Monitoring the Session

SB 2557

West Bill Lets Each Police Agency Define Racial Profiling

Died in committee

Verdict: Smells

SmellsInitial review
Sen. Royce WestDSenate 23
All 3 charges, and why
The hole

THE TEXT

…“written policy required by Article 2B.0053(b) and adopted by the”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The caption promises to prevent racial profiling, but the ban now reaches only what each agency's own policy defines as racial profiling. That lets each agency set the scope of the ban its own officers must follow.

The hole
Caption mismatch

THE TEXT

…“is not subject to the requirements of Section 552.021, Government”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The caption leads with preventing racial profiling, but the body takes most stop recordings out of the general public records requirement. That makes the footage that could show profiling harder for the public to get, a shift the caption does not flag.

Caption mismatch
New fee, fund, board or appointees

THE TEXT

“(g) The attorney general shall set a proposed fee to be”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill creates a new fee for copies of recordings, set high enough to cover review and copying costs. The caption does disclose that it authorizes a fee.

New fee, fund, board or appointees

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to preventing racial profiling and to video and audio equipment and recordings of certain law enforcement motor vehicle stops; authorizing a fee; creating a criminal offense.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Footage that could show it mostly leaves public records law. Unauthorized release? Class A misdemeanor!

The bill rewrites the state ban on racial profiling so that it is defined by each police agency's own written policy, and it sets new rules for patrol car video and audio recordings. It touches peace officers, police agencies, and members of the public who ask for those recordings. Officers must follow agency rules on when to record and note why they did not, while recordings are largely pulled out of the general public records law, deadly-force videos can be held until all cases end, the attorney general sets a copy fee, and an employee who releases a recording without permission commits a Class A misdemeanor offense.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R SB 2093 (Died in committee) and this bill (Died in committee). Checked against 88R only.DO-OVER. Reworked text of a bill filed before that died: 88R SB 2093 (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.CREATES AN OFFENSE. The caption of the graded version (introduced) reads: “relating to preventing racial profiling and to video and audio equipment and recordings of certain law enforcement motor vehicle stops; authorizing a fee; creating a criminal offense.”FEE INCLUDED. The caption of the graded version (introduced) reads: “relating to preventing racial profiling and to video and audio equipment and recordings of certain law enforcement motor vehicle stops; authorizing a fee; creating a criminal offense.”NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Mar 13, 2025 and referred to the Senate Criminal Justice committee. No public hearing. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB2557 · 2025-03-13

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to preventing racial profiling and to video and audio equipment and recordings of certain law enforcement motor vehicle stops; authorizing a fee; creating a criminal offense.

WHAT IT DOES

Footage that could show it mostly leaves public records law. Unauthorized release? Class A misdemeanor!

The bill rewrites the state ban on racial profiling so that it is defined by each police agency's own written policy, and it sets new rules for patrol car video and audio recordings. It touches peace officers, police agencies, and members of the public who ask for those recordings. Officers must follow agency rules on when to record and note why they did not, while recordings are largely pulled out of the general public records law, deadly-force videos can be held until all cases end, the attorney general sets a copy fee, and an employee who releases a recording without permission commits a Class A misdemeanor offense.

CHARGES

[x] THE HOLEanalysis confidence 60%

THE TEXT

…“written policy required by Article 2B.0053(b) and adopted by the”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The caption promises to prevent racial profiling, but the ban now reaches only what each agency's own policy defines as racial profiling. That lets each agency set the scope of the ban its own officers must follow.

[x] CAPTION MISMATCHanalysis confidence 55%

THE TEXT

…“is not subject to the requirements of Section 552.021, Government”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The caption leads with preventing racial profiling, but the body takes most stop recordings out of the general public records requirement. That makes the footage that could show profiling harder for the public to get, a shift the caption does not flag.

[x] NEW FEE, FUND, BOARD OR APPOINTEESanalysis confidence 40%

THE TEXT

“(g) The attorney general shall set a proposed fee to be”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill creates a new fee for copies of recordings, set high enough to cover review and copying costs. The caption does disclose that it authorizes a fee.

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Criminal Justice
FILED UNDER

SPEECH AND LAWFARE

THE TEXT

…“employee of a law enforcement agency commits an offense if the”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill makes it an offense for police employees to release a stop recording without agency permission.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Skyview Development LLC$36,332.00

Skyview Development LLC

$36,332.00

Cash
$0.00
Paid by others
$36,332.00
Total
$36,332.00
Other filed descriptions $32,032.00fundraiser $4,300.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 1, 2024 to Jun 1, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Jun 1, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100987569, 101009506, 101058878, 101063137.

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$20,000.00

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$20,000.00

Cash
$20,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$20,000.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 11, 2024 to Oct 10, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100987569, 101063137.

