Monitoring the Session

SB 785

cities must allow new HUD-code manufactured homes somewhere

Became law

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Pete FloresRSenate 24

Initial review · graded Oct 19, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the regulation of new HUD-code manufactured housing.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

At least one residential zone. Silence for 45 days means approved.

The bill limits how Texas cities can block new HUD-code manufactured homes. Cities with zoning must allow new manufactured homes in at least one residential zone, cannot require a specific use permit for them, and an install application counts as approved unless the city denies it in writing with a reason within 45 days. Manufactured home buyers, retailers and installers get an easier path, and city zoning boards lose some power to keep these homes out.

Labels

Labels: BUZZER BEATER. Final vote May 30, 2025: the Senate concurred in the House amendments. 3 days before the session ended Jun 2, 2025.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 2343 by Rep. Guillen (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB785 · 2025-01-15

SOLD BY

+ 1 coauthor

ITEM

relating to the regulation of new HUD-code manufactured housing.

WHAT IT DOES

At least one residential zone. Silence for 45 days means approved.

The bill limits how Texas cities can block new HUD-code manufactured homes. Cities with zoning must allow new manufactured homes in at least one residential zone, cannot require a specific use permit for them, and an install application counts as approved unless the city denies it in writing with a reason within 45 days. Manufactured home buyers, retailers and installers get an easier path, and city zoning boards lose some power to keep these homes out.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version F · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version F · May 27, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Local Government
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Testimony taken in committee
  8. Left pending in committee
  9. Considered in public hearing
  10. Vote taken in committee
  11. Reported favorably w/o amendments
  12. Committee report printed and distributed
  13. Placed on intent calendar
  14. Co-author authorized
  15. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  16. Vote recorded in Journal
  17. Read 2nd time
  18. Amendment(s) offered FA1 Flores
  19. Amended
  20. Vote recorded in Journal
  21. Passed to engrossment as amended
  22. Vote recorded in Journal
  23. Three day rule suspended
  24. Record vote
  25. Read 3rd time
  26. Passed
  27. Record vote
  28. Reported engrossed
  29. Received from the Senate
  30. Read first time
  31. Referred to Land & Resource Management
  32. Considered in public hearing
  33. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  34. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  35. Committee report distributed
  36. Committee report sent to Calendars
  37. Considered in Calendars
  38. Placed on General State Calendar
  39. Read 2nd time
  40. Amended 1-Guillen
  41. Record vote RV#3609
  42. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  43. Passed to 3rd reading as amended
  44. Record vote RV#3610
  45. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  46. Read 3rd time
  47. Passed
  48. Record vote RV#3655
  49. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  50. House passage as amended reported
  51. House amendment(s) laid before the Senate
  52. Read
  53. Senate concurs in House amendment(s)
  54. Record vote
  55. Reported enrolled
  56. Senate concurs in House amendment(s)-reported
  57. Signed in the Senate
  58. Signed in the House
  59. Sent to the Governor
  60. Signed by the Governor
  61. Effective on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . September 1, 2026
ALSO NOTED · NOT CHARGED (1)

CARVE-OUT · analysis confidence 40%

THE TEXT

“A municipality may not require a specific use permit or other permit that serves a similar purpose to a specific use permit for a new HUD-code manufactured home”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill exempts one product class, new HUD-code manufactured homes, from a city permit tool that other housing still faces. The caption says the bill is about manufactured housing, so this is a narrow but disclosed benefit.

FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 96 yea · 41 nay

Senate · 28 yea · 2 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · May 27, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate: Final passage · Apr 10, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$55KMorris Jaffe$25,000Justin Jaffe$25,000

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 12, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$55,000.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$55,000.00

Cash
$55,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$55,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 13, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100985131, 101008112, 101072110.

Morris Jaffe$25,000.00
Justin Jaffe$25,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$55,000.00

Cash
$55,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$55,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 13, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100985131, 101008112, 101072110.

