Monitoring the Session

HB 5203

Bell Preemption Bill Withholds Local Sales Tax Before Any Ruling

Died in committee

Verdict: Smells

SmellsInitial review
Rep. Cecil Bell Jr.RHouse 3
Why it's charged
Caption mismatch

THE TEXT

“the comptroller shall withhold payment of any money due”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The caption speaks only of preemption, but the body sets heavy money penalties that start as soon as the attorney general files suit, before any ruling. The caption also does not mention the tax-rate caps or the exclusive Supreme Court jurisdiction.

Caption mismatch

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to state preemption of certain municipal and county regulation.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

The attorney general sues, and tax caps and grant bans start. Lose? Five years of it!

The bill bars cities and counties from adopting or enforcing any ordinance, order, or rule in a field already covered by the Elections Code or the Penal Code, unless another statute expressly allows it. It lets injured people, trade associations representing them, and the attorney general sue local governments over these and other preempted rules, and it shifts the burden of proof onto the local government. Once the attorney general files suit, the state withholds the local government's sales tax money, caps its property tax rate, and denies its state grants; a loss extends the tax cap and grant ban for five years and costs the local government its sales tax suspense account.

Labels

Labels: NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Mar 14, 2025 and referred to the House State Affairs committee. No public hearing. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB5203 · 2025-03-14

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to state preemption of certain municipal and county regulation.

WHAT IT DOES

The attorney general sues, and tax caps and grant bans start. Lose? Five years of it!

The bill bars cities and counties from adopting or enforcing any ordinance, order, or rule in a field already covered by the Elections Code or the Penal Code, unless another statute expressly allows it. It lets injured people, trade associations representing them, and the attorney general sue local governments over these and other preempted rules, and it shifts the burden of proof onto the local government. Once the attorney general files suit, the state withholds the local government's sales tax money, caps its property tax rate, and denies its state grants; a loss extends the tax cap and grant ban for five years and costs the local government its sales tax suspense account.

CHARGES

[x] CAPTION MISMATCHanalysis confidence 45%

THE TEXT

“the comptroller shall withhold payment of any money due”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The caption speaks only of preemption, but the body sets heavy money penalties that start as soon as the attorney general files suit, before any ruling. The caption also does not mention the tax-rate caps or the exclusive Supreme Court jurisdiction.

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to State Affairs
FILED UNDER

SPEECH AND LAWFARE

THE TEXT

…“following provisions or a trade association representing the person”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill widens who can sue cities and counties over preempted rules to include trade associations, and it adds attorney general suits in which the local government bears the burden of proof.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Aug 30, 2024 to Apr 2, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$303,416.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$303,416.00

Cash
$77,500.00
Paid by others
$225,916.00
Total
$303,416.00
mail $151,916.00advertising $57,250.00polling $16,750.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 14, 2024 to Mar 3, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101012348, 101016762, 101032999, 101036177, 101041213, 101061435.

DUSTIN BURROWS CAMPAIGN$84,000.00

DUSTIN BURROWS CAMPAIGN

$84,000.00

Cash
$75,000.00
Paid by others
$9,000.00
Total
$84,000.00
polling $9,000.00

Also funds 39 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 13, 2025 to Sep 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 29, 2025 to Jan 27, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101032999, 101036177, 101041213.

Texas Conservative Majority PAC$83,505.68

Texas Conservative Majority PAC

$83,505.68

Cash
$0.00
Paid by others
$83,505.68
Total
$83,505.68
canvassing $50,000.00Other filed descriptions $24,666.67polling $7,750.00texting $1,089.01

Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Feb 9, 2026 to Mar 3, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101041213, 101061435.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$303,416.00

Cash
$77,500.00
Paid by others
$225,916.00
Total
$303,416.00
mail $151,916.00advertising $57,250.00polling $16,750.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 14, 2024 to Mar 3, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101012348, 101016762, 101032999, 101036177, 101041213, 101061435.

×

DUSTIN BURROWS CAMPAIGN

$84,000.00

Cash
$75,000.00
Paid by others
$9,000.00
Total
$84,000.00
polling $9,000.00

Also funds 39 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 13, 2025 to Sep 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 29, 2025 to Jan 27, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101032999, 101036177, 101041213.

