Monitoring the Session

SB 2858

Creighton Preemption Bill Reaches Every Health And Safety Code Field

Did not pass

Verdict: Smells

SmellsNeeds review
Sen. Brandon CreightonRSenate 4
Both charges, and why
Dragnet

THE CAPTION

“relating to state preemption of certain municipal and county”…

Caption, House committee report version (H)

THE TEXT

…“field of regulation that is occupied by a provision of this code.”

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The caption says the bill preempts certain local regulation, and the stated purpose names elections, camping and abortion enforcement. But the field rule covers any local rule in any area the entire Health and Safety Code touches, which reaches ordinary local health and sanitation rules well beyond those named targets.

Dragnet
Caption mismatch

THE TEXT

…“penalty equal to the balance of the suspense account maintained for”…

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The caption speaks only of preemption, but the body adds a heavy money penalty: the state takes the local government's held sales tax balance, plus a five-year tax-rate freeze and grant ban. This is arguably enforcement of the preemption the caption names, so confidence stays moderate.

Caption mismatch

Needs review · Nov 1, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to state preemption of certain municipal and county regulation.

Caption from analyzed text · version H.

Summary

Caption says “certain” local rules. Lose to the attorney general, lose the sales tax!

The bill bars cities and counties from passing or keeping local rules in any area already covered by the Election Code or the Health and Safety Code, and from regulating conduct the Penal Code already prohibits, unless another statute allows it. It touches every Texas city and county, and it adds these codes to the list of laws that injured people or their trade associations can sue local governments under. It also lets the attorney general sue a city or county, and while the suit is pending the state withholds the local government's sales tax money, freezes its tax rate and budget, and cuts off most state grants; if the state wins, the local government loses that held money and faces a five-year tax-rate freeze and grant ban.

Labels

Labels: GOT HALFWAY. Passed the Senate on Apr 30, 2025. Died in the House: voted out of the Intergovernmental Affairs committee 6-5, no floor vote.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB2858 · 2025-03-14

SOLD BY

+ 1 coauthor

ITEM

relating to state preemption of certain municipal and county regulation.

WHAT IT DOES

Caption says “certain” local rules. Lose to the attorney general, lose the sales tax!

The bill bars cities and counties from passing or keeping local rules in any area already covered by the Election Code or the Health and Safety Code, and from regulating conduct the Penal Code already prohibits, unless another statute allows it. It touches every Texas city and county, and it adds these codes to the list of laws that injured people or their trade associations can sue local governments under. It also lets the attorney general sue a city or county, and while the suit is pending the state withholds the local government's sales tax money, freezes its tax rate and budget, and cuts off most state grants; if the state wins, the local government loses that held money and faces a five-year tax-rate freeze and grant ban.

CHARGES

[x] DRAGNETanalysis confidence 50%

THE CAPTION

“relating to state preemption of certain municipal and county”…

Caption, House committee report version (H)

THE TEXT

…“field of regulation that is occupied by a provision of this code.”

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The caption says the bill preempts certain local regulation, and the stated purpose names elections, camping and abortion enforcement. But the field rule covers any local rule in any area the entire Health and Safety Code touches, which reaches ordinary local health and sanitation rules well beyond those named targets.

[x] CAPTION MISMATCHanalysis confidence 45%

THE TEXT

…“penalty equal to the balance of the suspense account maintained for”…

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The caption speaks only of preemption, but the body adds a heavy money penalty: the state takes the local government's held sales tax balance, plus a five-year tax-rate freeze and grant ban. This is arguably enforcement of the preemption the caption names, so confidence stays moderate.

TOTAL

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version E · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · May 12, 2025

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. However, the revenue impact would be dependent on the number of violations resulting in attorney general action, the disposition of those actions, and the amount of interest earned from any withheld municipal and county sales tax distributions.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Business & Commerce
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Testimony taken in committee
  8. Left pending in committee
  9. Considered in public hearing
  10. Vote taken in committee
  11. Reported favorably as substituted
  12. Committee report printed and distributed
  13. Placed on intent calendar
  14. Co-author authorized
  15. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  16. Record vote
  17. Read 2nd time
  18. Amendment(s) offered FA1 Creighton
  19. Amended
  20. Vote recorded in Journal
  21. Amendment(s) offered FA2 Creighton
  22. Amended
  23. Vote recorded in Journal
  24. Passed to engrossment as amended
  25. Record vote
  26. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  27. Record vote
  28. Read 3rd time
  29. Passed
  30. Record vote
  31. Reported engrossed
  32. Received from the Senate
  33. Read first time
  34. Referred to Intergovernmental Affairs
  35. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  36. Considered in public hearing
  37. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  38. Left pending in committee
  39. Considered in formal meeting
  40. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  41. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  42. Committee report distributed
  43. Committee report sent to Calendars
  44. Considered in Calendars
  45. Placed on General State Calendar
FILED UNDER

SPEECH AND LAWFARE

THE TEXT

…“following provisions or a trade association representing the person”…

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The bill widens the private lawsuit route against cities and counties to three more codes and lets trade associations sue for affected persons, with governmental immunity waived and attorney's fees available.

