , except for any part collected outside

municipal boundaries and except for any part pledged to retire any

outstanding indebtedness or obligation incurred, or as a reserve

for future construction, repair, or maintenance of the drainage

system. If the governing body has levied, in the drainage charge,

an amount in contribution to the funding of future system

improvements, including replacement, new construction, or

extension, that amount is not transferable to the general fund ].

SECTION 3. Subchapter Z, Chapter 552, Local Government

Code, is amended by adding Section 552.916 to read as follows:

Sec. 552.916. PROHIBITION ON TRANSFER OF MUNICIPAL UTILITY

REVENUE. (a) In this section, "municipal utility" means any

utility owned, operated, or controlled by a municipality or by a

nonprofit corporation whose directors are appointed by one or more

municipalities.

(b) Notwithstanding any other law, a municipality may not

transfer revenue from a municipal utility to the general fund of the

municipality.

SECTION 4. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.