Monitoring the Session

HB 3997

Patterson Bill Lets LNG Terminals Pay For Fast-Track Permits

Did not pass

Verdict: Smells

SmellsReviewed
Rep. Jared PattersonRHouse 106
Both charges, and why
Carve-out

THE TEXT

…“construct or modify a liquefied natural gas export terminal.”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The fast-track review and tighter challenge rules apply to one kind of project only, LNG export terminals. The caption names this target honestly, so this is a narrow favor in plain view, not a hidden one.

Carve-out
New fee, fund, board or appointees

THE TEXT

…“application review process to pay an additional fee in an amount the”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill creates a new fee for the expedited review, set at whatever amount the agency decides. The caption openly says it is authorizing a fee.

New fee, fund, board or appointees

Reviewed · Nov 1, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to permit application review and contested case procedures for environmental permits involving a project to construct or modify a liquefied natural gas export terminal; authorizing a fee.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Comments answered within 120 days. Challengers are held to the exact reasons they list.

This bill tells the state environmental agency to set up a fast-track permit review for projects that build or expand liquefied natural gas export terminals, paid for by an extra fee from applicants who choose it. It touches LNG terminal developers, the agency, the state hearings office, and residents or groups who want to challenge these permits. On the ground, the agency must answer public comments within 120 days, any challenge goes straight to a state hearings judge on a tight schedule, and challengers are held to the exact reasons they list for why they are affected.

Labels

Labels: FEE INCLUDED. The caption of the graded version (introduced) reads: “relating to permit application review and contested case procedures for environmental permits involving a project to construct or modify a liquefied natural gas export terminal; authorizing a fee.”ACROSS THE AISLE. Joint authors: 2 Republicans, 1 Democrat. Party as the Legislative Reference Library lists it for the 89th Legislature.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB3997 · 2025-03-06

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to permit application review and contested case procedures for environmental permits involving a project to construct or modify a liquefied natural gas export terminal; authorizing a fee.

WHAT IT DOES

Comments answered within 120 days. Challengers are held to the exact reasons they list.

This bill tells the state environmental agency to set up a fast-track permit review for projects that build or expand liquefied natural gas export terminals, paid for by an extra fee from applicants who choose it. It touches LNG terminal developers, the agency, the state hearings office, and residents or groups who want to challenge these permits. On the ground, the agency must answer public comments within 120 days, any challenge goes straight to a state hearings judge on a tight schedule, and challengers are held to the exact reasons they list for why they are affected.

CHARGES

[x] CARVE-OUTanalysis confidence 40%

THE TEXT

…“construct or modify a liquefied natural gas export terminal.”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The fast-track review and tighter challenge rules apply to one kind of project only, LNG export terminals. The caption names this target honestly, so this is a narrow favor in plain view, not a hidden one.

[x] NEW FEE, FUND, BOARD OR APPOINTEESanalysis confidence 50%

THE TEXT

…“application review process to pay an additional fee in an amount the”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill creates a new fee for the expedited review, set at whatever amount the agency decides. The caption openly says it is authorizing a fee.

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · April 16, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Environmental Regulation
  4. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  5. Considered in public hearing
  6. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  7. Left pending in committee
  8. Considered in formal meeting
  9. Committee substitute considered in committee
  10. Reported favorably as substituted
FILED UNDER

SPEECH AND LAWFARE

THE TEXT

…“administrative law judge may only consider the reasons specified by”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill limits people challenging an LNG terminal permit to the exact reasons they write in their hearing request, which narrows who can bring a challenge against this industry.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 28, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$132,750.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$132,750.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$32,750.00
Total
$132,750.00
polling $32,750.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 25, 2025 to Oct 7, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100996442, 101018590, 101035748, 101067950, 101072483.

Texas Sands PAC$84,800.00

Texas Sands PAC

$84,800.00

Cash
$68,000.00
Paid by others
$16,800.00
Total
$84,800.00
polling $16,800.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 4, 2024 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100976997, 101018590, 101035748, 101072483.

