Monitoring the Session

HB 5470

Schofield Bill Lets 3.3M-County Sheriffs Sign Contracts Commissioners Can’t Block

Died in committee

Verdict: Smells

SmellsInitial review
Rep. Mike SchofieldRHouse 132
Why it's charged
Bracket bill

THE TEXT

…“applies only to a county with a population of 3.3 million or more.”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

Every section is limited by a population floor of 3.3 million, so this state-code change reaches only the very largest county or counties. The caption admits only to "certain counties" and never names which ones.

Bracket bill

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the authority of sheriffs and constables to enter into contracts to provide law enforcement services in certain counties and county financial authority in relation to sheriffs and constables in certain counties.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Caption: “certain counties.” Bill: 3.3M or more. Contract income goes straight to the sheriff or constable.

The bill lets sheriffs and constables in counties of 3.3 million or more sign their own paid contracts to police neighborhoods, businesses, local governments, property owners' associations and subdivision landowners. It bars the county commissioners court from blocking those contracts or setting their terms. It also stops the county from moving or limiting money budgeted to those offices, and it sends contract income straight to the sheriff or constable without cutting their regular budget.

Labels

Labels: NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Mar 14, 2025 and referred to the House Intergovernmental Affairs subcommittee on County & Regional Government. No public hearing. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB5470 · 2025-03-14

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the authority of sheriffs and constables to enter into contracts to provide law enforcement services in certain counties and county financial authority in relation to sheriffs and constables in certain counties.

WHAT IT DOES

Caption: “certain counties.” Bill: 3.3M or more. Contract income goes straight to the sheriff or constable.

The bill lets sheriffs and constables in counties of 3.3 million or more sign their own paid contracts to police neighborhoods, businesses, local governments, property owners' associations and subdivision landowners. It bars the county commissioners court from blocking those contracts or setting their terms. It also stops the county from moving or limiting money budgeted to those offices, and it sends contract income straight to the sheriff or constable without cutting their regular budget.

CHARGES

[x] BRACKET BILLanalysis confidence 55%

THE TEXT

…“applies only to a county with a population of 3.3 million or more.”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

Every section is limited by a population floor of 3.3 million, so this state-code change reaches only the very largest county or counties. The caption admits only to "certain counties" and never names which ones.

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to s/c on County & Regional Government by Speaker
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 28, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$432,937.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$432,937.00

Cash
$212,000.00
Paid by others
$220,937.00
Total
$432,937.00
advertising $185,677.00Other filed descriptions $22,000.00polling $13,260.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 23, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101006866, 101027356, 101057804, 101070463, 101071373.

Texas Conservative Majority PAC$331,750.00

Texas Conservative Majority PAC

$331,750.00

Cash
$200,000.00
Paid by others
$131,750.00
Total
$331,750.00
canvassing $102,500.00polling $24,250.00Other filed descriptions $5,000.00

Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 24, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101070463, 101071373.

Republican Party of Texas$254,625.06

Republican Party of Texas

$254,625.06

Cash
$0.00
Paid by others
$254,625.06
Total
$254,625.06
mail $254,625.06

Also funds 12 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Oct 31, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 23, 2026 to Oct 19, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101070463, 101071373.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$432,937.00

Cash
$212,000.00
Paid by others
$220,937.00
Total
$432,937.00
advertising $185,677.00Other filed descriptions $22,000.00polling $13,260.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 23, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101006866, 101027356, 101057804, 101070463, 101071373.

×

Texas Conservative Majority PAC

$331,750.00

Cash
$200,000.00
Paid by others
$131,750.00
Total
$331,750.00
canvassing $102,500.00polling $24,250.00Other filed descriptions $5,000.00

Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 24, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101070463, 101071373.

