Monitoring the Session

SB 2037

bill fast-tracking permits for LNG export terminals

Became law, effective Sep 1, 2025

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Kevin SparksRSenate 31

Initial review · graded Oct 22, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to permit application review and contested case procedures for environmental permits involving a project to construct or modify a liquefied natural gas export terminal; authorizing a fee.

Caption from analyzed text · version H.

Summary

Faster deadlines, plus a paid fast lane for state environmental permits.

The bill sets faster deadlines and a paid fast-track option for state environmental permits for liquefied natural gas export terminals. It touches companies building or changing these terminals, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, and people who want a contested hearing on these permits. The agency must answer public comments within 120 days, a judge must hold a first hearing within 60 days of referral, and anyone asking for a hearing must spell out each reason they are an affected person.

Labels

Labels: FEE INCLUDED. The caption of the graded version (House committee report) reads: “relating to permit application review and contested case procedures for environmental permits involving a project to construct or modify a liquefied natural gas export terminal; authorizing a fee.”

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB2037 · 2025-03-07

SOLD BY

+ 3 coauthors

ITEM

relating to permit application review and contested case procedures for environmental permits involving a project to construct or modify a liquefied natural gas export terminal; authorizing a fee.

WHAT IT DOES

Faster deadlines, plus a paid fast lane for state environmental permits.

The bill sets faster deadlines and a paid fast-track option for state environmental permits for liquefied natural gas export terminals. It touches companies building or changing these terminals, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, and people who want a contested hearing on these permits. The agency must answer public comments within 120 days, a judge must hold a first hearing within 60 days of referral, and anyone asking for a hearing must spell out each reason they are an affected person.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version F · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version F · May 22, 2025

The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined because the amounts and timing of expedited permit applications that would be received and the associated fees that would be assessed and collected to the General Revenue-Dedicated Water Resource Management Account No. 153 (Account No. 153) are unknown at this time. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Natural Resources
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Testimony taken in committee
  8. Left pending in committee
  9. Considered in public hearing
  10. Vote taken in committee
  11. Reported favorably as substituted
  12. Recommended for local & uncontested calendar
  13. Committee report printed and distributed
  14. Co-author authorized
  15. Co-author authorized
  16. Placed on intent calendar
  17. Co-author authorized
  18. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  19. Vote recorded in Journal
  20. Read 2nd time
  21. Amendment(s) offered FA1 Sparks
  22. Amended
  23. Vote recorded in Journal
  24. Amendment(s) offered FA2 Johnson
  25. Amended
  26. Vote recorded in Journal
  27. Passed to engrossment as amended
  28. Vote recorded in Journal
  29. Three day rule suspended
  30. Record vote
  31. Read 3rd time
  32. Passed
  33. Record vote
  34. Reported engrossed
  35. Received from the Senate
  36. Read first time
  37. Referred to Environmental Regulation
  38. Considered in formal meeting
  39. Committee substitute considered in committee
  40. Reported favorably as substituted
  41. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  42. Committee report distributed
  43. Committee report sent to Calendars
  44. Considered in Calendars
  45. Placed on General State Calendar
  46. Read 2nd time
  47. Amendment(s) offered 1-Patterson
  48. Postponed 5/20/25 2:15 PM
  49. Laid out as postponed business
  50. Amended 1-Patterson
  51. Record vote RV#3090
  52. Passed to 3rd reading as amended
  53. Record vote RV#3091
  54. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  55. Read 3rd time
  56. Passed
  57. Record vote RV#3142
  58. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  59. House passage as amended reported
  60. House amendment(s) laid before the Senate
  61. Read
  62. Senate concurs in House amendment(s)
  63. Record vote
  64. Reported enrolled
  65. Senate concurs in House amendment(s)-reported
  66. Signed in the Senate
  67. Signed in the House
  68. Sent to the Governor
  69. Signed by the Governor
  70. Effective on 9/1/25
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 109 yea · 29 nay

Senate · 29 yea · 2 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · May 21, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate: Final passage · Apr 24, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$60KKyle & Jamie Stallings$25,000Tim Dunn$25,000

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 25, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$60,000.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$60,000.00

Cash
$60,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$60,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 15, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101012623, 101029380, 101072732.

Kyle & Jamie Stallings$25,000.00
Tim Dunn$25,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$60,000.00

Cash
$60,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$60,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 15, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101012623, 101029380, 101072732.

