Monitoring the Session

SB 779

Bill Bars Public Nuisance Suits Over Products Or Government-Approved Conduct

Died in committee

Verdict: Smells

SmellsInitial review
Sen. Mayes MiddletonRSenate 11
Why it's charged
Pitch: Speech and lawfare

ACTUALLY

“A public nuisance claim is not cognizable in this”…

Bill text, Senate committee report version (S)

The bill builds a lawsuit shield for businesses whose conduct is licensed, regulated or tied to a product, so public nuisance suits against them cannot go forward.

Pitch: Speech and lawfare

Initial review · graded Oct 22, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to common law public nuisance claims.

Caption from analyzed text · version S.

Summary

The statement of intent calls these suits “public nuisance threats.” Cities and counties can’t file them.

The bill bars public nuisance lawsuits in Texas when the conduct is government-approved, when another legal or regulatory remedy already exists, or when the claim is about a product. It touches private parties and cities, counties and other local governments that sue businesses, and the businesses and product makers they would sue. On the ground, a whole class of large public nuisance suits can no longer be brought for cases filed after the law takes effect, though claims under other laws are still allowed.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R SB 1034 (Died in committee) and this bill (Died in committee). Checked against 88R only.DO-OVER. Reworked text of a bill filed before that died: 88R SB 1034 (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.GOT HALFWAY. Passed the Senate on Apr 10, 2025. Died in the House: never got out of the Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence committee.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB779 · 2025-01-14

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to common law public nuisance claims.

WHAT IT DOES

The statement of intent calls these suits “public nuisance threats.” Cities and counties can’t file them.

The bill bars public nuisance lawsuits in Texas when the conduct is government-approved, when another legal or regulatory remedy already exists, or when the claim is about a product. It touches private parties and cities, counties and other local governments that sue businesses, and the businesses and product makers they would sue. On the ground, a whole class of large public nuisance suits can no longer be brought for cases filed after the law takes effect, though claims under other laws are still allowed.

CHARGES

[x] PITCH: SPEECH AND LAWFARE

ACTUALLY

“A public nuisance claim is not cognizable in this”…

Bill text, Senate committee report version (S)

The bill builds a lawsuit shield for businesses whose conduct is licensed, regulated or tied to a product, so public nuisance suits against them cannot go forward.

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version S · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version S · March 28, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to State Affairs
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Testimony taken in committee
  8. Left pending in committee
  9. Considered in public hearing
  10. Vote taken in committee
  11. Reported favorably as substituted
  12. Committee report printed and distributed
  13. Placed on intent calendar
  14. Not again placed on intent calendar
  15. Placed on intent calendar
  16. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  17. Record vote
  18. Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
  19. Record vote
  20. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  21. Record vote
  22. Read 3rd time
  23. Passed
  24. Record vote
  25. Reported engrossed
  26. Received from the Senate
  27. Read first time
  28. Referred to Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
FILED UNDER

SPEECH AND LAWFARE

THE TEXT

“A public nuisance claim is not cognizable in this”…

Bill text, Senate committee report version (S)

The bill builds a lawsuit shield for businesses whose conduct is licensed, regulated or tied to a product, so public nuisance suits against them cannot go forward.

SIGNED FOR BY

Senate · 17 yea · 12 nay

Sources

Senate: Final passage · Apr 10, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$1.14MRussell Gordy$300,000Kenneth Fisher$215,000

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 6, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$1,140,000.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$1,140,000.00

Cash
$1,140,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$1,140,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 12, 2024 to Oct 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101009502, 101012383, 101061137, 101072395, 101072779.

Russell Gordy$300,000.00
Kenneth Fisher$215,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$1,140,000.00

Cash
$1,140,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$1,140,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 12, 2024 to Oct 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101009502, 101012383, 101061137, 101072395, 101072779.

Votes4

Senate Apr 10, 2025

Yea
17
Nay
12
Present, not voting
1
Absent
0
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 17, Nays 12, Present-not voting 1. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 17 (published)
  • Nay: 12 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 10, 2025

Yea
17
Nay
12
Present, not voting
1
Absent
0
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Middleton moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration CSSB 779 at this time on its third reading and final passage: CSSB 779, Relating to common law public nuisance claims. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 17, Nays 12, Present-not voting 1.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 17 (published)
  • Nay: 12 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 9, 2025

Yea
17
Nay
12
Present, not voting
1
Absent
0
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read second time and was passed to engrossment by the following vote: Yeas 17, Nays 12, Present-not voting 1. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 17 (published)
  • Nay: 12 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 9, 2025

