Monitoring the Session

SB 1844

Paxton’s bill widening disannexation for cities that skip services

Became law, effective Sep 1, 2025

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Angela PaxtonRSenate 8

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to disannexation of certain areas of a municipality for failure to provide services.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Any area inside a city can petition out, not only annexed ones.

The bill widens who can petition a Texas city to be released from city limits when the city fails to provide services, adding areas that did not become part of the city through the normal annexation rules. It touches residents of any area inside a city, not only formally annexed areas, and the cities that serve them. A court must order disannexation and award attorney's fees if the city fails to provide listed services to the area while it provides those services to other parts of the city.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB1844 · 2025-03-04

SOLD BY

+ 1 coauthor

ITEM

relating to disannexation of certain areas of a municipality for failure to provide services.

WHAT IT DOES

Any area inside a city can petition out, not only annexed ones.

The bill widens who can petition a Texas city to be released from city limits when the city fails to provide services, adding areas that did not become part of the city through the normal annexation rules. It touches residents of any area inside a city, not only formally annexed areas, and the cities that serve them. A court must order disannexation and award attorney's fees if the city fails to provide listed services to the area while it provides those services to other parts of the city.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version E · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · May 12, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Local Government
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Testimony taken in committee
  8. Left pending in committee
  9. Considered in public hearing
  10. Vote taken in committee
  11. Reported favorably as substituted
  12. Recommended for local & uncontested calendar
  13. Committee report printed and distributed
  14. Co-author authorized
  15. Placed on intent calendar
  16. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  17. Record vote
  18. Read 2nd time
  19. Amendment(s) offered FA1 Paxton
  20. Amended
  21. Vote recorded in Journal
  22. Passed to engrossment as amended
  23. Record vote
  24. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  25. Record vote
  26. Read 3rd time
  27. Passed
  28. Record vote
  29. Reported engrossed
  30. Received from the Senate
  31. Read first time
  32. Referred to Land & Resource Management
  33. Considered in formal meeting
  34. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  35. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  36. Committee report distributed
  37. Committee report sent to Calendars
  38. Laid out in lieu of companion CSHB 2494
  39. Read 2nd time
  40. Passed to 3rd reading
  41. Record vote RV#2492
  42. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  43. Read 3rd time
  44. Passed
  45. Record vote RV#2593
  46. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  47. House passage reported
  48. Reported enrolled
  49. Signed in the Senate
  50. Signed in the House
  51. Sent to the Governor
  52. Signed by the Governor
  53. Effective on 9/1/25
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 91 yea · 44 nay

Senate · 21 yea · 10 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · May 15, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate: Final passage · May 7, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

James Stanton$47,500Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$40KGary Blake$30,000

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

James Stanton$47,500.00
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$40,000.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$40,000.00

Cash
$40,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$40,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 11, 2024 to Jun 30, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100982305, 101012314.

Gary Blake$30,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$40,000.00

Cash
$40,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$40,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 11, 2024 to Jun 30, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100982305, 101012314.

Votes6

House May 15, 2025

Yea
91
Nay
44
Present, not voting
2
Absent
9
Excused
4
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 2593

SB 1844 was passed by (Record 2593): 91 Yeas, 44 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 91 (published)
  • Nay: 44 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 9 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 4 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 14, 2025

Yea
88
Nay
39
Present, not voting
2
Absent
15
Excused
6
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 2492

SB 1844 was passed to third reading by (Record 2492): 88 Yeas, 39 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 88 (published)
  • Nay: 39 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 15 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 6 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 7, 2025

Yea
21
Nay
10
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 21, Nays 10.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 21 (published)
  • Nay: 10 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 7, 2025

Yea
22
Nay
9
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Paxton moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration CSSB 1844 at this time on its third reading and final passage: CSSB 1844, Relating to disannexation of certain areas of a municipality for failure to provide services. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 22, Nays 9.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 22 (published)
  • Nay: 9 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 6, 2025

Yea
22
Nay
9
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

CSSB 1844 as amended was passed to engrossment by the following vote: Yeas 22, Nays 9.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 22 (published)
  • Nay: 9 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 6, 2025