Votes8

Senate May 30, 2025

Yea
30
Nay
1
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

Sources

Senator Flores moved to concur in the House amendment to SB 785. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 30, Nays 1.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 30 (published)
  • Nay: 1 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 27, 2025

Yea
96
Nay
41
Present, not voting
2
Absent
8
Excused
3
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3655

SB 785 was passed by (Record 3655): 96 Yeas, 41 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 96 (published)
  • Nay: 41 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 8 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 3 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 26, 2025

Yea
83
Nay
51
Present, not voting
2
Absent
13
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3610

SB 785, as amended, was passed to third reading by (Record 3610): 83 Yeas, 51 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 83 (published)
  • Nay: 51 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 13 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 26, 2025

Yea
109
Nay
24
Present, not voting
1
Absent
15
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3609

Amendment No. 1 was adopted by (Record 3609): 109 Yeas, 24 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 109 (published)
  • Nay: 24 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 15 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 10, 2025

Yea
28
Nay
2
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 28, Nays 2. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 28 (published)
  • Nay: 2 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 10, 2025

Yea
28
Nay
2
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Flores moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that SB 785 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 28, Nays 2.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 28 (published)
  • Nay: 2 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 10, 2025

Yea
Not printed
Nay
Not printed
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

Voice vote. No numeric tally or individual yeas are inferred.

Sources

SB 785 as amended was passed to engrossment by a viva voce vote.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: Not printed
  • Nay: Not printed
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 10, 2025

Yea
Not printed
Nay
Not printed
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

Voice vote. No numeric tally or individual yeas are inferred.

Sources

The amendment to SB 785 was read and was adopted by a viva voce vote.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: Not printed
  • Nay: Not printed
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses10
For
8
Against
2
On
0
Names

For

  • Self2 registrations
  • Texas Apartment Association1 registration
  • Texas Association of Builders1 registration
  • Texas Farm Bureau1 registration
  • Texas Manufactured Housing Association1 registration
  • Texas Realtors1 registration
  • Texas20361 registration

Against

  • City of Georgetown1 registration
  • City of Leander1 registration
Sources

10 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version F · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version F · May 27, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 19, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R HB 2343

by Rep. Guillen, different lead author · Died in committee · same text

Introduced text

Last action, Mar 9, 2023: Referred to Land & Resource Management

Relating to the regulation of new HUD-code manufactured housing.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Jan 15, 2025

06/22/2025 E Effective on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report · Enrolled

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors

House committee · Land & Resource Management · Committee vote 6 aye, 1 nay, 2 absent · Out of committee

Senate committee · Local Government · Committee vote 6 aye, 1 nay · Out of committee

Companion

HB 1835 by Guillen (identical)

Subjects

City Government--Land Use & Zoning

Housing--Manufactured Housing

PERMITS

Text

The text as introduced · 366 words

89R3895 MP-F

By: Flores
S.B. No. 785

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the regulation of new HUD-code manufactured housing.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 1201.008, Occupations Code, is amended

by amending Subsections (b) and (d) and adding Subsections (d-1)

and (g) to read as follows:

(b) Subject to Subsection (g), on [ On ] application, the

municipality shall permit the installation of a HUD-code

manufactured home for use as a dwelling in any area determined

appropriate by the municipality, including a subdivision, planned

unit development, single lot, and rental community or park. An

application to install a new HUD-code manufactured home for use as a

dwelling is considered to be granted unless the municipality in

writing denies the application and states the reason for the denial

not later than the 45th day after the date the application is

received.

(d) Except as approved by the department and subject to

Subsection (d-1) , a local governmental unit may not require a

permit, a fee, a bond, or insurance for the transportation and

installation of manufactured housing by a licensed retailer or

installer. This subsection does not prohibit the collection of

actual costs incurred by a local governmental unit that result from

the transportation of a manufactured home.

(d-1) A municipality may not unreasonably regulate or

restrict the installation of new HUD-code manufactured homes. A

municipality may not require a specific use permit or other permit

that serves a similar purpose to a specific use permit for a new

HUD-code manufactured home that has been constructed in accordance

with federal law and this chapter.

(g) A municipality with zoning regulations or zoning

district boundaries:

(1) shall permit the installation of a new HUD-code

manufactured home for use as a dwelling under at least one:

(A) residential zoning classification; or

(B) type of residential zoning district; and

(2) may not adopt or enforce other zoning regulations

or zoning district boundaries that directly or indirectly prohibit

the installation of new HUD-code manufactured homes in all

residential zoning classifications or types of residential zoning

districts adopted by the municipality.

SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.