SIGNED FOR BY

Senate · 19 yea · 12 nay

Sources

Senate: Final passage · Apr 30, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Donors report through Friends of Brandon Creighton.

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

$0 raised since Jul 1, 2024. Derived sum of published report totals. blank in the state's data, consistent with zero. Flow, Jul 1, 2024 through Jun 30, 2026. State filing data as of Nov 4, 2026. 4 of 4 filed reports carry a published figure.

Report 101060909: Published total from the filed report. Retrieved Oct 29, 2026. Filed report 101060909

$0 spent Jan 1, 2026 to Jun 30, 2026. Published total from the filed report. Flow, Jan 1, 2026 through Jun 30, 2026. State filing data as of Nov 4, 2026. 1 of 1 filed reports carry a published figure.

Report 101060909: Published total from the filed report. Retrieved Oct 29, 2026. Filed report 101060909

$0 cash on hand. Published report total. Stock, as of Jun 30, 2026. State filing data as of Nov 4, 2026.

$0 loans outstanding. Published report total. Stock, as of Jun 30, 2026. State filing data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived sum of itemized contributions in regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Unitemized contributions are not included. Flow, Jul 1, 2024 through Jun 30, 2026. State filing data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

Votes4

Senate Apr 30, 2025

Yea
19
Nay
12
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 19, Nays 12. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 19 (published)
  • Nay: 12 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 30, 2025

Yea
19
Nay
12
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Creighton moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration CSSB 2858 at this time on its third reading and final passage: CSSB 2858, Relating to state preemption of certain municipal and county regulation. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 19, Nays 12.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 19 (published)
  • Nay: 12 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 30, 2025

Yea
19
Nay
12
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

CSSB 2858 as amended was passed to engrossment by the following vote: Yeas 19, Nays 12.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 19 (published)
  • Nay: 12 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 30, 2025

Yea
19
Nay
12
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Creighton moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration CSSB 2858 at this time on its second reading: CSSB 2858, Relating to state preemption of certain municipal and county regulation. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 19, Nays 12.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 19 (published)
  • Nay: 12 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses85
For
22
Against
63
On
0
Names

For

  • Allen Boone Humphries Robinson LLP1 registration
  • CenterPoint Energy Inc1 registration
  • Dallas Police Assoc1 registration
  • Dallas Police Association1 registration
  • Harris County Deputies' Organization FOP #391 registration
  • National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB)2 registrations
  • Schwartz, Page & Harding, LLP1 registration
  • Self1 registration
  • Self; Houston Police Officers’ Union2 registrations
  • Texas Apartment Association1 registration
  • Texas Association of Builders3 registrations
  • Texas Association of Staffing1 registration
  • Texas Farm Bureau2 registrations
  • Texas Municipal Police Association (TMPA)1 registration
  • Texas Public Policy Foundation3 registrations

Against

  • ACLU of Texas1 registration
  • Bexar County Commissioners Court1 registration
  • City of Austin2 registrations
  • City of College Station1 registration
  • City of Coppell1 registration
  • City of Corpus Christi2 registrations
  • City of Dallas2 registrations
  • City of Denton1 registration
  • City of Dripping Springs1 registration
  • City of El Paso1 registration
  • City of Fort Worth2 registrations
  • City of Galveston1 registration
  • City of Garland, Texas2 registrations
  • City of Georgetown2 registrations
  • City of Houston3 registrations
  • City of Irving2 registrations
  • City of McAllen2 registrations
  • City of Port Aransas1 registration
  • City of Port Arthur1 registration
  • City of San Antonio2 registrations
  • City of Sugar Land1 registration
  • City of Sugar Land, Texas1 registration
  • Conference of Urban Counties2 registrations
  • County Judges and Commissioners Assocaition of Texas1 registration
  • County Judges and Commissioners Associaton of Texas1 registration
  • Dallas County Commissioners Court2 registrations
  • Dallas County Criminal District Attorney - John Creuzot1 registration
  • El Paso County2 registrations
  • Every Texan2 registrations
  • Harris County Commissioners Court1 registration
  • Harris County Conmissioners Court1 registration
  • Keleberg County and County Judges and Commissioners Association of Texas1 registration
  • Lone Star Chapter Sierra Club1 registration
  • North Texas Commission1 registration
  • Pecos Cointy1 registration
  • San Antonio Water System1 registration
  • Self3 registrations
  • Self; County Judges and Commissioners Association of Texas, McMullen County1 registration
  • Sierra Club Lone Star Chapter1 registration
  • Tarrant County Administrator's Office1 registration
  • Texas AFL-CIO2 registrations
  • Texas Municipal League2 registrations
  • Travis County Commissioners Court2 registrations
Sources