Texas Conservative Majority PAC$57,950.00

Texas Conservative Majority PAC

$57,950.00

Cash
$0.00
Paid by others
$57,950.00
Total
$57,950.00
canvassing $35,000.00polling $22,950.00

Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Feb 12, 2026 to Sep 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101035748, 101067950.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$132,750.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$32,750.00
Total
$132,750.00
polling $32,750.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 25, 2025 to Oct 7, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100996442, 101018590, 101035748, 101067950, 101072483.

×

Texas Sands PAC

$84,800.00

Cash
$68,000.00
Paid by others
$16,800.00
Total
$84,800.00
polling $16,800.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 4, 2024 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100976997, 101018590, 101035748, 101072483.

×

Texas Conservative Majority PAC

$57,950.00

Cash
$0.00
Paid by others
$57,950.00
Total
$57,950.00
canvassing $35,000.00polling $22,950.00

Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Feb 12, 2026 to Sep 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101035748, 101067950.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · April 16, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas House · Filed Mar 6, 2025

04/25/2025 H Reported favorably as substituted

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Nov 1, 2026 at 1:53 PM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Environmental Regulation · Committee vote 7 aye, 0 nay, 2 absent · Final status: Did not pass

Companion

SB 2037 by Sparks (identical)

Subjects

Courts--Judges

Energy--General

Environment--General

Oil & Gas

PERMITS

ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS, STATE OFFICE OF

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, TEXAS COMMISSION ON

Text

The text as introduced · 552 words

89R15089 JRR-D

By: Patterson
H.B. No. 3997

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to permit application review and contested case procedures

for environmental permits involving a project to construct or

modify a liquefied natural gas export terminal; authorizing a fee.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Subchapter M, Chapter 5, Water Code, is amended

by adding Section 5.559 to read as follows:

Sec. 5.559. PROCEDURES FOR PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW AND

CONTESTED CASES INVOLVING PROJECT TO CONSTRUCT OR MODIFY LIQUEFIED

NATURAL GAS EXPORT TERMINAL. (a) This section applies only to a

permit application filed with the commission for a project to

construct or modify a liquefied natural gas export terminal.

(b) The commission by rule shall establish an expedited

permit application review process for permit applications

described by Subsection (a). Rules adopted under this subsection

must require an applicant who elects the expedited permit

application review process to pay an additional fee in an amount the

commission determines is necessary to cover the costs of the

expedited review.

(c) Not later than the 120th day after the close of the

public comment period for a permit application described by

Subsection (a), the executive director shall issue a written

response to any relevant and material public comments received

during the public comment period.

(d) Notwithstanding any other law, if a party requests a

contested case hearing involving a permit application described by

Subsection (a), the commission shall delegate to the State Office

of Administrative Hearings the responsibility to conduct the

contested case hearing. The provisions of Chapter 2001, Government

Code, and Section 2003.047 of that code apply to a contested case

hearing held under this subsection to the extent not inconsistent

with this section or rules adopted under this section.

(e) In a request for a contested case hearing under this

section, the party requesting the hearing must specify each reason

the party is an affected person as defined by Section 5.115(a). In

determining whether a party is an affected person, the

administrative law judge may only consider the reasons specified by

the party in the party's request for a contested case hearing.

(f) In a contested case under this section, an

administrative law judge shall hold a preliminary hearing for the

case not later than the 30th day after the date the commission

refers the case to the administrative law judge, provided that the

judge may grant one extension of the time, not to exceed 15 days, on

request of any party.

(g) The commission shall adopt rules as necessary to

implement this section.

(h) To the extent of a conflict between this section and

another law, this section controls.

SECTION 2. The change in law made by this Act applies only

to a permit application described by Section 5.559(a), Water Code,

as added by this Act, that is filed with the Texas Commission on

Environmental Quality on or after the effective date of this Act. A

permit application described by Section 5.559(a), Water Code, as

added by this Act, that is pending on the effective date of this Act

is governed by the law in effect at the time the application was

filed, and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.