Monitoring the Session

SB 689

Hughes Bill Bans DEI Offices In State And Local Government

Did not pass

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Bryan HughesRSenate 1

Initial review · graded Oct 22, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to employment practices regarding diversity and prohibiting the implementation of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives by certain governmental entities.

Caption from analyzed text · version H.

Summary

No diversity statements either. Universities and school districts sit outside the new chapter.

The bill bars state agencies, the legislature, state courts, counties, cities and special districts from running diversity, equity, and inclusion offices, from hiring staff or contractors to do that work, and from asking anyone for a diversity statement, unless federal law requires it. It also removes the Labor Code language that let employers combine race or sex with job factors to reach workforce diversity, and repeals the state agency workforce diversity program rules. Anyone who thinks a covered entity is breaking the rule can complain to the attorney general, who may go to court to force the entity to comply, while universities and school districts are left outside this new chapter.

Labels

Labels: GOT HALFWAY. Passed the Senate on Apr 3, 2025. Died in the House: voted out of the State Affairs committee 9-5, no floor vote.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB689 · 2024-12-20

SOLD BY

+ 7 coauthors

ITEM

relating to employment practices regarding diversity and prohibiting the implementation of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives by certain governmental entities.

WHAT IT DOES

No diversity statements either. Universities and school districts sit outside the new chapter.

The bill bars state agencies, the legislature, state courts, counties, cities and special districts from running diversity, equity, and inclusion offices, from hiring staff or contractors to do that work, and from asking anyone for a diversity statement, unless federal law requires it. It also removes the Labor Code language that let employers combine race or sex with job factors to reach workforce diversity, and repeals the state agency workforce diversity program rules. Anyone who thinks a covered entity is breaking the rule can complain to the attorney general, who may go to court to force the entity to comply, while universities and school districts are left outside this new chapter.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version E · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · May 8, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to State Affairs
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Testimony taken in committee
  8. Left pending in committee
  9. Co-author authorized
  10. Considered in public hearing
  11. Left pending in committee
  12. Co-author authorized
  13. Considered in public hearing
  14. Vote taken in committee
  15. Reported favorably as substituted
  16. Committee report printed and distributed
  17. Placed on intent calendar
  18. Co-author authorized
  19. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  20. Record vote
  21. Read 2nd time
  22. Amendment(s) offered FA1 Creighton
  23. Amended
  24. Record vote
  25. Amendment(s) offered FA2 Miles
  26. Amendment fails of adoption
  27. Record vote
  28. Amendment(s) offered FA3 West
  29. Amendment fails of adoption
  30. Record vote
  31. Passed to engrossment as amended
  32. Record vote
  33. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  34. Record vote
  35. Read 3rd time
  36. Passed
  37. Record vote
  38. Reported engrossed
  39. Received from the Senate
  40. Read first time
  41. Referred to State Affairs
  42. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  43. Considered in public hearing
  44. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  45. Left pending in committee
  46. Considered in formal meeting
  47. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  48. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  49. Committee report distributed
  50. Committee report sent to Calendars
FILED UNDER

DEI BY ANOTHER NAME

THE TEXT

…“than a school district”

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The ban on DEI offices covers cities, counties and special districts but leaves school districts out of this chapter, so DEI units there are not reached by this bill.

SIGNED FOR BY

Senate · 20 yea · 11 nay

Sources

Senate: Final passage · Apr 3, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

GOPAC Election Fund$250,000.00

GOPAC Election Fund

$250,000.00

Cash
$250,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$250,000.00

Also funds 2 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101028838, 101071548.

CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)$100,000.00

CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101067724.

Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC$100,000.00

Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 32 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Feb 20, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101071548.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

GOPAC Election Fund

$250,000.00

Cash
$250,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$250,000.00

Also funds 2 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101028838, 101071548.

×

CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101067724.

×

Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 32 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Feb 20, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101071548.

Votes7

Senate Apr 3, 2025

Yea
20
Nay
11
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 20, Nays 11. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 20 (published)
  • Nay: 11 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 3, 2025

Yea
20
Nay
11
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Hughes moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration CSSB 689 at this time on its third reading and final passage: CSSB 689, Relating to employment practices regarding diversity and prohibiting the implementation of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives by certain governmental entities. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 20, Nays 11.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 20 (published)
  • Nay: 11 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 2, 2025

Yea
20
Nay
11
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

CSSB 689 as amended was passed to engrossment by the following vote: Yeas 20, Nays 11.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 20 (published)
  • Nay: 11 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 2, 2025

Yea
11
Nay
20
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The amendment to CSSB 689 was read and failed of adoption by the following vote: Yeas 11, Nays 20.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 11 (published)
  • Nay: 20 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 2, 2025

Yea
11
Nay
20
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The amendment to CSSB 689 was read and failed of adoption by the following vote: Yeas 11, Nays 20.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 11 (published)
  • Nay: 20 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 2, 2025

Yea
20
Nay
11
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The amendment to CSSB 689 was read and was adopted by the following vote: Yeas 20, Nays 11.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 20 (published)
  • Nay: 11 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 2, 2025

Yea
20
Nay
11
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Hughes moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration CSSB 689 at this time on its second reading: CSSB 689, Relating to employment practices regarding diversity and prohibiting the implementation of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives by certain governmental entities. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 20, Nays 11.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 20 (published)
  • Nay: 11 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses93
For
29
Against
62
On
2
Names