Yea
17
Nay
12
Present, not voting
1
Absent
0
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Middleton moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration CSSB 779 at this time on its second reading: CSSB 779, Relating to common law public nuisance claims. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 17, Nays 12, Present-not voting 1.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 17 (published)
  • Nay: 12 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses36
For
18
Against
17
On
1
Names

For

  • ExxonMobil1 registration
  • Koch Industries1 registration
  • Panhandle Producers & Royalty Owners Assoc1 registration
  • Self2 registrations
  • Self; Hunt Companies1 registration
  • Self; Texas Railroad Association1 registration
  • Texans for Lawsuit Reform2 registrations
  • Texas Association of Builders1 registration
  • Texas Association of Business1 registration
  • Texas Association of Manufacturers1 registration
  • Texas Chemistry Council1 registration
  • Texas State Rifle Association1 registration
  • Texas Trucking Association1 registration
  • Texas Veterinary Medical Association1 registration
  • TXOGA1 registration
  • Vulcan Materials1 registration

Against

  • City of Dallas1 registration
  • Dallas County Commissioners Court1 registration
  • Greater Edwards Aquifer Alliance1 registration
  • Harris County Attorney1 registration
  • Lone Star Chapter Sierra Club1 registration
  • Public Citizen1 registration
  • Self3 registrations
  • Self; Climate Cabinet1 registration
  • Self; Texas counties1 registration
  • Self; Texas Trial Lawyers Asn1 registration
  • Self; Texas Trial Lawyers Association1 registration
  • Self; Texas Watch1 registration
  • Teaching hospitals of texas1 registration
  • Travis County Commissioners Court1 registration
  • University Medical Center of El Paso1 registration

On

  • Office of the Attorney General1 registration
Sources

36 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version S · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version S · March 28, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Adversarial review by claude-opus-5-5 at high effort: sent to the editor.

Analysis of text version S by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R SB 1034

by Sen. Middleton, same lead author · Died in committee · reworked

Introduced text

Last action, Apr 13, 2023: Left pending in committee

Relating to the tort of public nuisance.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Jan 14, 2025

04/17/2025 H Referred to Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence: Apr 17 2025 2:29PM

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:19 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence · Final status: Died in committee

Senate committee · State Affairs · Committee vote 7 aye, 1 nay, 3 absent · Out of committee

Companion

HB 3964 by Vasut (identical)

Subjects

Civil Remedies & Liabilities

Political Subdivisions

Tort Reform

NUISANCES

Text

The text as introduced · 398 words

89R867 SCL-F

By: Middleton
S.B. No. 779

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to common law public nuisance claims.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Title 4, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, is

amended by adding Chapter 100C to read as follows:

CHAPTER 100C. CIVIL ACTIONS RELATED TO PUBLIC NUISANCES

Sec. 100C.001. DEFINITION. In this chapter, "public

nuisance claim" means a request in a civil action to recover

damages, abatement, or other relief for a public nuisance under the

common law of this state, whether asserted as a cause of action or

an injury.

Sec. 100C.002. LIMITATIONS ON COMMON LAW PUBLIC NUISANCE

CLAIMS. (a) A public nuisance claim is not cognizable in this

state if it seeks relief arising from:

(1) an action or condition that is authorized,

licensed, approved, or mandated by a statute, ordinance,

regulation, permit, order, rule, or other similar measure issued,

adopted, promulgated, or approved by the federal government, a

federal agency, a state, a state agency, or a political

subdivision;

(2) an action or condition that occurs or exists in a

context where a statutory cause of action or administrative

enforcement mechanism already exists to address conduct that is

injurious to the public; or

(3) a product or a claim based on the manufacturing,

distributing, selling, labeling, or marketing of a product,

regardless of whether the product is defective.

(b) The aggregation of multiple injuries to individuals or

of private nuisances does not constitute a public nuisance or give

rise to a public nuisance claim.

(c) This section may not be construed to limit a claimant

from obtaining relief provided by other law.

Sec. 100C.003. RELATIONSHIP TO COMMON LAW. To the extent of

a conflict between this chapter and the common law of public

nuisance, this chapter controls. Otherwise, this chapter

supplements the common law of public nuisance, both as to the claim

and defenses.

SECTION 2. Chapter 100C, Civil Practice and Remedies Code,

as added by this Act, applies only to an action filed on or after the

effective date of this Act.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives

a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as

provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this

Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this

Act takes effect September 1, 2025.