Erle Allen Nye Jr.$15,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Skyview Development LLC

$36,332.00

Cash
$0.00
Paid by others
$36,332.00
Total
$36,332.00
Other filed descriptions $32,032.00fundraiser $4,300.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 1, 2024 to Jun 1, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Jun 1, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100987569, 101009506, 101058878, 101063137.

×

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$20,000.00

Cash
$20,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$20,000.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 11, 2024 to Oct 10, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100987569, 101063137.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R SB 2093

by Sen. West, same lead author · Died in committee · reworked

Introduced text

Last action, Mar 21, 2023: Referred to Criminal Justice

Relating to preventing racial profiling and to video and audio equipment and recordings of certain law enforcement motor vehicle stops; creating an offense.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Mar 13, 2025

04/03/2025 S Referred to Criminal Justice

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Senate committee · Criminal Justice · Final status: Died in committee

Subjects

Crimes--Miscellaneous

Criminal Procedure--General

Law Enforcement

Open Records

DISCRIMINATION

PEACE OFFICERS

VIDEOTAPE & FILM

ATTORNEY GENERAL

Text

The text as introduced · 1,599 words

89R15208 JSC-D

By: West
S.B. No. 2557

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to preventing racial profiling and to video and audio

equipment and recordings of certain law enforcement motor vehicle

stops; authorizing a fee; creating a criminal offense.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Article 2B.0052, Code of Criminal Procedure, is

amended to read as follows:

Art. 2B.0052. RACIAL PROFILING PROHIBITED. A peace officer

may not engage in an act of racial profiling , as defined by the

written policy required by Article 2B.0053(b) and adopted by the

law enforcement agency employing the officer .

SECTION 2. Article 2B.0053, Code of Criminal Procedure, is

amended by adding Subsection (b-1) to read as follows:

(b-1) A policy adopted under Subsection (b) must be

consistent with the Federal Rules of Evidence and the Texas Rules of

Evidence.

SECTION 3. Article 2B.0151(c), Code of Criminal Procedure,

is amended to read as follows:

(c) If a law enforcement agency installs video or audio

equipment or equips peace officers with body worn cameras as

provided by this article, the policy adopted by the agency under

Article 2B.0053(b) must include :

(1) guidelines for when a peace officer should

activate the camera or other equipment or discontinue a recording

currently in progress;

(2) provisions relating to data retention, including a

provision requiring the retention of [ standards for reviewing ]

video and audio recordings for a minimum period of 90 days;

(3) provisions relating to storage of video and audio

recordings, creation of backup copies of the recordings, and

maintenance of data security;

(4) guidelines for public access, through open records

requests, to recordings that are public information;

(5) procedures for supervisory or internal review; and

(6) procedures for the handling and documenting of

equipment and malfunctions of equipment [ documentation ].

SECTION 4. Subchapter D, Chapter 2B, Code of Criminal

Procedure, is amended by adding Articles 2B.01515, 2B.0155,

2B.0156, 2B.0157, 2B.0158, and 2B.0159 to read as follows:

Art. 2B.01515. RECORDING INTERACTIONS WITH PUBLIC. (a) In

this article, "motor vehicle stop" has the meaning assigned by

Article 2B.0051.

(b) A peace officer who uses a law enforcement motor vehicle

or motorcycle equipped with video or audio equipment described by

Article 2B.0151(b)(1) or (2) shall act in a manner that is

consistent with the policy of the law enforcement agency that

employs the officer with respect to when and under what

circumstances the equipment must be activated for the purpose of

recording interactions with the public.

(c) A peace officer who does not activate video or audio

equipment in response to a call for assistance or on making a motor

vehicle stop must include in the officer's incident report or

otherwise note in the case file or record the reason for not

activating the equipment.

(d) Any justification for failing to activate the equipment

because it is unsafe, unrealistic, or impracticable is based on

whether a reasonable officer under the same or similar

circumstances would have made the same decision.

Art. 2B.0155. RECORDINGS DOCUMENTING CERTAIN CONDUCT OF LAW

ENFORCEMENT OFFICER. (a) Except as provided by Subsection (b), a

video or audio recording made under Article 2B.01515 and

documenting an incident that involves the use of deadly force by a

peace officer or that is otherwise related to an administrative or

criminal investigation of an officer may not be deleted, destroyed,

or released to the public until all criminal matters have been

finally adjudicated and all related administrative investigations

have concluded.

(b) A law enforcement agency may release to the public a

recording described by Subsection (a) if the law enforcement agency

determines that the release furthers a law enforcement purpose.

(c) This article does not affect the authority of a law

enforcement agency to withhold under Section 552.108, Government

Code, information related to a closed criminal investigation that

did not result in a conviction or a grant of deferred adjudication

community supervision.