For

  • Cicero Action1 registration
  • Do No Harm Action2 registrations
  • FGA Action1 registration
  • Self16 registrations
  • Self; Texas Values3 registrations
  • Self; Travis County Republican Party1 registration
  • Texas Eagle Forum1 registration
  • Texas Faith & Freedom Coalition1 registration
  • Texas Values2 registrations
  • Texas Values Action1 registration

Against

  • ACLU of Texas2 registrations
  • City of Austin2 registrations
  • City of Dallas2 registrations
  • City of Houston1 registration
  • City of San Antonio2 registrations
  • Common Cause Texas1 registration
  • Dallas County Criminal District Attorney John Creuzot1 registration
  • Equality Texas1 registration
  • Lone Star Chapter Sierra Club1 registration
  • Self40 registrations
  • Self; Austin justin coalition1 registration
  • Self; Equity Action1 registration
  • Self; Texas Association of School Psychologists1 registration
  • Self; Texas Democratic Party1 registration
  • Self; Texas state employees union1 registration
  • Self; TX-AFT1 registration
  • Texas AFL-CIO1 registration
  • Texas State Teachers Association1 registration
  • Travis County Commissioners Court1 registration

On

  • Self1 registration
  • Texas Education Agency1 registration
Sources

93 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version E · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · May 8, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version H by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Dec 20, 2024

05/20/2025 H Committee report sent to Calendars

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:19 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors
Cosponsors

House committee · State Affairs · Committee vote 9 aye, 5 nay · Out of committee

Senate committee · State Affairs · Committee vote 9 aye, 0 nay, 2 absent · Out of committee

Companion

HB 1521 by Gerdes (identical)

Subjects

Human Relations

State Agencies, Boards & Commissions

DISCRIMINATION

Text

The text as introduced · 667 words

89R4133 RDS-F

By: Hughes
S.B. No. 689

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the implementation of diversity, equity, and inclusion

initiatives by certain governmental entities.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Subtitle A, Title 6, Government Code, is amended

by adding Chapter 621 to read as follows:

CHAPTER 621. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND

INCLUSION INITIATIVES

Sec. 621.001. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:

(1) "Diversity, equity, and inclusion office" means an

office, division, or other unit of a governmental entity

established for the purpose of:

(A) influencing hiring or employment practices

or workforce composition at the entity with respect to race, sex,

color, or ethnicity, other than through the use of color-blind,

race-neutral, and sex-neutral hiring processes in accordance with

any applicable state and federal antidiscrimination laws;

(B) promoting differential treatment or

providing special benefits to individuals on the basis of race,

sex, color, or ethnicity;

(C) promoting policies or procedures designed or

implemented in reference to race, sex, color, or ethnicity, other

than policies or procedures:

(i) approved in writing by the attorney

general; and

(ii) implemented for the sole purpose of

ensuring compliance with any applicable federal law;

(D) conducting trainings, programs, or

activities designed or implemented in reference to race, sex,

color, ethnicity, gender identity, or sexual orientation, other

than trainings, programs, or activities:

(i) developed by an attorney;

(ii) approved in writing by the attorney

general; and

(iii) conducted for the sole purpose of

ensuring compliance with any applicable court order or state or

federal law; or

(E) promoting, as an official position of the

entity, a particular opinion referencing unconscious or implicit

bias, cultural appropriation, allyship, transgender ideology,

microaggressions, group marginalization, anti-racism, systemic

oppression, social justice, intersectionality, neo-pronouns,

heteronormativity, disparate impact, gender theory, racial or

sexual privilege, or any related formulation of the these concepts.

(2) "Governmental entity" means:

(A) a department, commission, board, office, or

other agency that is in the executive branch of state government and

that was created by the constitution or a statute, other than an

institution of higher education as defined by Section 61.003,

Education Code;

(B) the legislature or a legislative state

agency;

(C) the supreme court, the court of criminal

appeals, a court of appeals, a district court, or the Texas Judicial

Council or another agency in the judicial branch of state

government;

(D) a county, municipality, special purpose

district, including a school district, or any other political

subdivision of this state; or

(E) an open-enrollment charter school

established under Subchapter D, Chapter 12, Education Code.

Sec. 621.002. RESPONSIBILITY OF GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY

REGARDING DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION INITIATIVES. A

governmental entity shall ensure that each unit of the entity does

not, except as required by federal law:

(1) establish or maintain a diversity, equity, and

inclusion office; or

(2) hire or assign an employee of the entity or

contract with a third party to perform the duties of a diversity,

equity, and inclusion office.

Sec. 621.003. COMPLAINT; ENFORCEMENT. (a) A person who has

a reasonable belief that a governmental entity is violating this

chapter may file a complaint with the attorney general.

(b) If the attorney general determines that a governmental

entity named in a complaint received under Subsection (a) is

violating this chapter, the attorney general may file a petition

for a writ of mandamus to compel the governmental entity to comply

with this chapter.

(c) A mandamus action under Subsection (b) must be filed in:

(1) Travis County, if the governmental entity is an

entity described by Section 621.001(2)(A)-(C); or

(2) the county in which the governmental entity is

located, if the governmental entity is an entity described by

Section 621.001(2)(D) or (E).

SECTION 2. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives

a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as

provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this

Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this

Act takes effect September 1, 2025.