Monitoring the Session

HB 5391

TxDOT Must Weigh Local Designs, Unless It Calls Them ‘Unreasonable’

Died in committee

Verdict: Smells

SmellsInitial review
Rep. Penny Morales ShawDHouse 148
Why it's charged
The hole

THE TEXT

“Subsection (a)(7) does not apply to a transportation project if the department finds that an alternative design for a transportation project approved by the governing body of a municipality, county, or metropolitan planning organization is frivolous, unreasonable, or intended to delay a transportation project.”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill's main new duty is to weigh locally approved alternative designs. This clause lets TxDOT itself skip that duty whenever it calls a local design "unreasonable." That broad, self-judged standard could let the agency avoid the main case the bill targets, though the duty still binds where TxDOT makes no such finding.

The hole

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to design considerations of transportation projects by the Texas Department of Transportation.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Who decides what’s “frivolous, unreasonable, or intended to delay”? TxDOT.

The bill adds two new factors that the Texas Department of Transportation must weigh when it builds or rebuilds highways: an alternative design approved by a vote of a local city, county, or regional planning body, and the harm earlier road projects did to an affected community. It touches TxDOT, the Transportation Commission, and local governments and planning organizations near projects that undergo federal environmental review. On the ground, TxDOT must review local alternative designs as if under federal environmental review, unless it decides a design is frivolous, unreasonable, or meant to delay the project.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 5154 (Died in committee) and this bill (Died in committee). Checked against 88R only.DO-OVER. Reworked text of a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 5154 (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Mar 14, 2025 and referred to the House Transportation committee. No public hearing. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB5391 · 2025-03-14

SOLD BY

+ 4 coauthors

ITEM

relating to design considerations of transportation projects by the Texas Department of Transportation.

WHAT IT DOES

Who decides what’s “frivolous, unreasonable, or intended to delay”? TxDOT.

The bill adds two new factors that the Texas Department of Transportation must weigh when it builds or rebuilds highways: an alternative design approved by a vote of a local city, county, or regional planning body, and the harm earlier road projects did to an affected community. It touches TxDOT, the Transportation Commission, and local governments and planning organizations near projects that undergo federal environmental review. On the ground, TxDOT must review local alternative designs as if under federal environmental review, unless it decides a design is frivolous, unreasonable, or meant to delay the project.

CHARGES

[x] THE HOLEanalysis confidence 45%

THE TEXT

“Subsection (a)(7) does not apply to a transportation project if the department finds that an alternative design for a transportation project approved by the governing body of a municipality, county, or metropolitan planning organization is frivolous, unreasonable, or intended to delay a transportation project.”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill's main new duty is to weigh locally approved alternative designs. This clause lets TxDOT itself skip that duty whenever it calls a local design "unreasonable." That broad, self-judged standard could let the agency avoid the main case the bill targets, though the duty still binds where TxDOT makes no such finding.

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Transportation
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Oct 17, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$21,500.00

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$21,500.00

Cash
$21,500.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$21,500.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 19, 2024 to Aug 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100984943, 101006793, 101044547, 101054176, 101068938.

House Democratic Caucus$7,000.00

House Democratic Caucus

$7,000.00

Cash
$7,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$7,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Apr 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Apr 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101054176.

Texas Organizing Project Political Action Committee$6,254.03

Texas Organizing Project Political Action Committee

$6,254.03

Cash
$0.00
Paid by others
$6,254.03
Total
$6,254.03
Other filed descriptions $4,070.03printing $2,184.00

Also funds 4 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 30, 2024 to Oct 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 31, 2024 to Sep 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100984943, 101068938.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$21,500.00

Cash
$21,500.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$21,500.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 19, 2024 to Aug 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100984943, 101006793, 101044547, 101054176, 101068938.

×

House Democratic Caucus

$7,000.00

Cash
$7,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$7,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Apr 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Apr 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101054176.

×

Texas Organizing Project Political Action Committee

$6,254.03

Cash
$0.00
Paid by others
$6,254.03
Total
$6,254.03
Other filed descriptions $4,070.03printing $2,184.00

Also funds 4 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 30, 2024 to Oct 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 31, 2024 to Sep 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100984943, 101068938.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R HB 5154

by Rep. Morales Shaw, same lead author · Died in committee · reworked

Introduced text

Last action, Mar 24, 2023: Referred to Transportation

Relating to design considerations of transportation projects by the Texas Department of Transportation.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas House · Filed Mar 14, 2025

04/07/2025 H Referred to Transportation: Apr 7 2025 5:28PM

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:19 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors

House committee · Transportation · Final status: Died in committee

Companion

SB 2899 by Cook (identical)

Subjects

City Government--Roads

County Government--Roads

Environment--General

Highways

METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS

TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, TEXAS

TRANSPORTATION, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF

Text

The text as introduced · 377 words

By: Morales Shaw
H.B. No. 5391

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to design considerations of transportation projects by the

Texas Department of Transportation.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 201.615, Transportation Code, is amended

by amending Subsections (a) and (b) and adding Subsection (d) to

read as follows:

(a) The department shall consider the following factors

when developing transportation projects that involve the

construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or resurfacing of a

highway, other than a maintenance resurfacing project:

(1) the extent to which the project promotes safety;

(2) the durability of the project;

(3) the economy of maintenance of the project;

(4) the impact of the project on:

(A) the natural and artificial environment;

(B) the scenic and aesthetic character of the

area in which the project is located;

(C) preservation efforts; and

(D) each affected local community and its

economy;

(5) the access for other modes of transportation,

including those that promote physically active communities; [ and ]

(6) except as provided by Subsection (c), the

aesthetic character of the project, including input from each

affected local community ;

(7) except as provided by Subsection (d), an

alternative design for the project that has been approved by a vote

of the governing body of a municipality, county, or metropolitan

planning organization that represents an affected local community;

and

(8) the negative impacts to an affected local

community from previous transportation projects .

(b) The commission shall adopt rules to implement this

section. Rules adopted under this section must require the

commission to review alternative designs for each transportation

project to which Subsection (a)(7) applies as if the project were

subject to review under the National Environmental Policy Act of

1969 (42 U.S.C. Section 4321 et seq.).

(d) Subsection (a)(7) does not apply to a transportation

project if the department finds that an alternative design for a

transportation project approved by the governing body of a

municipality, county, or metropolitan planning organization is

frivolous, unreasonable, or intended to delay a transportation

project.

(e) Subsection (a)(7) only applies to a transportation

project subject to review under the National Environmental Policy

Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. Section 4321 et seq.).

SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.