85 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version E · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · May 12, 2025

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. However, the revenue impact would be dependent on the number of violations resulting in attorney general action, the disposition of those actions, and the amount of interest earned from any withheld municipal and county sales tax distributions.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version H by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Mar 14, 2025

05/27/2025 H Placed on General State Calendar

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report

Data snapshot Nov 1, 2026 at 2:15 PM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors

House committee · Intergovernmental Affairs · Committee vote 6 aye, 5 nay · Out of committee

Senate committee · Business & Commerce · Committee vote 6 aye, 5 nay · Out of committee

Companion

HB 5203 by Bell, Cecil (very similar)

Subjects

City Government--General

County Government--General

Courts--General

Crimes--Miscellaneous

Elections--General

State Finances--Management & Control

ATTORNEY GENERAL

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS

SUPREME COURT

Text

The text as introduced · 1,461 words

2025S0248-1 03/13/25

By: Creighton
S.B. No. 2858

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to state preemption of certain municipal and county

regulation.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. The legislature finds that:

(1) the state has historically been the exclusive

regulator of many aspects of commerce, trade, elections, and

criminal justice in this state;

(2) in recent years, several local jurisdictions have

sought to establish their own regulations of commerce, trade,

elections, and criminal justice that are different than the state's

regulations; and

(3) such local regulations have led to a patchwork of

regulations that apply inconsistently across this state.

SECTION 2. The purpose of this Act is to provide additional

statewide consistency by returning sovereign regulatory powers to

the state where those powers belong in accordance with Section 5,

Article XI, Texas Constitution.

SECTION 3. This Act:

(1) may not be construed to prohibit a municipality or

county from building or maintaining a road, imposing a tax, or

carrying out any authority expressly authorized by statute;

(2) may not be construed to prohibit a home-rule

municipality from providing the same services and imposing the same

regulations that a general-law municipality is authorized to

provide or impose;

(3) does not affect the authority of a municipality or

county to conduct a public awareness campaign; and

(4) does not affect the authority of a municipality or

county to repeal or amend an existing ordinance, order, or rule that

violates the provisions of this Act for the limited purpose of

bringing that ordinance, order, or rule in compliance with this

Act.

SECTION 4. Chapter 1, Elections Code, is amended by adding

Section 1.023 to read as follows:

Sec. 1.023. PREEMPTION. Unless expressly authorized by

another statute, a municipality or county may not adopt, enforce,

or maintain an ordinance, order, or rule regulating conduct in a

field of regulation that is occupied by a provision of this code.

An ordinance, order, or rule that violates this section is void,

unenforceable, and inconsistent with this code.

SECTION 5. Chapter 1, Penal Code, is amended by adding

Section 1.11 to read as follows:

Sec. 1.11. PREEMPTION. Unless expressly authorized by

another statute, a municipality or county may not adopt, enforce,

or maintain an ordinance, order, or rule regulating conduct in a

field of regulation that is occupied by a provision of this code.

An ordinance, order, or rule that violates this section is void,

unenforceable, and inconsistent with this code.

SECTION 6. Section 102A.002, Civil Practice and Remedies

Code, is amended to read as follows:

Sec. 102A.002. LIABILITY FOR CERTAIN REGULATION. Any

person who has sustained an injury in fact, actual or threatened,

from a municipal or county ordinance, order, or rule adopted or

enforced by a municipality or county in violation of any of the

following provisions or a trade association representing the person

has standing to bring and may bring an action against the

municipality or county:

(1) Section 1.004, Agriculture Code;

(2) Section 1.109, Business & Commerce Code;

(3) Section 1.004, Finance Code;

(4) Section 30.005, Insurance Code;

(5) Section 1.005, Labor Code;

(6) Section 229.901, Local Government Code;

(7) Section 1.003, Natural Resources Code;

(8) Section 1.004, Occupations Code;[ or ]

(9) Section 1.004, Property Code ;

(10) Section 1.023, Elections Code; or

(11) Section 1.11, Penal Code .