Yea
22
Nay
9
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Paxton moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration CSSB 1844 at this time on its second reading: CSSB 1844, Relating to disannexation of certain areas of a municipality for failure to provide services. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 22, Nays 9.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 22 (published)
  • Nay: 9 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses17
For
4
Against
12
On
1
Names

For

  • HFFTS, Inc.1 registration
  • Self; Homeowners for Fair Taxes and Services1 registration
  • Self; Homeowners for fair taxes and services1 registration
  • Texas Farm Bureau1 registration

Against

  • City of Austin2 registrations
  • City of Corpus Christi1 registration
  • City of Fort Worth1 registration
  • City of Georgetown1 registration
  • City of Granbury,TX1 registration
  • City of San Antonio1 registration
  • North Texas Commission1 registration
  • Self; City of Granbury1 registration
  • Self; Granbury City Council2 registrations
  • Texas Municipal League1 registration

On

  • Self; Mayor lakeway tx1 registration
Sources

17 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version E · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · May 12, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Mar 4, 2025

05/28/2025 E Effective on 9/1/25

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report · Enrolled

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors

House committee · Land & Resource Management · Committee vote 5 aye, 0 nay, 4 absent · Out of committee

Senate committee · Local Government · Committee vote 6 aye, 0 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee

Companion

HB 2494 by Craddick (identical)

Subjects

City Government--Annexation

Special Districts & Authorities--Navigation & Ports

Utilities--Water & Sewer

ATTORNEY'S FEES

Text

The text as introduced · 597 words

89R5776 MP-F

By: Paxton
S.B. No. 1844

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to disannexation of certain areas of a municipality for

failure to provide services.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Sections 43.141(a), (b), and (f), Local

Government Code, are amended to read as follows:

(a) A majority of the qualified voters of an [ annexed ] area

may petition the governing body of the municipality to disannex the

area if the municipality fails or refuses to provide services or to

cause services to be provided to the area:

(1) if the area was annexed under Subchapter C-1,

within the period specified by Section 43.056 or by the service plan

prepared for the area under that section; [ or ]

(2) if the area was annexed under Subchapter C-3, C-4,

or C-5, within the period specified by the written agreement under

Section 43.0672 or the resolution under Section 43.0682 or 43.0692,

as applicable ; or

(3) notwithstanding Section 43.0505, if the area did

not become part of the municipality in compliance with Subchapter

C .

(b) If the governing body fails or refuses to disannex the

area within 60 days after the date of the receipt of the petition,

any one or more of the signers of the petition may bring a cause of

action in a district court of the county in which the area is

principally located to request that the area be disannexed. On the

filing of an answer by the governing body, and on application of

either party, the case shall be advanced and heard without further

delay in accordance with rules for expedited actions under the

Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. The district court shall enter an

order disannexing the area and award attorney's fees to the signers

of the petition if the court finds that a valid petition was filed

with the municipality and that the municipality failed to:

(1) perform its obligations in accordance with:

(A) the service plan under Section 43.056;

(B) the written agreement entered into under

Section 43.0672; or

(C) the resolution adopted under Section 43.0682

or 43.0692, as applicable; [ or ]

(2) perform in good faith ; or

(3) provide any of the services described by Section

43.056(b) to the area, regardless of whether the area was annexed,

if any of those services are provided to other areas in the

municipality .

(f) For an area annexed under this chapter, before [ Before ]

the petition is circulated among the voters, notice of the petition

must be given by posting a copy of the petition for 10 days in three

public places in the [ annexed ] area and by publishing a copy of the

petition once in a newspaper of general circulation serving the

area before the 15th day before the date the petition is first

circulated. Proof of the posting and publication must be made by

attaching to the petition presented to the secretary:

(1) the sworn affidavit of any voter who signed the

petition, stating the places and dates of the posting; and

(2) the sworn affidavit of the publisher of the

newspaper in which the notice was published, stating the name of the

newspaper and the issue and date of publication.

SECTION 2. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives

a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as

provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this

Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this

Act takes effect September 1, 2025.