Monitoring the Session

SB 1425

One Unnamed City Keeps State Tax Money For 20 Years

Died in committee

Verdict: Smells

SmellsInitial review
Sen. Angela PaxtonRSenate 8
Why it's charged
Carve-out

THE TEXT

“A municipality described by Section 351.152(46) is”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The longer revenue window and the delayed repayment check go only to one city, named by a cross-reference rather than by name. The caption says only 'certain municipalities.'

Carve-out

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the entitlement of certain municipalities to certain tax revenue associated with hotel and convention center projects.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

The usual is 10. The repayment check moves from year 20 to year 40!

The bill lets one specially described city keep state tax money from a qualified hotel and convention center project for 20 years instead of the usual 10. It touches that one city, described only by a cross-reference to Section 351.152(46), and the state comptroller who tracks and recovers the money. The state's check on whether the city took more than the project produced moves from year 20 to year 40, so any required repayment comes much later.

Labels

Labels: NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Feb 19, 2025 and referred to the Senate Economic Development committee. No public hearing. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB1425 · 2025-02-19

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the entitlement of certain municipalities to certain tax revenue associated with hotel and convention center projects.

WHAT IT DOES

The usual is 10. The repayment check moves from year 20 to year 40!

The bill lets one specially described city keep state tax money from a qualified hotel and convention center project for 20 years instead of the usual 10. It touches that one city, described only by a cross-reference to Section 351.152(46), and the state comptroller who tracks and recovers the money. The state's check on whether the city took more than the project produced moves from year 20 to year 40, so any required repayment comes much later.

CHARGES

[x] CARVE-OUTanalysis confidence 60%

THE TEXT

“A municipality described by Section 351.152(46) is”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The longer revenue window and the delayed repayment check go only to one city, named by a cross-reference rather than by name. The caption says only 'certain municipalities.'

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Economic Development
FILED UNDER

CORPORATE WELFARE

THE TEXT

…“351.157 until the 20th anniversary of the date the qualified hotel”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill doubles how long one city can keep state hotel-related tax revenue to support a hotel and convention center project.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

James Stanton$47,500Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$40KGary Blake$30,000

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

James Stanton$47,500.00
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$40,000.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$40,000.00

Cash
$40,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$40,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 11, 2024 to Jun 30, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100982305, 101012314.

Gary Blake$30,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$40,000.00

Cash
$40,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$40,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 11, 2024 to Jun 30, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100982305, 101012314.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Feb 19, 2025

03/06/2025 S Referred to Economic Development

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Senate committee · Economic Development · Final status: Died in committee

Companion

HB 3066 by Leach (identical)

Subjects

City Government--Finance

Taxation--Hotel, Motel Occupancy

CONVENTIONS & CONVENTION CENTERS

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS

Text

The text as introduced · 685 words

89R9098 RDS-F

By: Paxton
S.B. No. 1425

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the entitlement of certain municipalities to certain

tax revenue associated with hotel and convention center projects.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 351.158, Tax Code, is amended to read as

follows:

Sec. 351.158. PERIOD OF ENTITLEMENT. (a) Except as

provided by Subsection (b), a [ A ] municipality is entitled to

receive revenue as provided by Sections 351.156 and 351.157 until

the 10th anniversary of the date the qualified hotel to which the

entitlement relates is open for initial occupancy.

(b) A municipality described by Section 351.152(46) is

entitled to receive revenue as provided by Sections 351.156 and

351.157 until the 20th anniversary of the date the qualified hotel

to which the entitlement relates is open for initial occupancy.

SECTION 2. Section 351.162, Tax Code, is amended by

amending Subsections (b) and (c) and adding Subsection (b-1) to

read as follows:

(b) Except as provided by Subsection (b-1), on [ On ] the 20th

anniversary of the date a hotel designated as a qualified hotel by a

municipality as part of a qualified project to which this section

applies is open for initial occupancy, the comptroller shall

determine:

(1) the total amount of state tax revenue received

under Section 351.156 and, if applicable, under Section 351.157 by

the municipality from the qualified project during the period for

which the municipality was entitled to receive that revenue; and

(2) the total amount of state tax revenue described by

Subdivision (1) received by the state during the period beginning

on the 10th anniversary of the date the qualified hotel opened for

initial occupancy and ending on the 20th anniversary of that date

from the same sources from which the municipality received the

revenue described by Subdivision (1).

(b-1) On the 40th anniversary of the date a hotel designated

as a qualified hotel by a municipality described by Section

351.152(46) as part of a qualified project to which this section

applies is open for initial occupancy, the comptroller shall

determine:

(1) the total amount of state tax revenue received

under Section 351.156 and, if applicable, under Section 351.157 by

the municipality from the qualified project during the period for

which the municipality was entitled to receive that revenue; and

(2) the total amount of state tax revenue described by

Subdivision (1) received by the state during the period beginning

on the 20th anniversary of the date the qualified hotel opened for

initial occupancy and ending on the 40th anniversary of that date

from the same sources from which the municipality received the

revenue described by Subdivision (1).

(c) If the amount determined under Subsection (b)(1) or

(b-1)(1), as applicable, exceeds the amount determined under

Subsection (b)(2) or (b-1)(2), as applicable , the comptroller shall

promptly provide written notice to the municipality stating that

the municipality must remit to the comptroller the difference

between those two amounts in the manner provided by this

subsection. The municipality shall, using money lawfully available

to the municipality for the purpose, remit monthly payments to the

comptroller in an amount equal to the total amount of municipal

hotel occupancy tax revenue received by the municipality from the

qualified hotel in the preceding month until the amount remitted to

the comptroller equals the total amount due as stated in the notice.

The first payment required under this subsection must be made not

later than the 30th day after the date the municipality receives the

notice from the comptroller. Subsequent payments are due on the

20th day of each month until the total amount stated in the notice

is paid. The comptroller shall prescribe the procedure a

municipality must use to remit a payment required by this

subsection to the comptroller.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives

a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as

provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this

Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this

Act takes effect September 1, 2025.