SECTION 7. Chapter 102A, Civil Practice and Remedies Code,

is amended by adding Sections 102A.008 through 102A.013 to read as

follows:

Sec. 102A.008. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:

(1) "Local government" means a municipality or

county.

(2) "No-new-revenue tax rate" means the

no-new-revenue tax rate calculated under Chapter 26, Tax Code.

Sec. 102A.009. ATTORNEY GENERAL INVESTIGATION AND ACTION.

(a) The attorney general may investigate an alleged violation of

this chapter by a local government.

(b) If after conducting an investigation under Subsection

(a), the attorney general determines that a local government

adopted, enforced, or maintained an ordinance, order, or rule in

violation of the provisions listed in Section 102A.002, the

attorney general may bring an action in the name of the state

against the local government for the violation.

Sec. 102A.010. ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS DURING PENDENCY OF

ACTION. During the pendency of an action brought under Section

102A.009, with respect to a local government defending the action:

(1) the comptroller shall withhold payment of any

money due to the local government under Section 321.502 or 323.502,

Tax Code, as applicable;

(2) the local government may not adopt an ad valorem

tax rate that exceeds the local government's no-new-revenue tax

rate; and

(3) the local government may not receive state grant

funds and any pending application for such funds shall be denied.

Sec. 102A.011. BURDEN OF PROOF; INITIAL HEARING. (a) A

local government defending an action brought under Section 102A.009

has the burden of proof to establish by a preponderance of the

evidence that the local government complied with the law the

alleged violation of which is the subject of the action.

(b) The court of original jurisdiction shall set an action

brought under Section 102A.009 for an initial hearing not later

than the 30th day after the date the local government defending the

action was served with process for the action.

Sec. 102A.012. RESOLUTION OF ACTION IN FAVOR OF ATTORNEY

GENERAL. (a) If the attorney general prevails in an action brought

under Section 102A.009:

(1) the local government defending the action may not,

during the five state fiscal years following the year in which the

judgment becomes final:

(A) adopt an ad valorem tax rate that exceeds the

local government's no-new-revenue tax rate; or

(B) receive state grant funds; and

(2) the court issuing the final judgment resolving the

action shall provide in the judgment that the state is entitled to

recover from the local government defending the action a penalty

equal to the balance of the suspense account maintained for the

local government under Section 321.501 or 323.501, Tax Code, as

applicable, that exists on the date the judgment is signed.

(b) The comptroller shall, on receipt of a copy of the final

judgment in an action brought under Section 102A.009 that includes

a provision described by Subsection (a)(2), deposit the balance of

the suspense account maintained for the local government defending

the action under Section 321.501 or 323.501, Tax Code, as

applicable, as of the date the judgment is signed to the credit of

the general revenue fund.

Sec. 102A.013. RESOLUTION OF ACTION IN FAVOR OF LOCAL

GOVERNMENT. If a local government prevails in an action brought

under Section 102A.009, the comptroller shall, notwithstanding any

other law, immediately send to the local government the balance of

the suspense account maintained for the local government under

Section 321.501 or 323.501, Tax Code, as applicable, as of the date

the judgment resolving the action is signed.

SECTION 8. Section 102A.002, Civil Practice and Remedies

Code, as amended by this Act, and Section 102A.009, Civil Practice

and Remedies Code, as added by this Act, apply only to a cause of

action that accrues on or after the effective date of this Act.

SECTION 9. Every provision, section, subsection, sentence,

clause, phrase, or word in this Act, and every application of the

provisions in this Act to every person, group of persons, or

circumstances, are severable from each other. If any application

of any provision in this Act to any person, group of persons, or

circumstances is found by a court to be invalid, preempted, or

unconstitutional, for any reason whatsoever, then the remaining

applications of the Act to all other persons and circumstances

shall be severed and preserved and shall remain in effect. All

constitutionally valid applications of the provisions in this Act

shall be severed from any applications that a court finds to be

invalid, preempted, or unconstitutional, because it is the

legislature's intent and priority that every single valid

application of every statutory provision be allowed to stand alone.

The legislature further declares that it would have enacted this

Act, and each provision, section, subsection, sentence, clause,

phrase, or word, and all constitutional applications of the

provisions of this Act, irrespective of the fact that any

provision, section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word,

or applications of this Act were to be declared invalid, preempted,

or unconstitutional.

SECTION 10. The Texas Supreme Court has exclusive and

original jurisdiction over a challenge to the constitutionality of

this Act or any part of this Act and may issue injunctive or

declaratory relief in connection with the challenge.

SECTION 11. This Act takes effect immediately if it

receives a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each

house, as provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution.

If this Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate

effect, this Act takes effect September 1, 2025.