SB 3071
Bettencourt Tax Injunction Bill Gives Owners 15 Days To Sue
Did not pass
Verdict: Smells
Why it's charged
The hole
THE TEXT
“An action to enjoin the collection of taxes must be filed not later than the 15th day after the date the taxing unit adopts a tax rate.”
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The caption targets a deviation the taxing unit 'subsequently' makes after adopting the higher rate, but the suit window closes 15 days after the rate is adopted. A deviation that surfaces later, such as a cost overrun or a cut in scope, may fall outside the window unless the text is read to reopen it at the next rate adoption.
The holeNeeds review · Nov 1, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade
Caption
relating to the authority of a property owner to obtain an injunction restraining the collection of ad valorem taxes by a taxing unit if the taxing unit adopts a tax rate that exceeds the voter-approval tax rate and subsequently takes an action that constitutes a material deviation from the stated purpose of the tax increase.
Caption from analyzed text · version I.
Summary
The deviation comes “subsequently.” The clock starts when the rate is adopted.
The bill lets a property owner go to court and stop a local taxing unit from collecting taxes when that unit raised taxes above the voter-approval rate through an election and then strays significantly from the purpose it gave voters. It touches every taxing unit that asks voters for a tax increase, and every property owner in those units, by defining a 'material deviation' to include changes in purpose, financing, scope, or cost overruns of more than 33 percent. While such a suit is pending the owner does not have to pay the tax, and an owner who paid and wins gets a refund plus attorney's fees and court costs, but the suit must be filed within 15 days after the taxing unit adopts a tax rate.
Labels
Labels: STALLED AFTER COMMITTEE. Voted out of the Senate Local Government committee 5-2 on May 15, 2025. Never placed on a calendar. The bill died.
Receipt
The receipt
89R-SB3071 · 2025-05-12
SOLD BY
ITEM
relating to the authority of a property owner to obtain an injunction restraining the collection of ad valorem taxes by a taxing unit if the taxing unit adopts a tax rate that exceeds the voter-approval tax rate and subsequently takes an action that constitutes a material deviation from the stated purpose of the tax increase.
WHAT IT DOES
The deviation comes “subsequently.” The clock starts when the rate is adopted.
The bill lets a property owner go to court and stop a local taxing unit from collecting taxes when that unit raised taxes above the voter-approval rate through an election and then strays significantly from the purpose it gave voters. It touches every taxing unit that asks voters for a tax increase, and every property owner in those units, by defining a 'material deviation' to include changes in purpose, financing, scope, or cost overruns of more than 33 percent. While such a suit is pending the owner does not have to pay the tax, and an owner who paid and wins gets a refund plus attorney's fees and court costs, but the suit must be filed within 15 days after the taxing unit adopts a tax rate.
CHARGES
[x] THE HOLEanalysis confidence 50%
THE TEXT
“An action to enjoin the collection of taxes must be filed not later than the 15th day after the date the taxing unit adopts a tax rate.”
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The caption targets a deviation the taxing unit 'subsequently' makes after adopting the higher rate, but the suit window closes 15 days after the rate is adopted. A deviation that surfaces later, such as a cost overrun or a cut in scope, may fall outside the window unless the text is read to reopen it at the next rate adoption.
TOTAL
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
LBB estimate · fiscal note version S · source
Sources
Fiscal note · version S · May 16, 2025
No first-year general revenue figure available here.
LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.
Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.
HISTORY
- Received by the Secretary of the Senate
- Permission to introduce
- Vote recorded in Journal
- Read first time
- Referred to Local Government
- Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
- Considered in public hearing
- Testimony taken in committee
- Vote taken in committee
- Reported favorably as substituted
- Committee report printed and distributed
FILED UNDER
No verified beat found.
THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
Donors
Donors report through Friends of Paul Bettencourt.
Not tied to this bill.
Sources
The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.
Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
MoneyMissing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.
Votes
No floor vote loaded for this bill.
Witnesses18
- For
- 7
- Against
- 11
- On
- 0
Names
For
- Self4 registrations
- Self; Local Politics Matter ATX1 registration
- Self; South Texans’ Property Rights Association1 registration
- Texas Taxpayers and Research Association1 registration
Against
- Austin Chamber of Commerce1 registration
- Austin Transit Partnership1 registration
- Cap Metro Transit Authority1 registration
- City of Austin1 registration
- Farm&City1 registration
- Harris County Commissioners Court1 registration
- Kiewit Infrastructure1 registration
- Self1 registration
- Self; Downtown Austin Alliance1 registration
- Self; Parsons1 registration
- Transit Forward1 registration
Sources
18 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.
Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.
Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.
Fiscal
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
LBB estimate · fiscal note version S · source
Sources
Fiscal note · version S · May 16, 2025
No first-year general revenue figure available here.
LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.
Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.
How this was graded
Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.
Sources
Texas Senate · Filed May 12, 2025
05/19/2025 S Committee report printed and distributed: May 19 2025 1:57PM
Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report
Data snapshot Nov 1, 2026 at 2:15 PM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.
Senate committee · Local Government · Committee vote 5 aye, 2 nay · Out of committee
Companion
HB 3879 by Troxclair (similar)
Subjects
City Government--Finance
Civil Remedies & Liabilities
County Government--Finance
Elections--General
Taxation--Property-Assessment & Collection
Taxation--Property-Tax Rate
Text
The text as introduced · 508 words
89R30235 TJB-F By: Bettencourt S.B. No. 3071 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to the authority of a property owner to obtain an injunction restraining the collection of ad valorem taxes by a taxing unit if the taxing unit adopts a tax rate that exceeds the voter-approval tax rate and subsequently takes an action that constitutes a material deviation from the stated purpose of the tax increase. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. Section 26.012, Tax Code, is amended by adding Subdivision (16-a) to read as follows: (16-a) "Materially deviate" means to make a significant change in carrying out the purpose stated to voters on a ballot proposition, stated in any order or resolution calling for an election required under this chapter, or stated in resolutions adopted to accompany or supplement a ballot proposition, including: (A) a significant change in purpose; (B) a significant change in the financing structure for the purpose; (C) an increase of more than 33 percent in actual or projected costs of the purpose; (D) a significant reduction in scope or scale of the purpose; (E) a legal determination, including a finding under Chapter 1202 or 1205, Government Code, that the purpose stated on the ballot proposition or any order or resolution calling for an election required under this chapter was not in conformity with law; or (F) any other attempt to substantially impair the rights and expectations of the voters as they existed at the time of the election. SECTION 2. Section 26.05, Tax Code, is amended by adding Subsection (e-2) to read as follows: (e-2) A person who owns taxable property is entitled to an injunction restraining the collection of taxes by a taxing unit in which the property is taxable if the taxing unit materially deviates from the purpose stated at the time the voters approved a tax rate under this chapter. An action to enjoin the collection of taxes must be filed not later than the 15th day after the date the taxing unit adopts a tax rate. A property owner is not required to pay the taxes imposed by a taxing unit on the owner's property while an action filed by a property owner under this subsection is pending. If the property owner pays the taxes and subsequently prevails in the action, the property owner is entitled to a refund of the taxes paid, together with reasonable attorney's fees and court costs. The property owner is not required to apply to the collector for the taxing unit to receive the refund. SECTION 3. Section 26.05(e-2), Tax Code, as added by this Act, applies only to an ad valorem tax rate adopted on or after the effective date of this Act. SECTION 4. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this Act takes effect September 1, 2025.