×

Republican Party of Texas

$254,625.06

Cash
$0.00
Paid by others
$254,625.06
Total
$254,625.06
mail $254,625.06

Also funds 12 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Oct 31, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 23, 2026 to Oct 19, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101070463, 101071373.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas House · Filed Mar 14, 2025

04/07/2025 H Referred to s/c on County & Regional Government by Speaker: Apr 7 2025 5:28PM

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:19 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Intergovernmental Affairs · Final status: Died in committee

Companion

SB 2951 by Bettencourt (identical)

Subjects

City Government--General

County Government--General

Law Enforcement

Political Subdivisions

Property Interests--Property Owners Association

Special Districts & Authorities--Miscellaneous

State Finances--Management & Control

Taxation--School District

CONSTABLES

SHERIFFS

Text

The text as introduced · 838 words

89R19677 MP-D

By: Schofield
H.B. No. 5470

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the authority of sheriffs and constables to enter into

contracts to provide law enforcement services in certain counties

and county financial authority in relation to sheriffs and

constables in certain counties.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Subchapter B, Chapter 85, Local Government Code,

is amended by adding Section 85.025 to read as follows:

Sec. 85.025. AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT TO PROVIDE

LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES IN CERTAIN COUNTIES. (a) In this section:

(1) "Local government" means a municipality, special

purpose district, school district, or other political subdivision

of this state that has taxing authority.

(2) "Property owners' association" has the meaning

assigned by Section 202.001, Property Code.

(3) "Special purpose district" has the meaning

assigned by Section 403.0241, Government Code.

(4) "Subdivision" has the meaning assigned by Section

201.003, Property Code.

(b) This section applies only to a county with a population

of 3.3 million or more.

(c) A sheriff may enter into a contract with a resident of

the sheriff's county, local government or business located in the

sheriff's county, property owners' association, or owner of land in

a subdivision to provide law enforcement services in the sheriff's

county:

(1) in and near the area owned, leased, managed, or

regulated by the person contracting with the sheriff; and

(2) to the persons residing in or visiting an area

described by Subdivision (1).

(d) The commissioners court of the sheriff's county may not

prohibit or otherwise restrict the sheriff from entering into a

contract under this section. The sheriff may enter into the

contract and determine the terms of the contract, regardless of

whether the commissioners court approves of the contract or the

terms.

SECTION 2. Subchapter C, Chapter 86, Local Government Code,

is amended by adding Section 86.026 to read as follows:

Sec. 86.026. AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT TO PROVIDE

LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES IN CERTAIN COUNTIES. (a) In this section:

(1) "Local government" means a municipality, special

purpose district, school district, or other political subdivision

of this state that has taxing authority.

(2) "Property owners' association" has the meaning

assigned by Section 202.001, Property Code.

(3) "Special purpose district" has the meaning

assigned by Section 403.0241, Government Code.

(4) "Subdivision" has the meaning assigned by Section

201.003, Property Code.

(b) This section applies only to a county with a population

of 3.3 million or more.

(c) A constable may enter into a contract with a resident of

the constable's precinct, local government or business located in

the constable's precinct, property owners' association, or owner of

land in a subdivision to provide law enforcement services in the

constable's precinct:

(1) in and near the area owned, leased, managed, or

regulated by the person contracting with the constable; and

(2) to the persons residing in or visiting an area

described by Subdivision (1).

(d) The commissioners court of a constable's county may not

prohibit or otherwise restrict the constable from entering into a

contract under this section. The constable may enter into the

contract and determine the terms of the contract, regardless of

whether the commissioners court approves of the contract or the

terms.

SECTION 3. Subchapter Z, Chapter 130, Local Government

Code, is amended by adding Section 130.903 to read as follows:

Sec. 130.903. REQUIREMENTS AND PROHIBITIONS RELATED TO

COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT IN CERTAIN COUNTIES. (a) This section

applies only to a county with a population of 3.3 million or more.

(b) A county may not:

(1) transfer money appropriated to the office of

sheriff or constable to the county's general revenue fund or any

other county account; or

(2) prohibit the office of sheriff or constable from

spending money appropriated to the office for any lawful purpose.

(c) In relation to money received under a contract entered

into under Section 85.025 or 86.026, the commissioners court of the

sheriff's or constable's county:

(1) shall credit the money to the office of the sheriff

or constable, as applicable, and may not credit the money to the

county's general revenue fund; and

(2) may not reduce the appropriation to the office of

the sheriff or constable, as applicable, by the amount of the money

received because the money is considered for purposes of Section

120.002 as part of the office's appropriation for the county fiscal

year in which the money is received.

(d) The county may not prohibit or otherwise restrict the

use of the money described by Subsection (b) by the sheriff or

constable, as applicable, for a lawful purpose, if the county

auditor or county treasurer determines that the money is available

to the office of the sheriff or constable, as applicable.

SECTION 4. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives

a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as

provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this

Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this

Act takes effect September 1, 2025.