Art. 2B.0156. RELEASE OF VIDEO OR AUDIO RECORDING. (a) A

member of the public is required to provide the following

information when submitting a written request to a law enforcement

agency for one or more video or audio recordings made under Article

2B.01515:

(1) the dates and approximate times of the recordings;

(2) the specific location or locations where the

recordings occurred; and

(3) if known, the name of one or more persons known to

be a subject of the recording or recordings.

(b) A failure to provide all of the information required by

Subsection (a) to be part of a request for a recording does not

preclude the requestor from making a future request for the same

recording.

(c) A request may not be denied solely because the requestor

does not know the name of a person who is a subject of the recording.

(d) Except as provided by Subsection (e), a recording

described by Subsection (a) that is held by a law enforcement agency

is not subject to the requirements of Section 552.021, Government

Code.

(e) A recording that is or could be used as evidence in a

criminal prosecution is subject to the requirements of Section

552.021, Government Code.

(f) Notwithstanding Subsection (e), a law enforcement

agency may:

(1) seek to withhold a recording subject to Subsection

(e) by asserting any exceptions to disclosure in Chapter 552,

Government Code, or other law; or

(2) release a recording requested in accordance with

Subsection (a) after the agency redacts any information made

confidential under Chapter 552, Government Code, or other law.

(g) The attorney general shall set a proposed fee to be

charged to members of the public who seek to obtain a copy of a

recording under this article. The fee amount must be sufficient to

cover the cost of reviewing and making the recording. A law

enforcement agency may provide a copy without charge or at a reduced

charge if the agency determines that waiver or reduction of the

charge is in the public interest.

(h) A recording is confidential and excepted from the

requirements of Chapter 552, Government Code, if the recording:

(1) was not required to be made under law or under a

policy adopted by the appropriate law enforcement agency; and

(2) does not relate to a law enforcement purpose.

Art. 2B.0157. VIDEO AND AUDIO RECORDINGS; REQUEST FOR

ATTORNEY GENERAL DECISION. (a) Notwithstanding Section

552.301(b), Government Code, a governmental body's request for a

decision from the attorney general about whether a requested

recording made under Article 2B.01515 falls within an exception to

public disclosure is considered timely if made not later than the

20th business day after the date of receipt of the written request.

(b) Notwithstanding Section 552.301(d), Government Code, a

governmental body's response to a requestor regarding a requested

recording is considered timely if made not later than the 20th

business day after the date of receipt of the written request.

(c) Notwithstanding Section 552.301(e), Government Code, a

governmental body's submission to the attorney general of the

information required by that subsection regarding a requested

recording is considered timely if made not later than the 25th

business day after the date of receipt of the written request.

(d) Notwithstanding Section 552.301(e-1), Government Code,

a governmental body's submission to a requestor of the information

required by that subsection regarding a requested recording is

considered timely if made not later than the 25th business day after

the date of receipt of the written request.

Art. 2B.0158. PRODUCTION OF VIDEO OR AUDIO RECORDING IN

RESPONSE TO VOLUMINOUS PUBLIC INFORMATION REQUESTS. (a)

Notwithstanding Section 552.221(d), Government Code, an officer

for public information who is employed by a governmental body and

who in accordance with Article 2B.0156 receives a voluminous

request for recordings made under Article 2B.01515 is considered to

have promptly produced the information for purposes of Section

552.221, Government Code, if the officer takes the actions required

under that section before the 21st business day after the date of

receipt of the written request.

(b) For purposes of this article, "voluminous request"

includes:

(1) more than five separate requests for recordings

from the same person in a 24-hour period; or

(2) a request or multiple requests from the same

person in a 24-hour period for recordings that, taken together,

constitute more than five total hours of video or audio recordings.

Art. 2B.0159. OFFENSE. (a) A peace officer or other

employee of a law enforcement agency commits an offense if the

officer or employee releases without permission of the applicable

law enforcement agency a recording made under Article 2B.01515.

(b) An offense under this article is a Class A misdemeanor.

SECTION 5. (a) A law enforcement agency operating video or

audio equipment on the effective date of this Act may submit any

existing policy of the agency regarding the use of the equipment to

the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement to determine whether the

policy complies with Article 2B.0151(c), Code of Criminal

Procedure, as amended by this Act.

(b) Notwithstanding Article 2B.0151(c), Code of Criminal

Procedure, as amended by this Act, a law enforcement agency

operating video or audio equipment on the effective date of this Act

is not required to adopt or implement a policy that complies with

that article before September 1, 2026.

(c) Articles 2B.0155, 2B.0156, 2B.0157, 2B.0158, and

2B.0159, Code of Criminal Procedure, as added by this Act, apply to

a release of a recording on or after the effective date of this Act,

regardless of whether the incident that is the subject of the

recording occurred before, on, or after the effective date of this

Act.

SECTION 6. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.