×

Texas Conservative Majority PAC

$83,505.68

Cash
$0.00
Paid by others
$83,505.68
Total
$83,505.68
canvassing $50,000.00Other filed descriptions $24,666.67polling $7,750.00texting $1,089.01

Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Feb 9, 2026 to Mar 3, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101041213, 101061435.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas House · Filed Mar 14, 2025

04/07/2025 H Referred to State Affairs: Apr 7 2025 5:28PM

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:19 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · State Affairs · Final status: Died in committee

Companion

SB 2858 by Creighton (very similar)

Subjects

City Government--General

County Government--General

Intergovernmental Relations

ATTORNEY GENERAL

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS

SUPREME COURT

Text

The text as introduced · 1,515 words

By: Bell of Montgomery
H.B. No. 5203

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to state preemption of certain municipal and county

regulation.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. The legislature finds that:

(1) the state has historically been the exclusive regulator

of many aspects of commerce, trade, elections, and criminal justice

in this state;

(2) in recent years, several local jurisdictions have

sought to establish their own regulations of commerce, trade,

elections, and criminal justice that are different than the state's

regulations; and

(3) such local regulations have led to a patchwork of

regulations that apply inconsistently across this state.

SECTION 2. The purpose of this Act is to provide additional

statewide consistency by returning sovereign regulatory powers to

the state where those powers belong in accordance with Section 5,

Article XI, Texas Constitution.

SECTION 3. This Act:

(1) may not be construed to prohibit a municipality or

county from building or maintaining a road, imposing a tax, or

carrying out any authority expressly authorized by statute;

(2) may not be construed to prohibit a home-rule

municipality from providing the same services and imposing the same

regulations that a general-law municipality is authorized to

provide or impose;

(3) does not affect the authority of a municipality or

county to conduct a public awareness campaign; and

(4) does not affect the authority of a municipality or

county to repeal or amend an existing ordinance, order, or rule that

violates the provisions of this Act for the limited purpose of

bringing that ordinance, order, or rule in compliance with this

Act.

SECTION 4. Chapter 1, Elections Code, is amended by adding

section 1.023 to read as follows:

Sec. 1.023. PREEMPTION. Unless expressly authorized by

another statute, a municipality or county may not adopt, enforce,

or maintain an ordinance, order, or rule regulating conduct in a

field of regulation that is occupied by a provision of this code.

An ordinance, order, or rule that violates this section is void,

unenforceable, and inconsistent with this code.

SECTION 5. Chapter 1, Penal Code, is amended by adding

section 1.11 to read as follows:

Sec. 1.11. PREEMPTION. Unless expressly authorized by

another statute, a municipality or county may not adopt, enforce,

or maintain an ordinance, order, or rule regulating conduct in a

field of regulation that is occupied by a provision of this code.

An ordinance, order, or rule that violates this section is void,

unenforceable, and inconsistent with this code.

SECTION 6. Section 102A.002, Civil Practice and Remedies

Code, is amended to read as follows:

Sec. 102A.002. LIABILITY FOR CERTAIN REGULATION. Any

person who has sustained an injury in fact, actual or threatened,

from a municipal or county ordinance, order, or rule adopted or

enforced by a municipality or county in violation of any of the

following provisions or a trade association representing the person

has standing to bring and may bring an action against the

municipality or county:

(1) Section 1.004, Agriculture Code;

(2) Section 1.109, Business & Commerce Code;

(3) Section 1.004, Finance Code;

(4) Section 30.005, Insurance Code;

(5) Section 1.005, Labor Code;

(6) Section 229.901, Local Government Code;

(7) Section 1.003, Natural Resources Code;

(8) Section 1.004, Occupations Code;[ or ]

(9) Section 1.004, Property Code ;

(10) Section 1.023, Elections Code; or

(11) Section 1.11, Penal Code .

SECTION 7. Chapter 102A, Civil Practice and Remedies Code,

is amended by adding sections 102A.008 through 102A.014 to read as

follows:

Sec. 102A.008. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:

(1) "Local government" means a municipality or county.

(2) "No-new-revenue tax rate" means the no-new-revenue tax

rate calculated under Chapter 26, Tax Code.

Sec. 102A.009. ATTORNEY GENERAL INVESTIGATION AND ACTION.

(a) The attorney general may investigate an alleged violation of

this chapter by a local government.