Votes7

Senate May 26, 2025

Yea
29
Nay
2
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Sparks moved to concur in the House amendments to SB 2037. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 29, Nays 2.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 29 (published)
  • Nay: 2 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 21, 2025

Yea
109
Nay
29
Present, not voting
3
Absent
7
Excused
2
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3142

SB 2037 was passed by (Record 3142): 109 Yeas, 29 Nays, 3 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 109 (published)
  • Nay: 29 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 3 (published)
  • Absent: 7 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 2 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 20, 2025

Yea
124
Nay
16
Present, not voting
2
Absent
4
Excused
4
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3091

CSSB 2037, as amended, was passed to third reading by (Record 3091): 124 Yeas, 16 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 124 (published)
  • Nay: 16 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 4 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 4 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 20, 2025

Yea
142
Nay
0
Present, not voting
1
Absent
3
Excused
4
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3090

Amendment No. 1 was adopted by (Record 3090): 142 Yeas, 0 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 142 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 3 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 4 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 24, 2025

Yea
29
Nay
2
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 29, Nays 2. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 29 (published)
  • Nay: 2 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 24, 2025

Yea
29
Nay
2
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Sparks moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that CSSB 2037 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 29, Nays 2.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 29 (published)
  • Nay: 2 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 24, 2025

Yea
Not printed
Nay
Not printed
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

Voice vote. No numeric tally or individual yeas are inferred.

Sources

CSSB 2037 as amended was passed to engrossment by a viva voce vote.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: Not printed
  • Nay: Not printed
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses11
For
8
Against
1
On
2
Names

For

  • Cheniere Energy1 registration
  • ExxonMobil1 registration
  • Freeport LNG1 registration
  • Permian Basin Petroleum Association1 registration
  • Self; Texas Association of Manufacturers1 registration
  • Texas Alliance of Energy Producers1 registration
  • Texas Independent Producers & Royalty Owners Association (TIPRO)1 registration
  • Texas Oil and Gas Association1 registration

Against

  • Lone Star Chapter Sierra Club1 registration

On

  • TCEQ1 registration
  • Texas Commission on Environmental Quality1 registration
Sources

11 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version F · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version F · May 22, 2025

The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined because the amounts and timing of expedited permit applications that would be received and the associated fees that would be assessed and collected to the General Revenue-Dedicated Water Resource Management Account No. 153 (Account No. 153) are unknown at this time. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version H by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Mar 7, 2025

06/20/2025 E Effective on 9/1/25

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report · Enrolled

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors

House committee · Environmental Regulation · Committee vote 6 aye, 0 nay, 3 absent · Out of committee

Senate committee · Natural Resources · Committee vote 9 aye, 0 nay · Out of committee

Companion

HB 3997 by Patterson (identical)

Subjects

Energy--General

Environment--General

Fees & Other Nontax Revenue--State

Oil & Gas

PERMITS

ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS, STATE OFFICE OF

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, TEXAS COMMISSION ON

Text

The text as introduced · 552 words

89R15089 JRR-D

By: Sparks
S.B. No. 2037

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to permit application review and contested case procedures

for environmental permits involving a project to construct or

modify a liquefied natural gas export terminal; authorizing a fee.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Subchapter M, Chapter 5, Water Code, is amended

by adding Section 5.559 to read as follows:

Sec. 5.559. PROCEDURES FOR PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW AND

CONTESTED CASES INVOLVING PROJECT TO CONSTRUCT OR MODIFY LIQUEFIED

NATURAL GAS EXPORT TERMINAL. (a) This section applies only to a

permit application filed with the commission for a project to

construct or modify a liquefied natural gas export terminal.

(b) The commission by rule shall establish an expedited

permit application review process for permit applications

described by Subsection (a). Rules adopted under this subsection

must require an applicant who elects the expedited permit

application review process to pay an additional fee in an amount the

commission determines is necessary to cover the costs of the

expedited review.

(c) Not later than the 120th day after the close of the

public comment period for a permit application described by

Subsection (a), the executive director shall issue a written

response to any relevant and material public comments received

during the public comment period.

(d) Notwithstanding any other law, if a party requests a

contested case hearing involving a permit application described by

Subsection (a), the commission shall delegate to the State Office

of Administrative Hearings the responsibility to conduct the

contested case hearing. The provisions of Chapter 2001, Government

Code, and Section 2003.047 of that code apply to a contested case

hearing held under this subsection to the extent not inconsistent

with this section or rules adopted under this section.

(e) In a request for a contested case hearing under this

section, the party requesting the hearing must specify each reason

the party is an affected person as defined by Section 5.115(a). In

determining whether a party is an affected person, the

administrative law judge may only consider the reasons specified by

the party in the party's request for a contested case hearing.

(f) In a contested case under this section, an

administrative law judge shall hold a preliminary hearing for the

case not later than the 30th day after the date the commission

refers the case to the administrative law judge, provided that the

judge may grant one extension of the time, not to exceed 15 days, on

request of any party.

(g) The commission shall adopt rules as necessary to

implement this section.

(h) To the extent of a conflict between this section and

another law, this section controls.

SECTION 2. The change in law made by this Act applies only

to a permit application described by Section 5.559(a), Water Code,

as added by this Act, that is filed with the Texas Commission on

Environmental Quality on or after the effective date of this Act. A

permit application described by Section 5.559(a), Water Code, as

added by this Act, that is pending on the effective date of this Act

is governed by the law in effect at the time the application was

filed, and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.