(b) If, after conducting an investigation under Subsection

(a), the attorney general determines a local government adopted,

enforced, or maintained an ordinance, order, or rule in violation

of the provisions listed in section 102A.002, the attorney general

may bring an action in the name of the state against a local

government for the violation.

Sec. 102A.010. ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS DURING PENDENCY OF

ACTION. During the pendency of an action brought under Section

102A.009, with respect to a local government defending the action:

(1) the comptroller shall withhold payment of any money due

to the local government under Section 321.502 or 323.502, Tax Code,

as applicable;

(2) the local government may not adopt an ad valorem tax

rate that exceeds the local government 's no-new-revenue tax rate;

and

(3) the local government may not receive state grant funds

and any pending application for such funds shall be denied.

Sec. 102A.011. BURDEN OF PROOF; INITIAL HEARING. (a) A

local government defending an action brought under Section 102A.009

has the burden of proof to establish by a preponderance of the

evidence that the local government complied with the law the

alleged violation of which is the subject of the action.

(b) The court of original jurisdiction shall set an action

brought under Section 102A.009 for an initial hearing not later

than the 30th day after the date the local government defending the

action was served with process for the action.

Sec. 102A.012. RESOLUTION OF ACTION IN FAVOR OF ATTORNEY

GENERAL. (a) If the attorney general prevails in an action brought

under Section 102A.009:

(1) the local government defending the action may not,

during the five state fiscal years following the year in which the

judgment becomes final:

(A) adopt an ad valorem tax rate that exceeds the local

government's no-new-revenue tax rate; or

(B) receive state grant funds; and

(2) the court issuing the final judgment resolving the

action shall provide in the judgment that the state is entitled to

recover from the local government defending the action a penalty

equal to the balance of the suspense account maintained for the

local government under Section 321.501 or 323.501, Tax Code, as

applicable, that exists on the date the judgment is signed.

(b) The comptroller shall, on receipt of a copy of the final

judgment in an action brought under Section 102A.009 that includes

a provision described by Subsection (a)(2), deposit the balance of

the suspense account maintained for the local government defending

the action under Section 321.501 or 323.501, Tax Code, as

applicable, as of the date the judgment is signed to the credit of

the general revenue fund.

Sec. 102A.013. RESOLUTION OF ACTION IN FAVOR OF LOCAL

GOVERNMENT. If a local government prevails in an action brought

under section 102A.009, the comptroller shall, notwithstanding any

other law, immediately send to the local government the balance of

the suspense account maintained for the local government under

Section 321.501 or 323.501, Tax Code, as applicable, as of the date

the judgment resolving the action is signed.

SECTION 8. Section 102A.002, Civil Practices and Remedies

Code, as amended by this Act, applies only to a cause of action that

accrues on or after the effective date of this Act. Section

102A.009, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, as added by this Act,

applies only to a cause of action that accrues on or after the

effective date of this Act. Section 102A.014, Civil Practice and

Remedies Code, as added by this Act, and Section 22.220, Government

Code, as amended by this Act, apply only to an appeal initiated on

or after the effective date of this Act.

SECTION 9. Every provision, section, subsection, sentence,

clause, phrase, or word in this Act, and every application of the

provisions in this Act to every person, group of persons, or

circumstances, are severable from each other. If any application

of any provision in this Act to any person, group of persons, or

circumstances is found by a court to be invalid, preempted, or

unconstitutional, for any reason whatsoever, then the remaining

applications of the Act to all other persons and circumstances

shall be severed and preserved and shall remain in effect. All

constitutionally valid applications of the provisions in this Act

shall be severed from any applications that a court finds to be

invalid, preempted, or unconstitutional, because it is the

legislature's intent and priority that every single valid

application of every statutory provision be allowed to stand alone.

The legislature further declares that it would have enacted this

Act, and each provision, section, subsection, sentence, clause,

phrase, or word, and all constitutional applications of the

provisions of this Act, irrespective of the fact that any

provision, section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word,

or applications of this chapter were to be declared invalid,

preempted, or unconstitutional.

SECTION 10. The Texas Supreme Court has exclusive and

original jurisdiction over a challenge to the constitutionality of

this Act or any part of this Act and may issue injunctive or

declaratory relief in connection with the challenge.

SECTION 11. This Act takes effect immediately if it

receives a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each

house, as provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution.

If this Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate

effect, this Act takes effect September 1, 2025.